Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-11 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
Jarek Adamski wrote: 1. 4MB SIMM - 1/3 Agreed. What types of Simms are u thinking off? EDO is getting scarecer. Perhaps EDO, perhaps not. I must try. I don't expect much difference in standard simple access. I have 1MB SIMM now and I still have to find the socket for it. I have

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-11 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Jarek Adamski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: All sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 12:55 PM Subject: Re: New hardware for SAM How many people will have this card? Or better I should start design of new computer apart the SAM? There will be only

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-11 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Martin Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 11:47 PM Subject: Re: New hardware for SAM Doom?? On a Spectrum?... What an odd thought... Aargh a large blob of red is coming at me... Oh, that was *my

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-10 Thread Jarek Adamski
Simon Cooke wrote: We had a prototype that ran at 12MHz with an overclocked Z80... and discovered that you'd need to have some glue (probably a finite state machine) in the middle that marshals memory and IO transactions over to the internal memory. I know this. The CPU must have its own fast

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Thomas Harte
1. 4MB SIMM - 1/3 2. ZX128 emul - 1/3 3. DMA - 0/3 4. ISA cross- 0/3 5. Interlacer - 0/3 6. Amiga HDFDD - 1/0 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 Alright, I vote for 28MHz CPU and DMA . . . -Thomas

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Simon Cooke
Don't forget that if you're considering doing a 28MHz CPU for the SAM, you may want to consult with me and /or Martin Rookyard regarding the fiddly details you'll have to worry about :) We had a prototype that ran at 12MHz with an overclocked Z80... and discovered that you'd need to have some

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Simon Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 10:31 PM Subject: Re: New hardware for SAM Simple solution: Try it and see ;) And dont forget to see how it runs with Lemmings ;)

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread David L
- Original Message - From: Jarek Adamski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 3:34 PM Subject: New hardware for SAM 1. 4MB SIMM - 1/3 Agreed. What types of Simms are u thinking off? EDO is getting scarecer. 2. ZX128 emul - 1/3 Nope

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Simon Cooke
Simple solution: Try it and see ;) And dont forget to see how it runs with Lemmings ;) Yep... if you don't get snow on the screen, and the sound still works, and it can still load from disk, you've cracked it :) Thinking of which, you may need extra gubbins in there to check for a write to

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Frode Tennebø
Jarek Adamski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. DMA - 0/3 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 And this concludes the votes from the Norwegian jury... -Frode -- ^ Frode Tennebø| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^ | Ericsson Radar AS. | Isebakkeveien 49 |

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Simon Cooke
Jarek Adamski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. DMA - 0/3 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 And this concludes the votes from the Norwegian jury... Can I jump in with the Norge nil points quip now? :) Just be glad you don't get Terry Wogan on your Eurovision Song Contest coverage.. yuck!

RE: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Justin Skists
3. DMA - 0/3 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 I vote for these two (on one board?) Justin

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Thomas Harte
Just be glad you don't get Terry Wogan on your Eurovision Song Contest coverage.. yuck! Surely being in America saves you from any Eurovision anyway? -Thomas

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Gordon Wallis
I'd have to go for: 5. Interlacer - 0/3 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 But, then, I don't really understand techy stuff like DMA and ISA. SIMM compatibility would be nice, as would HDFDDs. Although a more direct 128K emulator sounds good, I'd prefer some _new_ games ;-) Gord. -- The

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Gordon Wallis
David L wrote: You Gordon where discussing MSX hardware not so long ago there is an MSX graphics board (Gordon will know the name!) which adds a lot of nice extra facilities could it be adapted to work? Damn. I _should_ know the name, as I remember looking it up. Can't remember where

Re: New hardware for SAM

1999-09-08 Thread Martin Fitzpatrick
Gordon Wallis wrote: I'd have to go for: 5. Interlacer - 0/3 7. 28MHz CPU- 0/0 But, then, I don't really understand techy stuff like DMA and ISA. SIMM compatibility would be nice, as would HDFDDs. Although a more direct 128K emulator sounds good, I'd prefer some _new_ games

New hardware for SAM

1999-09-07 Thread Jarek Adamski
Hi! I want to add one more thing to my hardware project list. This is extention with CPU compatibile to Z80, but 16b and working at 28MHz. This is all I know in this matter as yet. So I counted the votes (valid/invalid): 1. 4MB SIMM - 1/3 2. ZX128 emul - 1/3 3. DMA - 0/3 4.