On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:35:13PM +0100, Ian CLANCY wrote:
> Hi List,
> I've created an extensive how to for setup of clustered Samba on GPFS using
> CTDB .
> Can anyone suggest an appropriate forum to share this information .
> Perhaps the Samba Wiki ?.
Putting this into the Samba Wiki would be
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:15:35PM +, Paul Older wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 17:04, "Jeremy Allison" wrote:
>
>
> >On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:36:41AM +, Paul Older wrote:
> >> * A few years ago, Samba made changes to their licensing meaning
> >>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:36:41AM +, Paul Older wrote:
> I think I'm unravelling the mystery I have on this one. I believe the
> situation to be as follows:
>
> * Apple used to deploy the actual open source Samba system with it OSX.
> * A few years ago, Samba made changes to their l
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:54:00AM -0700, Brian Martin wrote:
>
> I have received a suggestion to check whether this might be related
> to a mis-configured off-line synchronization (mobsync.exe) on the
> workstation, which I will check the next time I have access to the
> machine. Assuming I don't
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:14:35PM -0400, Kevin Field wrote:
> >
>
> Thanks Jeremy! I'm not sure how I missed that in the docs. Anyway,
> it is much, much better than before, but still not exactly like
> Windows. For example, we have two folders beginning with C-FZP.
We're never going to give t
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:25:30AM -0600, Jacobson, Jared M @ CSG - CSW wrote:
> Hey, all,
>
> I had a lot of trouble getting login working for Active Directory users
> on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Samba 4 Active Directory domain
> controller. Here are some things I learned that I hope will be u
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:57:21AM -0700, Brian Martin wrote:
> I have Samba 4.0.9 installed under Ubuntu 12.04. It's configured as
> a domain member, with a Windows 2008R2 server being the DC. All
> workstations are running Windows 7. One of my users is reporting
> problems in the following sce
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> Already been down that path. I can't find a network issue anywhere.
> Our samba server itself is set up with a bonded interface which
> attaches to 2 different cards in the switch. I've pulled each
> ethernet cable to see the results
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:53:19AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
> Am 02.10.2013 21:53, schrieb Jeremy Allison:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:38:21AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have run into a problem with our samba4 setup. I have
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:17:18AM -0400, Kevin Field wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help.
> I just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an
> answer.
>
> Switched recently from W2K3 to Samba4.0.9/CentOS6.4 for our
> fileshare for
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:39PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> I see a lot of this in the logs, but can't determine if it really
> means anything:
>
> Oct 2 09:45:28 agentsmith2 smbd[21954]: getpeername failed. Error
> was Transport endpoint is not connected
> Oct 2 09:45:28 agentsmith2 smbd[2
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:20:34AM -0600, Wayne Andersen wrote:
> I have Samba 4.0.9 installed on three Centos servers.
>
> On my primary DC I am getting faults and core dumps.
>
> Oct 2 06:10:37 dc1 smbd[1195]: [2013/10/02 06:10:37.083800, 0]
> ../lib/util/fault.c:72(fault_report)
> Oct 2 06:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:38:21AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have run into a problem with our samba4 setup. I have successfully
> joined a Cisco ISE v1.1.4 (Identity Service Engine) test machine to the
> samba4 AD. User authentication does work but unfortunately the ISE is
> unab
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:38:21AM +0200, Andreas Oster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have run into a problem with our samba4 setup. I have successfully
> joined a Cisco ISE v1.1.4 (Identity Service Engine) test machine to the
> samba4 AD. User authentication does work but unfortunately the ISE is
> unab
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:21:44PM -0300, Thiago Fernandes Crepaldi wrote:
> Andrew, in my company we are also experiencing a higher CPU usage of Samba
> 4 (smbd) if compared to Samba 3.
>
> In fact, it almost reaches 100% of CPU and uses all the memory during *dir
> copies* (individual file copy
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 02:28:47PM +0200, ant...@u-picardie.fr wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> So, in root i run this :
>
>
> git cherry-pick -x 31714c97845fff11b2997c86b5fc3a3bff8ed710
No, it's more complicated. Download the patch file and
do:
git am /path/to/patch-file
to fix in your tr
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:09:42AM +0200, LIBERT Anthony wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I try to install samba on ubuntu server 13.04
>
> So I downloaded the 4.0.9 version of samba but when the make I get
> this error:
>
> ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c : In function 'scavenger_timer' :
> ../source3
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:23:34PM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> actually a symlink it should follow.
>
> In short the Mac OSX smb clients are a steaming pile of dinosaur
> droppings which have subtly different behaviour between at least the
> following versions 10.4, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 that m
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:08:39PM -0500, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
> Using samba 3 as cluster share for many years now and we now need to
> for the create mode on files. This seems to not be working in3.6.15.
>
> [share]
> comment = Share Data
> path = /clustershare/share
> force user = roo
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:29:18PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> I run SAMBA 3.6.15 on a Solaris 10 server that acts as a portal for my MS
> Windows users into a large number of UNIX servers providing amongst other
> things web-servers and ftp-servers.
>
> The SAMBA server has these varied resou
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:44:39PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:48:57AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > It's an old, old check back from when SJIS and EUC were
> > common multi-byte systems.
> >
> > SJIS especially has the prope
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:43:40AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Hi, Jeremy!
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:40:06PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Ok, here is a fix for 3.6.x. Can you test this and see
> > if it fixes the problem ? If so, I'll get this fixed
> &
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:04:53PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:02:26AM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote:
> > On 2013-09-06 10:54 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >
> > > Either that or add another debug inside
> > > convert_string_internal()
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:40:25PM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote:
> On 2013-09-05 11:34 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > No, it doesn't make sense. smb_iconv() vectors
> > through pull and push function pointers that
> > do the actual conversion - that's where the
>
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:02:26AM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote:
> On 2013-09-06 10:54 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > Either that or add another debug inside
> > convert_string_internal() to print out
> > the values of srclen and i_len at various
> > points and
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:28:14PM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I'm still good at adding printf("DEBUG\n") lines around :-)
> so I tried my hand with dtrace for a start.
>
> Here are some examples of what it returns when looking at smb_iconv()
> while I opened the directory and li
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:15:16PM +0200, Laurent Blume wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've noticed this problem for a few years now, I think. I see it popped
> out now and then in discussions. But they always end before a solution
> is given.
>
> So let's try one more time :-)
>
> I have plenty of UT
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:25:15PM +0200, steve wrote:
> Hi
> Yeah, the lesson plan is a good idea!
>
> LibreOffice locks files as you'd expect:) Nothing else works though. I'm
> amazed that no one else has encountered this before.
Every "content management service" software product is based on
t
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:45:49PM +0200, Patric Falinder wrote:
> Ok so I've been testing a little bit more with NFS and while using "force
> user" works just fine, "inherit owner" does not. Inherit owner works just
> fine on the rest of the Samba share that's not on NFS. There must be a way
> to
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:10:38AM +0100, Tris Mabbs wrote:
> Hiya Andrew,
>
> Many thanks for the typically helpful and comprehensive reply :-)
>
> > I think that's probably the right track :-)
> >
> > The code here is triggered when poll() indicates that the socket is
> readable.
> > This socke
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:21:02PM -0400, pisymbol . wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a Windows 2003 Server that is causing rpcclient to SEGV via the
> following command:
>
> $ rpcclient -U Administrator%foobar -c 'netshareenum 502'
> ...
> type: 0x6269: SEC_DESC_OWNER_DEFAULTED SEC_DESC_DACL_DEFAULTE
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:21:02PM -0400, pisymbol . wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a Windows 2003 Server that is causing rpcclient to SEGV via the
> following command:
>
> $ rpcclient -U Administrator%foobar -c 'netshareenum 502'
> ...
> type: 0x6269: SEC_DESC_OWNER_DEFAULTED SEC_DESC_DACL_DEFAULTE
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:00:18AM +0200, Philipp Lies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a strange phenomenon with the transfer speed between windows
> clients and samba servers. Here's the setup:
>
> server 1: centos 6.3 with samba 3.5.10
> server 2: centos 6.4 with samba 3.6.9
> both servers are configu
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 02:05:48AM +0100, Chris Hayes wrote:
>
> Basically, I want to know more about which Samba uses, how much it
> tries to keep the two in sync, etc. For example, a moment ago I
> changed the POSIX ACLs on a file that already had a security.NTACL
> glob in the extended attribut
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56:18PM -0400, Ryan Bair wrote:
> I'm running Samba 4.0.7 on CentOS 6.4 running double duty as DC and file
> server.
>
> OS X clients are taking a _long_ time to list long directories. One
> directory with 10K entries is taking 3-4 minutes to display the entries in
> Fin
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:50:29AM -0400, Ira Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 10:31 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Just a heads-up, because this bug took me absolutely ages to chase down,
> > > and I want to save others the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
> least question 1?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
> On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> >I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in
>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:01:20AM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >> but not all NASs do. there are
> >> several commercial SMB/CIFS implementation out there.
> >
> > Sure, but non available to buy as
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:17:56PM -0500, Chris Weiss wrote:
>
> a cheaper nas will probably use samba,
Or a very expensive one :-). Samba is used mainly in the
low end NAS (due to cost), or extremely high end NAS
(due to flexibility for the vendor to make it do *anything* :-)
> but not all NASs
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30:35AM +0800, blue_sky886 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use library of samba that license is "GPLv2" in my program that is
> proprietary.
>
> The source code version of samba is 3.0.6.
>
> Is it possible to modify the license to "LGPL"?
I'm afraid not. Your only optio
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:12:04AM -0700, Ilya Markov wrote:
> I have read that none of the samba code has been written to explicitly
> support threads, but that there are "sections" are not inherently
> thread-unsafe (e.g. talloc).
>
> I am attempting to write a multi-threaded client to interfa
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:03:33PM -0400, Terre Porter wrote:
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
> SO_SNDBUF=65536
Not to comment on any other thing in your post
bue please remove this line from your smb.conf.
It's voodoo bullshit from the long-ancient past :-)
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:15:34PM -0300, Santiago Pestarini wrote:
> 2013/6/14 Santiago Pestarini :
> > Hi!
> > I was searching for info about this issue and found almost nothing.
> > So, let's go directly to the matters...
> >
> > - Problem:
> > AutoCAD says "You do not have permission to save to
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:45:33AM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote:
> ==
> "All water has a perfect memory and is
>forever trying to get back to where
>it was."
>
>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Tom Jermy wrote:
> I'm wanting to extend vfs shadow_copy2 in samba a little and want to add
> additional information to the snapshot name - it's parsed by str[fp]time with
> the format:
>
> %Y%m%d-%H%M%S
>
> I want to add a 6 arbitrary characters to the
a6ca5656ef3e41019 is the first bad commit
> > commit f77d5d6479c879c8770fbc9a6ca5656ef3e41019
> > Author: Timur Bakeyev
> > Date: Wed Feb 27 16:25:07 2013 -0800
> >
> > Fix bug # 9666 - Broken filtering of link-local addresses.
> >
> > This patch should ad
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:10:46PM +0100, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 4:51 PM
> To: Ferencik, Samuel: Markets (PRG)
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:14:47PM +0100, samuel.feren...@barclays.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our smbclient calls have started failing on connections to Windows 2008 AD
> servers. (Previously there were only Windows 2003 Servers, so we had no
> issues.)
>
> Domain=[INTRANET] OS=[Windows Server 2008
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:28:39PM -0600, Cory Spence wrote:
>
> In all my efforts, I can't seem to get this to work in the lab. Does Samba
> 4 support SMB 3.0 encrypted shares? This would include either where the
> Samba server is serving out an encrypted share as the file server or as a
> clie
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:02:23AM -0700, Jessica Guynn wrote:
> Is there a parameter for smb config for incoming connections to originate
> from ports greater than 1024 (insecure ports)?
smbd doesn't care what port number the incoming connection is
arriving from.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 04:44:37PM +, CCOR58 wrote:
> Hi
> I am new today here and have a couple of confusing items I hope
> someone here o the list can straighten out for me.
>
> 1. The definitions of the served usershares apprears in more than
> one location; in ubutu 12.04 LTS there appears
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 02:22:19PM +0100, taom...@inwind.it wrote:
>
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=160161
>
> This is my issue report for 3.6.13 version. Looking at the thread posts, it
> is a common issue. After some test what I found is that samba (only 3.6.13
> version) in sha
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:09:16PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> This backtrace looks like it might be something to do with your recent
> struct DIR work. The revision 5727bfa is from master after the work you
> did for Ceph in the VFS.
I think David nailed it. I think this is like
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
>
> Ok, eliminating both "Valid users" and "admin users" and adding "write list =
> %S" to the [homes] share appears for have solved the issue.
>
> Thanks!
Great - that makes me feel a lot happier about the
safety of your solution :-
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:18:46PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:01:02PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> [homes]
> >> admin users = %S
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:01:02PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
>
>
> [homes]
>admin users = %S
Having admins users = %S seems strange. Is this what you want ?
admin users (S)
This is a list of users who will be granted administrative
privileges on the share. This means
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:01:21AM -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> > From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
> >
> > Start with only smbd and depending on your configuration the
> > VFS modules. Depending on whether you need NetBIOS, you
> > might also need nmbd. Please try to av
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:44:11AM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
> We've had basically no issues with an older samba 3.4 installation working
> with Win 7, but suddenly this morning, "homes" shares are acting strange.
>
> I can create new folders, I can create new documents. However, any attempt to
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:46:48PM -0400, Dylan Klomparens wrote:
> I am trying to figure out why winbind is using 100% CPU on my file server.
> I am using Samba version 4.0.4. Everything is fine for a few minutes when I
> start winbind, however after a while it begins using 100% CPU. I haven't
> b
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:37:47PM +0200, BOTZ Franck (Informaticien) - DDT
67/SG/MGI/CI wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My S4 is configured as a file server.
>
> The AD DC is a 2003 win server.
>
> My users are talking about slow speed on open pst file or other largest file.
>
> I have this in my smb.con
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:52:08AM -0700, Khanh N. wrote:
> Thanks, for the reply.
>
> I did read quite a few HowTo's about joing an AD and setup Samba that way.
> However, my company's IT department won't give out an LDAP binding user
> account because of their security policies, hence I need th
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:01:12PM -0700, Khanh N. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been search for almost a week, and I think I'm at a dead end without a
> solution.
>
> Initially, I wanted to setup a Centos Samba server for Windows users of our
> company lab, and use our company's AD/LDAP for log-in wit
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:24:20PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > If I see it right, we could avoid most of those calls.
> > First, they are only relevant to see whether we can do
> > sendfile. That choice i
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:24:20PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 03:18:53PM +0100, Frank Kautz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when re-exporting the parallel (network) file-system FhGFS, I noticed a
> > significantly reduced read performance. In the output of strace, I see a
>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:44:35AM +, Marcel Hernandez Bertran wrote:
>
> I'd like to know if there's any way to bind a source IP address for smbclient
> requests, the likes of ssh's -b argument:
>
> ssh [-1246AaCfgkMNnqsTtVvXxY] [-b bind_address]...
>
> -b bind_address
>Use bin
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:54:52PM -0400, Mark Drummond wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Been fighting with this all day and I am at a loss. Maybe I've been
> staring at it too long. I'm getting a "not permitted to access this
> share error" where I think I should be getting in no problem.
>
> user 'fizbi
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:59:49PM -0500, Cory Spence wrote:
> Hello Samba folks,
>
> Server 2012 has an option to create encrypted shares which enable
> in-transit data encryption between Windows 8 clients using SMB 3.0.
>
> (
> http://blogs.technet.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/communityse
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:41:56PM -0800, rmarquez wrote:
> Trying to get a linux samba file server using samba 4.0.3 (compiled on the
> machine) running on ubuntu 3.8rc6 kernel to share out and negotiate with a
> linux client running the same kernel and smbd compiled from 4.0.3 samba
> source.
>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:53:16PM +0100, Daniel Hedblom wrote:
> I guess this works as intended but i wanted to put it here anyhow for
> future reference for others.
>
> If a share definition is located above [Global] it gets totally different
> attributes. We had enormous problems with rights on
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:42:02AM +0100, Joeri Vanthienen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've downloaded the samba 3.6.12 OpenCSW package.
> I joined openindiana to the the active directory, winbind seems to
> work fine, I see all the users with "wbinfo -u".
> However, my samba server is not starting. It seems
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:01:04AM +0100, d.guthm...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hello Samba-Specialists,
>
> which smb.conf-options do I have to set to get access to a Samba-Share from a
> Windows7-Machine, if the Windows7-Machine is very restrictive configured
> regarding 'smb-signing'?
>
> Windows7-Con
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:41:35PM +1000, C Waddy wrote:
> No luck so far with a suitable solution for file replication to BDC and
> retain ntfs perms..
>
> After testing again with Rsync, it will not preserve NTFS permissions, no
> matter what flags are used?
>
> Glusterfs is cool but only for 6
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:13:39PM -0800, Gregory Sloop wrote:
>
> I'm in the same boat, and I'm only aware of two possibilities.
>
> 1) Robocopy - using a Windows client.
>BUT Robocopy doesn't do file deltas - changed files are copied in
>their entirety. Which isn't a problem if you don'
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:00:23PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> I've a weird problem with Samba. I'm using Samba to share a filesystem
> between
> two linux systems because I believe I need byte range locking to prevent
> multiple processes on different computers from reading/writing the same ISA
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:27:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [Please CC me in reply, I'm not subscribed]
>
> On two of our machines, "net rpc share allowedusers" gives the error
> "Coult not query secdesc for share", partial debug log (-d10) below.
>
> The servers are both running Wi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Papp Tamas wrote:
> hi All,
>
>
> We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64.
> We use this smb.conf:
>
> [global]
> socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
> SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072
Remove the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01:11AM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Hi Jeremy. Thanks for the reply. Would that mean that it is not
> possible to use the recycle bin in the ADS domain mode?
It's nothing to do with the ADS domain mode, it's to
do with what fileserver backend you're using.
smbd ==
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
> checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
> Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I file it
> as a bug report - or Samba
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
> >>
> >> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:03:08PM -0500, Alex Korobkin wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> In Samba 3.6, rpc_server/spoolss/srv_spoolss_nt.c file has this stance at
> line 1740:
>
> /* some sanity check because you can open a printer or a print
> server */
> /* aka: \\server\printer or \\server */
>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>
> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
> it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
> in a file system or some table in some kind of non-filesytem media
> library. If you can'
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:50:39PM +0100, Ray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at home I only use Linux, so no problem there. Even all my
> Squeezebox radios haven't got any problem with "special" characters,
> which is not really a surprise, because under the hood they also run
> Linux.
>
> But I also run a sit
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:54:26PM +0800, Kinglok, Fong wrote:
> My machine is running samba 4.0.3 inside a DomU of Debian Wheezy.
>
> Following the Samba AD Howto and running Samba 4.0.3 successfully but with
> one pretty serious problem. When I try access the folder with 1000 files,
> the spe
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:21:43AM +, Nirmit Kansal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to implement the the samba in the source code of my project and for
> this I need to do the command line part through my code
> So I need the APIs for doing the things, like add user and all other things
> so,
> I
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:09:43PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> Ok, now I'm stuck...
>
> We have several stand-alone UNIX (AIX) systems that we need to share a few
> SMB shares from. None of these are joined to our domain.
>
> We want the end-users to be able to map these shares to their W
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:31:57PM +, Steve Tice wrote:
> Jeremy Allison samba.org> writes:
>
> >
> > There's no code in Samba to do this unless you're doing it
> > via a client.
> >
> > You could write custom code to pull the data out of t
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:07:26PM +, Steve Tice wrote:
> My organization is in the position of having to support full
> Windows ACLs on CIFS shares. We've been successfully utilizing
> Samba 3.5.10-125 and vfs_acl_tdb to accomplish that. However,
> the size of the resulting
> /var/lib/samba/st
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:46:16PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> >See if there's a config.log. Look for things to do with "nls",
> >"i18n", "l10n", "gettext" etc.
> >
> >Btw, I think OpenLDAP and "Active Directory support" are only relevant
> >to client/member support for AD. The Samba 4.x AD
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:58:08PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> As a further follow-up, here's an example, from source3/utils/net_cache.c:
>
> d_printf(_("Key: %s\t Timeout: %s\t Value: %s %s\n"), keystr,
> timeout_str, datastr, timeout > now_t ? "": _("(expired)"));
>
> My
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 04:47:56PM +, Steve Tice wrote:
> Jeremy Allison samba.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:24:04PM -0600, Steve Tice wrote:
> > > Can anybody provide the expected response to an SMB2 CREATE request that
> > >
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:24:04PM -0600, Steve Tice wrote:
> Can anybody provide the expected response to an SMB2 CREATE request that
> includes ACCESS_SYSTEM_SECURITY in the DesiredAccess mask? I’m particularly
> interested in cases where the SMB client is connected as an authenticated
> user wit
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:57:24PM +, Bjoren Davis wrote:
> Hello Samba folks,
> I have come across a problem with smbclient 3.5.6 when I use the tar 'x'
> feature.
> Pathnames that work out to be 100 characters long are extracted incorrectly:
> bash-3.2$ tar tvf ugh.tar
> -rw-r--r-- bdavis/Do
Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0
=
December 11th 2012.
The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 4.0, a major
new release of the award-winning Free Software file, print and
authentication server suite for Microsof
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:34:46PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
> I am using version 3.5.6 so I could use that but obviously don't want to
> negate it with an upgrade.
>
> I'm thinking I must crazy to ask for "force directory security mode"
> parameter to come back?
Well they were very confusing, a
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
> I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an
> Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the
> permissions each day.
>
> At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to:
>
> root@backbl
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
> I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an
> Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the
> permissions each day.
>
> At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to:
>
> root@backbl
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:44:53PM +0100, Adrian Berlin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Seems I cannot send attach to lists.samba.org
>
> Debug file with level 10 below:
Please log a bug @ bugzilla.samba.org and
attach the log there.
Lists aren't the place for debug files.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscrib
e send the quotes directly to me j...@samba.org (unless
you're happy to send to the lists).
Thanks in advance, and I hope Samba4 works well for everyone,
as we've had a lot of fun developing it !
Cheers,
Jeremy Allison,
Samba Team.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:53:53AM +0100, Adrian Berlin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Debug file with level 10 attached.
I didn't say post to the list (it got stripped anyway :-).
I said log a bug and attach the log there.
Hope this helps,
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:47:19AM +0100, Adrian Berlin wrote:
> Hi!
> Do you have any feedback?
> Best regards/Adrian Berlin
At this point you need to log a bug and attach a debug level 10
log showing the problem.
Hope this helps,
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following UR
1 - 100 of 2729 matches
Mail list logo
