Also, I have entered the following in smb.conf file
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
winbind use default domain = yes
Restarted Samba and i checked wbinfo.
wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND
Hi guys,
Sorry for creating a chain of emails. After reading the man page, i
realized that wbinfo -t is to verify
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Avinash Raoavinash@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I have entered the following in smb.conf file
winbind uid = 1-2
winbind gid = 1-2
Henrik Dige Semark skrev:
Adam Tauno WIlliams skrev:
[2009/08/14 18:22:24, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(210)
pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for DomAdmin
[2009/08/14 18:22:24, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(562)
User DomAdmin in passdb, but
John Drescher wrote:
How come I have to disconnect from the domain, rename the computer,
reboot, join the domain and then reboot again.
I usually I do all of that minus the first reboot.
John
I was thinking that I had to reboot after the first step. Thought it gave
me an error, but maybe
I was thinking that I had to reboot after the first step. Thought it gave
me an error, but maybe I am wrong. I'll try it and see.
It does. I just ignore the box.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I've tried to get OCFS2 1.4.1 with CTDB but no success. Maybe you give me idea
what I did wrong.
We have 2 nodes. Both nodes are running on Debian/Lenny. I've tried 2.6.26 and
backported 2.6.29/2.6.30. The access to OCFS2 partition is by iscsi.
The configuration file on both nodes:
smb01:~#
Hi All,
Here is the version number.
r...@akaza-fs:/usr/local/samba/sbin# ./smbd --version
Version 3.2.0
r...@akaza-fs:/usr/local/samba/sbin# ./nmbd --version
Version 3.2.0
Thanks,
Shaun
From: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Reply-To: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009
Thank you Michael. I tried OCFS2. OCFS2 administration looks easier than GFS
one.
Yauheni Labko (Eugene Lobko)
Junior System Administrator
Chapdelaine Co.
(212)208-9150
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 05:10:22 pm Michael Adam wrote:
Yauheni Labko wrote:
Thank you for the answer, Michael.
As
Hi,
I try it once again:
If I compile 3.4 with --enable-merged-build, do I get a own smbd4
binary or does
samba just starts 2 smbd processes?
regards
martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:51:15PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
I try it once again:
If I compile 3.4 with --enable-merged-build, do I get a own smbd4
binary or does
samba just starts 2 smbd processes?
You get a samba4 binary.
Volker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Sorry for the missing text.. what i meant was verify that the
workstation trust account created when the Samba server is added
to the Windows NT domain is working. I don't have a windows NT domain,
I have a samba server running on Ubuntu 8.04 Server and WinXP clients!
And I am trying to get
You get a samba4 binary.
Volker
Thank you for your answer ... and here is my problem,
I get various xxx4 binaries (like smbtorture4 or smbclient4) but
I do not find any samba4 in my the installation target /opt/samba3_4
Did I miss something while compiling?
regards
Martin
--
To
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:09:12PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
You get a samba4 binary.
Volker
Thank you for your answer ... and here is my problem,
I get various xxx4 binaries (like smbtorture4 or smbclient4) but
I do not find any samba4 in my the installation target /opt/samba3_4
Hallo, Avinash,
Du meintest am 17.08.09:
Sorry for the missing text.. what i meant was verify that the
workstation trust account created when the Samba server is added
to the Windows NT domain is working. I don't have a windows NT
domain, I have a samba server running on Ubuntu 8.04
Solved my own problem no thanks to y'all! ;)
There was a difference between the two servers after all, Server 1 had one
network interface, Server 2 had two.
Set the following option in smb.conf on Server 2:
socket address = LISTENING_ADDRESS
And the problem went away,
I'm curious though why
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:28:00PM +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Do you need winbind? Without any Windows server (PDC) you don't need
the winbind crap.
winbind crap?
Volker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Do you have a samba4 binary in the bin/ subdirectory of
the place where you compiled it from? If so, then we're just
missing samba4 in the make install target.
Volker
Yes there it is - /root/samba-3.4/source3/bin/samba4
but the install script does not copy the binary
ok, now I am
Hallo, Volker,
Du meintest am 17.08.09:
Do you need winbind? Without any Windows server (PDC) you don't
need the winbind crap.
winbind crap?
Beg your pardon - in a LAN without any Windows PDC or BDC I don't need
it.
It's fine to know that it works in mixed LANs ... but it's a crutch. And
John Drescher wrote:
I was thinking that I had to reboot after the first step. Thought it
gave
me an error, but maybe I am wrong. I'll try it and see.
It does. I just ignore the box.
I get the error:
The following error occurred attempting to change the computer name to
comp: (The
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Yauheni Labkoy...@chappy.com wrote:
I've tried to get OCFS2 1.4.1 with CTDB but no success. Maybe you give me idea
what I did wrong.
It looks like you're using the ocfs2 standalone kernel cluster stack.
This one doesn't support the locks CTDB needs. You'll need
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:47:13PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
ok, now I am confused - the merged-build samba version
is working without problems or complains although the
samba4 binary is missing ...
How do I get samba3 to start samba4 as second daemon - or
do I have to start both
You have to start both manually, with some special config
settings. I'm afraid I do not have the time right now to
walk you through all this, I'm VERY sorry for that. But none
of this is really finished yet, so it would not really gain
you much anyway.
Volker
Ok Volker, thank you for your
It does. I just ignore the box.
I get the error:
The following error occurred attempting to change the computer name to
comp: (The domain domain was joined under the old computer name
comp)
Access is denied.
I vaguely remember that error. I am sorry perhaps I was wrong and you
need the
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:11:28PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
We wanted to use the merged-build 3.4 of samba in
production environment - so if i understand your last
comment correctly than that is not recommended yet
anyway ... or am I wrong here?
You're right, this is not finished.
John Drescher wrote:
It does. I just ignore the box.
I get the error:
The following error occurred attempting to change the computer name to
comp: (The domain domain was joined under the old computer name
comp)
Access is denied.
I vaguely remember that error. I am sorry perhaps I was
Does anyone know any reviews/articles on Samba 3.4, where it is built
together with Samba4?
I would like to know how it behaves, what are its good and/or bad sides
etc., but generally lack resources to test it myself.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Does anyone know any reviews/articles on Samba 3.4, where it is built
together with Samba4?
I would like to know how it behaves, what are its good and/or bad sides
etc., but generally lack resources to test it myself.
Any pointer to mailing posts touching the
I'm trying to make some DNS server software aware of NetBIOS names on
the local network. Is there an easy and efficient way using Samba to
keep track of what NetBIOS names are present?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On 08/17/2009 12:53 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
I'm trying to make some DNS server software aware of NetBIOS names on
the local network. Is there an easy and efficient way using Samba to
keep track of what NetBIOS names are present?
Thanks.
Use the findsmb utility that ships as part of the
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
On 08/17/2009 12:53 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
I'm trying to make some DNS server software aware of NetBIOS names on
the local network. Is there an easy and efficient way using Samba to
keep track of what NetBIOS names are present?
Thanks.
Use the
Thanks for the findsmb and wins.dat tips! :)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Gerald Carterje...@plainjoe.org wrote:
Another alternative would be to look at integrating your
DNS server with nmbd, perhaps using the wins.dat (or whatever
the WINS db is backed up to now).
Running nmbd is an
winbindd has the capability of doing hostname resolution for
NetBIOS names and can then be added to nsswitch.conf. Check out
the man pages.
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
Thanks for the findsmb and wins.dat tips! :)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Gerald Carterje...@plainjoe.org wrote:
Another
Actually it looks like this is only available for IRIX. I thought
it had been ported to other platforms as well. :-(
Herb Lewis wrote:
winbindd has the capability of doing hostname resolution for
NetBIOS names and can then be added to nsswitch.conf. Check out
the man pages.
Matthew Dempsky
Do you need winbind? Without any Windows server (PDC) you don't
need the winbind crap
winbind crap?
Beg your pardon - in a LAN without any Windows PDC or BDC I don't need
it.
Do you usually call crap to everything you don't need? That's
interesting...
--
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Dale
Schroederd...@briannassaladdressing.com wrote:
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Hello my friends.
Looks like I had seen some light with this small issue.
Normally wet u have a PDC in your network, with Winboxes, AD, NT4, u
must have at least 1 Master
Hallo, Miguel,
Du meintest am 17.08.09:
Do you need winbind? Without any Windows server (PDC) you don't
need the winbind crap
winbind crap?
Beg your pardon - in a LAN without any Windows PDC or BDC I don't
need it.
Do you usually call crap to everything you don't need?
No.
That's
We're running Samba 3.3.4 on RHEL 5 Linux, using Active Directory
authentication.
I've noticed that we are able to assign NTFS Full Control permissions to
directories; however, we are unable to do the same on the files contained
within those directories. Is there a default setting that is
Just wondering if it possible to fetch shadow file from other server and
easily convert it to smbpasswd format ? So that users can use same
password on samba that on mailserver? (without ldap or similar
configurations?)
--
Eero
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:35:44PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Just wondering if it possible to fetch shadow file from other server and
easily convert it to smbpasswd format ? So that users can use same
password on samba that on mailserver? (without ldap or similar
configurations?)
No.
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because I
haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment with no
Windows or Mac computers?
Thanks
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
Am 17.08.2009 um 21:40 schrieb Steve Litt:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked
because I
haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment
with no
Windows or Mac computers?
no.
Thanks
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because I
haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment with no
Windows or Mac computers?
Well, atleast it is more secure than
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because I
haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:55:34PM -0400, John Drescher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because I
haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 07:52:59PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
What is status of Windows 7 with samba 3.4.0 version?
We're trying to make sure that 3.4.1 will work
seamlessly with Win7 RTM code (at least I'm considering
any such bug a show-stopper for 3.4.1). So
3.4.1 might slip a little for
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:18:41PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Plus if Steve French or Jeff ever write the client code
for CIFSFS it has transport encryption built into the
UNIX extensions (krb5 or NTLMv2 keying).
Next one: Once I'm done with my winbind cleanup the next
project there is to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:15:59PM -0400, Dorrian, William M Contractor
ace...@saj wrote:
We're running Samba 3.3.4 on RHEL 5 Linux, using Active Directory
authentication.
I've noticed that we are able to assign NTFS Full Control permissions to
directories; however, we are unable to do
On Monday 17 August 2009 15:55:34 John Drescher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because
I haven't done much with Samba for 9 years.
Is
Steve Litt skrev:
On Monday 17 August 2009 15:55:34 John Drescher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because
I haven't done much with
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment
with no
Windows or Mac computers?
no.
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 08/17/2009 04:25 PM, Henrik Dige Semark wrote:
Steve Litt skrev:
On Monday 17 August 2009 15:55:34 John Drescher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eero
Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Steve Litt kirjoitti:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question
Hello
I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and
'inherit owner'.
By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this
share, its permissions are not quite what I need.
Therefore, I try to use 'force directory mode' or 'inherit permissions'.
However, whenever I
Hallo, Steve,
Du meintest am 17.08.09:
Is there anything Samba can contribute to an all-Linux environment
with no Windows or Mac computers?
I prefer mounting shares via cifs, not via NFS.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-08-16
00:00:04.0 -0600
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-08-17 00:01:12.0
-0600
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Sun Aug 16 06:00:02 2009
+Build status as of Mon Aug
The branch, master has been updated
via b62ce48f007aa93b6c6a7f066f1daf06c7fd1389 (commit)
via 47452b8cecaa9ad17d88e259a9972c5ddd007629 (commit)
via d60f049eaf30d7a717291b2f295cc889efc7afa9 (commit)
via 3b3bde938cd404605b43710478cf7999551071b4 (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 905db3288532131171ca1c54198660d86eef1ae9 (commit)
from b62ce48f007aa93b6c6a7f066f1daf06c7fd1389 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 52108a19a4130af0c241794898c61bf425b914e5 (commit)
from 905db3288532131171ca1c54198660d86eef1ae9 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 87921bf694cf5c733de0179cf188c6a5cbaf48f0 (commit)
from 52108a19a4130af0c241794898c61bf425b914e5 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 36f828bafb973586157e9745593418994a962a34 (commit)
from 87921bf694cf5c733de0179cf188c6a5cbaf48f0 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 3be12b15f1758b54456d49368dbca7f25a99f4cc (commit)
from e873995e31e2f04e708194287a64c66a32cc4948 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 9fa042bb9f71057fc869e37d4cc180e8a772b1bb (commit)
from 3be12b15f1758b54456d49368dbca7f25a99f4cc (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-3-test has been updated
via a01f0a4025d382c1bc82f4992ea4566db4df3818 (commit)
from 8d57806544dade748aaac9cc493deb75d4e95735 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-3-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 6a91468853d9c37993d109b079eb042d1b33cba9 (commit)
from bdccf9831ae530b55d1819c040a3ee5448b24ac3 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-2-test has been updated
via 58ec19243e59e05e0356760115c394b3a0158a63 (commit)
from 6a91468853d9c37993d109b079eb042d1b33cba9 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-2-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 7a79d161838efcec27a159fc40481e7be419b778 (commit)
via 0a5ea25d21a9745508e118a20fca837e74b031df (commit)
via 0a46fd630e38134a080214119e5712673687f7c0 (commit)
via faedda0455da90aa8d5500eb2263b6ade3b72ec1 (commit)
from
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 7505f03eee949bb861f6138be8b5ef86be9c7b7f (commit)
from 9fa042bb9f71057fc869e37d4cc180e8a772b1bb (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-4-stable has been updated
via e1d73ad5256466c078cee699a71244fb4de7f8a4 (commit)
via 0f05b1585485ec6dee142bd811e6cc85923bed23 (commit)
via ce3636bb502da954dfd79afdeb040b1fbfef6faf (commit)
via 3ac99dded70132326ec3f310ad93993ffc68952a (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via 3dee92fcb9af917da439e2c0cb10449d09d4c9ff (commit)
from 7a79d161838efcec27a159fc40481e7be419b778 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 6cc9e4b9006e3f10ff88d20ecd0dd26c2fa63611 (commit)
from 3dee92fcb9af917da439e2c0cb10449d09d4c9ff (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 1b09e36f0bc1942a5156715db21aed1ad403800e (commit)
from 6cc9e4b9006e3f10ff88d20ecd0dd26c2fa63611 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via abe7648609949847c15089cb5096176eba8a6dfa (commit)
via 53196955d47293ebf5956ddbdbbbc131e7116a78 (commit)
from 1b09e36f0bc1942a5156715db21aed1ad403800e (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 7def4ab2da002e9ecc1feaed2916035c214add9f (commit)
from 7505f03eee949bb861f6138be8b5ef86be9c7b7f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 97e1703ee5f647755129c6e859ea77a38200b3af (commit)
from 7def4ab2da002e9ecc1feaed2916035c214add9f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, v3-4-stable has been updated
via 25e378df1869a7ac514124bb699344a1426556b3 (commit)
via 83236f7761f7b526f5e234382b39ead813c8b819 (commit)
from e1d73ad5256466c078cee699a71244fb4de7f8a4 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-stable
- Log
74 matches
Mail list logo
