to have a function that calculated the character length
after conversion to UCS2 since it's much more efficient to calculate (/2)
than that of a multi-byte charset. Maybe there is.. need to take a look.
Thanks,
Shirish
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Shirish
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Shirish Kalele wrote:
In init_unistr2, the string length for the UNISTR2 structure seems to be set
equal to the number of bytes occupied by the string when encoded in the Unix
charset (i.e. the value returned by strlen
Hi,
In init_unistr2, the string length for the UNISTR2 structure seems to be set
equal to the number of bytes occupied by the string when encoded in the Unix
charset (i.e. the value returned by strlen()). This is not necessarily the
number of characters in the string (given UTF-8 and other
can be as much as 6 bytes.
Ken
Ken Cross
Network Storage Solutions
Phone 865.675.4070 ext 31
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Shirish Kalele
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:08 PM
-infolevels.
attached you'll find a backport of the msdfs-proxy for 2_2, maybe you could
have a quick look and comment on that one too.
thanks again,
guenther
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:15:17PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
Hi,
This is cool. Which Windows clients have you tested
Hi,
Please upgrade to the latest version of Samba 2.2.x. I think this was
fixed in 2.2.4.
Regards,
Shirish
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
: Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shirish Kalele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Wiebach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: msdfs referrals at share-level
hello shirish,
we made some more experiments with the dfs-code and now have a running
Hi,
Clients do request dfs referrals for every share they connect to. In a dfs
reply for a share, you could try and send a different sharename and see what
happens. I don't know if clients will be able to handle this. Look for
self_referral in the setup_dfs_referral() code to find out where to
Hi John,
Yes, the msdfs code only tries the entire path and the path one level up
when asked for a dfs referral. There didn't seem to be a case where the
redirector ever jumped straight to a path without resolving each component
first (which would result in a correct referral). But it looks like
Steve,
There are two extra DWORDs of similar form in the NTCreateX replies sent
by Windows 2000. Win2K sends 42 words instead of the known 34.
While exploring client-side caching, I discovered that these are actually
access masks for the User who's opening the file and Everyone Else
the standard Unix permissions. It needs to be extended to handle
POSIX ACLs.
- Shirish
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 04:15:20PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
Steve,
There are two extra DWORDs of similar form in the NTCreateX replies sent
by Windows 2000. Win2K
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 04:15:20PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
Steve,
There are two extra DWORDs of similar form in the NTCreateX replies sent
by Windows 2000. Win2K sends 42 words instead of the known 34.
While exploring client-side caching, I
I think Steve French's cifsfs module for linux does understand dfs. I don't
know where to get it though.
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Ken Stone wrote:
Can anyone point me to any documentation on the internals of
Microsoft's
Dfs?
Better yet, does anyone know of a unix/linux client that
with a Win 2000 client, it worked. So I'll try
to figure out what's wrong with my NT4. If you have any clue,
let me know!!!
Thank you for your help,
Pierre B.
Shirish Kalele wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I just tried this out here and it works fine. Must be a problem with your
setup.
Can you map
Jerry,
csc policy is for client-side offline caching. I think Damir is looking
for Samba to support files offlined by storage managers like HSM. Both are
called offline files. One of the reasons the csc policy parameter was so
named.
Samba could set the 'offline' flag in the files attributes to
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Shirish Kalele wrote:
As I understood it (and I could be wrong), indicating offline wasn't
a problem, the problem was finding out if a file was offline. I'm
sure Damir could code up a custom fix to make Samba do it (using
ioctl's or whatever) and distribute
Jerry,
csc policy is for client-side offline caching. I think Damir is looking
for Samba to support files offlined by storage managers like HSM. Both are
called offline files. One of the reasons the csc policy parameter was so
named.
Samba could set the 'offline' flag in the files attributes to
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Shirish Kalele wrote:
As I understood it (and I could be wrong), indicating offline wasn't
a problem, the problem was finding out if a file was offline. I'm
sure Damir could code up a custom fix to make Samba do it (using
ioctl's or whatever) and distribute
18 matches
Mail list logo
