Hi folks,
Plot3d() look amazing! I really like the way lighting is used to
because it help understand the shape of the surface.
I have a data file that I want to plot using plot3d, so I import the
data using numpy.loadtxt. plot3d() only plots functions so I try to
interpolate the dataset using
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
want to do.
Unfortunately python is not a very friendly functional programming
Daniel Farrell wrote:
Hi folks,
Plot3d() look amazing! I really like the way lighting is used to
because it help understand the shape of the surface.
I have a data file that I want to plot using plot3d, so I import the
data using numpy.loadtxt. plot3d() only plots functions so I try to
On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba ccordob...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
want to do.
kcrisman wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba ccordob...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
Then that sounds like another Python syntax error we could make
available. Not sure we'd want to, though.
- kcrisman
for those coming from Maple. What does Mathematica do for such
anonymous functions (if anything)?
#^2+1 (note the is important; it says what comes before is an
kcrisman wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba ccordob...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
Jason Grout wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba ccordob...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python,
I felt ambivalent about adding the - until this point. If - is
going to mean something else in python eventually, it seems like a bad
idea to overload it in a Sage-specific way.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 10:01 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
Note that - gets a meaning
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new sage
users that come from python to see such a different syntax meaning.
But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
The problem is that most CAS are functional in nature and the first thing
one tries to
On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
I don't know if it's a good idea to make this valid Sage syntax,
though.
I'm on the fence, but leaning towards not favoring it just because
of the added complexity and the departure from true Python, and the
python version isn't
On Dec 14, 11:43 am, Carlos Córdoba ccordob...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new sage
users that come from python to see such a different syntax meaning.
But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
The problem is
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
meaning.
But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
The Mathematica syntax is
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
meaning.
But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
meaning.
But what about
2009/12/14 Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from
Martin Rubey wrote:
Carlos Córdobaccordob...@gmail.com writes:
Anyway, the use of anonymous functions is mostly useful on constructs
that operate over lists, like map and reduce. In 10 years of using
Mathematica I've ever needed to derive this kind functions, but
nevertheless I've checked
Mathematica's syntax can be quite dense, which has the same
disadvantage as Perl code in my opinion - it can be hard to read. But
sometimes it is nice to be able to do so much concisely. I miss it
sometimes.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 3:31 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
I truly hope
I have been unable to get any of the virtualbox sages running on my
macs. Last time I tried I downloaded virtualbox 3.1, and importing
the appliance failed on both my mac pro (running 10.4.11) and my
laptop (running 10.5.something). I have had no problems on a windows
xp host.
-Marshall
On Dec
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:31:14PM +0100, Jaap Spies wrote:
Martin Rubey wrote:
Carlos Córdobaccordob...@gmail.com writes:
Anyway, the use of anonymous functions is mostly useful on constructs
that operate over lists, like map and reduce. In 10 years of using
Mathematica I've ever
Is there no way now to run Sage under Windows (XP) with VMware
Workstation -- only with VirtualBox?
(I thought VMware Workstation 6.5 should be able to import the virtual
appliance beginning with the sage.ovf file, this being, apparently,
one of the types of things VMware can import. But I get a
I think that having a way to make anonymous functions is very
important. While, as someone relatively new to sage, I haven't used in
sage, I use it all the time in math (For example, my prefered
definition of the Mandlebrot set is {x|x ∊ ℂ; lim_(n-∞)
(λz:z^2+x)ⁿ(0)≠∞} )...
I quite like the idea
Is the latex and dvips binary installed in the Sage directory? If so
where?
Thanx
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
No idea, but I observed also similar problems.
The first idea was that this is problem from mathplotlib, but I
followed the example at http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Matplotlib/UsingTex
and tried the following
P=plot(x^2,(x,-3,3))
Christopher Olah wrote:
I think that having a way to make anonymous functions is very
important. While, as someone relatively new to sage, I haven't used in
sage, I use it all the time in math (For example, my prefered
definition of the Mandlebrot set is {x|x ∊ ℂ; lim_(n-∞)
(λz:z^2+x)ⁿ(0)≠∞}
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
marcW wrote:
hi,
I'm really surprised about the consideration for a remark like a
newbie like me.
Well, we definitely like to listen to people who give suggestions!
Of course computational precision is important, the little game i was
showing leads to a soluion
around 0.1 for ra and
Hi, consider:
R.A,B,C=QQ[]
print sorted([(A, 3), (A - 2*B, 1)])
print sorted([(-A + 2*B, 1), (A, 3)])
Outcome not equal. Issue of Python or Sage?
Roland
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Rolandb rola...@planet.nl wrote:
R.A,B,C=QQ[]
print sorted([(A, 3), (A - 2*B, 1)])
print sorted([(-A + 2*B, 1), (A, 3)])
Outcome not equal. Issue of Python or Sage?
I don't think they should necessarily be equal as A - 2*B and -A + 2*B
are different
To add to the mix, I have had no trouble running the virtualbox
version
of sage on my mac (mini, OS 10.5.8)
Dave Galant
On Dec 15, 5:40 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been unable to get any of the
30 matches
Mail list logo
