On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:27:25AM +1200, Derek wrote:
Just wanted to confirm whether this CVE affects the 3.0.4 version of
Samba..
The samba.org website claims This security advisory is applicable to
all Samba 3.0.x releases to date
Yet the actual CVE [1] has Versions: Samba 3.0.0 -
So correct me if i'm wrong,
in order to use the ldap backend, you need to insert the posix users in
ldap as well ??
there is no way to get it work, with the normal basic setup (passwd
shadow group ect. files)
that's odd ?!
Collen.
Adam Williams wrote:
you'll need to put your posix users
another friendly competitor for deploying windows software is opsi, a
GPL-desktop-management system
http://www.opsi.org/
opsi stable version 3.2
http://download.uib.de/opsi3.2/doku/
info at http://download.uib.de/opsi3.2/doku/
opsi version 3.3 release candidate 1 will be announced soon.
info
Hello
This is my first mail for this list, so please be considerately.
I'm trying to build a tiny version of samba for an embedded device.
currently im using the version 2.2 with a footprint of smbd 2.4M.
Thats to much.
Is there a way/patch to build smbd without everything beside file exchage?
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Yet the actual CVE [1] has Versions: Samba 3.0.0 - 3.0.29 (inclusive)
The CVE suggests that the version 3.0.4 would not be affected, my confused!
I'm not a native english speaker, but I wonder from what
term in the CVE you read that 3.0.4 is not affected
I
Thanks Guenther,
that is exactly the patch I needed to join my AD-Member back into my
Windows 2000-SP4 domain!
Jens
Guenther Deschner wrote:
Jens Nissen wrote:
I doff my hat, indeed, my SBS200 is running SP1.
(Microsoft never provided updates for SBS2000 beyond SP1,
there were individual
Collen Blijenberg wrote:
in order to use the ldap backend, you need to insert the posix users
in ldap as well ??
there is no way to get it work, with the normal basic setup (passwd
shadow group ect. files)
that's odd ?!
It isn't completely impossible, if you really wanted to have two
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:09:15PM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
I can't attach a 301MB samba server log file. Is there a way I can
upload the file at some location?
As far as cifs, it tries to send some commands but does not get a reply for
a long time and times out, so everything is
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Volker Lendecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, maybe 10MB before the reconnect, bzip2 -9 and you can
send it directly to me :-)
rzip often compresses log files better than bzip2...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi,
the home directories of our users are NFS-mounted from a NetApp filer to
our samba server. Everthing was fine until the users installed the
service pack 3 for Windows XP on the client machines. Suddenly it was
impossible to write MS Office files on the samba share. Word or Excel
I get the prorotype error (uint32 / uint32_t) in include/util_tdb.h
regardless of if I use cc or gcc, see [Samba] Failed building 3.0.30
for tru64 4.0F
If I modfy include/util_tdb.h changing uint32_t to uint32, and correct
the typo (TDB_BASE_OBJ) - (TDBBASE_OBJ) in the Makefile.in, . and
Hi,
Im running XP SP3 here on samba 2.0.24 and 2.0.28 and no problems here.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Dirk Kastens
Verzonden: vrijdag 6 juni 2008 13:43
Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: [Samba] XP SP3 and posix
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Bengt Nilsson wrote:
I get the prorotype error (uint32 / uint32_t) in include/util_tdb.h
regardless of if I use cc or gcc, see [Samba] Failed building 3.0.30
for tru64 4.0F
If I modfy include/util_tdb.h changing uint32_t to uint32, and correct
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:42:50PM +0200, Dirk Kastens wrote:
the home directories of our users are NFS-mounted from a NetApp filer to
our samba server. Everthing was fine until the users installed the
service pack 3 for Windows XP on the client machines. Suddenly it was
impossible to write
My system is OSF1 V4.0 1229 alpha, login message Digital UNIX
V4.0F (Rev. 1229)
I also have a OSF1 V5.1 2650 alpha, login message Compaq Tru64 UNIX
V5.1B (Rev. 2650).
I will try to see if it works better on the 5.1 system..
6 jun 2008 kl. 14.34 skrev Volker Lendecke:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008
Hi,
L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
Hi,
Im running XP SP3 here on samba 2.0.24 and 2.0.28 and no problems here.
It works with local filesystems. I does not work with NFS-mounted
filesystem.
Regards,
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi,
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Well, re-export of NFS-imported directories is not
recommended and one of the exceptions to you should
never... :-)
You should not NFS-export NFS-mounted filesystems. I don't know why you
shouldn't create a samba share on an NFS-filesystem. Our samba servers
are
wel how about im having 3 nfs mounts on my samba
on 2 different servers
1 debian( export )
1 sco unix 5.0.7 ( export )
1 samba server ( nfs mounted )
8 drive mappings on client pc's
linked folders to nfs mounted folders in the users home drive.
need i say more.
Louis
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:14:08PM +0200, Dirk Kastens wrote:
You should not NFS-export NFS-mounted filesystems. I don't know why you
shouldn't create a samba share on an NFS-filesystem.
Exactly for the problems you've seen.
No. CIFS on the NetApp only works with Active Directory. We use
All,
If I set up a BDC with a replicated ldap server, can I point the ldap
backend and idmap backend options *both* to the localhost and enable
a referral on the slave so that writes (ie Idmap updates) will be
referred to the master server?
I'm running debian unstable with openldap 2.4 (and
Hallo, Dirk,
Du (dkastens) meintest am 06.06.08:
You should not NFS-export NFS-mounted filesystems. I don't know why
you shouldn't create a samba share on an NFS-filesystem.
It may work.
A school in the neighbourhood runs some shares in these ways - a third
server shares some directories
No. CIFS on the NetApp only works with Active Directory. We use
LDAP for
user authentication so we have to keep our samba servers.
Despite what NetApp sales reps try to tell you, NetApp
filers work perfectly fine in a Samba domain. Just create a
Samba PDC backed by your LDAP (domain
I tried ./configure + make on my 5.1 system and it worked fine.
So the problem is for the older Digital UNIX V4.0F system.
Do you have access to such a system?
6 jun 2008 kl. 14.34 skrev Volker Lendecke:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Bengt Nilsson wrote:
I get the prorotype error
Apologies, my ldap user/computer ou's in smb.conf were wrong. :-(
However the DOMAIN CONTROLLER NOT FOUND error with wbinfo -t in 3.0.30
still holds, and I could not get 3.0.28a to populate the Idmap ou in
LDAP, whereas despite the 3.0.30 problem, that release could indeed do
so.
Cheers
Alex
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:52:54PM +0200, Bengt Nilsson wrote:
I tried ./configure + make on my 5.1 system and it worked fine.
So the problem is for the older Digital UNIX V4.0F system.
Do you have access to such a system?
No, sorry :-)
Volker
pgpkQL3bit7wV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Which files does the max log size property manage? I'm pretty confident it
manages log.smb but what about log.nmbd and log.winbindd. The reason I ask
is despite having set max log size, log.winbindd has grown to be a few
gigs. I don't know if this is a defect in Samba or an indication I need to
Hi again
2008/6/5 Jean-Yves Avenard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the smb log file, I would see
make_connection: connection to public denied due to security descriptor.
A thread bump...
No one has ever faced this issue? any solutions by any chance?
Thanks
JY
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:48:44AM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
2008/6/5 Jean-Yves Avenard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the smb log file, I would see
make_connection: connection to public denied due to security descriptor.
A thread bump...
No one has ever faced this issue? any solutions by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick wrote:
Hello
This is my first mail for this list, so please be considerately.
I'm trying to build a tiny version of samba for an embedded device.
currently im using the version 2.2 with a footprint of smbd 2.4M.
Thats to much.
Is
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Herb Lewis wrote:
try doing an nm on the suspected .o file and see if the reference
to the function is there. That will prove which file(s) is comes
from than maybe you can determine which function it comes from.
Thanks, but I've already done that; I used nm to
Hi,
The announcement states:
Secunia Research reported a vulnerability that allows for
the execution of arbitrary code in smbd
Does this means arbitrary code executed as root ou as the user that is
authenticaded after smdb drops privilegies?
Does this affect samba 2.x as well? What versions?
i work in a lab environment, and we'd like to prevent users from logging
into 5 machines at once. I've looked through the smb.conf man page
pretty thoroughly, but nothing appears to address this problem.
Anyone have any ideas, how you can limit the amount of logins a user can
have to teh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Homem wrote:
Hi,
The announcement states:
Secunia Research reported a vulnerability that allows for
the execution of arbitrary code in smbd
Does this means arbitrary code executed as root ou as the user that is
authenticaded after
On Friday 06 June 2008 19:49, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Gustavo Homem wrote:
Hi,
The announcement states:
Secunia Research reported a vulnerability that allows for
the execution of arbitrary code in smbd
Does this means arbitrary code executed as root ou as the user that is
run script to capture all the following output
run gdb trans2.o then run the command x/400i (may need to change
the number of lines)
search for the offending function call and see where it says it
is in the file
Kai Lanz wrote:
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Herb Lewis wrote:
try doing an nm
Hi,
I recently installed samba (3.0.28) on a linux box as a PDC. The networks
has about 20 windows xp professional and a few Linux (all Fedora 8).
Basically the server works OK but I have run into a few problems:
Initially windows roaming profile was not configured. At that time,
sometimes when
i've had a similar problem for weeks/months now with microsoft word 2003
saying files are read-only, even when the file permissions are 777. i
was google searching which said the problem is due to windows desktop
search. i uninstalled that but that didn't completely fix it. i'll try
posix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo Homem wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2008 19:49, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Gustavo Homem wrote:
Hi,
The announcement states:
Secunia Research reported a vulnerability that allows for
the execution of arbitrary code in smbd
Does this
On Friday 06 June 2008 20:41, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Gustavo Homem wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2008 19:49, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Gustavo Homem wrote:
Hi,
The announcement states:
Secunia Research reported a vulnerability that allows for
the execution of arbitrary code in
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM, George He [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed samba (3.0.28) on a linux box as a PDC. The networks
has about 20 windows xp professional and a few Linux (all Fedora 8).
Basically the server works OK but I have run into a few problems:
Initially
Hi John,
when you say wins, do you mean the lmhosts file?
No. If you set the PDC to be a wins server then add this ip as the
wins server in every windows client the windows machines will find the
domain controller.
But that should work. Have you added the proper format of a domain controller?
Hi
Thanks for your help
2008/6/7 Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you set access controls with the Windows server manager?
no, I don't even know what that is
If not, and the settings in your smb.conf are everything you
need to control access to your shares, then you might want
to
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
when you say wins, do you mean the lmhosts file?
No. If you set the PDC to be a wins server then add this ip as the
wins server in every windows client the windows machines will find the
domain controller.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:08 PM, George He [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
when you say wins, do you mean the lmhosts file?
No. If you set the PDC to be a wins server then add this ip as the
wins server in every
Hi folks,
are there any more detailed docs about those scripts? I have some
annoying issues there and I can't find anything about that in the docs.
If using usrmgr.exe is it possible to tweak the add user script that
the full name of a user is stored too, like if I add the user manually
with
The branch, v3-2-stable has been updated
via 5462e1a6bf99fc199053aebe412867f420eb1841 (commit)
from b93d927dd440f0009740cf00644f603edf5a8a7c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-stable
- Log
46 matches
Mail list logo
