Hi again Willy, Dale and Ryan
You were all right about everything. I have made quite a bit of progress
- mainly in understanding - but still have problems
Firstly - Ryan was right - that I completely misunderstood the "Client
Driver" versus "Server Driver" issue.
You were also right - tha
I don't doubt it. I was using a custom addprinter script from Acrophobia
(http://acrophobia.sourceforge.net), which was not compatible with SELINUX
and I'm afraid I'm not enough of an expert to figure out how to fix it.
Thanks!
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Which you should. SELinux can certainly
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> I'm aware that you cannot use smbpasswd in a loop creating the
> accounts because you have to type in the password
Sure you can.
Example using a variable x for the username and, in this case, setting
the password equal to the username:
echo -e "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008, Ryan Novosielski might have said:
>
>> Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
>> from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
>> of which may alrea
On Friday 04 January 2008, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> I cannot
> use smbpasswd -x in a loop.
Why not?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008, Ryan Novosielski might have said:
> Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
> from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
> of which may already be missing, some of which may be present)? I cannot
> use smbpasswd -x in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone brighter than me think of an easy way to remove MANY users
from an smbpasswd file (I have a list of users that can be removed, some
of which may already be missing, some of which may be present)? I cannot
use smbpasswd -x in a loop. Is there
I am having trouble getting samba-3.0.24-11 setup as a PDC with an
ldap backend using FDS on a FC6 test box. I have installed the
1.0.4-1 version of the directory server accepting the defaults except
for the server name with out any problems. I can query the directory
server and it is populated w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Which you should. SELinux can certainly be made to work with Samba.
Scott Vintinner wrote:
> You can ignore this post. I finally realized that I still had SELINUX
> enabled.
>
>
> Scott Vintinner wrote:
>> I'm trying to install print drivers onto m
You can ignore this post. I finally realized that I still had SELINUX enabled.
Scott Vintinner wrote:
I'm trying to install print drivers onto my samba 3.0.28 server (Fedora
Core 8) following the Add Printer Wizard Driver Installation directions
here:
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Sam
On Friday 04 January 2008, Boaz Bezborodko wrote:
> As I understand it winbind allows users to be logged in as Linux
> users when they log in as Windows users.
winbind allows authentication to be done by a Microsft domain controller
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
With a recent upgrade to Centos 4.6 my system's Samba was also upgraded
to 3.0.25b. But now I get a series of
auth/auth_util.c:create_builtin_administrators(792) and
auth/auth_util.c:create_builtin_users(758) errors every day.
As I understand it winbind allows users to be logged in as Linux u
I have Samba 3.0.26a in an openSUSE 10.3 machine.
I have set up a share like this:
path = /dati/paolo
valid users = paolo
read only = No
acl map full control = No
create mask = 0760
directory mask = 0770
nt acl support = No
map archi
not sure that you are right.
Samba use both unix right and posix acl right.
the directory test1 have unix right that autorise smb-Users to access-it.
And you cancel it with acl entry => the smb-users group have no right.
But you not have default acl entry, if you spec default acl entry with the
Hello
I've seen nothing new on the Samba mailing list about this one, is there
a plan to make this an official patch?
This could also probably be considered a security issue and be
integrated in the Debian package?
David Disseldorp a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:05:22 +0100
> "[EMAI
Hello
I'm running Debian Etch with distro kernel & Samba package (2.6.18-5-686
& 3.0.24-6etch9).
In my smb.conf I have :
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
inherit acls = yes
I start with a dir test1 with no rights for group smb-Users, rx for
group smb-Inf, and rwx for group smb-Bme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamrock wrote:
> "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jamrock wrote:
>>> "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> news:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
Yesterday I found big problems concerning my roaming profiles. They seem
to work on some computers where they are always used, on some other the
did not load properly (i.e. a default profile was loaded instead).
After some debugging with userenv.log I found the very strange problem:
case sens
Greeting Andy,
Your config seem to be ok, but change os level to 65. I suppose that you
send only ldap parameters and not all the smb.conf parameters.
First check your DNS resolution (from your server and client). But I'm
sure that your need to add the following parameter in the smb.conf to
"Quinn Fissler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've done it - it can be done without pain.
> I was using ldap - I backed up my db first - I also change SIDs by using a
> large scale edit and re-imported.
>
> If you want client machines to stay joined to the domain, y
"Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jamrock wrote:
> > "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
