kcrisman wrote:
After using the sage notebook for a few days with TinyMCE I got the
impression
that the Sage notebook is almost pointless without it :-).
Yes.
Yeah, it is one of those features where once you have it you cannot
understand why we ever though we didn't need it, so a big
It would also be interesting to know how much RAM your system has and
if the computation you run over night ever hit swap since it is
basically game over once you hit swap in a GB computation :)
I have a brand new system with 4 GB RAM so I guess should be enough.
On the other hand, I
It would also be interesting to know how much RAM your system has and
if the computation you run over night ever hit swap since it is
basically game over once you hit swap in a GB computation :)
I have a brand new system with 4 GB RAM so I guess should be enough.
On the other hand, I
Well, to be honest 4 GB isn't much these days and GBasis computations
tend to be rather large, especially if you use Lex. I often ran out of
memory on a 24 GB system three years ago doing rather large-ish GB
computations and none of those ideals were the size you posted. That
was over
PolyBoRi is automatically used by Sage for GB computations?
If you construct a BooleanPolynomialRing. See
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/b0aa7ef45b3c/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
On the other hand I calculated my new ideal and I wonder why it takes
so long for SAGE to evaluate
I believe there are memory (and time?) limitations for each user on
sagenb, so a tough GB calculation would likely get stopped.
Seems strange that just defining the ideal would take that long.
-M. Hampton
On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
PolyBoRi is
[CCing Michael B. and Alexander D. since they seem to be unaware of
this discussion involving PolyBoRi]
On Feb 6, 3:35 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi,
PolyBoRi is automatically used by Sage for GB computations?
If you construct a BooleanPolynomialRing. See
Thank you to everyone!
You really help me with your answers!
I assume you're talking about the call
B.ideal([x1*x2 + ..., x2 + ..., ...]) ?
Yes, about this call I'm talking about! I can see the sandals when
scrolling over there..I guess the feedback from SAge is that has
finished
On Feb 6, 4:06 am, Adela adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you to everyone!
You really help me with your answers!
I assume you're talking about the call
B.ideal([x1*x2 + ..., x2 + ..., ...]) ?
Yes, about this call I'm talking about! I can see the sandals when
scrolling over there..I
Hi!
If I didn't made an error converting this input, PolyBoRi returns an
answer immediately.
Indeed [1].
And of course it is the GB for all orderings.
Regarding seeing, what is going use prot=True.
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
Yes, it seems they were not generated. I thought running pdflatex on
the file with the shell-escape option was enough though.
The rendered pdf is full of ?? so my guess is that sage commands
don't work when being called by latex.
Is there a way to solve that?
Samuel DM
On 6 fév, 13:54, Harald
On Feb 6, 2:06 pm, Samuel DM sder...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it seems they were not generated. I thought running pdflatex on
the file with the shell-escape option was enough though.
The rendered pdf is full of ?? so my guess is that sage commands
don't work when being called by latex.
Is
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Adela Mihaita adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I attached to this message a file with the commands I introduced in Sage to
prepare my ideal for the GB computation. The first one works ok, but after
introducing the ideal and pressing, I have to wait and wait,
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Feb 6, 2:06 pm, Samuel DM sder...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it seems they were not generated. I thought running pdflatex on
the file with the shell-escape option was enough though.
The rendered pdf is full of ?? so my guess is that sage commands
don't work when being
On Friday 06 February 2009, Adela Mihaita wrote:
Hello!
I attached to this message a file with the commands I introduced in Sage to
prepare my ideal for the GB computation. The first one works ok, but after
introducing the ideal and pressing, I have to wait and wait, and never get
a
Fails with:
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomialRing' object has
no attribute 'Ideal'
after fixing that it works in 20 seconds (inkl. Sage startup).
I never got this message because after introducing the ideal, it keeps
thinking and never ending. I don' t
Sometimes its convenient to use the DATA directory, which will be
packaged with the worksheet if you save it (as a .sws file). So for
example you could copy the file to the DATA directory doing something
like:
os.system('cp /full/path/to/list2.txt ' + DATA + 'list2.txt')
and then
f =
Hello!
I attached to this message a file with the commands I introduced in Sage to
prepare my ideal for the GB computation. The first one works ok, but after
introducing the ideal and pressing, I have to wait and wait, and never get a
result.
Thank you!
On Feb 6, 1:36 am, Adela adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
It would also be interesting to know how much RAM your system has and
if the computation you run over night ever hit swap since it is
basically game over once you hit swap in a GB computation :)
I have a brand new system with 4 GB RAM
Hello,
I have a couple of problems trying to use sagetex. I am basically
trying to compile the example.tex file in the latex_embed folder of
the example directory.
I have MacTeX (TL 2008) and tlmgr has installed sagetex so there
should be no problem, but when I run pdflatex on the example.tex
On Feb 6, 1:50 pm, Samuel DM sder...@gmail.com wrote:
I have MacTeX (TL 2008) and tlmgr has installed sagetex so there
should be no problem, but when I run pdflatex on the example.tex file,
the log file mentions that it couldn't find the graphic files.
Well, are there graphic files in
Thanks Jason, I'm surprised this never showed up on my radar before.
-Marshall
On Feb 6, 12:45 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Marshall Hampton wrote:
Sometimes its convenient to use the DATA directory, which will be
packaged with the worksheet if you save it (as a .sws
Marshall Hampton wrote:
Sometimes its convenient to use the DATA directory, which will be
packaged with the worksheet if you save it (as a .sws file). So for
example you could copy the file to the DATA directory doing something
like:
os.system('cp /full/path/to/list2.txt ' + DATA +
Hello~
I test the sage on the sage Notebook homepage.
http://www.sagenb.org
So I wrote the code and comments and published it.
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/209/
I'm Korean and I want to show my code to my friends.
So I wrote the comments in Korean.
Sage support UTF-8, So I can see the
I sent a new message with the attachment required.
Thank you!
On 6 Feb, 14:35, mabshoff michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-dortmund.de
wrote:
On Feb 6, 4:06 am, Adela adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you to everyone!
You really help me with your answers!
I assume you're talking about the
Hello,
I'm novice in SAGE but I have a strange problem:
I have to compute some eigenvalues for the set of cuspidal newforms
for the group Gamma0(15), weight 4 and Legendre character chi of
conductor 5, so I type in SAGE the following set of instruction:
SAGE: chi=DirichletGroup(11,QQ).1
SAGE:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM, beppe giuseppe.molt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm novice in SAGE but I have a strange problem:
I have to compute some eigenvalues for the set of cuspidal newforms
for the group Gamma0(15), weight 4 and Legendre character chi of
conductor 5, so I type in SAGE
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Adela adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
Fails with:
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.pbori.BooleanPolynomialRing' object
has
no attribute 'Ideal'
after fixing that it works in 20 seconds (inkl. Sage startup).
I never got this message because after
Dear William,
I thank you for your very prompt replay!
Actually ther is a missprint in my post: the my group
is Gamma0(15), not Gamma0(11), so the first line of
my code was
SAGE: chi=DirichletGroup(15,QQ).1
so that the dimension of the eigenforms space is 4.
I have just tried the code on the
You need to give the full path if you are in the notebook.
If you strongly need to not to give the full path you could run the
command
$mkdir (where your files are)/sagenotebook
$sage -notebook directory=Where your files are/sagenotebook
The disadvantage is that this will create another server,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:37 AM, giuseppe.molteni1
giuseppe.molte...@unimi.it wrote:
Dear William,
I thank you for your very prompt replay!
Actually ther is a missprint in my post: the my group
is Gamma0(15), not Gamma0(11), so the first line of
my code was
SAGE:
On Feb 6, 4:16 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
That said, Dan, what do you think of using the shell-escape option to
run Sage directly?
The whole idea behind the design of this additional file in sagetex
is, that the sage-calculations could take some time! And at least I
On Feb 1, 2009, at 3:42 PM, David Joyner wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Christophe Deroulers
christophe.deroulers__ggsa...@normalesup.org wrote:
When one looks at what Sage sends to Maxima when desolve(diff(y,x,
2)+y(x)==0,y,[0,3,2]) is called, it turns out that Maxima receives
On Jan 31, 2009, at 3:23 AM, Alasdair wrote:
Well I tried
v = iter(Permutations(range(n)))
and the code compiled fine - but still ran slow. To test the Petersen
graph (10 vertices), the compiled code took a wall time of 524.23 s,
and the uncompiled code, using
v=(p for p in
Hi,
On both the command line and in the notebook (my computer and
sagenb.org) with 3.3.alpha5 Sage closes after executing the following:
{{{
from jinja import Environment
env = Environment()
s = {% for i in a %}
{{ i }}
{% endfor %}
tmpl = env.from_string(s)
print tmpl.render(a=[1,2,3])
}}}
On Feb 6, 1:52 pm, Timothy Clemans timothy.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Timothy,
On both the command line and in the notebook (my computer and
sagenb.org) with 3.3.alpha5 Sage closes after executing the following:
{{{
from jinja import Environment
env = Environment()
s = {% for i
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Adela adisev...@gmail.com wrote:
One more question.
Did you use the command line in WM or Firefox?
I used Firefox and I still have the problem of looong waiting; nothing
changed even when I modified that problem with the ideal.
I just tried it with Ideal
sage-2.8.15 is on there now. It doesn't even start. I talked with
the old administrator today, and he said he had some trouble with it
when the program was working. I don't think anybody has really needed
to use it since he tried to put it on there. It all just got put on
the back burner.
Depending on what you're doing with the permutations, all your time
may be spent elsewhere, and compiling your snippet may not help.
Specifically, if you don't cdef anything I'd be surprised to see a
big speedup, but if you cimport permutation group elements directly
you could
39 matches
Mail list logo
