= TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF.
Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place.
Should any of the others be removed as well?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
time on Samba :-) :-).
I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks in Redmond or is
there more to it than that?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:42:03 -0800
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:54:52PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
I must admit to being intrigued as to why they're *very* interested in your
working on Samba fulltime. Is it just to poke at the folks
fileservice once this migration is finished. At the moment I have my
samba
server on the network in a bogus domain and of course there's no useful
communication.
The samba server is set up to use LDAP and is running 3.0.13 under Mandriva.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic
, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must
be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3
mangling, that would help.
Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
, but if it really worked fine to an NT server, then there must
be something better we can do...if we just get more standard looking 8.3
mangling, that would help.
Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
of is that you'll have to make sure all four
sites use the same SID.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074
512-322-0180
there was an error with the printer that claimed the user was btalbot
although kpotts was logged in at the time!
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:25:23 -0500
Looks good so far. I've been running it for several hours and both Jeff and I
are trying to break it. Assuming I don't crash and burn, I'll push it out to
my customer site tonight and if they don't see any
.
Whenever you find yourself in Austin, you'll have to stop by and collect the
beer that I owe you.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
a bug in
commercial software, I don't think I could pay for the fix by promising to buy
someone a beer at an uncertain date in the future. Besides, who wants to
drink a beer with Bill Gates?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:27:31 -0700
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:48PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:43:54 -0700
Can you try with : defer sharing violations = Yes
)
ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such
object)
Do you want another debug level 10 report?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX
.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned anything
correctly). Can you svn update and try and reproduce your problem with
this parameter set to yes. If you can, try setting it to no and seeing
if the problem goes away.
Thanks!
I hope I can get to this in the next few days.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg
fail, I'll try all day
to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know. If it doesn't, I'll put
it on my client's network this evening and let you know how well it works
there.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:01:55 -0500
I'm halfway there. It just failed with defer sharing violations = Yes.
I've changed the flag to No. Since it doesn't always fail, I'll try all day
to get it to fail. If it fails, I'll let you know
SVN on their machine and leave oplocks
off.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you
/smblogmail
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:59:10 -0500
I sent you a large log yesterday but it was blocked by some mail server due
to the size. I've just dropped the email messag on my web server at:
http://www.trinsics.com/~cwg/smblogmail
I just had
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500
[2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782)
ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N
o such object)
These lines appear to all be searching
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:04:37 -0500
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500
[2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782)
ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:02:07 -0700
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:00:48AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
~sigh~ Thanks, but neither the server nor the switch are showing any netw
ork problems.
Hell, we aren't even seeing any collisions
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0500
I haven't been able to reproduce it yet.
Got it!
Open an Excel file. Save it. Go to lunch.
When you return, go to FileSave As... and click on Save to save it over
itself. Say that you want to save the file
intend to turn them back on again.
(What is your favourite color, what is the flight speed of a fully laden
sparrow... :-) ?
Blueno red.
African or European?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
search filter is ok
# ldap filter = ((uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount))
# When the user changes his password, update ntPassword,
# lmPassword and the password fields.
ldap passwd sync = Yes
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic
a test version of Samba 3.0.x ?
I would. I get calls about this from users several times per day!
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
Hi,
I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office
and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use
when we know it isn't.
(BTW, there's a typo on the man page under lock spin count. acquired, not
aquired.)
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues
From: Andreas Haumer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:12:19 +0200
Hi!
Chris Garrigues wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office
and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use
when we know
From: Rashkae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 11:02:35 -0400
I would start with smbstatus to see what workstation/user has the file
open.
None.
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West
/Accounting/Quickbooks/Point Meridian.QBW Wed May 26 10:10:02
2004
When she re-entered quickbooks it gave the usual error that the file was
already in use.
I restarted samba and it let her in.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions
0 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] À3nß ]Ï0ð E ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]
º
½L2ãÀn¾¶¢PDpö Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
(10.2.240.134)
(Don't let accountingiii and accounting3 confuse you.)
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what
[2004/05/18 10:28:08, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_query_request(451)
process_name_query_request: Name query from 10.1.1.187 on subnet 10.1.1.1 for name
SHREDDER00
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions
For the record, the clue was in the Account flags. The account needs to be a
machine account, not a user account. Oops.
Chris
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:46:56 -0500
Brad,
I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of
upgraded
If Brad didn't solve this, I hope someone else has a clue for me.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what
I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still
happens about once a day (but not always the same time). Can anybody suggest
a useful debugging strategy?
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:47:02 -0600
nmbd has been dying on me
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:33:06 -0700
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:07:29AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
I have upgraded to 3.0.2a-2mdk in order to solve another issue, but this still
happens about once a day (but not always the same time). Can
From: Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:58:24 +1000
Can you join other computers to the domain?
Yes, all the 2000 and XP boxes are fine. It's just this one box.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions
it
was a samba problem and from the beginning thought that something bogus was
cached in the NT box.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
domain you will need
to rebuild it as a member server.
Based on the tests that both you and Craig suggested, it appears that the
system is *not* a DC. Server manager doesn't say that it's either a PDC or a
BDC. Also, my cohort, Jeff, is fairly certain that it wasn't a DC before.
Chris
--
Chris
.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't
learned anything
it
searches the domain for another machine with the same name, you may want
to delete the machine account from /etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd
(or whatever backend you are using... smbpasswd -m -x MACHINE_NAME)
we're using the LDAP backend and we did that.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues
that it is *not* a DC? I don't understand why it
thinks it is one.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't apply what you've
\4\23dc=borderent,dc=com\4\0, 25) = 25
time(NULL) = 1080325192
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [FPE USR2], NULL, 8) = 0
--- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGPIPE +++
I'm in over my head on this one. Any idea where I should look next?
Chris
--
Chris
somewhere, probably in
the registry, but I have no idea where to look. Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074 512-322-0180
If you don't
46 matches
Mail list logo
