Dear All,
I am using samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5 with openldap for centralized
authentication and Nfs mount partition for storage drives.
Now the user who logged in the domain and using a shared drive, if they
stay ideal for approx 30min.
The drive get disconnected and when they try to open it 2-3 time
Lets see if this help.
I have setup a server a couple of weeks before, windows 2k3 AD I
add my vm centos 5.3 machine to it, I share 1 folder and add the home
users folder.
Is running and have no issue with.
Windows 2k3 domain name: DOM.local
machine name: dompdc
IP: 192.168.2.2
This topic seems to rear its head every now and then, but I can't seem to
get a definitive answer
I'm running a single RHEL5 server that is currently serving out home
directories and a public share via Samba. My Linux desktop clients would
like to access these same shares via NFS. So, the age-old
Hi Jonathon,
Thanks for looking into it.
The log messages are as follows:
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 samba]#
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 samba]#
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 samba]# tail smbd.log
bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
Error = Address already in use
[2009/07/13 14:38:00, 0] smbd/server.c:ma
Thanks for the reply.
I followed the steps but it still did not work.
In step 2, there were no smbd.pid or nmbd.pid files found.
In step 3, even after starting the service, when checking status, smbd
id dead.
Even after the reboot, same status.
Shuaib
-Original Message-
From: MargoAn
Hello,
A few days ago came a demand for users of 3 domains
could sign up on their machines.
1 of them is with Ubuntu / Linux (Samba 3.3.2), 1 with Debian (Samba
3.20) and last with Windows Server 2003 (Mixed Mode).
The problem in the relationship between Debian / Linux and Ubuntu / Linux.
Added
Shuaib Ilyas (shilyas) wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but
after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status:
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 share]#
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# service smb status
smbd dead but pid file exists
nmbd (pid 807
Quoting "Shuaib Ilyas (shilyas)" :
I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but
after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status:
What does the samba logfile say about this? On Fedora (which should have
the same layout as RHEL), the samba logfile is
Hi,
I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but
after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status:
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 share]#
[r...@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# service smb status
smbd dead but pid file exists
nmbd (pid 8078) is running...
[r...@
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:53:15AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Elvar wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Elder Souza wrote:
> >
> >> No prob Jeremy, thanx for your help!
> >>
> >> Elder Souza
> >> (71) 9972-7573 / (71) 8801-5734
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, J
Hi people.
I want to know if this is possible.
I have right now 3 domains in my network.
Dom A = Samba 3.0.33 Gentoo + LDAP. This serve to a domain of 10
users at location 1.
Dom B = Windows 2003 AD serving 8 users at location 2.
Dom C = WinNT + samba as client serving most of t
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:03:43AM -0400, Daniel Barowy wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've been running Samba for years, and with the exception of IDMAP,
> we've been very happy. Well, now we have a real need to keep this
> information in a shared DB, so I'm trying to set up the idmap_ldap
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Gabriel Petrescu wrote:
> Hi:)
>
> If I run the command:
>
> getent group
>
> or
>
> getent passwd
>
>
>
> the result is
>
> usernma or goup instead of
>
> domain\username or domain\group
>
> do you have any clue about what's wrong?
>
> Thanks:)
>
> Gabi
> --
> To
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:39:26PM +0200, Lukas Deseyve wrote:
>
> No,
>
> i use at first time samba 3.3.6 and here was this problem. then i tried
> samba 3.4.0. but with same problem (and before any time i tried samba
> 3.3.3 and in this version was also this problem). Last version what i use
Hi:)
If I run the command:
getent group
or
getent passwd
the result is
usernma or goup instead of
domain\username or domain\group
do you have any clue about what's wrong?
Thanks:)
Gabi
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.sa
Good day.
I want to try a new version of samba. I have installed samba4:
freebsd-samba# samba4 -V
Version 4.0.0alpha8
freebsd-samba# uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-samba.domain 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun
Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008
r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Brian,
Which logs should I be checking?
The following output comes from the winbindd.log. I replaced the FQDN
of the domain controller in the second to last line of the log file. It
was in the format SERVERNAME.domain.name
[2009/07/13 09:16:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(564)
write_data:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Elvar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Elder Souza wrote:
>>
>>> No prob Jeremy, thanx for your help!
>>>
>>> Elder Souza
>>> (71) 9972-7573 / (71) 8801-5734
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Jeremy Allison
cd to samba-3.4.0/packaging/RHEL and run sh makerpms.sh
then rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/X86_64/samba*3.4.0*.rpm
smbpasswd -w
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart
Niklas Saers wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I'm running a vanilla CentOS 5.3 server, and yum there has Samba
3.0.33. What's the recommended way to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Elvar wrote:
>
>
> Elder Souza wrote:
>
>> No prob Jeremy, thanx for your help!
>>
>> Elder Souza
>> (71) 9972-7573 / (71) 8801-5734
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:44:05PM -0300, Elder Souza
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:54:42AM -0500, Xu, Ying (Houston) wrote:
> One of our daily jobs needs to process a lot of files on a solaris
> server and dump the files onto a windows server. We currently use
> sharity to accomplish this. However, the performance becomes worse when
> the files get la
One of our daily jobs needs to process a lot of files on a solaris
server and dump the files onto a windows server. We currently use
sharity to accomplish this. However, the performance becomes worse when
the files get larger. We want to find another approach to do this. The
reason we didnt use
No,
i use at first time samba 3.3.6 and here was this problem. then i tried
samba 3.4.0. but with same problem (and before any time i tried samba
3.3.3 and in this version was also this problem). Last version what
i use without this problem is 3.0.30
But i dont know if this problem is new b
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Lukas Deseyve wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i tried Samba 3.4.0 but with same result:(
>From what I understand, Jeremy says you should downgrade to 3.3.6 to
restore the behavior you want.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: ht
Hi,
i tried Samba 3.4.0 but with same result:(
I created a new bug #6549 where i put also my log file with debug
level 10
Lukas
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:47:31PM +0200, dese...@linuxbox.cz wrote:
i have problem with share with parametr "force u
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 03:14:35PM -0400, Michael Joyner ᏩᏯ wrote:
> net user add . is there any way to specify destination OU when
> security=ads ?
You can define the container where to create users (and groups) with
--container="ou=mycontainer". The base dn of your domain will be appended
auto
26 matches
Mail list logo
