>>> I'm still looking for old YS's if anyone has any they don't want...
>>>
>>> Gavin
>>
>>Simon, do we still have your old copies lying around in the attic?
>>If so, are you planning to keep or get rid?
>>
>>Maria.
>
>Possibly - in one of the boxes...
>
>...but I've got all the ones I was in here.
Why don't we put these instructions on the web - maybe with Andrews Sam Users
page? (http://carou.sel.cam.ac.uk/computers/samusers.html)
Dan.
Welcome to the sam-users mailing list!
Please save this message for future reference. Thank you.
If you ever want to remove yourself from this
Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
>
> On Friday 5th Feb 1999 (My bithday by the way) Andrew Collier wrote:-
> >
> >But the last bit is just the same - surely you must have known it in order
> >to send your message to the list. :-)
> >
> >imc
> >
> Andrew, it is not the same as the mailing list, that`s , th
> On Friday 5th Feb 1999 (My bithday by the way) Andrew Collier
> wrote:- > >But the last bit is just the same - surely you must have
> known it in order >to send your message to the list. :-) > >imc >
> Andrew, it is not the same as the mailing list, that`s ,
> that`s why I did what I did, I knew
> What I meant by that last one was - is it time for another episode of
> "Who's on sam-users?"
>
> Dan?
*wakes* wossa?
Hokay - I'll fire up the old database and give it a whirl but please consider
that it is a) Friday and b) I'm back from the pub and c) Marketing were paying.
Dan.
Work: [EMAI
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 02:12:21PM -, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
> On Friday 5th Feb 1999 (My bithday by the way) Andrew Collier wrote:-
No he didn't. That was me.
> Andrew, it is not the same as the mailing list, that`s
ntnu.no and unit.no are the same thing. The former is the new name and
On Friday 5th Feb 1999 (My bithday by the way) Andrew Collier wrote:-
>
>But the last bit is just the same - surely you must have known it in order
>to send your message to the list. :-)
>
>imc
>
Andrew, it is not the same as the mailing list, that`s , that`s why
I did what I did, I knew someone wo
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999 12:27:22 GMT+0 Fri, 5 Feb 99 13:33:06 GMT, you wrote:
>
>> Now if only Future was open to doing a special Your Sinclair CD
>> based on this site, include near-100% articles coverage, cover tape
>> snapshots, etc, etc. I'd LOVE to handle a project like that...
>
>I'd want one! H
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 01:04:00PM -, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
> Thank[snip]s Gavin, I knew someone would respond quicker if I did it like
> that,
> it`s just that I could not remember the last bit (ntnu).
But the last bit is just the same - surely you must have known it in order
to send you
Thank`s Gavin, I knew someone would respond quicker if I did it like that,
it`s just that I could not remember the last bit (ntnu).
Malcolm.
Agreed.
(Just to see if the guy who looks after it has realised I've
changed email addresses)
Jut.
> -Original Message-
> From: The Mad Goose [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 1999 12:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: who?
>
> What I meant by that last on
What I meant by that last one was - is it time for another episode of
"Who's on sam-users?"
Dan?
Peace, Love, Kisses...
JohnnaPig Teare
JPOL: http://www.yi.com/home/TeareJohnna
"It won't get better but it might never get worse..."
> Now if only Future was open to doing a special Your Sinclair CD
> based on this site, include near-100% articles coverage, cover tape
> snapshots, etc, etc. I'd LOVE to handle a project like that...
I'd want one! How about knocking out an unofficial version anyway?
Most of the snaps from YS co
> who
>
certainly a question I'm keen to know the answer to...
;-)
Peace, Love, Kisses...
JohnnaPig Teare
JPOL: http://www.yi.com/home/TeareJohnna
"It won't get better but it might never get worse..."
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 10:53:21AM +, Andrew Collier wrote:
> At 10:37 am + 5/2/99, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
> >who
> why
Because he forgot that you are supposed to send list commands to
sam-users-request instead of to the list, obviously...
(That was odd, since it was in my mailbox right
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Collier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 10:37 am + 5/2/99, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
>> who
> why
where
(uhoh, this could go on for some time...)
Gavin
Someone /had/ to respond like that It was inevitable.
Jut.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Collier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 1999 10:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
>
> At 10:37 am + 5/2/99, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
> >who
>
>
At 10:37 am + 5/2/99, Malcolm Mackenzie wrote:
>who
why
who
> From: The Mad Goose [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Now we now why the deal on new PSU's involves us returning our old
>shagged out ones...
Ahhh sneaky... :)
Could this also be the reason why Greenweild's ran out of
PSUs? Bob bought the entire stock after he warned everyone
not to use them? :)
On Thu, 04 Feb 1999 14:32:42 PST Thu, 4 Feb 99 22:57:15 GMT, you wrote:
>>Future haven't made any official statement regarding YS copyrights.
>They
>>haven't said "no", but then they haven't said "yes" either. Most YS
>writers
>>had a contract that gave Future first serial rights (i.e. YS print
21 matches
Mail list logo
