Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 17:13:28 schrieb Gerhard Stein:
nope, it didn't help:
gerstrong@ZController:~$ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
zcontroller calcdom.local Z37 A IP -k yes
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741811, 'Unexpected
information received')
File
I just found this:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS - Under troubleshoot
Let me try it out first.
Am 10.10.2013 15:07, schrieb Gerhard Stein:
I have had an IP Address Record of the name Z37 which was
192.168.2.203. Using nslookup I find it, but samba-tool queries the
name and shows 0
nope, it didn't help:
gerstrong@ZController:~$ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add
zcontroller calcdom.local Z37 A IP -k yes
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741811, 'Unexpected
information received')
File
/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py,
I have had an IP Address Record of the name Z37 which was 192.168.2.203.
Using nslookup I find it, but samba-tool queries the name and shows 0
Records?
$ nslookup Z37
Server:192.168.2.1
Address:192.168.2.1#53
Name:Z37.calcdom.local
Address: 192.168.2.203
$ samba-tool dns
Hi there
We're having problems with users attaching to our (winbind) Samba
servers and being assigned the same UID. Rarely happens - not repeatable
- but definitely a pattern
Anyway, I've been googling about and I think I've figured out the root
cause, so I thought I'd check with the community
...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von dahopk...@comcast.net
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 18:59
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Question on approach to authenticate Linux against Samba4
This is in a test environment: Also, it is wordy, but I'm hoping it explains
my scenario.
I am migrating
Thank you for the help ... seems like almost there but .. short version ..
getent passwd doesn't retrieve any information from the samba4 DC. Seems that
nslcd tries to use a simple bind and not kerberos but I think I have nslcd.conf
set correctly. Rest of story, see below.
For good measure
10.04 didn't work
except for the warning about sasl not being complete ...
- Original Message -
From: dahopk...@comcast.net
To: steve st...@steve-ss.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:23:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Question on approach to authenticate Linux
This is in a test environment: Also, it is wordy, but I'm hoping it explains my
scenario.
I am migrating from a custom LDAP+Samba3 authentication solution to Samba4. I
have used the classicupgrade option to pull off the data from the existing ldap
server to populate the samba4 database.
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:59 +, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
I have read through the recent thread on winbind and honestly I am not sure
that I want to pursue either winbind or sssd if it is possible to use
nss_pam_ldap which seems closest to the current approach.
Hi
Ok, I can
as step 8 is to join the domain).
Sincerely,
Dave Hopkins
- Original Message -
From: steve st...@steve-ss.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:45:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Question on approach to authenticate Linux against Samba4
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16
On 25/07/13 17:59, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
1) will the unixHomedirectory be honored?
2) will I be able to easily add users so that the unix settings will
be properly configured? I currently use the IDEALX smbldap tools.
Being able to script account creation is very important to me ..
On 25/07/13 20:14, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
[SNIP]
Step 6: I already have samba-common, and samba-common-bin (latest for
10.04) installed. I'd assume I need to uninstall these and install
samba4 instead (especially as step 8 is to join the domain).
Not familiar with Ubuntu, but that is
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 19:14 +, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
Thank you for the very quick response. But in trying to follow the
suggested link, there are few steps are different.
First, Step 3 is to install various packages. I already have
auth-client-config installed which had
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 20:59 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On 25/07/13 20:14, dahopk...@comcast.net wrote:
[SNIP]
Step 6: I already have samba-common, and samba-common-bin (latest for
10.04) installed. I'd assume I need to uninstall these and install
samba4 instead (especially as
Hi,
Recently I'm trying Samba over Ceph (kernel client) mount. I encounter
error when I add permission to file/directory for an additional user
from Windows Explorer. Since Ceph does not support posix ACL operation
for now, I was thinking that vfs_acl_xattr/vfs_acl_tdb with option
ignore
Am 2013-02-22 08:36, schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times,
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
in a file system or
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
it does not make a
On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
What we have here is a
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Rob Townley rob.town...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20,
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider The Wall from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's In
The Flesh.mp3 and In The Flesh?.mp3 as tracks. Or, another example
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider The Wall from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 05:09:58 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, 04:18:33 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 20:16:15 schrieb Ray:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 20:50 +0100, Ray wrote:
Hi,
at home I only use Linux, so no problem there. Even all my Squeezebox
radios haven't got any problem with special characters, which is not
really a surprise, because under the hood they also run Linux.
But I also run a site-to-site VPN
On 20.02.2013 10:37, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
The issue is that you have been abusing your file system to store
metadata in the file names. A practice that is always going to end in
trouble. For example what do you do when a filename for your chosen
metadata format exceeds the maximum length
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
in a file system or some table in some kind of non-filesytem media
library. If you can't
with windows and unix with these files.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: rob.town...@gmail.com
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Rob Townley
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 0:34
Aan: Jonathan Buzzard
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Question marks, asterisks
@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Question marks, asterisks, colons in filenames
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
jonat...@buzzard.me.uk wrote:
On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing
...@gmail.com
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Rob Townley
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 0:34
Aan: Jonathan Buzzard
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Question marks, asterisks, colons in
filenames
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
jonat...@buzzard.me.uk wrote
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:50:39PM +0100, Ray wrote:
Hi,
at home I only use Linux, so no problem there. Even all my
Squeezebox radios haven't got any problem with special characters,
which is not really a surprise, because under the hood they also run
Linux.
But I also run a site-to-site
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider The Wall from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's In
The Flesh.mp3 and In The Flesh?.mp3 as tracks. Or, another example in
an MP3 collection: There's a Band called Stellar,
On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider The Wall from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's In
The Flesh.mp3 and In The Flesh?.mp3 as tracks. Or, another example in
an MP3 collection:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
jonat...@buzzard.me.uk wrote:
On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
Hi,
I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
Google brings up nothing useful:
Consider The Wall from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's In
The
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Stoica
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2013 12:22 AM
To: sa...@samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Question about implementing samba4 cleartext
passwords
Hello
I want
Hello
I want to create a domain using samba4 and from there to authenticate
users against ad. The challange for me is that i have never worked out
with domain or with ldap , and that i need to use AD users/passwords to
authenticate not only the domain clients , but the mail users and
perhaps
Hi.
I am not a developer, or IT person, so, I have what is probably a dumb
question. I am looking for a way to connect my kindle fire to my company
network through vpn. I have established a connection, but am not able to see
anything on the network. I had downloaded an app from AntTek that
Hi,
We are having some performances problems with users that have folders
shared over their internal networks.
We were wondering, when the user list files using dir *.dat or calls
/FirstNextFile , is the filtering done on the local or on the remote
one?
Thanks in advance!
--
Enrico
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 23:23 +0100, Enrico Scantamburlo wrote:
Hi,
We are having some performances problems with users that have folders
shared over their internal networks.
We were wondering, when the user list files using dir *.dat or calls
/FirstNextFile , is the filtering done on the
...@lists.samba.org on behalf of Schorsch
Sent: Sat 13-10-2012 8:39
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Question about printing
Hello all,
is it possible to print from a linux box to a printer, shared on a
windows 7 box?
In Windows 7 the Administrator account is deactivated without a password
Hello all,
is it possible to print from a linux box to a printer, shared on a
windows 7 box?
In Windows 7 the Administrator account is deactivated without a password
in default.
Have i to enable the account?
Have i to set a password?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello All,
I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba
3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some
pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is
RHEL and i am using RHEL 6 upstream packages for samba. My question is,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Anthony Boccia aboc...@afilias.info wrote:
Hello All,
I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba
3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some
pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The
On 25/07/12 15:39, Anthony Boccia wrote:
Hello All,
I haven been having issues joining my windows 7 client to a samba
3.5.10-125 PDC. I have been doing some reading online and have found some
pages that suggest that samba3x plays better with windows 7. The PDC OS is
RHEL and i am using RHEL 6
samba3x is essentially anything beyond the original Samba 3.0 packages.
However, the fact they didn't bump samba3x is actually not true. Redhat
started doing this with RHEL5.4 as a technology preview with Samba 3.3:
Hello, everyone,
My server is Samba 3.5 on Centos 6.2. It is a stand alone file server
and now I have trouble to set the correct permission.
My goal is to set 0770 on all the share, including files and
directories. here is my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = GEO
server string
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 12:40 -0600, Daniel Patrick Sullivan wrote:
Hi, Everybody,
I sent an email to this list with a couple of questions in it earlier
this week; this is kind of a 'repeat' question, so I apologize if
you've read this one already; I wanted to flesh out the details of my
Hi, Everybody,
I sent an email to this list with a couple of questions in it earlier
this week; this is kind of a 'repeat' question, so I apologize if
you've read this one already; I wanted to flesh out the details of my
inquisition a tad bit more in hopes that somebody could potentially
chime in
Hello all,
I have migrated an old Win2k Active Directory to a Samba4 only
domain. Because the provision step has not been used I now do
not have the dns.keytab file for secure dynamic DNS updates
with bind9. I have found a useful link here:
Andreas Oster aoster at
novanetwork.de writes:
Hello all,
I have migrated an old Win2k Active
Directory to a Samba4 only
domain. Because the provision step
has not been used I now do
not have the dns.keytab file for secure
dynamic DNS updates
with bind9. I have found a useful link
From: Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:23:48 -0600
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in smb.conf like read only users = or
something like that?
read list = user1 user2
Am 13.12.2011
I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users.
for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users.
and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and
grant read only permissions to user2 and user3
how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that?
my
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, skull skul...@gmx.ch wrote:
I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users.
for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users.
and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1
and
grant read only permissions to user2 and
Is it possible using Samba to have a user access a share for a one-time
only session?
In particular, what I mean is, is it possible to have a printer shared
through Samba so that everytime a user tries to print through the share,
they are asked to reaunthenticate? Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Keith Lynn l...@cis.usouthal.edu wrote:
In particular, what I mean is, is it possible to have a printer shared
through Samba so that everytime a user tries to print through the share,
they are asked to reaunthenticate?
Not an answer (sorry), but I'm curious as
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Dale Schroeder [mailto:d...@briannassaladdressing.com]
Inviato: venerdì 29 luglio 2011 19:31
A: Andrea Lanza
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Oggetto: Re: [Samba] question about groups
Andrea,
How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share' and also on all existing
subfolders
Can I use Samba to transfer a image folder from Windows to Linux via usb flash
drive?
You don't need samba for that. Simply copy your image folder to the
flash disk. Then insert the flash disk in your linux machine, where
(normally) it should appear on your desktop.
Good luck.
--
To
From: Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:30:31 -0500
Andrea,
How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share' and also on all existing
subfolders of /path/to/share.
In the share definition, you could also add
directory mask = 2770
force
Hi all,
I have a (simple?) question about groups.
this is my scenario:
Windows Active directory domain
Samba file server ADS integrated
2 shares on this last server (share1, share2)
2 groups on the AD (group1 and group2)
First share is only fully available to group1: this is easily done
Andrea,
How about doing 'chmod 2770 /path/to/share' and also on all existing
subfolders of /path/to/share.
In the share definition, you could also add
directory mask = 2770
force directory mode = 2770
Dale
On 07/29/2011 6:03 AM, Andrea Lanza wrote:
Hi all,
I have a (simple?)
Can I use Samba to transfer a image folder from Windows to Linux via usb flash
drive?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello!
I want to use Samba only as authentication server that stores groups and user
accounts. With no shares (excluding, of course [netlogon]), no printers...
So, I think that it is do not really need to create UNIX groups and users in my
case. Is it possible to work without creating users in
Andrey,
It is good idea, but you sure that no another ways to manage users\groups?
I know that LDAP is good and scalable solution, but in case of very small
network tdbsam passdb backend is more easy to use.
Best regards,
Artem.
06.07.2011, 15:12, Андрей Гребенников
Thx
James Peach sent something similar to me too..
darn vfs objects :) Thx james :)
I remember now on irix we had to do some stuff with these.
I do not see the cacheprime vfs object on FC13 but I
do see readahead so I guess I will start with that...
I also heard that there are
On 17 January 2011 08:14, Chris Duffy c...@small-tree.com wrote:
We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13,
10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system
as the client. We will be adding some Windows
machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces.
We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec
We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13,
10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system
as the client. We will be adding some Windows
machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces.
We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec read or write
performance between the Mac and the FC13 system
over 10Gbit
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:14:04AM -0600, Chris Duffy wrote:
We are testing Samba 3 (and 4) on Fedora Core 13,
10Gbit connection with a Mac OS 10.6.4 system
as the client. We will be adding some Windows
machines sooner or later with 10Gbit interfaces.
We are seeing 100-150MBytes/sec read
Hello Jeremy,
Unfortunately the patch link no longer works. Can you find a copy
of it and I'll take a look ?
I tried to contact Martin Zielinski (no success :-() and I still wait for an
answer from SEH Computertechnik GmbH, but I found this in an mail archive: [1].
From what is written in
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:42:06PM +0100, Timo Denissen wrote:
I found this [1] in the samba archives. Has the patch been patched into
samba?
If so, has it been removed later? I am still looking for a way to change the
location string for printer objects with rpcclient and haven't found a
I found this [1] in the samba archives. Has the patch been patched into samba?
If so, has it been removed later? I am still looking for a way to change the
location string for printer objects with rpcclient and haven't found a solution
yet :-(
[1]
Hello,
I have a problem concerning Samba, CUPS and rpcclient: When I add a printer
using CUPS and share it with samba I enter a location and a comment, the latter
is shown in Microsoft Windows network neighborhood as a comment (as it should
be), but the location is not set. When I do a
At 07:25 AM 9/18/2010 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:38:21 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
In both versions it seems like hard-links work and symbolic
links fail
That's expected. The core cifs protocol as implemented in windows
doesn't support symlinks.
Ah, well then
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:38:21 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
...
This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Hello,
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
I mount up the Windows share, then run a script that expands
about ten TAR format
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:00 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out
Hello,
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
I mount up the Windows share, then run a script that expands
about ten TAR format archives containing a couple of hundred
files with the 'pax' utility.
At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
Oops. I see the problem is that CIFS, at least in the older
stable versions, does not support hard
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:49:49 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
Oops. I see the problem is that
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to
proceed.
...
This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:00:14 -0400
starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote:
Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS
5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure
At 08:44 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
RHEL6 is fairly current with mainline code (at least as of this past
spring or so). If it works OK on Fedora, it should be OK in RHEL6.
Super. I'll try loading up the 6 beta in a VM and check it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On 9/12/2010 1:06 PM, brandon berumen wrote:
i have a media player which is the one at this link:
http://www.argosy.tw/product-detial.php?prod_id=154 they say i can use samba
with this. my question is this, i already have a substantial amount of data
stored on this hdd. if i were to install
i have a media player which is the one at this link:
http://www.argosy.tw/product-detial.php?prod_id=154 they say i can use samba
with this. my question is this, i already have a substantial amount of data
stored on this hdd. if i were to install samba now would i lose my data? do i
need to
Hello,
I'm writing a FUSE fs which cooperates with the automounter to offer the
user easy and effective access
to all kinds of resources, like USB and CDrom devices, and SMB shares.
see:
http://linux.bononline.nl/projects/mount.md5key.new/
Now I want to make my FUSE fs aware a share and
Figured out that logins require the domain\username as the username now
to login without kerberos.
Regards,
Mark
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:50:58PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Anyone got any thoughts about this?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:32:28AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Hi There,
I've
Anyone got any thoughts about this?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:32:28AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Hi There,
I've just upgraded to 2 new 2008 R2 domain controllers, and had been
using 2003 integration with samba successfully. After hitting this issue
Hi There,
I've just upgraded to 2 new 2008 R2 domain controllers, and had been
using 2003 integration with samba successfully. After hitting this issue
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6700 I upgraded my samba to
3.4.8, which seems to be working OK for pc hosts.
However, I used to also
Hi all,
Juste a little bit question :
why some user have two IPC$ connection.
example :
18331 jfc Utilisateurs m559
transferts 18331 m559 Wed Jul 7 08:02:15 2010
sys 18331 m559 Wed Jul 7 08:02:10 2010
jfc 18331 m559 Wed Jul
All,
I'm trying to find out if you can limit Samba to only pull user accounts
from a particular Active Directory OU. My AD has over 200K contacts entries
for the global address list so I would like samba to only query the location
with the valid user accounts. I'm running samba 3.0.1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian,
You are first going to want to update samba as the current version of
the 3.0 codebase is discontinued and getting no security updates:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba3_Release_Planning
It may also help to post what your smb.conf to see
I've been looking over mailing lists and I've seen multiple having issues with
joining a domain using an account on a different domain I'm wondering if there
is a solution. The example is something like this:
The server needs to be a member of the cntrlsrvs.w2k.vt.edu domain however the
account
2010 20:21:08 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: Rhshshgs Sdasdad r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between WinXP and
Win7
Also information about the differences and workarounds using profile
?
This there a link available How to setup samba with win 7 clients?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
between WinXP and Win7
Robert
remove the .V2 share and then remove your profiles from vista/win
7 at this
reg key
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList
then all will work as expected
?
This there a link available How to setup samba with win 7 clients?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile
?
This there a link available How to setup samba with win 7 clients?
regards robert
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference
-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:37:34 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between
WinXP and Win7
Robert
remove the .V2 share and then remove your
16:37:34 +0100
Von: Damien Dye damien.j@googlemail.com
An: r...@gmx.at
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] question difference of roaming profile between
WinXP and Win7
Robert
remove the .V2 share and then remove your profiles from vista/win 7 at
this
reg key
1 - 100 of 622 matches
Mail list logo
