Thanks for the answer.
So net join ads work fine
Here is my smb.conf :
[global]
workgroup = DDCS67
security = ADS
realm = DDCS67.INTRA
encrypt passwords = yes
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config *:range = 70001-8
idmap config SHORTDOMAINNAME:backend = ad
Hai..
Few questions, before i go start my project.
i now have 2 domains, samba3 with ldap ( DOMAIN1) ( and dns ) , and
separated Win2008R2 (DOMAIN2) ( and dns )
Since i dont have any lic's on my win2008 for users want to know if its
possible to do the following.
Keep the
Yes, sure.
Il 12/02/2013 03.19, Linda W ha scritto:
[homes] is a special name:
from smb.conf manpage:
The [homes] section
If a section called [homes] is included in the configuration file,
services connecting clients to their home directories can be
created on
the fly by the
Dewayne,
I would never have posted the message if my DNS was not functional. Here
are the answers (on the AD server and on the S3 server) for the tests of
the HOWTO :
host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.sc.isc84.org.
_ldap._tcp.sc.isc84.org has SRV record 0 100 389 vspdc.sc.isc84.org.
host -t SRV
I'm forwarding this to the technical list. I can fix this by deleting and
recreating the account, however I'd like to understand why this is
happening.
I have come across a few accounts (out of 300+) that seem to be locked that
will not unlock. These accounts were migrated from S3. Can someone
Forwarding this to the technical list for assistance. If it's not possible
to upgrade from 4.0.0, is there any idea when an upgrade strategy will be
available?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:14 +, Brian Haupt wrote:
Hi everyone
This one is driving me crazy.
Every file that is created in a cifs mounted share is ALWAYS created 0777:
-rwxrwxrwx+
Here is my smb.conf tested with 4.0.3 and 4.1.0pre1-GIT-efd60ae:
[global]
workgroup = MARINA
realm = hh3.site
netbios name = HH1
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have come across a few accounts (out of 300+) that seem to be locked
that will not unlock. These accounts were migrated from S3. Can someone
advise - what am I missing here?
I've reset the password several times via
Dewayne,
I would never have posted the message if my DNS was not functional. Here
are the answers (on the AD server and on the S3 server) for the tests of
the HOWTO :
host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.sc.isc84.org.
_ldap._tcp.sc.isc84.org has SRV record 0 100 389 vspdc.sc.isc84.org.
host -t SRV
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 15:52 -0500, nicholas geovanis wrote:
Here's a short quote from a work-related email I sent earlier today,
announcing AD authentication from a linux VM. It expresses my awe at the
folks who write and maintain Samba, and it's long overdue from me:
It’s been 3 or 4 years
Hello Ricky,
These do not seem to work. samba-tool user setexpiry alters the
accountExpires attribute. samba-tool user enable/disable's behavior is
odd. disable appears to add 2 to the current value and enable subtracts 2
from the updated value (only if it's been disabled). Like this:
Running
Actually it does show locks. Here is the pertinent section:
Locked files:
Pid UidDenyMode Access R/WOplock
SharePath Name Time
--
2752 1149
Hi,
Can you try adding:
veto oplock files = /*.lock/
to your share definition, and seeing what happens. Also if that doesn't
help then try adding:
fake oplocks = yes
just to see what happens. At this point can I just say that I am not
responsible for any file corruption as a result of these
Same thing on both attempts. Here is the veto oplock try:
Locked files:
Pid UidDenyMode Access R/WOplock
SharePath Name Time
--
176601258
Hi,
Okay could you please try:
share modes = no
locking = no
on your share.
Thanks
Ned
On 12 February 2013 15:06, Donny Brooks dbro...@mdah.state.ms.us wrote:
Same thing on both attempts. Here is the veto oplock try:
Locked files:
Pid UidDenyMode Access R/W
Hi
On 12 February 2013 16:03, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ricky,
These do not seem to work. samba-tool user setexpiry alters the
accountExpires attribute. samba-tool user enable/disable's behavior is
odd. disable appears to add 2 to the current value and enable subtracts 2
The way I understand it, 512 is normal account (my account is set to this
and is fine). 16 is locked out. 512+16=528, so 528 is a normal account,
that is locked out. 2 is disabled and if I disable my account, it adds 2
(514). The real problem is that I cannot find a way to change this back to
512
Setup a DC using 4.0.3 - all appears to go fine...
Setup a second DC and everything works fine to here...but I'm not sure
if replication is actually working or not.
Here's what I get from ./samba-tool drs showrepl
I've also done. [./samba-tool drs kcc -Uadministrator
dc2.samba.somedom.local] in
I think that is just a bug. Not sure if its been reported yet or not though.
Ricky
On Feb 12, 2013 11:18 AM, Gregory Sloop gr...@sloop.net wrote:
Setup a DC using 4.0.3 - all appears to go fine...
Setup a second DC and everything works fine to here...but I'm not sure
if replication is
I just set-up replication this morning and saw a similar situation.
I tested it by simply turning off my PDC and seeing what happened -- and
everything worked just fine.
I then also added a new user to this alternate DC, brought up the PDC, killed
the alternate DC after a minute, and checked
That seems to have worked. Thanks for that.
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 09:32 AM CST, Edward Ashley
n...@redmonkeysoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Okay could you please try:
share modes = no
locking = no
on your share.
Thanks
Ned
On 12 February 2013 15:06, Donny Brooks
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote:
The way I understand it, 512 is normal account (my account is set to
this and is fine). 16 is locked out. 512+16=528, so 528 is a normal
account, that is locked out. 2 is disabled and if I disable my account,
it adds 2
System Summary:
centos 6.2
samba 3.5
smbldap-tools 0.9.6
openldap 2.4.23
Hello,
I am installing smb 3.5 on a CentOS 6.2 host using smbldap-tools. I've
previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4 using smb 3.0 but
CentOS now uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the
System Summary:
centos 6.2
samba 3.5
smbldap-tools 0.9.6
openldap 2.4.23
Hello,
I am installing smb 3.5 on a CentOS 6.2 host using smbldap-tools. I've
previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4 using smb 3.0 but
CentOS now uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the
I have:
*389 Directory Server (v1.2) with about 100+ current and active users.
*Separate SAMBA server that I would like to use LDAP credentials to
authenticate with.
Found guides for using LDAP credentials with SAMBA here:
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba
Hi,
how can I what filer server is currently running in samba4, s3fs or ntvfs?
My smb.conf looks like this:
server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind,
ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, web
dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc,
In more recent versions of samba, the server services line is typically
omitted (as is the dcerpc endpoint servers). If you have +smb, -s3fs, you
are using ntvfs, otherwise +s3fs does just what it says (and in your line
there is no smb either, which is good if you are running s3fs). As far as I
Thanks Ricky.
On 02/12/2013 10:08 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
In more recent versions of samba, the server services line is typically
omitted (as is the dcerpc endpoint servers). If you have +smb, -s3fs, you
are using ntvfs, otherwise +s3fs does just what it says (and in your line
there is no smb
So, I'm wondering if anyone has a howto on promoting a non-master DC
to FSMO/Operation master and making it the Primary DC? [I don't see it
in the Wiki and searching doesn't produce anything for me.]
In my particular case, I have a couple of test DC's I've setup. Rather
than tear them down, I
Hi Greg,
Yes, its really that simple, however you may end up needing to transfer
them one role at a time if you end up getting errors (something I had to do
once). Samba-tool needs a bit more documentation (on the wiki that is),
however you can see more info by using --help after any command... I
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 06:17 -0500, Thomas Simmons wrote:
Forwarding this to the technical list for assistance. If it's not possible
to upgrade from 4.0.0, is there any idea when an upgrade strategy will be
available?
So, what happened was this:
We got 4.0.3 ready, thinking that the upgrade
Hi All Experts,
I am about to extend our production Samba4 schema to add a few
intra-organizational attributes (Employee ID,Passport No., Date of
Joining, Date of Leaving) . How can
I make change in my samba4 schema. I have already make a post in the
forum, but got no reply. Sorry for
posting
I meant to send this to the list, but my phone had other ideas:
Ah you are right that it means LOCKOUT. I didn't notice that the
article skipped 4 for some reason and went straight to 8. That makes
much more sense. If samba-tool does not currently support toggling
that bit it should be very easy
On 12 February 2013 23:03, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured out a way to correct this via RSAT, though I still think there is
a problem - I'm sure checking Unlock Account should, well, unlock the
account. Anyhow, In RSAT, if you select View Advanced Features, you
will get an
2013-02-13 06:20 keltezéssel, Vijay Thakur írta:
Hi All Experts,
I am about to extend our production Samba4 schema to add a few
intra-organizational attributes (Employee ID,Passport No., Date of
Joining, Date of Leaving) . How can
I make change in my samba4 schema. I have already make a post
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Thakur
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2013 4:21 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Extend Samba4 Schema Scope
Hi All Experts,
I am about to extend our
Hi,
did you try to do it with winbind,
ldap-sam:trusted=yes
ldapsam:editposix=yes
net sam provision
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via e5b4ac7 Fix bug 9633: recursive mget should continue on EPERM
from 292504a s3:auth: wbcAuthenticateEx gives unix times (bug #9625)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 872a7d6 s3: Make SMB2_GETINFO multi-volume aware.
from e5b4ac7 Fix bug 9633: recursive mget should continue on EPERM
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 4096d6c s3: Make SMB2_GETINFO multi-volume aware.
via d82117a Fix bug #9642 - vfs_afsacl.c won't build.
via 26ce124 autoconf: rename pdb_ldap module to pdb_ldapsam
via 13cba9b source3/wscript: support 'pdb_ldap' module in
The branch, master has been updated
via fa3924f Fix bug 9519 - Samba returns unexpected error on SMB posix
open.
from efd60ae Fix some cut-and-paste and spelling in debug messages
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via a64a617 Add a herald with version string to smbtorture
from fa3924f Fix bug 9519 - Samba returns unexpected error on SMB posix
open.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
42 matches
Mail list logo
