Hallo, Pakorn,
Du (pakorn) meintest am 24.04.08:
There's a lot of different users who will log into the workstation,
all of them are not superuser, therefore they can't run mount command
and specify their samba username/password.
You may set the SUID flag for mount,cifs and umount.cifs on
Michael Heydon wrote:
Pakorn Chutinimitkul wrote:
Hi again,
I updated Samba on both client and server to 3.0.28a. Client is
openSuSE 10.2. Server is Debian Lenny. I noticed that newly created
file's
ownership will be changed to username that is used when mounting CIFS
volume (under -o
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Pakorn,
snip
You may set the SUID flag for mount,cifs and umount.cifs on the
server.
That could be a security hazard. If we assume that cifs unix extensions
can be made to work, I could bring in my laptop which contains a SUID
root binary and mount it to my
The client is running 2.6.18 stock kernel. It shud be a year and a half old or
so. I saw cifs module loaded.
Here's the output from modinfo cifs
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.7-default/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko
author: Steve French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
license:GPL
Hallo, Michael,
Du (michaelh) meintest am 24.04.08:
You may set the SUID flag for mount,cifs and umount.cifs on the
server.
That could be a security hazard.
One mistake (from me): these flags must be set on the client. The client
tries to mount, and it uses its local mount.cifs.
If we
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Du (michaelh) meintest am 24.04.08:
You may set the SUID flag for mount,cifs and umount.cifs on the
server.
That could be a security hazard.
One mistake (from me): these flags must be set on the client. The client
tries to mount, and it uses its
Hallo, Pakorn,
Du (pakorn) meintest am 24.04.08:
There's a lot of different users who will log into the workstation,
all of them are not superuser, therefore they can't run mount command
and specify their samba username/password. I tried to create a Samba
account for each machine, say
Hi Helmut,
I'll give it a try. Just for my curiosity, is there a way to bypass
Samba's authentication?
Thank you!
Pakorn
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Pakorn,
Du (pakorn) meintest am 24.04.08:
There's a lot of different users who will log into the workstation,
all of them are not
Hallo, Pakorn,
Du (pakorn) meintest am 24.04.08:
I'll give it a try. Just for my curiosity, is there a way to bypass
Samba's authentication?
That may (should) depend from the allowed users. In our LANs there is no
user guest or nobody allowed, we haven't tried them.
Viele Gruesse!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a tool I found that will join the computer to the new domain and
then allow you to change the sid of the user profile to the new sid of the
the new domain. Email me and I will email it to you. I do not remember
where I got it from other wise I would have
It looks like 3.0.28a may be the only release with these problems.
3.0.28 works fine. Although all releases are showing failed look ups
for S-1-1-0 and S-1-5-2. Do these need to be added?
I have opened Bug 5414. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5414
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 10:49 +1200,
There is a tool I found that will join the computer to the new domain and
then allow you to change the sid of the user profile to the new sid of the
the new domain. Email me and I will email it to you. I do not remember
where I got it from other wise I would have sent you a link.
wbinfo can turn names into sids, sids into names, and sids into uids.
However, getent passwd only finds users in the local /etc/passwd file.
Same for getent group. /etc/nsswitch.conf says this:
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
shadow: compat
I strace'd the
Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there is any support for samba and terminal services? I
currently have two windows boxes, one with terminal services installed and
the other with active directory. From what I have seen
At 12:01 18/04/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
veto files = /.??*/
Thanks. I guess hide dot files = yes is deprecated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Konstantin,
Just in case, check that nmbd is running.
Thanks,
Leonid
Konstantin Gredeskoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] ???/ ?
?:
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Samba gurus,
I have a Fedora 8 linux server, running samba 3.0.28a-0.fc8. I am
doing the simplest thing of all -
Hi Jerry,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply. Please see below.
Hi all,
I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however
the
bug is supposed to be fixed by now.
I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows
Should I be running winbindd in this situation?
Not really, winbind is used for things like a samba server authenticating
against a Windows server and NTLM authentication.
You can just make the second box look at the ldap server on the first, or
if you like, run an ldap slave on the
Perhaps, though, I am asking the wrong question.
Here is what I have (on one Linux server):
- OpenLDAP
- Samba 3.0, user data stored in LDAP
- local Unix users / groups resolved via LDAP
I have added another Linux machine and local Unix users / groups are
resolved via
Hi Adam,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:32:31 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
idmap will only be populated if you are using winbind.
Ah, that is definately not clear from what I read.
The configuration example and text http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/
Anand Kumria wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:32:31 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
snip
Here is what I have (on one Linux server):
- OpenLDAP
- Samba 3.0, user data stored in LDAP
- local Unix users / groups resolved via LDAP
I have added another Linux machine and local Unix users /
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote:
You only need 1 WINS server for your organization (or 2 for redundancy). We
have multiple subnets here at OSU and only 2 WINS servers. Our DHCP
servers had out the WINS server IP addresses to all clients, and Samba is
configured to use them
Hi again, list!
Please please please! Any indeas are highly welcome!
It is possible with Linux? Maybe someone tried Solaris with ZFS with
Samba? Should I try this maybe?
Thanks in advance,
A.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Ash Gosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to be too complex
Please please please! Any indeas are highly welcome!
Ash - did you try setting hide unreadable = yes on the share as per my
previous email?
Alex
--
Alex Harrington - Network Manager
Longhill High School
t: 01273 304086 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hi,
I'm really lost with this problem. Here is my /etc/pam.conf, maybe
someone can help me, the system still keeps kicking me out of telnet and
local console. id and group commands are now working, group is not
working on every user.
#
#ident @(#)pam.conf 1.14 99/09/16 SMI
#
# Copyright (c)
To: Oliver Weinmann
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] RE: Samba 3.0.28a under Solaris 8 + libnss_winbind.so
problem?
Hi,
does your /etc/nsswitch.conf contain the winbind name service modules?
This should look like this:
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
Oliver
Hi,
does your /etc/nsswitch.conf contain the winbind name service modules?
This should look like this:
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
Oliver Weinmann schrieb:
Hi,
I'm really lost with this problem. Here is my /etc/pam.conf, maybe
someone can help me, the system
It seems to be too complex for me. I'll share my config, please tell me what
also I need to do:
parts from smb.conf:
nt acl support = yes
acl compatibility = win2k
map acl inherit = yes
.
[michael]
path = /home/shared/michael
valid users = +users
read
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ash Gosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I need to create a share that will be readoble by root only (by owner) and
writeable for all. We replacing a dead Windows NT 4.0 server and there was a
permission type called Add and our users uses this type of permission
Ash Gosh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ash Gosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I need to create a share that will be readoble by root only (by owner) and
writeable for all. We replacing a dead Windows NT 4.0 server and there was a
permission type called Add and our users uses this
Ash Gosh wrote:
I need to create a share that will be readoble by root only (by owner) and
writeable for all.
Real easy. We did it to create a quarantine share for Windows AV
agents to move viruses to. The share is world-writable - but not
readable by anyone
You simply create a share and
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I did this once a couple of years ago using NT style policy and
the firewall policy object. IIRC, I did it all at the file system level;
each computers' SYSTEM service was allowed to write to a text file that
Thanks for the answer but in this case anyone can look into the folder
and see the file
list. Sometimes even a filenames could be the secret. So this is not
helps us.
Set hide unreadable = yes on the share.
Alex
--
Alex Harrington - Network Manager, Longhill High School
t: 01273 304086 |
Ash Gosh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I did this once a couple of years ago using NT style policy and
the firewall policy object. IIRC, I did it all at the file system level;
each computers' SYSTEM service was allowed to write
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Real easy. We did it to create a quarantine share for Windows AV agents
to move viruses to. The share is world-writable - but not readable by anyone
You simply create a share and set the following smb.conf settings
Alan Bunch wrote:
I am currently running Red Hat v 3 samba rpm's.
samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
samba-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
I would like to run the current release version to see if I can clean up
some of the problems I am having. File locking and not releasing are
the
Mr. Gowda,
Please review the following prior posts:
HOW TO: Migrating users' locally-stored profiles from one domain or
workgroup to a new domain
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-December/115326.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-December/115413.html
Note that I have
It's getting even more strange. After a reboot i can now use id, group
still doesn't work and my telnet and login session get disconnected after a
few minutes. If I change the /etc/pam.conf back to normal I don't get
disconnected. Any ideas?
On 4/4/08, Oliver Weinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem solved.
The AD admin turned off server signing and samba is able to join the
domain.
-Original Message-
From: Naadir Jeewa
Sent: 01 April 2008 16:07
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Strong(er) authentication required when joining Active
Directory (Samba 3.0.28)
Hello all,
Hi,
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
we have similiar problems with samba+ldap after updating to 3.0.27.
But in our case, the following ldap-Attributes won't get updated:
sambaPwdMustChange
sambaPwdCanChange
only sambPwdLastSet gets altered.
in newly created accounts the two Attributes even won't be
Linux == Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux I finally got this started working for ssh after changing
Linux things like privilege seperation, allowkerberos login
Linux parameters in sshd_config. Still not sure about why su was
Linux not working. Anyways thanks for your
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:34:13 -0500
Christopher DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to mount a CIFS share with the following stipulations:
1. I must have the UNIX extensions (specfically, symlinks).
2. I must use plaintext authentication (don't ask).
I've
Greg Zartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been using Samba for about 7 years of so, but have hit a hurdle I
just can't seem to figure out.
I want to setup samba domain member servers to be members of a samba
3.0.25 (NT4 type) domain. No windbind, LDAP, or
A user cannot access a Linux machine unless he is authenticated by the
machine.
Jamrock,
Many thanks for your very informative response. The makes complete
sense really.
Ultimately, I'm sure LDAP is the best solution and one I intend to look
at in more detail.
A message to the Samba
Madars Vitolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
For samba acting as PDC with ldap backend (openldap) is it possible to
hook some how password change event?
So that if user in windows changes domain user password, it will update
ldap account as usual but is
Mesterhazy Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we have a Samba 3.0.24 server on a Fedora Core 5 system and we use it as
PDC. I have client machines with Windows XP SP2.
What I want:
- some machines (for example machine1) should be used only by user1 and
user2
-
On Sunday 30 March 2008 12:24:54 pm Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote:
A user cannot access a Linux machine unless he is authenticated by the
machine.
Jamrock,
Many thanks for your very informative response. The makes complete
sense really.
Ultimately, I'm sure LDAP is the best solution and
Adam Williams wrote:
i don't think you need the domain=W2K3ADDOMAIN in your mount
statement. i've never had to use it anyway.
Before I did that, I'd get Bad User/Password errors on the windows
server. At least now Windows sees it working.
It seems like my problem is that CIFS authenticates
More information on my problem:
_
From: Tosh, Michael J
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:36 AM
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Mount error 13
I am trying to connect a SLES9 server to a share on a Windows 2003
domain.
More information on my problem: (with text this time)
linuxserver:/var/log # date;mount -v -t cifs //server/share /mnt/share
-o credentials=.cifs_creds
Wed Mar 26 12:03:38 EST 2008
parsing options: rw,credentials=.cifs_creds
Domain W2K3ADDOMAIN
mount.cifs kernel mount options
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 schrieb Tosh, Michael J:
More information on my problem: (with text this time)
linuxserver:/var/log # date;mount -v -t cifs //server/share /mnt/share
-o credentials=.cifs_creds
Wed Mar 26 12:03:38 EST 2008
parsing options: rw,credentials=.cifs_creds
Domain
Guenter Kukkukk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 schrieb Tosh, Michael J:
More information on my problem: (with text this time)
linuxserver:/var/log # date;mount -v -t cifs //server/share
/mnt/share -o credentials=.cifs_creds Wed Mar 26 12:03:38 EST 2008
parsing options:
i don't think you need the domain=W2K3ADDOMAIN in your mount statement.
i've never had to use it anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Doug VanLeuven wrote:
What you're fighting with the snapshots is the windows machine changes
the password every 7-30 days depending on the version service pack.
So depending on the timing, a reverted snapshot won't work anymore.
Depending on the timing, every snapshot could have a different
Rich West wrote:
It might be easier to remove the system from the domain and re-add it to
the domain...
Except I have several copies of this VM saved, so rejoining one fixes one VM
only.
If it is troublesome to extract the string from Windows, then I will junk all
of the snapshots and start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Lueck wrote:
Rich West wrote:
It might be easier to remove the system from the domain and re-add it
to the domain...
Except I have several copies of this VM saved, so rejoining one fixes
one VM only.
If it is troublesome to extract
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Lueck wrote:
| Rich West wrote:
| It might be easier to remove the system from the domain and re-add it
| to the domain...
|
| Except I have several copies of this VM saved, so rejoining one fixes
| one VM only.
|
| If it is troublesome to
mingj a écrit :
I set up a Point-n-Print printer server with Samba3.0.28 and it works fine
from XP, but when I try to connect and install the printer driver from Vista
machines, it gives me 0x57 error, does anybody know why this is happening?
I later found out it's AddPrinterConnection call
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Lukasz Szybalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Günter Kukkukk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski:
After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same
issue as
The driver is Vista compliant because I can install the printer on Vista via
local port using the same driver.
After some experiments, I figured out it's the missing help file in
oemsetup.inf that causes the trouble. If I add a HelpFile=x.CHM in
the inf file, then PnP installation will
Andy wrote:
Hay together,
is the following entry in nsswitch.conf possible ?
passwd: compat
passwd_compat: winbind
I want to use the compat mode, so i can use the +/- semantic.
But in this case i cant login with username/password.
If i configure the nsswitch.conf like:
passwd: files winbind
On Thursday 20 March 2008 12:15:24 pm mingj wrote:
Since the same oemsetup.inf works for XP, does anybody know if Vista has
changed the behavior in terms of the requirement for a help file for PnP
installations?
My experimentation suggests that Vista does much stricter checking of all the
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.03.2008, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
we have similiar problems with samba+ldap after updating to 3.0.27.
But in our case, the following ldap-Attributes won't get updated:
sambaPwdMustChange
sambaPwdCanChange
only sambPwdLastSet gets altered.
in newly
Mario Gzuk schrieb:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.03.2008, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
we have similiar problems with samba+ldap after updating to 3.0.27.
But in our case, the following ldap-Attributes won't get updated:
sambaPwdMustChange
sambaPwdCanChange
only sambPwdLastSet gets
Dean, Barry B.Dean at liverpool.ac.uk writes:
Now when I test ntlm_auth I get the following odd goings on:
Scenario A: Works
Type: ntlm_auth --username=USER --password=PASSWORD --domain=DOMAIN
Result: NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0)
Scenario B: FAILS
Type: ntlm_auth
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 15:31:59 Kai Blin wrote:
Dean, Barry B.Dean at liverpool.ac.uk writes:
Now when I test ntlm_auth I get the following odd goings on:
Scenario A: Works
Type: ntlm_auth --username=USER --password=PASSWORD --domain=DOMAIN
Result: NT_STATUS_OK: Success
Hi !
we have similiar problems with samba+ldap after updating to 3.0.27.
But in our case, the following ldap-Attributes won't get updated:
sambaPwdMustChange
sambaPwdCanChange
only sambPwdLastSet gets altered.
in newly created accounts the two Attributes even won't be created !?
I already
we have similiar problems with samba+ldap after updating to 3.0.27.
But in our case, the following ldap-Attributes won't get updated:
sambaPwdMustChange
sambaPwdCanChange
only sambPwdLastSet gets altered.
in newly created accounts the two Attributes even won't be created !?
I already
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Günter Kukkukk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski:
After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same
issue as described here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html
It seems that the net binary treat $1 as something with special meaning, as
in shell script. Thus, the password $ - 111.
Another evidence is that when I change the password for user abc from $
to 11$11,
and run the command:
===
net rpc
Replying to myself:
The problem with changing the SID was that I wasn't changing the SID
everywere. I was changing the SID only on my net setlocalsid,
setdomainsid and the smbldap config file... After I did the
smbldap-populate again, everything worked (the new samba domain now
has the same sids
Kyle Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there some automated system to import windows accounts into a samba
or a samba ldap situation?
I've got a few hundred users on an NT domain, and I'd like to migrate
them sometime before the last piece of hardware
I found it already-- there was a second ocurrence of /usr/loca/... under
[netlogon]. Now why are there two occurrences?
--
J.J. Gerritse
Mühlenstraße 11
D-47546 Kalkar-Wissel
Duitsland
+49-2824-971487
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've had similar problems as well, though I was using Solaris 10u3. I
never have had the time to dedicate to getting it working. On Solaris,
getting the PAM/nsswitch stuff correct enough was my biggest problem
(since on Solaris, PAM is a little
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:40:49PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
I pushed this patch to Steve ~last may. You might want to check that
the kernel you're working with has it. Without it, sec=none doesn't
really do what you expect...
[snip]
We had a customer report that attempting to make CIFS
After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same
issue as described here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html
While using vim on files mounted under CIFS, when trying to write an
existing file you will randomly be warned The file has been changed
since
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2008 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski:
After mounting a windows share via cifs I have came across the same
issue as described here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html
While using vim on files mounted under CIFS, when trying to write an
existing file
On Monday 03 March 2008 13:01:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/2008, joop gerritse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
security = share
This is incorrect for a domain/PDC, should be:
security = user
I changed it, however, no effect seen yet...
When asking questions, it is usually necessary to
On 3/3/2008, joop gerritse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is incorrect for a domain/PDC, should be:
security = user
I changed it, however, no effect seen yet...
Did you restart Samba?
But, like I said before - there were other problems with your config,
but they were basic enough to
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Brian May wrote:
Question: what happens with BDCs? Do you need to specify account
creation scripts on the BDC too?
No, you only need these on the PDC. That's how I have it set up and it
works like a champ.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, John Drescher wrote:
This is why I have 4 LDAP servers. One master and the rest secondary
that sync with the master using synchrepl. Its really easy to add an
LDAP server to just about any linux box and it really does not need
that much power especially if it is one of
I finally got this started working for ssh after changing things like
privilege seperation, allowkerberos login parameters in sshd_config.
Still not sure about why su was not working. Anyways thanks for your
help.
Cheers, LA
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hector == Hector Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hector I added the nss_base_passwd ou=Hosts,dc=jome?one but
Hector nothing seems to change... I don't know if I removed
Hector properly the nscd cache when retying... I rebooted the
Hector computer... Is that ok or do I have to do
Steve == Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve I second this. The syncrepl stuff appears to be as solid as
Steve a rock and is very easy to set up; waay better than the
Steve old slurpd. I went from a master and no slaves to a master
Steve and two slaves, using
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:51 PM, David Eisner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Permissions tab of the Advanced Security Settings dialog, whenever I
uncheck the Allow inheritable permissions from the parent to
propagate to this object and all child objects checkbox, and hit
Apply, the checkbox
Adam == Adam Tauno Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam ldap machine suffix = ou=computers
Adam ldap user suffix = ou=People
I use those (or similar) without any problems.
Adam Specifying these causes problems, it is up to the add script where to
Adam create the account
If the PDC goes down on our network, the primary LDAP server is likely
to go down too, so making any changes to LDAP is not possible without
reconfiguration. So I am uncertain: what is required for the BDC?
This is why I have 4 LDAP servers. One master and the rest secondary
that sync with
Yeah, sure... But it is a field which is part of the sambaSamAccount
objectClass, isn't it? Anyway, thanks for the tag
2008/2/28, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hector == Hector Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hector Thank you Steve and Frank... ... I can see something
Hector in
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Alex Still wrote:
I think I found it.
Samba-3.0.28 calls set_filetime() from real_write_file(), which 3.0.8isn't
doing.
set_filetime - utimes - nfs SETATTR (in my case)
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:19:47 +0800
kstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Samba team,
I feel user will feel more confortable when they can mount folder (via
mount.cifs or mount.smbfs) under particular shared folder.
Example:
I have a share folder call department, all department's folder
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:58:54PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
At least considering to distribute it (or a derived work) as part of
the samba distribution could help samba users to switch from smbfs to
cifs?
Sorry, we
On Feb 20, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Why do we need to check that, expect if we think that unprivileged
processes on our box have access to the keytab?
That would be the concern, yes.
Todd Stecher | Windows Interop Dev
Isilon SystemsP +1-206-315-7500 F
From my readings, only the Heimdahl Kerberos distribution has S4USelf
support, at least in the Samba 4 code base. MIT tries to stay away
from being PAC-cognizent.
It sounds like you're trying to do something slightly different - e.g.
Constrained Delegation, where the identity lives in
BARKAN AVIGDOR wrote:
Hi,
I have written a simple c# program that move file from windows to a Unix path
via samba.
The user that do the work is a full privilege user.
Using a win application this works fine but when I activated the prog. as a win service,
I got a strange activity and
BARKAN AVIGDOR wrote:
Hi,
I have written a simple c# program that move file from windows to a Unix
path via samba.
The user that do the work is a full privilege user.
Using a win application this works fine but when I activated the prog.
as a win service,
I got a strange activity and
pbowers wrote:
To get force create mode and force directory mode to work with cifs
clients try setting unix extensions = no in your smb.conf. It worked for
me.
(chuckle) Just came to report to this list the solution that was finally found.
Indeed, unix extensions = no seems to be the correct
One
other
thing
.
.
.
typically
a
Windows
service
typically
does
not
run
under
the
user
account
logged
into
the
local
machine.
More
commonly,
a
service
is
run
with
either
an
account
created
for
the
service,
the
system
account
or
the
local
administrator
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Alex Still [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We're experiencing performance issues after migrating from 3.0.8 to 3.0.28
.
Write performance has degraded about 30%, regardless of the size of file
being copied. (tests described below are a single 150Mb file
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux == Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux I would assume that the process is winbind and it running
Linux as root. think of anything else.
Are you sure of that? Based on the error, it really looks like
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Alex Still wrote:
I think I found it.
Samba-3.0.28 calls set_filetime() from real_write_file(), which 3.0.8 isn't
doing.
set_filetime - utimes - nfs SETATTR (in my case)
After removing that bit from real_write_file, I get exactly the same
performance
701 - 800 of 8464 matches
Mail list logo
