> From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0800 > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote: > > > > I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND RCVBUF, > > and the file share does seem snappier. I had never messed with these > > options, I just found several places that said setting these to 8192 > > gave a performance increase, so I had always used them. Not any more. > > The trouble with the Internet is that really old advice never dies :-).
I just looked in my own config files and found:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF.
Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place.
Should any of the others be removed as well?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1755
512-322-0180 http://www.trinsics.com
Would you rather proactively pay for
uptime or reactively pay for downtime?
Trinsic Solutions
Your Proactive IT Management Partner
pgpaPKHj5fIEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
