Ah ... somenews!
Here what I found in /var/log/nmbd:
Samba name server MASTER is now a local master browser for workgroup
PACK on subnet 192.168.0.1
*BUT* I have the following line in the [global] section of smb.conf:
hosts allow=192.168.0. 192.168.1.
I found in docs that above list can be
You must reconfigure your pam system for telnet if you need use domain pass.
This is not implemented but this is security hole but you can this set in
/etc/pam.d/...
Try use ssh not telnet.
Bye.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Title: Word 97 and samba.
Hi
Are there any known problems with Word 97 and Samba.
I have couple of users that complain about Word loosing
contact with the server. Sometimes with error msg. sometimes not.
Sometimes behaves like its trying to store something but can't do it.
The user is
Hi
parameter hosts allow is only for blocking bad users nothing configure...
nmbd can be master browser only on network that is on your network machine
eth.
If you have only one network adapter eth0 configured then MASTER is only on
ip network of this.
In secondary network 192.168.1 is master
Hi all,
I really know you'll tell me it is not an issue from Samba nor a matter
of topic in this list.
But. I have problems with oplocks, surely because of my version:
Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian I noticed it all in bug 26128 and posted
here precisions, few days ago.
Version 2.2.3a-12!!!???
Hello All:
I have a small problem in setting up Samba on my NT
network here. This is the environment on which I'm
running Samba Server on:
Samba Version: 2.2.7-1.7.3
OS: Redhat 7.3
Kernel: 2.4.18-18.7.x
Problem description:
Samba Server is not visible in my windows XP/NT
network neighborhood.
nmbd can be master browser only on network that is on your network machine
eth.
Thanks for your answer.
If I understand you well, MASTER is only PDC for 192.168.0 because of
eth0 configuration. Here is it:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.1
netmask
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:48, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote:
Hi all,
I really know you'll tell me it is not an issue from Samba nor a matter
of topic in this list.
But. I have problems with oplocks, surely because of my version:
Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian I noticed it all in bug 26128 and
Not you not have right.
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Paul ARGUDO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marian Mlcoch, Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cantisan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Access Samba Servers from the Internet?
I dont understand what is your problem with samba?
If you need use admin instalation of network shared Office2000 you must read doc
of Office 2000 and setup /a ...
You cannot simply install one client and use this
word2000 by another, this is not good but on more aplication it
works.
You
Any other options
that might help?
I had a problem with auto-timeout from client side :-)
But its a windows problem only ;-)
Type NET CONFIG SERVER and look at SESSION TIMEOUT..
By default you have 15 minutes
Then, if a user is typing from more than 15 minutes, without disk
access, in a
Since upgrading from 2.2.4 to 2.2.7, smbclient gives error message
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote file for files with ascii
characters in the filename which have codes from 0x80 to 0xff. There is
an example below. Copying the file using a windows PC to a samba server
works ok, the
Is länkar.html filename in windows PC identical?
This problem exist with missconfigured codepages conf for windows and linux.
In smb conf you must set proper codepage and translation to iso... for
windows and linux client separately.
- Original Message -
From: Mr David Munro [EMAIL
Hi,
Please give me some infomantion.
Hi,
I met a problem which had been discussed before,
but
I can't find the answer.
I'm now using samba samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm.
Following is the old list
Hi,
I'd like to deny the usage of roving
profiles under Samba 2.2.7, but I
don't know what should I set.
Could you help me please?
Thanks in advance!
Regards;
Istvan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marian Mlcoch, Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mr David Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND for filenames with 8bit
characters
Is ldnkar.html filename in windows PC identical?
This problem
Hi,
I hate to stress you guys, i already posted a few messages about this but
i am still confused about what's going on. Windows (here XP but i think
others as well) is unable to see my list of shares when i have
security=user! how come? how can i fix this?
Thanks angain,
Razvan Rotaru
--
To
I have a samba file server working and sharing files.
When i mount any directory in my XP, i see some files but not the total
of files that exists in this directory.
the file permissiones are 777 on my linux.
But i open a microsoft word and click on open file, and i write de full
name of the
Hi Tommy,
We have similar problems with Word 97- SR2 and networkdrives on Samba
server.
In our case it is no problem between Word and Samba.
The problems started when we changed our local antivirus software from
McAfee to Sophos. (Sophos told us that this is a known problem).
With Word 97 - SR1
hello,
can any one help me with some details pls.
i was looking for the process(the internals)when a client logs in to
samba(configured as a PDC).
and the same questions what happens when a client logs off.(do the PDC
know abt this?).
iam keen in to these details,since i want to insert in to
Hi all!!
Id set up my samba 2.2.7 to auth with security=domain
mode, but my clients cannot auth successfully never because the samba server
cannot talk correctly with my PDC(w2k adv. Server).
In the computer manager event, I see authentication
request but with empty usernamesso
Simply you must log to windows with username and password from samba
smbpasswd...
When you not have users in samba add by linux commands
useradd username1
smbpasswd -a username1
Thats all.
- Original Message -
From: Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December
I got it so my logfile no longer complains about
invalid user. I was creating a machine trust account but not an actual user
account. I am still having 2 problems.
When i attempt to log onto the domain at bootup I
put in my username and password and select DARCSTAR for the domain to log
Hi, I'm trying to setup samba server on FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE, with samba version 2.2.7a.
It runs so good (better than our snap server :).
I need to know if should be possible, that users can modify, save, and all other
possible operations on files except delete it.
My users config are, more
Since I've upgraded to Redhat 7.2 I cannot get swat to work,
I am using the 2.4.7-10 kernal with samba 2.2.7 installed.
I have checked all the applicable files, edited them accordingly as per
Gary Fournerat's
excellent How-to. No joy.
I am pretty certain this is an xinetd issue. I never had
I am having problems with Samba and Winbind on RedHat 8.0. Just to let you
know I am a Samba and Linux newbie please be gentle.
I have put the settings of my files at the end of this message in case these
can help. Here is my problem.
I can access a share created in the smb.conf file from
I got it so my logfile no longer complains about
invalid user. I was creating a machine trust account but not an actual user
account. I am still having 2 problems.
When i attempt to log onto the domain at bootup I
put in my username and password and select DARCSTAR for the domain to log
I think you have already test via ping the ip
address.
if the net works try to comment the following in
smb.conf (only if for security reason is possible)
; host allow =
if you have problems let me have more information
about the client os and if you want send your smb.conf to [EMAIL
Client OS is win2k. Now i can access the share as
root, but not as sean (user)
Does that give anymore information? If you need the
smb.conf I can post it.
- Original Message -
From:
Luca
Massarenti
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:53
AM
Hello,
I'm new to this group so please accept my apologies for any gaffs I might
make.
My problem is this:
I am running Samba 2.23 on RedHat 7.3. Using various unix permissions, users
groups smbusers / smbpasswords I am able to control who see what shares.
The Security in samba is set to
- Original Message -
From: Craig Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Samba Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: [Samba] Access to Everyone
Hello,
I'm new to this group so please accept my apologies for any gaffs I might
make.
My problem is this:
I am
You can force all users to be recognized as a single user. Set permissions on
the directory to
drwxrwsrws nobody nobody /home/technical
[Technical]
comment = Technical
browseable = yes
path = /home/technical
valid users = +users
force create mode = 0777
fforce directory mode = 0777
force
Hello Everyone,
I was just reading up a bit on the latest MS patch that affects SMB.
Here is a quote that I read about it:
...Windows Server Message Block (SMB) protocol which could enable group
policy on domain controllers to be modified. Flaws in cryptographic
signing
Title: Message
I've been looking thru manpages and online for
help.
I
*think* I've got winbind mostly setup (somehow) but it seems to be using the
wrong Domain.
Some info:
I
am running RH7.3
Kernel 2.4.18-3
Samba 2.2.7
In
my smb.conf file I have:
[global]
security = Domain
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote:
I have had issues with ReiserFS2.x,
but we really need ACLs, so until
some distro supports ACLs on ReiserFS,
it's not coming near my file
servers (mail/news/web maybe).
Thanks for moderation and additional answers to Simo, Buchan.
I might be a
Hello,
Recycle bins creating the directory structure inside the .recycle
directory have an issue I believe... ...at least how I have it setup :)
The directories created in the .recycle directory have permissions only
allowing access to the user who created it. Thus, if someone deletes
I've seen more than a few issues (on this list) regarding accessing the same
files with both samba and NFS ...all bad
T o n y
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
Appalachian Log Structures Inc.
www.applog.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
888-999-2574 x124
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I have written a brief summary of winbind and a simple cookbook
installation guide for winbind on HP-UX 11.
This is limited to the pre-compiled binaries that are supplied on
samba.org for HP-UX.
http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/hp/
Currently available are 2.2.5 and 2.2.7,
The machine we are currently using as our existing PDC is getting old
and tired, so we have built a new machine and are attempting to migrate
users across to the new machine. However, since there can only be one
PDC on a network, this involves an all nighter moving users profiles
across to the new
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote:
nmbd can be master browser only on network that is on your network machine
eth.
Thanks for your answer.
If I understand you well, MASTER is only PDC for 192.168.0 because of
eth0 configuration. Here is it:
Master browsers are 'elected'
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote:
JP,
Your question is one many samba users have to deal with. Debian Linux is
user supported software, so if you want samba to always be up to date,
volunteer to become the samba maintainer for Debian, then you will control
you own destiny.
If
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
Hello All:
I have a small problem in setting up Samba on my NT
network here. This is the environment on which I'm
running Samba Server on:
Samba Version: 2.2.7-1.7.3
OS: Redhat 7.3
Kernel: 2.4.18-18.7.x
Problem description:
Samba Server is
Hello,
I have a few questions.
I have network like this:
(A)-(MS)(SS)---(B)
| |
inet (C)
Ms and SS are linux servers with samba. others are workstations with
WinMe.
Can I make all subnets and all computers to see all computers
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prasad,
Since you press for an answer please excuse my bluntness.
You will have to find the answers to this question by either reading
volumes of published material (like the MS Windows NT/2K Resource Kit
Manuals) or by sniffing out what happens on
I joined the domain (LMC) with the following command
Smbpasswd -j LMC -r LMC_EXC1 (this is our PDC) -U administrator
I then got prompted for the password, I entered it
And got the message Joined the LMC Domain
Then I stopped and restarted the smb service
Did a wbinfo -u and then -g and still
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote:
I'd set up my samba 2.2.7 to auth with security=domain mode, but my
clients cannot auth successfully never because the samba server cannot
talk correctly with my PDC(w2k adv. Server).
In the computer manager event, I see authentication
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Guenther Deschner wrote:
is there any technical reason why winbind does not implement the
represenatition of domain local groups in mixed-mode win2k-domains ?
Already implemented in HEAD/SAMBA_3_0
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Glynn Condez wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to know if its possible to run smbd under
various ID's like nobody? if its possible how do I run
it? man smbd doesn't tell on running different ids.
smbd/nmbd/winbindd all have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, John H Terpstra wrote:
first i want to have a file(say filename is logged-in)when a client
log in PDC.then when a client logs off(will samba know abt this at
all?)i want to remove the IP entry from the same file(logged-in).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, John H Terpstra wrote:
Your question is one many samba users have to deal with. Debian Linux is
user supported software, so if you want samba to always be up to date,
volunteer to become the samba maintainer for Debian, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Robert Adkins wrote:
...Windows Server Message Block (SMB) protocol which could enable group
policy on domain controllers to be modified. Flaws in cryptographic
signing implementation used by MS in SMB are the root cause of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John H Terpstra wrote:
If I read correctly then you are trying to use samba as a WINS server
for multiple workgroups/domain. If that is correct then you have a
problem as samba is NOT multiple workgroup/domain capable.
Sorry
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Kevin wrote:
Since I've upgraded to Redhat 7.2 I cannot get swat to work,
I am using the 2.4.7-10 kernal with samba 2.2.7 installed.
If you used Red Hat's packages you need to install the swat package also.
Red Hat do not include SWAT in the main Samba package.
If you
Just create a 'guest only' share, and set 'writeable = no' on that share
Jim Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
JP,
(Thanks to Jerry Carter for pointing out the following omission in my last
reply to you)
You should also be aware that two (2) samba team members actively maintain
Samba packaging. You will find it under samba-2.2.7a/packaging/Debian, and
you can use this to build a Debian comliant samba
I'm trying to add print drivers to printers on a Samba server using a
NT4 workstations in the past this has worked. I'm currently running
Samba 2.2.7a CUPS 1.1.17, when I attempt to add drivers to the new
printer it crashes the NT4 workstation. Prior to the workstation
crashing however it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Dietrich Restemeyer wrote:
Only the damned HP driver for my 970cxi does not work. It seems to be
installed well, but if try to access the printer windows comes up with a
window : access violation at port ..
Sounds like the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Hikaru Katayamma wrote:
I've got a problem where when we have to restart the samba server, if
everyone hasn't logged off, anyone running Outlook will have their files
corrupted. Using a standard NT file server, this doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Kelly S. Smelser wrote:
Does anyone know of problems with RPC support pertaining to the remote
procedure calls that MS Access XP initiatates to determine its default
printer? It appears that Access does not like Samba printer
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:48, Jean-Paul ARGUDO wrote:
Hi all,
I really know you'll tell me it is not an issue from Samba nor a matter
of topic in this list.
But. I have problems with oplocks, surely because of my version:
Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian I noticed it all in bug
Now it is! I found that it wasn't - what a putz i am! but I am still getting
the groups problem. if i type groups jfountain, it only shows domain
admins and none of the other groups i am a member of.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Gabriel Matthews wrote:
I know this is a stupid question, but I'm a bit lost here.
I want to set up winbindd on my server to do all the authentication stuff,
and in the man page it says this:
In /etc/pam.d/* replace the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Tyler Durdin wrote:
Can anyone point me to a/some good tutorials on setting up samba as a
secondary domain controller? Thanks in advance.
The Samba-HOWTO-Collection contains a HOWTo set up Samba as a BDC for a
Samba PDC. See
Pihhan,
Sorry, I do not have time to answer all your questions.
- John T.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Pihhan wrote:
Hello,
I have a few questions.
I have network like this:
(A)-(MS)(SS)---(B)
| |
inet (C)
Ms and SS are linux servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Robert Adkins wrote:
While that is true, is it also possible that they could have
fixed something else that is unrelated, but could potentially cause
minor or major issues with Samba?
Well you never know. But I was
Hi:
I am experiencing the following problem:
I have a Linux SAMBA server set up with a share containing the source
code for my RH Linux 8.0 kernel, which is on another machine. I have no
problems mounting or accessing the share on the RH client. The problem
occurs when I run the 'make'
Will this config allow browsing on different subnets?
on on server (on subnets 1 and 2):
remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.255
remote browse sync = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.255
on second server (on subnets 2 and 3):
remote announce = 192.168.2.255 192.168.3.255
remote browse sync
Jerry,
While that is true, is it also possible that they could have fixed
something else that is unrelated, but could potentially cause minor or
major issues with Samba?
Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804
i am having a similar problem with files over 4 GBhelp would be greatly
appreciated
Patrick Blitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hy.
even if that had been a very common subject already, i still have this one
big (litterary) problem. I want to
Hi all,
I can see the RH7.3 linux box I've configured with the latest
Redhat RPM samba package in the Windows 2000 network
neighbourhood, but when I double click the W2000 computer
icon I get the message
\\Linuxbox is not accessible,
The network path was not found.
The network is a small
Jamie,
Have you crated a user and a smbpasswd for the user that you are connecting
using Network Neighborhood?
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Risk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Stumped at Network
hi all
I run a 2TB intel server based on RedHat with XFS kernel patch . I am
experiencing situations when some vb application causes the system to
experience the following error
too many open files and no body can access certain folders .A volume repair
is done and then it is ok . For a while .
Hi Bob, thanks for responding ...
Yes; at least if your asking about the unix side of things. Through some
magic
that I did a few days ago I piped the password file for linux into a
password
file for samba, then initialized the samba account of interest. A
decription
of what I did is here:
--On Friday, December 13, 2002 6:59 PM +0530 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
can any one help me with some details pls.
i was looking for the process(the internals)when a client logs in to
samba(configured as a PDC).
and the same questions what happens when a client logs off.(do the PDC
know
Bob had responded (again, thanks Bob) with two suggestions.
1. Try connecting with the same user and password as on the
unix side. I set up a new W2000 user account with name
and password to match. When I click on the Network
Neighbourhood, I still get the Network path not found.
Hi all,
I can see the RH7.3 linux box I've configured with the latest
Redhat RPM samba package in the Windows 2000 network
neighbourhood, but when I double click the W2000 computer
icon I get the message
\\Linuxbox is not accessible,
The network path was not found.
The network is a small
I had samba working on an old Sun Enterprise server using a JBOD that was
managed with veritas volume manager (legacy stuff that had long outlived
it's usefulness). Management arbitrarily decided to replace the aging
Solaris server with a native Windows server without talking to me. I instead
I feel your pain Karen.
I'd tried briefly (before I figured that it wasn't worth my breath
because they wouldn't listen at all) to convince my superiors to clean
up a HD problem through Samba and one of the two Solaris boxes we have.
We have this nice brand new storage array, and it probably
I experienced the exact same thing with my Windows 2000/Red Hat 7.2
System
until someone here on the list suggested it was firewall related.
Since my
network is pretty much local, I stopped IPCHAINS and IPTABLES. Then
no
problem accessing the Red Hat/Samba Server.
Tom Winfield
An
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:11:05PM -0600, Long, Jesse wrote:
ln: creating symbolic link 'asm' to 'asm-i386': Operation not permitted.
If you're trying to create a symlink on a remote filesystem mounted via
Samba/smbfs, it's not at all surprising that it would not work. Samba
makes your UNIX
Have you checked
/proc/sys/fs/file-max?
See what that value iswe had the same error (non-samba) and this value
was set to 8192.
Try raising the value in this file??
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:25 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Dec 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
[2002/12/08 01:50:29, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(110)
error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(83) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans)
NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL
is this error message a red herring?
Yes. It means that
Hi,We have a problem with our Linux and samba units.We mount remote windows shared drives, and transfer a lot of file to/from them.If Windows crash :) or unplugging RJ, our program hang on read/write calls ( and all other access to remote file ) for undefined time... WE NEED to set a SHORT
My smbpasswd command to join the WIN2k domain fails with a session set up 21 error
then 'NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
) = 54'. I included the last few lines of the strace output below. Maybe it is enough
for someone to tell me what the problem between the PDC and my REDHAT 8.0 2.4.19 with
SAMBA
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 19:38, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Oddly enough, I got oplock problems when I upgraded from 2.2.3a-6 to
2.2.3a-12, whereupon I filed a bug and downgraded.
The Debian maintainer assured me nothing had been done but security
backports; so I upgraded again and crossed my
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 12:50, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Dec 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
[2002/12/08 01:50:29, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(110)
error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(83) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans)
Go with a GNU/Linux system and get the best of the two worlds:
Unix power
and
cheap hardware
btw, I cannot believe they say managing a windows box is more
comfortable, have you ever showed your boss how much time his NT admins
need to spend to easily click trough endless number of windows?
I
In samba 3.0 we have unix extensions, they will be available to
GNU/Linux client through steve's new CIFS fs (in linux kernel 2.5)
most probably.
While I still puch for NFS currently, I have to say that CIFS security
model is much better as it does not trust machines but requires each
user to
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 23:24, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
I can't not understand with debian cannot update packeges that are in
the stable version ... but that's a debian problem not samba related ...
Well, I think I understand and approve of the reasons: it's so packages
Hello,
i have a Samba PDC version 2.2.3a on a Red Hat Linux Box 7.3. By joining to
thi domain some Windows 2000 Professional Sp3, everything works fine but,
when opening my computer, i see every sambe network drive with a RED CROSS
over it!
All the network drives are automatically mapped to the
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 23:24, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
I can't not understand with debian cannot update packeges that are in
the stable version ... but that's a debian problem not samba related ...
Well, I think I understand and approve of the reasons:
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 00:06, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
That's fine with development versions, but samba stable is ... well ...
stable :-)
There's (at least) three other things involved here, though:
* Because upstream (samba developers) say something is stable may not
Same problem here, Francesco... on ONE of the computers (out of a dozen or
so). Odd, no?
What not upgrade, no? That's a pretty old version of Samba.
--
Greg J. Zartman, P.E.
Vice-President
Logging Engineering International, Inc.
1243 West 7th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97402
541-683-8383
Well, to experiment, you might try, in your printing share:
printing command = echo Tried to print %s /tmp/junk
And see if that command gets executed.
Joel
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0500, daulton theodore wrote:
Thanks Joel. I did move everything except 'printing, printcap name and
Joel:
I will forego answering your questions since I finally got it working so
that I can now delete files without hanging the application. I did the
following three things, and I am not sure what combination made it work. I
think it was probably the first two.
1) Made the printer path
Hi,
I'm moving my samba server to another NT 4.0 domain. Do I need to disjoint
the previous domain and then join the new domain?
Regards,
Norman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Herb Lewis wrote:
This renaming was to work around a browser problem where browsers
would think any file with a .gz anywhere in the path was a
gzipped file.
Actually, I think it was a web server or transparent cache bug where
the web server would tell the client that any file with a .gz in
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 16:42, Esh, Andrew wrote:
Maybe have a look at /proc/17206 (or whatever PID is at the top of
top), and see what is in the fd directory.
the only unusual thing in there is
/var/cache/samba/printing/.tdb
here's the whole list:
rwx--1 root root 64 Dec
Title: CIFS and Kerberos question
Hi,
Thanks for your great work as always. This question is slightly an off-topic, but you guys know a lot about SMB/CIFS and Microsoft Active Directory Kerberos, so let me ask ...
I am trying to achieve PKI authentication and SMB access to Windows
Samba 3.0, alpha 21.
kerberos_verify.c has:
... krb5_get_permitted_enctypes(context, enctypes) ...
for (i=0;enctypes[i];i++) {
...
if (!(ret = krb5_rd_req(context, auth_context, packet,
NULL, keytab, NULL,
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
