. Deep copy
is needed only in certain special cases, e.g., a list of lists...
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
On Jan 15, 2008 10:44 AM, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be a lot easier to help if you gave the rational function.
Depending on how complicated the denominator is, you basically just have to
compute the Taylor series of the rational function, by differentiation and
On Jan 15, 2008 10:12 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,
I have been taking the same plunge (and prbably for the same reason).
It's not clear whether knowing C++ well was a help or a hindrance. I
have just read the book Learning Python by Lutz, published by
O'Reilly, and
On Jan 15, 2008 11:35 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the hints. I did look at Dive into... a while back (it
is recommended on the Sage website after all) but for some reason did
not get on with it (the very frist complete, working Python program
just left me cold), so
On Jan 15, 2008 3:00 PM, Georg Grafendorfer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
1. Is this a clean, from-source build of sage-2.9.3?
Yes, i tried it out on two different systems now, Athlon XP, and Core Duo,
both running on Debian Etch, and both show the same behaviour
2. What is the
Thanks for any clues you may be able to provide.
-- Bill
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support
, but on objects from SFASchur, SFAPower, SFAMonomial,
etc.., work perfectly. It seems to be only SFAElementary that has a
problem.
Thanks,
BFJ
Cheers,
Michael
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Jan 19, 2008 2:25 AM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 7:38 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 10:00 PM, Georg Grafendorfer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
OK, i'm already a bit
On Jan 19, 2008 5:48 PM, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The graphs(...) construction is naturally an iterator, so instead of
constructing a list, just iterate through them, saving the ones you
need. Try this:
sage: def check_size(g):
: return g.size() == 6
:
sage:
regards,
Lars Fischer
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
--
+---+
| Bill Purvis, Amateur Mathematician|
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://bil.members.beeb.net |
+---+
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Jan 21, 2008 8:32 PM, Hector [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for replying my own email, but I just started tinkering with
Python's wave module:
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-wave.html
I'll try to report my progress.
Best,
Sage also has some wav processing support that is built on
big.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
On Jan 23, 2008 4:24 AM, Gorka Merino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning Dr. Stein, I'm not sure if this is the appropriate place to ask
for but i had some problems t get into the forums,
I'm trying to install SAGE for Windows from the
http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/microsoft_windows/
On Jan 23, 2008 5:33 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2:29 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 11:48 PM, Paul Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I guess 'long' is based on GMP too, does it make sense to have two
concurrent
interfaces
On Jan 23, 2008 5:50 PM, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 8:26 pm, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike wrote:
It is due to the fact that ^ has a higher precedence than - in Python.
n(-1^(1/3)) is the same as n((-1^(1/3))).
Okay, here is how I ran into this:
On Jan 24, 2008 10:03 AM, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:41 pm, Paul Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus you have constructed a nice expression for 1:
sage: sol[2].subs(a=1).right()
(2/(3*sqrt(3)) + 10/27)^(1/3) - 2/(9*(2/(3*sqrt(3)) + 10/27)^(1/3)) + 1/3
On Jan 24, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William wrote:
I finally figured out how to get 7zip to unzip
sage-vmware and that produced a folder with jillions files.The
instructions
in the readme file (included below) say to click on sage.vmx. This file
is
,
Michael
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/sage_trac/ticket/1916
Is there a convention for splitting lines so that they will be treated
as
a single logical line so that I can make them fit into the paper
width?
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 AM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath-fonts.html.
There are install instructions for PC, Mac OS X, and Unix users.
On Jan 24, 11:45 pm, bill purvis [EMAIL
On Jan 27, 2008 12:03 PM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, William Stein wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 AM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath
On Jan 27, 2008 12:19 PM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, William Stein wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 AM, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
See http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsmath/download/jsMath
and the
worksheets were still there, just not visible on the list of
worksheets. Any guesses on what happened? As a stopgap, I manually
pasted in the worksheet text to a new copy, but if this happens a lot
it will really aggravate them.
-M. Hampton
--
William Stein
Associate Professor
On Jan 29, 2008 3:57 AM, Reineke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error when I'm trying to use show or save:
-
File /Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy/
plotting/, line 1, in module
File
On Jan 29, 2008 7:11 AM, dpvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current status of your sprite fonts plugin? That seems like
that would address the size issues.
It was a nice idea, but turned out to have some serious drawbacks. It
really slowed down IE (it appears that IE renders the
in its place. It is just like the
old days when all you had to do was drop the graphic into the info menu.
Tom Rike
On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:25 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 4:27 PM, Marshall Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I now have 14 students actively using Sage on 3
On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 AM, Marshall Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt anyone did anyone nefarious. I am not using the server_pool
option - should I be? The machine in question has a user account set
up just for running sage. If someone is really interested in taking a
look I could
On Jan 30, 2008 3:48 PM, pgdoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to take the Taylor series of a matrix. But I find I
can't even put a Taylor polynomial into a matrix without its being
simplified.
sage: f=-x/(2*x-4); f
-x/(2*x - 4)
sage: g=taylor(f,x,1,1); g
1/2 + x - 1
sage:
= value
type 'exceptions.TypeError': Singular error:
? not implemented
? error occurred in STDIN line 8: `def sage2=factorize(sage1);`
sage:
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
$SAGE_STARTUP_COMMAND; $@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage]$
Subsequent attempts to run sage all result in the same error message.
It doesn't seem to like me :-)
Helpful advice will be gratefully accepted.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
: 3.414818600982502E-02
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Joern.
___
Prof. Dr. Jörn Steuding
Institut für Mathematik
Lehrstuhl für Funktionentheorie
Universität Würzburg
Am Hubland
97074 Würzburg
Germany
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University
Storm
%%
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
On Feb 2, 2008 11:49 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there a way in SAGE to handle recurrences? Say, determine the
closed-form expression, or the limit as n goes to infinity, of
something like:
r_0 = sqrt(a), where a0
r_n = sqrt(a + r_{n-1})
Now, experimenting
Date: 2008-02-02
On Feb 3, 2008 2:20 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 9:58 AM, Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Would you make me a trac account with benjamin.peterson as the username
and
bach99 as the password, please?
Your trac ticket
On Feb 4, 2008 8:12 PM, mb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compute eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a matrix and I
don't understand the output.
sage: R=RealField(30)
sage: M=matrix(R,2,[2,1,1,1])
sage: M.eigenspaces()
[
(2.6180340, [
]),
(0.38196601, [
])
]
Sage is
On Feb 5, 2008 1:50 PM, Alex Donaldson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Mac OSX, running Python 2.5.1 from the terminal.
By regular interpreter i mean, pulling up the Terminal and typing
python to launch the Python. I want to be able to bundle everything up
for users and let them
On Feb 6, 2008 1:34 AM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sage team,
i am confused about the use of the notion category in Sage.
I defined M=Modules(PolynomialRing(QQ,'x,y,z')), and then i expected
that M?or dir(M) would provide me with informations on how to
construct objects of
On Feb 6, 2008 3:45 AM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William
On 6 Feb., 10:55, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
sage: R.x = QQ[]
sage: W = R^5; W
Ambient free module of rank 5 over the principal ideal domain
Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Rational Field
On Feb 6, 2008 9:08 AM, Georg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
using sage-2.10.1 on a Debian Etch system,
look at the following short file called example.sage:
class BMV:
def __init__(self):
self.l = range(5)
def write(self):
save(self, 'foo')
M = BMV()
it works as
/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/misc/misc_c.so,
2): Symbol not found: _close$UNIX2003
Referenced from: /Applications/sage/local/lib//libpari-gmp.dylib
Expected in: flat namespace
ERROR: name 'sage_prompt' is not defined
--
William Stein
Associate Professor
On Feb 7, 2008 11:56 AM, Kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In sage-2.10.1
sage: F.u = GF(2^20)
sage: F.gens()
(a,)
What is a?
A bug. Thanks for the report:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2089
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
]+ 32000*[0] + [1])
is very slow, but a dense list is fast:
f = R(32000*[1])
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support
On Feb 8, 2008 11:15 AM, Kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The function
random_prime(n)
returns differing types of objects. When n is 2, it returns a Sage
integer. When n is 2, it returns a Python integer. A look at the
source code gives the impression that it should return a Sage
On Feb 8, 2008 11:05 AM, Kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some trouble doctesting non sage files. The only things I
could find in the Programming Guide were:
4.3.1 Testing .py, .pyx and .sage Files
Run sage -t filename.py to test that all code examples in
filename.py.
for Mathematical Sciences Kyoto University
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
you so much for SAGE, I will recommend it everyone I
talk to concerning mathematics. A cultural milestone in education and
research.
Thanks! Enjoy!
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
: matmulspyx(D)
[0.000 0.000]
[0.000 0.000]
Must be a bug, or?
thanks, Georg
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Feb 11, 2008 8:52 AM, Georg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ohh yes.., this was a very bad demonstration of the real problem,
actually i have a for loop in my .spyx file (for a quick and dirty
matrix exponentiation):
s = sage.all_cmdline
for i in s.srange(1, k):
factor = factor * M * (1/k)
On Feb 12, 2008 8:56 AM, Kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking in the SAGE Tutorial and the SAGE Reference
Manual. Perhaps something could be put there also?
Good idea:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2145
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
On Feb 12, 2008 6:09 AM, Kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For sage-2.10.1, if I compile from source and run
'make check' - all is fine. If I then build a binary
distribution (using -bdist), and then inside the binary
distribution run 'make check' I get the following errors.
Kate
Testing
On Feb 13, 2008 1:17 PM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
in spite of your workaround, some thinks still don't work as they
should:
First session:
sage: R=PolynomialRing(QQ,'x0,y0,z0')
sage: Rel=R.ideal('z0**2-1','x0*y0-1')
sage: QR=R.quotient_ring(Rel)
sage:
On Feb 13, 2008 9:17 AM, Nils Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that sagenb.org is only a service that runs on William's
kindness (which apparently has multiple cores), but since its
existence is still advertised on sagemath.org, I assume it's the
intention that it should be accessible.
with the code in other ways also fails.
Ideas? Thanks!
Dean
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Feb 15, 2008 2:31 PM, Marshall Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that two lists are better than four - sage-support and sage-
devel should be enough.
I strongly agree. I would like us to have only sage-support and sage-devel,
and close all the other lists.
-- William
On Feb 15, 2008 2:58 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008 2:31 PM, Marshall Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that two lists are better than four - sage-support and sage-
devel
On Feb 15, 2008 3:19 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:08 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008 2:58 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Feb 15, 2008 1:35 PM, wdbragg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
import pylab as p
x = p.arange(-100, 300, 10)
y = abs(x)
p.plot(x, y, 'go')
p.savefig('plot.png')
This works as expected. However, if I change the function from abs to
cos...
import pylab as p
x = p.arange(-100, 300, 10)
y =
would just type things like the following, which do
all the sorts of things you want, but in 1 easy line:
sage: var('x')
sage: plot(cos(x), (-100,300))
sage: plot(cos(x), (-100,300), plot_points=1000)
sage: list_plot([cos(a) for a in range(-100,300,10)])
--
William Stein
Associate Professor
On Feb 15, 2008 4:36 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On SAGE Version 2.9.2, diff's Docstring is:
If you supply a variable x followed by a number n, then it will
differentiate with respect to n times with respect to n.
Should be something like:
If you supply a variable x
On Feb 15, 2008 5:00 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008 4:36 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On SAGE Version 2.9.2, diff's Docstring is:
If you supply
On Feb 15, 2008 5:21 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been quite happy using SAGE Mac OS X Binaries (on OS X 10.4). I
also use SAGE on an Ubuntu Linux desktop. It's just that sometimes I
miss some of SAGE's (original?) functionality while using the Mac,
e.g. 'animate'
On Feb 15, 2008 8:27 PM, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bottom line is this: If William's goal is really to have *every*
user be a developer (or at least to contribute very minor
documentation corrections or tests, if that counts as developing), as
he's stated numerous times, and if
of sage in which the command is available was included.
Thank you very much.
On Feb 16, 6:57 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We've decided that to increase the quality of our customer service,
all discussion on sage-newbie should be moved to sage-support.
I've disabled
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options
On Feb 16, 2008 10:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
I have a Matrix of, say, 64x64 and I plot it using matrix_plot(). It
is a fractal that fills the square [0,1]x[0,1] so I want to keep a 2D
view. I would like to change the x,y axes ranging values to be in the
have too
many other things on my plate, and I've been jumping
into every basic thing that needs to get done in
Sage for 3 years; that has to stop or I won't have
enough time to do my own research.
-- William
On Feb 20, 12:47 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, dean moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently posted on the wiggling graph problem, and do appreciate the
speed at which it was pounced on.
This was motivated by the published https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1691/
. After doing a work-around
to the
referee this?
Not to mention that the above code does the plot calculation only once,
which is faster anyway.
Jason
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip No, that would not be reasonable. [[woah, John Palmieri just
appeared
in my office... chat for a while...] Anyway, copy should return an exact
copy since that's the semantics of __copy__ in Python. However,
I strongly encourage you to write
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:07 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A forwarded email question about SAGE. Can anyone help?
I have been led to believe that what I need to do is the following class
field calculations. For
Crespo's (1997) tetrahedral example f(x) = x^4-2x^3+2x^2-2x+3
iD8DBQFHvtngdZTaNFFPILgRAvbjAJ9qlM5R2UnmCHwOMV2HOlhg+LcwZACcC21K
Mrx/wRMSjGXeYz2KpkXN0Xo=
=O3v+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:09 PM, AprèsTech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After uploading a worksheet from my PC to the sagenb.org server, I
can't edit or evaluate cells within it. I'm receiving the error
message
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Simon King
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I rename it to tensor.sage (not sure if this is a good idea),
Yes, that's a VERY GOOD idea. It's really crazy to use a compiled
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:03 AM, John Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 22, 8:47 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Simon King
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, William Stein [EMAIL
this problem gets fixed soon, and have
created a ticket for it:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2278
-- William
Regards,
Andy
On Feb 22, 9:45 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:09 PM, AprèsTech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:48 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 5:43 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 5:24 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Jonathan Bober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An old sage directory that I have that's been upgraded only a few times
has an spkg directory that's got more than 850 megs. This was only
upgraded from 2.8.15.alpha1 to 2.10.1, so I imagine that this directory
can
to make your own binary:
sage -bdist 2.10.2-my-binary
Wait ten minutes and look in SAGE_ROOT/dist for the tar ball. You can extract
that after you reinstall your OS, and you'll get your Sage back.
William
On Feb 29, 6:17 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:48 AM, anatoly techtonik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current 2.10.2 VMware image seems to have SCSI virtual disk type. This
causes problems with other VM software, such as VirtualBox that
supports only IDE images. As it doesn't really matter which drive type
is used
/standard/doc-2.10.2.spkg
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
The same output occurred when extracting sage 2.10.1
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options
192.168.1.103/localhost:8000 and several
other combinations, but no luck. The Apache response tells me something
is working; I just haven't managed to reach SAGE yet.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:57 AM, dean moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! That worked nicely.
But should this type of thing be documented, as others may face this?
Dean
Sure! Could you just take the current docs for spline?, modifying them the
way you wish they were regarding the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dean moore wrote:
When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
report it. Do the following
in an online SAGE notebook:
/1+1/
We get two. Now run the following:
/# Limaçon
,
Michael
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
didier deshommes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dean moore wrote:
When I was writing some other code this came out; finally decided to
report it. Do the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear sage supporters,
a strange error occurs in sage 2.10.2 in the following way:
sage: R.x = QQ[]
sage: f = x^3 + x + 1; g = x^3 - x - 1
sage: r = f.resultant(g)
sage: R.__dict__
. Do
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install m4
to install m4 on ubuntu. Unfortunately, at present a machine gun
can't be used in lieu m4 when building Sage.
-- William
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:13 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:57 AM
be saner than whatever you are currently using.
build/sage-2.10.2
Thanks,
- Sameer
On Mar 5, 2:42 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Sameer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
The other problem I am facing on powerpc Linux
done, not to build new software. You'll
need these packages:
g++, make, m4, ranlib
William
Dean
---
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:05 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:31 PM, dean moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not sending this to the whole
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hector Villafuerte wrote:
Hi,
this just happened to me (maybe because I'm annoyingly slow today...):
sage: var('t')
sage: x(t) = sin(2*pi*1000*t) + 1/2*sin(2*pi*2000*t + 3/4*pi)
Exception (click to the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 3:46 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the real problem here is that Sage by default has so many
identifiers in the global namespace. I don't really like having so
many names there. I think
'exceptions.TypeError': mutable matrices are unhashable
- David Joyner
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Sameer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I made scripts for gcc/g++/gfortran and put them in my ~/bin
directory. These scripts add -m64 argument to the compilers and so I
was able to generate 64 bit binaries. After several errors and
manually intervening
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Sameer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
I am getting closer. I rebuilt the iml and linboxwrap packages and
got rid of the undefined errors. Now, I get:
64/sage-2.10.2 ./sage -br
--
sage:
transfer function.
octave(tr([1 2],[1 2])
I think you might be missing a parenthesis to close the call to tr.
Thanks,
Jason
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM, felix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
A very simple question:
I need to resolve a system of equations with the solve(..) function.
How to declare that :
1) the variables belong to N (positives integers )
2) filter the answers of the resolved system
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should be R's home base:
# first we compute some data
b = 10
st = []
for i in range(500):
A = random_matrix(ZZ,160,160, x=-2**b, y=2**b)
t = cputime()
E = A.echelon_form()
st.append(cputime(t))
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Jay Pottharst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I'm having trouble adding two modular forms together,
sometimes. Here is a whittled-down demo case:
sage: b=CuspForms(22).basis()
sage: sum(b)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NameError: global
1301 - 1400 of 3187 matches
Mail list logo
