Hi,
I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help. I
just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an answer.
Switched recently from W2K3 to Samba4.0.9/CentOS6.4 for our fileshare
for WinXP clients.
Have an ancient (1995!) piece of software that uses
On 2013-10-03 2:38 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:17:18AM -0400, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help.
I just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an
answer.
Switched recently from W2K3
Hi,
Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving Windows XP clients here. I still
haven't sat down and figured out Windows-RID-to-unix-ID maps yet.
However, I noticed that I can put a person's lowercased name in a 'valid
users' list for a share and it works, even though they don't have a unix
account.
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler per the example at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions to my
smb.conf. Works great.
My concern is that the recycle dir will eventually grow large.
On 2013-09-26 10:20 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 08:47 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler per the example at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions to my
On 2013-09-26 10:37 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 09:24 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
On 2013-09-26 10:20 AM, Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 09/26/2013 08:47 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hi all,
Running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on CentOS 6.4 serving as an AD DC and
fileshare for XP clients.
Added recycler
On 2013-09-25 8:03 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
On 2013-09-25 2:47 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
inherit acls = yes
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
On a
On 2013-09-25 2:47 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Kevin Field wrote:
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
inherit acls = yes
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 box running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC
replicating from a W2k3 box.
If I run gpresult /s OLDDC /user MYDOM\Me on a command prompt on
OLDDC, I get a normal output, listing which GPOs are applied.
If I run gpresult /s NEWDC /user MYDOM\Me in the same place, I get
of the RPC server seem to function fine and then after some
amount of time no longer seem to be available?
Thanks,
Kev
On 2013-09-06 2:49 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Nothing too interesting:
$ sudo tail -n 50 /var/log/samba/log.smbd
smbd version 4.0.8-SerNet-RedHat-4.el6 started.
Copyright
Yep, that's exactly it. Thanks!
Kev
On 2013-09-06 10:16 AM, Ricky Nance wrote:
Have you disabled syslinux? That is what that change looks like to me.
Ricky
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I just noticed something
, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
(Just for the record, I haven't restarted samba in a couple weeks now.)
That's very interesting: via the IP, it is browsable.
As for the outputs:
$ sudo netstat -anp | grep samba\|smb
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0
as needed),
also I am interested if top has anything to say about samba or smbd (as
for processor and memory usage).
Ricky
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
Yep, that's exactly it. Thanks!
Kev
On 2013-09-06 10:16 AM
with it. I also wonder if, if I leave GEYSER
logged in long enough, I'll have the same result on it as I do on OLDDC.
So nobody else is having this browsability problem, eh?
Kev
On 2013-08-24 1:41 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hmm...it hasn't been long enough since a restart yet, because it's not
doing
also wonder if, if I leave GEYSER
logged in long enough, I'll have the same result on it as I do on OLDDC.
So nobody else is having this browsability problem, eh?
Kev
On 2013-08-24 1:41 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Hmm...it hasn't been long enough since a restart yet, because it's not
doing it ATM
/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable without restart
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC
and see what the output of 'df
-h' is.
Ricky
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I've upgraded to 4.0.9 and this behaviour persists.
Should I file a bug report, do you think? �Is nobody else
experiencing this?
Thanks
Hi,
On CentOS 6.4 (newdc), I have CUPS 1.4.2-50.el6_4.5 installed, can
access its web interface. There I set up our main shared printer, an
OCE Imagistics cm2520, and successfully printed a test page.
With SerNet Samba 4.0.9 on the same box configured every which example
way I could find,
to the
underlying directories (even if the underlying directory is 777, because
the user simply can't get to that point)...
If anyone disagree's or could explain this better please feel free to do
so, I am not opposed to learning new things :)
Ricky
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Kevin Field k
) is 755
permissions. Samba does run as root, but it also still obeys the rules
underlying file system.
Ricky
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I can understand that.
However, I'm a bit confused about how this is supposed
to the folder it will cause things to fail, which is the case
with the 'me' part of /home/me/share as it has 0700 permissions).
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
Oh, so it only looks at the immediate parent's permissions
. Also since you are using a /home/me
before your share, you need to make sure you have at least 755
permissions in both /home and /home/me, it might be a good idea to make
a directory named /srv/mytestshare instead.
Ricky
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). When I first launch Samba using
`sudo samba`, I can go to the Windows server and browse to \\newdc in
Explorer, and I see mytestshare, netlogon, printers, sysvol, and
Printers and Faxes.
since you are using a /home/me
before your share, you need to make sure you have at least 755
permissions in both /home and /home/me, it might be a good idea to make
a directory named /srv/mytestshare instead.
Ricky
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share.
I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod and then an attempted
file save causes a shared file to become zero bytes (despite the save
not being blank, and
BTW, I just confirmed this also happens with SELinux disabled. -K
On 2013-08-20 11:23 AM, Kevin Field wrote:
I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc)
replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share.
I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod
://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable without restart
I have
is fixed in 4.0.9:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9820
*From: *Kevin Field k...@mydomain.com
*To: *samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:38:32 AM
*Subject: *[Samba] AD DC eventually not browsable
One other thing, I just noticed that while \\newdc is still unbrowsable,
\\newdc\mytestshare works fine, as does \\newdc\netlogon.
Kev
On 2013-08-20 9:49 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Okay, I'm not sure, but I don't *think* it's that bug. First, I don't
know much about winbind, and never meant
://www.revsys.com/writings/quicktips/turn-off-selinux.html
Ricky
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Field k...@brantaero.com
mailto:k...@brantaero.com wrote:
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is
successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. �I'm following the
HOWTO
Hi Marc,
On 2013-08-15 4:18 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hello Kevin, hello Eli,
Am 15.08.2013 05:48, schrieb Kevin Field:
I get to the step /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
192.168.1.252 _msdcs.domain.co.il 2d59ac49-1175-4656-943e-d556baa242cb
CNAME DC2.domain.co.il -Uadministrator
I
Hi everyone,
I had posted recently about getting Samba4 to work on CentOS 6.4 but
having changes only replicating in one direction, from the Win2k3 AD but
not back to it. I solved the problem, this time, by disabling iptables.
I find it a bit hard to understand. These are the rules I have
With iptables disabled until I can figure out appropriate rules (
http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg104592.html -- what do you do
then? ) I added a user using samba-tool user add. If I go to the
Windows box and fire up ADUC, the user is not there, even though the AD
Replication Status
Thanks for your help, Thomas.
I think it was the missing state part of some of the lines. When I
use your example, it replicates, even in both directions this time!
Which is quite odd, since without iptables running, I still had problems
getting my Samba test user to replicate over to the
I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is
successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO
here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares
[mytest]
path = /home/me/mytestshare -- with or without trailing slash
: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
---
-Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Kevin Field
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. August 2013 16:15
Hi Eli,
I'm trying to join a freshly compiled 4.0.3 installation as an
additional DC to an existing W2K3 AD according to:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
I have built samba 4.0.3 on CentOS 6.3 x86_64. I am using the method
that describes using the built in
I have a CentOS 6.4 box with SerNet's Samba 4.0.8 installed and no
smb.conf file yet, as it should be. I want it to become an AD DC in my
existing Windows domain, replicating from the existing Windows Server
2003 box. I have SELinux enabled and want it to stay that way.
I'm getting this error
39 matches
Mail list logo
