On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 8:24 am, ancienthart joalheag...@gmail.com wrote:
Attempting to use this on my matrix, I end up with the following results (D
is my matrix):
I personally wish that sage simplify functions worked as follows:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:33 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:07 pm, Daniel Harris mail.dhar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Harris
On Jan 20, 4:27 am, Daniel Harris mail.dhar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:33 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:07 pm, Daniel Harris mail.dhar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu
More important is the option to apply a lot of things to a matrix.
Simon's got the right idea (lambda functions) for what you want to
do. But we should make this easier. My guess is that even the
'magic' decorator for turning methods into functions wouldn't help
here, and that is too
Problem solved with workaround.
I tried to compile sage-4.6.1 in a fresh directory again this time without
using
export MAKE=make -j12.
It appears that the parallel compile was causing the issue.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
