Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Rati
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Kristyan Osborne wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anyone has played with Microsoft's SMS 2003? I've got a Samba 3 PDC using an LDAP backend, and a Windows 2003 server running SMS 2003. The SMS 2003 setup moans that it cannot verify

Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Rati
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't

Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Rati
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:43:34AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: I have a very similar setup (if not exact) as the original poster and am having the same problem. The only difference there might be is that I am running Windows 2003 SP1, whereas the original poster didn't

Re: [Samba] SMS 2003 and Samba

2005-06-22 Thread Robert Rati
Then how would I make sure the network capture gets sent to the correct people? Just send it to one person (not the list) that has responded (ie Jeremy Allison or possibly yourself)? Rob Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote

[Fwd: [Samba] Still having groupmap problems]

2003-12-18 Thread Robert Rati
this. Would that cause a problem? Rob Original Message Subject: [Samba] Still having groupmap problems Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:00:19 -0600 From: Robert Rati[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have two samba servers on two separate subnets that are comprising a single domain

Re: [Fwd: [Samba] Still having groupmap problems]

2003-12-18 Thread Robert Rati
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote: | Dec 18 13:35:36 wdselab-a-1-100 net: ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem | during the LDAP search: LDAP error: invalid DN (Invalid DN | syntax)ldapsam_search_one_group: Query was: ou=Groups,dc=domain

[Samba] Still having groupmap problems

2003-12-17 Thread Robert Rati
I have two samba servers on two separate subnets that are comprising a single domain, and one of the samba servers is also the LDAP server. I've gotten everything configured except that I can't use the groupmap command. When I run: net groupmap add sid=SID-512 ntgroup=Domain Admins

Re: [Samba] Group Mapping problems

2003-12-16 Thread Robert Rati
Dickie wrote: I think a debug level 5 will show you exactly what its looking for. You can do smbcontrol smbd debug 5 to set that. hth, Greg On Monday 15 December 2003 17:27, Robert Rati wrote: I'm trying to map my LDAP groups to Windows Groups, but I'm not having any luck. Here is a group I'm

[Samba] Group Mapping problems

2003-12-15 Thread Robert Rati
I'm trying to map my LDAP groups to Windows Groups, but I'm not having any luck. Here is a group I'm trying to map: dn: cn=dom_admin,ou=Groups,dc=wdselab objectClass: sambaGroupMapping objectClass: posixGroup gidNumber: 1000 cn: dom_admin memberUid: dom_admin description: Domain

[Samba] More info on Home Drive mapping problems

2003-12-05 Thread Robert Rati
I'm running Samba 3.0 on Debain stable (compiled myself) with LDAP as the backend authentication. I've gotten everything working except home drive mapping (which I've gotten to work with limited success). I turned on log level 5 on my samba server, and I found that if I don't enable that

Re: [Samba] Home Drive Mapping problems

2003-12-04 Thread Robert Rati
? The only way I've gotten a home directory mapped is by enabling the path variable, but then ALL home drives the user looks at are that exact path. Rob Computer Science wrote: Replace valid users for users. Simple fix once you know this is the problem. Leo Robert Rati wrote: I've got Samba

[Samba] Home Drive Mapping problems

2003-12-03 Thread Robert Rati
I've got Samba 3.0 on a Debian stable system set up to authenticate using an LDAP server (also on the Debian system), and I'm having problems getting home drive mapping to work. What I would like, is that if someone browses to the Samba server (on a win2k PC), they can see all the home drives

[Samba] Groups and LDAP

2003-11-20 Thread Robert Rati
I'm a little weak on how the groups assignments work with Samba and LDAP. The Samba HOWTO collection says to map each Domain Group to a UNIX system group, but if all authentication is done via LDAP (Unix and Windows) then do the groups still have to exist on the Samba Unix machine? Where do

Re: [Samba] Groups and LDAP

2003-11-20 Thread Robert Rati
will now be the Domain Admins group on Windows clients. Any users that are added to the ntadmins unix group will be members of the Domain Admins group. To confirm the mapping just use net groupmap list. Patrick Robert Rati wrote: I'm a little weak on how the groups assignments work with Samba

Re: [Samba] Win2K Password Hash

2003-11-11 Thread Robert Rati
requirement? All the information I've found regarding setting up LDAP in this regard has been sketchy at best. I would think I'd have to configure a base dn atleast, but I haven't found out how to do this. Rob Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:50, Robert Rati wrote: I have a Samba 3.0

[Samba] Win2k Password Hash

2003-11-10 Thread Robert Rati
I posted this earlier, but never saw it show up in the mailing list so I'm posting it again. I have a Samba 3.0 PDC using LDAP as it's password database backend, but I can't get a user to log on to a Win2k machine on the domain. In the log file for the PC (on the Samba machine), I see that

[Samba] Win2K Password Hash

2003-11-10 Thread Robert Rati
I have a Samba 3.0 PDC using LDAP as it's password database backend, but I can't get a user to log on to a Win2k machine on the domain. In the log file for the PC (on the Samba machine), I see that the user is found in the LDAP backend but that getpwnam failed. The username does not exist on

[Samba] User Logon Problem

2003-11-07 Thread Robert Rati
I have a Samba 3.0 PDC talking to an LDAP server, but I can't get a user to log in on a Windows 2000 client. I see this in the log file: [2003/11/07 11:37:20, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(818) User tester in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2003/11/07 11:37:20, 0]

Re: [Samba] Win2K or Samba Caching?

2003-11-03 Thread Robert Rati
- Hash: SHA1 Robert Rati wrote: | I have a PDC that is Samba 3.0 setup to talk to an OpenLDAP server for | authentication, and I was able to get a user to log in to a Windows 2000 | machine on the domain. Then I tried adding additional users, but none | of them could log in. So I tried deleting

[Samba] Win2K or Samba Caching?

2003-10-31 Thread Robert Rati
I have a PDC that is Samba 3.0 setup to talk to an OpenLDAP server for authentication, and I was able to get a user to log in to a Windows 2000 machine on the domain. Then I tried adding additional users, but none of them could log in. So I tried deleting the admin user from the LDAP

[Samba] Samba 3.0 + LDAP + Machine accounts

2003-10-27 Thread Robert Rati
I'm trying to setup Samba 3.0 to talk to an LDAP server for authentication, but I can't get any communication to the LDAP server from Samba when a machine attempts to join the domain. I see the machine sending out the broadcast request to join the domain, but the samba server does not respond

[Samba] Samba + LDAP

2003-10-20 Thread Robert Rati
Does anyone know if the binaries provided by the Samba team are compiled with LDAP support? I've tried 2.2.8a and 3.0.0 for Debian, but both complain that the ldap parameters (like ldap server) for unknown. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the

Re: [Samba] Samba + LDAP

2003-10-20 Thread Robert Rati
Adam Williams wrote: Does anyone know if the binaries provided by the Samba team are compiled with LDAP support? I've tried 2.2.8a and 3.0.0 for Debian, but both complain that the ldap parameters (like ldap server) for unknown. Just ldd /usr/sbin/smbd. Is libldap in the list? If not, than

[Samba] Samba compiled with LDAP support?

2003-10-17 Thread Robert Rati
Are the 2.2.8a Debian Samba packaes provided by the Samba team compiled with LDAP support? I figured they would be, but when I try to configure a LDAP option in smb.conf, I get an error in log.smbd like this: [2003/10/17 11:58:12, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2093) Unknown parameter

[Samba] Help using multiple file servers

2003-09-10 Thread Robert Rati
I am trying to setup samba so that I can authenticate users from a single server, but use multiple file servers to server the home directories and user profiles. How would I go about doing this? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

Re: [Samba] Help using multiple file servers

2003-09-10 Thread Robert Rati
I'm not sure this will solve the problem I am looking at. I can see an LDAP server for authentication (although I currently don't have one setup and would prefer not to have to set one up), but how does an LDAP server help with the home directory and profile serving? If a user logs onto

[Samba] Samba authentication

2003-09-09 Thread Robert Rati
Is it possible to have two samba servers in two separate domains acting as PDCs authenticate against each other for logins? IE server A attempts to authenticate against B and then itself, and server B attempts to authenticate against A and then itself. Any help doing this would be very much

Re: [Samba] Samba authentication

2003-09-09 Thread Robert Rati
B auth from server A and then B. And server A auth from server A then B. Are you sure you don't want to replicate servers A B's databases? - Original Message - From: Robert Rati [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:31 am Subject: [Samba] Samba authentication

[Samba] Problems with 2 server and 2 domains

2003-09-05 Thread Robert Rati
I am trying to set up a windows Domain with Samba 2.2.8a and 2.2.7 on Debian and Redhat systems (respectively). This network has two subnets, so I have a samba server for each subnet, and they are configured to pass netbios traffic to each other so both networks can be seen in network