Re: Letter

1998-08-09 Thread Dean Liversidge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [cut] | | 'nothing like a real SAM' - yeah, nothing like all the shit you face | if your drive goes down... a PC drive = about a tenner.. How much for | a SAM drive, eh? eh? Phew.. I seem to be blowing a gasket or | something.. better calm down,

Re: Letter

1998-08-09 Thread Robert van der Veeke
Van: Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Letter Datum: Friday, August 07, 1998 12:37 I agree that a PC Basic, based on SAM Basic, which is of coursed based on Spectrum Basic, would be a nice idea - the big question is /who could write it?/ Personally,

Re: Letter

1998-08-09 Thread BillRitman
In a message dated 09/08/98 09:36:28, you write: Sam drive prices are the same as the PC Dave, cos they are PC drives now. Yeah, but you still need the 30 quid or whatever interface to connect it. If they'd have put one controller on board and write the dos properly to run both

Re: Letter

1998-08-09 Thread Andrew Collier
At 7:17 pm +0100 9/8/98, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 09/08/98 09:36:28, you write: Sam drive prices are the same as the PC Dave, cos they are PC drives now. Yeah, but you still need the 30 quid or whatever interface to connect it. If they'd have put one controller on

Re: Letter

1998-08-09 Thread BillRitman
In a message dated 09/08/98 18:53:39, you write: Changing new Sams (at this stage) to use a single controller would be bad because existing software might break, if it expected the second controller to be present. But if the Sam had been designed that way from the beginning, it