RE: [Samba] XP clients inexplicable pauses

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wohl Sent: 23 octombrie 2002 22:53 To: Paul Cochrane Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] XP clients inexplicable pauses On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Paul Cochrane

Re: [Samba] Re: getent group 'Domain Users' hangs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0200, Marcel Mary wrote: Indeed... There seems to be the problem: about 1000, making the group lookup result very long (~8KB) and hits a limit somewhere between Solaris and nss_winbind (shrinking the Domain Users group

[Samba] MSDFS info...

Hi, I'm new on Samba... I'm trying to set a samba server with a DFS share. I have found this example: # The smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = SAMBA host msdfs = yes [dfs] path = /export/dfsroot msdfs root = yes then I must create some link into

RE: [Samba] Delete files

Hello, i am trying to do this, too - to set up the recycle bin to work with W2k connected machines to my samba server. I put both lines to the smb.conf ( vfs object and vfs options ), but it still doesn't work. When I delete some file on W2k client, it's lost forever. Should I create

[Samba] Re: Samba + Winbind + Squid

Hi. I'm looking for samba 2.2.5 or 2.2.6 binary package to use with squid. So I need a version compile with option --with-winbind-auth-challenge and the one provide with red hat 8 doesn't have it. I tried to compile it but it doesn't work. Can someone help me? Thanks in advance, Hugues For

[Samba] Samba PDC and XP Pro Problem. (Not signorseal - fixed that one some time ago)

Hi, This is a simple query and may well have been answered in the mailing list archives but my searching can't find an answer to my specific problem. My PDC is Samba 2.2.3 on Redhat 7.3, clients are a mix of Win 2k and XP Pro laptops. The Win 2k laptops work fine (all service packs applied) and

RE: [Samba] Security issue

Continuing on my previous inquiry, Windows 2000 has the possibility to set numerous permissions on a number of users, but in the linux ext2 file system I only have the possibility to set rwx permissions for owner, group and everybody else. When I have a win2000 roaming profile

Re: [Samba] ipsec problem

is the Samba server one of the vpn endpoints? if so don't forget to include the vpn interface in smb.conf. Richard. On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:03, Jack Aboutboul wrote: On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:57, Thomas Angst wrote: I've got here a very strange problem. I've set up a vpn with freeswan

Re: [Samba] MSDFS info...

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Mac wrote: Nothing special needs to be done on the other three server (A, B and C). You just set up a share called 'shareA' on server storageA, and a share called 'share' on both servers storageB and storageC. They're completely normal shares. (You can even map

[Samba] Csc Policy

Hi, We are using Red Hat Linux 8.0 - and Samba 2.2.5 We are using csc_policy (Client side caching) to synchronise files between Windows 2000 Professional and Linux. The parameter we have in smb.conf is =csc policy = documents - it is having reliability problems, are there any other

RE: [Samba] 2 samba's?

It's probably safest to remove the rpm's and re-install them if you need them. rpm -e --allmatches package-name On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 00:01, Elliot wrote: Ok guys, I looked that the files associated with those 2 packages. It does seem to conflict with my source samba. Wish me luck guys...

Re: [Samba] ipsec problem

yes and no, I have tested both, one server is nat, router and samba and on the other side, there is a standalone samba server inside the lan and think about it, w2k is working only w98 is not working, if there is an access problem, why is it working with linux and w2k? thanks anyway richard

Re: [Samba] Always use the native protocol of the client -- WAS:How Samba let us down

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Message: 1 | To: Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:36:09 -0400 (EDT) | From: Bryan J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], | [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mathew McKernan [EMAIL PROTECTED], |

[Fwd: Re: [Samba] Always use the native protocol of the client -- WAS:How Samba let us down]

Original Message Subject: Re: [Samba] Always use the native protocol of the client -- WAS:How Samba let us down Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:48:48 +0200 From: Uwe Lienig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Forschungsinstitut Fahrzeugtechnik -FiF- To: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Samba] (Fwd) Re: SMBFS missing files using ls and find on RH7.3

Hi all, I finally got some info on this problem that you guys might have and not even know about! So check this out. -Steve --- Forwarded message follows --- Date sent: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:59:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark To:

[Samba] problem with ML

Hey all ! I don't receive any message from the ML whereas i'm registered. My mail server was down during 3 weeks and it works now since last week... is it the cause ? Regards, Amaury

Re: [Samba] Domain login problem...

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:19, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: I can logon from Win9x clients nicely to domain. I can usually join domain under Win2k-sp3. But I can't logon to domain. do you see an error message on the client? if none of this works - please send a level 5 or so debug log of a machine

RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues

1. Run ~samba/bin/wbinfo -u and make sure you are actually talking to your domain controller 2. Do you have winbind entries in your nsswitch.conf file? Have you made your system re-read this info (the command is nsadmin restart on irix, don't know about other platforms). 3. The windows box

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC and XP Pro Problem. (Not signorseal - fixedthat one some time ago)

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 04:42, Richard Horton wrote: My PDC is Samba 2.2.3 on Redhat 7.3, clients are a mix of Win 2k and XP Pro laptops. there are some bugs in 2.2.3 that were fixed in subsequent releases 2.2.6 looks to be very good - maybe worth upgrading (probably won't fix your problem

Re: [Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 07:43, Chris de Vidal wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts wrote: The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm doing File corruption is treated as a drop everything - priority 1 bug in Samba. If this

RE: [Samba] Security issue

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 06:05, Bart wrote: Continuing on my previous inquiry, Windows 2000 has the possibility to set numerous permissions on a number of users, but in the linux ext2 file system I only have the possibility to set rwx permissions for owner, group and everybody else.

Re:[2] [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Regarding tests you can perform on the windows side: A couple of months ago, a samba user wrote in this group explaining that the easiest way to reproduce op-lock break timeouts was to select 10 or 20 so MS Word files and open them all once. (I've tried multiuser test programs which lock

Re: [Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only turned them off, made no other changes, and have no more corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't that be a priority 1, drop everything bug? Other experience was confirmed by doing a Google, by 2 Samba authors, and by the results

Re: [Samba] Security issue

you want ACLs on the server you need a filesystem such as XFS that can support ACLs and a samba compiled --with-acl-support Does anyone know if the Debian packages are compiled with ACL support? Is there a place where the compile options for the packages can be found? Trey Nolen -- To

Re: [Samba] Security issue

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:31, Trey Nolen wrote: you want ACLs on the server you need a filesystem such as XFS that can support ACLs and a samba compiled --with-acl-support Does anyone know if the Debian packages are compiled with ACL support? Is there a place where the compile options

[Samba] Performance problem

We're trying to use Samba here to share out data from our Unix NAS server to PC (Win2K) clients. However, we're experiencing a problem in that saving a project from one of the applications (Petrel, used for subsurface analysis of oil/gas wells) can take 10 seconds, whereas saving to a win2k

Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.6 and RAS

Andreas Lindenbauer wrote: Hi ! Does anyone know a possibility to allow RAS-Dialin for users in a fully Samba-controlled Domain ? Tried usrmgr in Windows, but got only errors. (Should this work ?) Is there a possibility to make it on the command-line ? (Need not store the

[Samba] Unable to change group permissions from Windows

Hello, A little background real quick: I'm running a real small Samba server (latest release). It's located on a Windows domain. So far so good. Everything seems to be working properly. Now, I can get into the public share and create folders and stuff just fine. The problem I'm running into

[Samba] $BL$>5Bz9-9p"(L5NA%W%l%<%s%H(B

$B!c;v6H

[Samba] Re: Samba + Winbind + Squid

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Message: 16 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:26:10 +0200 | Subject: [Samba] Re: Samba + Winbind + Squid | | |Hi. | |I'm looking for samba 2.2.5 or 2.2.6 binary package to use with squid. |So I need a

[Samba] Winbind Help : NT Group permissions don't seem to apply when using username map

Samba 2.2.5 security = domain with winbind Also Using a username map for users with a corresponding UNIX account. Username.map: Karen = WALNETNT_karen (unix) (nt) Causes karen to come onto the samba share with UID and GID matching that used on the UNIX side. This lets karen (nt) write

Re: [Samba] Csc Policy

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 04:31, Thomas Buckley wrote: Hi, We are using Red Hat Linux 8.0 - and Samba 2.2.5 We are using csc_policy (Client side caching) to synchronise files between Windows 2000 Professional and Linux. The parameter we have in smb.conf is =csc policy = documents -

[Samba] Linux Compression

Hello, I know there are utilities that allow you to use compression for Linux file systems to zip upfiles. I was wondering if there is anything that allows you to specify a share and have everything under that share be compressed. In Windows you can specify any file, folder or entire tree

[Samba] RPM

I have a Dell GX110 with 128 MB RAM and a 8GB HD where I installed v2.3 of Caldera Linux while in visit mode (ie. direct from CD - no other OS kept). The video (among other things) needs attention. I downloaded i810_6_2.rpm (recommended by Dell for the installed video adaptor) to my Internet

Re: [Samba] Domain not available

Ok, attached is my smb.conf How can I check if Windows name resolution is working? What is signorseal reg fix and where can I find it? Yes, my machine-account is created on the server. Cyberduck - Original Message - From: Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cyberduck1 [EMAIL

Re: [Samba] Domain not available

Ok, attached is my smb.conf How can I check if Windows name resolution is working? What is signorseal reg fix and where can I find it? Yes, my machine-account is created on the server. Cyberduck - Original Message - From: Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cyberduck1 [EMAIL

[Samba] printing from w2k

Printing looks fine under win98 and I connect to the PDC on login from Win2k, but I can not connect to the printer. After setting the printer up it reports Access denied, unable to connect. Here is my smb.conf file. [global] #server information workgroup = Home server string = Samba %v

RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Somebody please drag this dead horse off the server. PV -Original Message- From: Van Sickler, Jim [mailto:vansickj-eodc;Kaman.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:10 PM To: Samba-L (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down Philip Burrow wrote: - Original

RE: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Philip Burrow wrote: - Original Message - From: Most of you Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:14 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down etc etc Well this one certainly roused you all. Must it be the case that you all

Re: [Samba] MSDFS info...

From: Fabrizio Morbini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] MSDFS info... Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:13:56 +0200 (CEST) On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Mac wrote: Nothing special needs to be done on the other three server (A, B and C). You just set up a

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Andrew Bartlett wrote: Philip Burrow wrote: - Original Message - From: Most of you Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:14 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down etc etc Well this one certainly roused you all. Must it be the case

Re: [Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

Chris de Vidal wrote: I agree - submit a documentation patch and maybe the crew will accept it. Good idea (: Open Source is great, isn't it?? Better than certain closed source vendors : No there isn't a problem No we aren't going to fix it because there is nothing to fix No there is

RE: [Samba] Samba PDC and XP Pro Problem. (Not signorseal -fixedthat one some time ago)

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:15, Richard Horton wrote: -Original Message- From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:brad;langhorst.com] [snip] yes it does does the other user actually have an account on the domain? are you sure that the normal user is actually logging into the

[Samba] ./configure failing 2.2.6 install (Newbie question)

I still have not had any luck on this one. It is driving me a bit bonkers. Any other ideas out there??? === I know this problem very good, as I had the same. Try install the developer package for libXaw Depending on your

[Samba] w2k hangs while access samba

another question, w2k clients hangs temporary while working. If you don't access a samba share for a while, it will freeze the whole network neighbourhood for a while, after I try to open an other file. I notice these on several w2k clients, not on w98 clients, in several networks. Has anybody

[Samba] Trust relationship lost in 2.2.1a repeatedly !

Hi All, I have been using samba 2.2.1a as the PDC, as a logon server for about 100 machines. Till now it has been fine, But for last 2 days all of sudden the trust relationship is lost from few random machines. Then we again have to reregister with SAMBA domain. When first time one m/c logins

[Samba] Domain not available

Hello People... I'm trying to set up a Samba PDC. In windows, the Samba server is called Server1, Domain MyDomain, Windows NT4.5 Primary. When I try to log into the Domain, W2K displays Domain MyDomain not available. What is going wrong here? Cheers Cyberduck

[Samba] Install to alternate location

Hello, I am trying to download and install samba with winbind but I can not make it go to a different location, I do not want it to go to/usr/local/samba because when I do then the system does not use the new version. I have tried to link the new version with the old but I could not get

Re: [Samba] Linux Compression

Not really a Samba question, but do a google on tar+linux and gzip+linux Jennifer Crusade wrote: Hello, I know there are utilities that allow you to use compression for Linux file systems to zip upfiles. I was wondering if there is anything that allows you to

[Samba] $BL$>5Bz9-9p"(L5NA%W%l%<%s%H(B

$B!c;v6H

Re: [Samba] XP connect to Samba as workgroup?

Brian Beaver wrote: Is there any way to force XP to connect to a Samba 2.2.6 server in workgroup mode? Yes, of course. (BTW, this is a relatively simple Windows issue, not a Samba topic, really.) go to Control Panel-System-Computer Name-Change... and click in the Workgroup radio button and

[Samba] help

Title: help Hello, Help! - I had a established samba client running forever until I was told that I had to move the server from one domain to another. I had the NT admin add the server to the new domain via server manager for domains. I then edited the smb.conf file to the new workgroup

[Samba] Does Samba 2.2.4 support 64 bit?

Hi, Does Samba 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 support 64 bit? We are using Clearcase Rational told us that only samba 2.2.5 support 64 bit? Any help would be arreciated. Thanks, -Murali -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

Re: [Samba] Domain not available

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 14:46, Cyberduck1 wrote: hmm you missed the most important point - read the howto... Ok, attached is my smb.conf see my comments in there How can I check if Windows name resolution is working? see my comments on your smb.conf What is signorseal reg fix and where can I find

Re: [Samba] Re: Samba + Winbind + Squid

Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Message: 16 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:26:10 +0200 | Subject: [Samba] Re: Samba + Winbind + Squid | | |Hi. | |I'm looking for samba 2.2.5 or 2.2.6 binary package

[Samba] Problem with winbind and network neighborhood...

Hello all, I installed Mandrake Linux 8.2 on the servers of my company and on my workstation and i am enjoying it very much, but now i want to install it on some employers workstations. Some of the users liked Mandrake 9.0 very much, but the only problem to them is to mount the windows shares,

Re: [Samba] Install to alternate location

On Thursday 24 October 2002 6:48 pm, Jennifer Crusade wrote: Hello, I am trying to download and install samba with winbind but I can not make it go to a different location, I do not want it to go to /usr/local/samba because when I do then the system does not use the new version. I have

[Samba] Re: Failed to open /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution was actually creating the private dir, then smbpasswd -a create the rest. Just seemed odd that I would have to mkdir a samba install, I think thats why I didn't do it, just to simple.Why

Re: [Samba] Domain not available

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 13:20, Cyberduck1 wrote: Hello People... I'm trying to set up a Samba PDC. In windows, the Samba server is called Server1, Domain MyDomain, Windows NT4.5 Primary. When I try to log into the Domain, W2K displays Domain MyDomain not available. What is going wrong here?

[Samba] Help with logon script

Hi all Sambies, I have Samba server 2.2.5 running on a RH7.3 (2.4.18-3) configured as a PDC and it works fine. Now we had the need to mount some drives (on Windows XP workstations) at logon, and I set up the logon script facility. My problem is that the testing directory on server to mount

Re: [Samba] Trust relationship lost in 2.2.1a repeatedly !

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 10:20, Yashpal Nagar wrote: Hi All, I have been using samba 2.2.1a as the PDC, as a logon server for about 100 machines. Till now it has been fine, But for last 2 days all of sudden the trust relationship is lost from few random machines. Then we again have to

[Samba] Add

The sender of this electronic message intends that this e-mail be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged and confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under

[Samba] Add User Confusion With 3.0 + LDAP

When using LDAP as both the Linux (nsswitch) and samba authentication backend, is it necessary to add the Linux PosixAccount into the directory before Adding the samba SambaAccount data, or will the samba add user process add both? It seems to me that if 3.0 is to be a PDC replacement, then a

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Keith G. Murphy wrote: I think he's referring to the phenomenon that I've seen on way too many technical mailing lists: be a complete asshole and you'll get the complete and undivided attention of multiple developers and power users, all of of whom assert, while helping, that that's not a

[Samba] cupsaddsmb rpcclient error

I am running samba 2.2.6 and cups 1.1.16. I can't get cupsaddsmb to complete successfully. I'm at an end here, I can't think of anything else to try after 2 weeks of searching the web. It copies the drivers to the print$ share directory, however the SetPrinter command fails on the rpcclient

[Samba] cupsaddsmb rpcclient error

I am running samba 2.2.6 and cups 1.1.16. I can't get cupsaddsmb to complete successfully. I'm at an end here, I can't think of anything else to try after 2 weeks of searching the web. It copies the drivers to the print$ share directory, however the SetPrinter command fails on the rpcclient

Re: [Samba] Printing probleme Samba 2.2.3.a with CUPS

Let me step in on this topic... Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, linux power wrote: There is a bug in samba printing cups at least for version 2.2.3 and up. It cant resolve -P %p in the print command line. Fix it by replacing -P %p with the absolute

[Samba] Samba with AIX version 4.0

Hello, I need some assisatnce. Which version of Samba can be used for unix AIX version 4? Moreover can I download the version off the internet and if so what is the exact site? Thanks, Athanasia Vouloukos GSI-Gemmar Systems International Project Manager (514) 631-3336 ext.2275 [EMAIL

Re: [Samba] ACL support in Samba

cksoo wrote: Now, I try to implement the ACL with similar to the ACL in windos 2000 server. However, I failed to implement it until file level, can someone guide me to implement me. 1. You need to run Samba on a Unix system with a filesystem that supports ACLs. 2. When compiling Samba, use

Re: [Samba] Install to alternate location

Jennifer Crusade wrote: I am trying to download and install samba with winbind but I can not make it go to a different location, I do not want it to go to /usr/local/samba because when I do then the system does not use the new version. I have tried to link the new version with the old

[Samba] Samba Community BoF at LISA 2002

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI... If anyone is interested, there will be a Samba Community BoF on Tues. Nov 5 at the Usenix LISA conference in Phil, PA. See http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa2002 for details. cheers, jerry

[Samba] user or group names with blanks

Hi I'm a happy user of samba since years I just d/l 2.2.6, configured it (w/ winbind), compiled and installed it It's working thought, i need to control access to some resources relatively to user's appartenance to some nt groups, and i intended to do this with read list/write list or valid

Re: Re: [Samba] 2.2.6 problems

passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = %u.BAT I had the very same problem. (update from samba 2.2.3 to 2.2.6) In the release notes, I found that thing : 3) Fixed string substitutions to

Re: [Samba] Use of pam_smbpass

Hi, The way it works is something like this: PAM uses either a global configuration file which specifies the module configuration for each service (i.e., httpd, samba, login, xauth, pop, imap, etc...the OLD way), or individual files within a directory - one per service. The directory is usually

Re: [Samba] Install to alternate location

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jay Ts wrote: Jennifer Crusade wrote: I am trying to download and install samba with winbind but I can not make it go to a different location, I do not want it to go to /usr/local/samba because when I do then the system does not use the new version. I have tried

Re: [Samba] plea for sample config files : accessing samba from windows...

Posting again, due to no response. If you can't share the working config files, then please let me know the essentials to getting this going (there are a lot of options in the conf file, that I don't know if I should ignore or make sure to set). Thanks, Joel Joel Thompson wrote: Hello, I

[Samba] [Fwd: Problem with CUPS and Samba]

-Forwarded Message- From: Piotr Paszyski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with CUPS and Samba Date: 24 Oct 2002 11:11:23 +0200 Hi! Sorry, but my english is little. I have RedHat 8.0 with samba 2.2.6-1. My samba works with WindowsNT4.0 domain (winbind). This is

[Samba] windows 98 Samba server IPC$

Hi!!! I have a big problem, I installed Samba in a red hat 7.3 server, I have many Workstation in windows 98 se, and others in win2k, I created an account in the samba server for the win2k called Bruno with password Bruno, and the same I use it to login in win2k, and create another

[Samba] smbmount

Hi I'm smbmount-ing 2 network shares with the following commands: smbmount //[correct_ip]/User [path] -o username=[],password=[] smbmount //[correct_ip]/Production [path] -o username=[],password=[] the shares mount properly and are accessible, but I get the following error messages when I run

[Samba] Use of pam_smbpass

Hi all. I've spent the last several days trying to get pam_smbpass working on my RH62 box with samba-2.2.x unsuccessfully, and hoped someone could help. I've tried versions 2.2.2 and 2.2.6, but I suspect it's perhaps a misunderstanding of what exactly pam_smbpass is used for. There are a few

[Samba] Password expiry

Hi all, I am running samba-2.2.6 on RH62 providing local workgroup shares for a mixture of 98/NT/2000/XP clients. I'd like to configure samba to somehow detect when a password is expired and pop up a box on the client workstation to require users to change their password. Is this possible? Does

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 07:34:19AM +0200, Walter Mautner wrote: As far as I know, oplocks are extensions to common file locks. In fact, whenever a oplock is set, also a conventional lock request is sent to the underlying non-smb locking system, and only if this one doesn't report it as

Re: [Samba] Re: Running smb without nmb? (Linux Suse 8.1 feature)

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Hannigan wrote: So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing? It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some circumstances that's what you would want. Hmmm, I recently developed a script for starting smbd and nmbd under RedHat, but perhaps

[Samba] Re: Running smb without nmb? (Linux Suse 8.1 feature)

Hi all, let me quote from /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/README.SuSE: Splitted init scripts - With version 2.2.5 Samba's init scripts have been reorganized. The smb script is split up into smb (for starting the smbd) and nmb (for starting nmbd). So far the two services could

[Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts wrote: The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm doing File corruption is treated as a drop everything - priority 1 bug in Samba. If this were a generic problem known with 2.2.6 we'd be issuing a

[Samba] Re: Fixed: OpLocks caused the corruptions/slowness (Was: How Samba let us down)

--- Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * The corruption was missing records. It would interrupt the print process and the Opus analysis indicated hundreds of records were missing. It would happen in random places in print files (hundreds of megs to gigs in size), and seldomly would not

Re: [Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

--- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the oplock problem with access databases is well known... I don't think samba alone can fix it. (somebody prove me wrong :) Samba alone probably cannot fix it. I have since learned it can also be a problem on NT. Jeremy says, file

Re: [Samba] OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)

--- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:43, Chris de Vidal wrote: If preventing file corruption is a drop everything - priority 1 bug (quoting Jeremy), it should either be documented and/or disabled by default. But if performance takes priority over

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

John, Please ignore this question from someone who probaby doesn't know enough to make sound statements, and who hasn't really followed the list closely lately Has there ever been an explanation found for the brief rash of people who had tidbits of Samba log file data inserted in their

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:35:02PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down': Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes and locking. [...] Mind if I add this to the

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down': Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes and locking. [...] Mind if I add this to the docs? Jelmer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes and locking. When a client opens a file it can request an oplock or file lease. This is (to simplify a bit) a guarentee that no one else has the file open simultaneously. It allows the client to not send any updates on the file to the

Re: [Samba] SMBFS workarounds

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rashkae wrote: On a side note: I think a reason that your comments attracted so much critism is not because people think samba doesn't take corruption seriously (I'm a big fan of Samba and samba team myself,, and I think the level of support offered on the mailing list by

[Samba] SMBFS workarounds

Well, yes, I see your point about smbfs mounting the file system in single user, but I see s many ways to quickly get around that Assuming your passwords are stored in properly read protected files, why could you not configure smbfs to mount the file system somewhere in the users home

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rashkae wrote: John, Please ignore this question from someone who probaby doesn't know enough to make sound statements, and who hasn't really followed the list closely lately I choose to help, not ignore. Has there ever been an explanation found for the brief rash

Re: [Samba] oplocks and share modes

Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes and locking. When a client opens a file it can request an oplock or file lease. This is (to simplify a bit) a guarentee that no one else has the file open simultaneously. It allows the client to not send any updates on the file to the

[Samba] Re: SMBFS workarounds

Rashkae wrote: Well, yes, I see your point about smbfs mounting the file system in single user, but I see s many ways to quickly get around that Assuming your passwords are stored in properly read protected files, why could you not configure smbfs to mount the file system somewhere in

Re: [Samba] Re: Running smb without nmb? (Linux Suse 8.1 feature)

Richard Sharpe wrote: On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Hannigan wrote: So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing? It's possible to not run nmbd at all, and in some circumstances that's what you would want. Hmmm, I recently developed a script for starting smbd and nmbd under

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:36:10PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:35:02PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down': Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of

Re: [Samba] Re: How Samba let us down

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:44:28AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:08:10PM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: And Solaris? At least they're autoconfigured to assume kernel oplocks according to testparm, and the docs say this is done only if the support is there.

  1   2   >