Are we planning on getting this into 3.0.28a? 30% is a big hit
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Alex Still wrote:
I think I found it.
Samba-3.0.28 calls set_filetime() from real_write_file(), which 3.0.8 isn't
doing.
set_filetime - utimes - nfs SETATTR (in my
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:37:43PM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
Are we planning on getting this into 3.0.28a? 30% is a big hit
I don't think that I will have the time to finish it
tomorrow. And as 3.0.28a will be released on Friday latest
according to Jerry, it won't make it.
Sorry,
Volker
Ross Smith wrote:
The basic problem is that any attempt to change permissions on a file
from a windows workstation results in an Access Denied error.
...
All the files are stored locally on a ZFS volume.
...
[samba]
comment = Main share
path = /globalfs/SAMBAshare
writeable = yes
nt acl
Hector == Hector Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hector Thank you Steve and Frank... ... I can see something
Hector in your Ldifs that I don't have: The objectClass:
Hector sambaSamAccount... I bet this is important in order to
Hector have Samba working!! Hehe... I'll keep
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux == Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
Linux MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2a98c46000 write(1,
Linux Creating directory \'/home/DOM/..., 44Creating
] On
Behalf Of Ross Smith
Sent: 22 February 2008 10:52
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] RE: Samba and ADS authentication problems
Bleh, sorry folks. Two days troubleshooting this and I find the problem
ten minutes after posting. Fixed it by synchronising the time with the
PDC and rebooting
Answering my own question again, after several days of searching I've
again found the solution within minutes of posting a question here.
The answer to the NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE is that you need to create the
/etc/krb5/krb5.keytab file:
yeah, read section 13.6.2 in the samba 3 official howto and reference
guide, it talks about interdomain trusts.
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm not really interested in resolving user information on Unix from a
Windows server. I'm interested in having a single user entry in the
LDAP database be
Linux == Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux I would assume that the process is winbind and it running
Linux as root. think of anything else.
Are you sure of that? Based on the error, it really looks like a
permission issue, and that shouldn't occur if the process is running
Hi,
I have written a simple c# program that move file from windows to a Unix path
via samba.
The user that do the work is a full privilege user.
Using a win application this works fine but when I activated the prog. as a win
service,
I got a strange activity and the prog wasn't been able
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Jeremy,
I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless make
something that works with it. Samba's
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
I guess that for backtrace I have to compile samba with debugging
symbols, haven't I?
Yep - that definately
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
It didn't help. There are still no debugging symbols. But while playing with
CFLAGS and compiling it the problem didn't happen. Couldn't it be related
to compiler flags:
I normally use:
CFLAGS=-march=k8 -O2 -pipe -msse3
In
I'm not really interested in resolving user information on Unix from a
Windows server. I'm interested in having a single user entry in the
LDAP database be able to log into multiple Windows domains. It appears
that the only way that this can be accomplished is via trusts?
Adam Williams
2008/2/21, Rob Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've had this problem on FreeBSD. Basically the behaviour of 'passwd'
changed somewhere between releases 5 and 7. I solved this by writing a
shell wrapper for the passwd tool. As simple as:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/passwd -l $1
Linux == Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
Linux MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2a98c46000 write(1,
Linux Creating directory \'/home/DOM/..., 44Creating directory
Linux '/home/DOM/user1'. ) = 44 mkdir(/home/DOM/user1,
Andrew == Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 16:52 -0500, Ryan Bair wrote:
Samba 4 could eat your children
Andrew I've only ever claimed it could eat your cat...
You were obviously wrong...
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe
Hector Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello people...
I had to sign up in the list because I don't know what else I could
do... I can't find my error anywhere!! :(
Hi Hector,
Can you post your /etc/ldap.conf file and your /etc/nsswitch.conf file?
Are there
Jamrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hector Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello people...
I had to sign up in the list because I don't know what else I could
do... I can't find my error anywhere!! :(
Hi Hector,
Can you
Kyle Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does one go about adding a machine account, or even a normal samba
account, on a Samba PDC with LDAP back end?
I wanted to avoid using something like smbldap-useradd, because I want
to actually understand what's going
I hope you can get attachments!!... I'll send the files you asked me
for as attachment and I'll paste them in the message body too, but I
think it's easier to read if they come in separated files...
Anyway, I also want to thank the interest to all the people who are
trying to help me... Thank you
: 23-feb-2008 17:38
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Windows 2000 pro doesn't join a domain with
Samba+Ldap(linux)
To:
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
I hope you can get attachments!!... I'll send the files you asked me
for as attachment and I'll paste them in the message body too, but I
think it's easier
Hi,
I've had this problem on FreeBSD. Basically the behaviour of 'passwd'
changed somewhere between releases 5 and 7. I solved this by writing a
shell wrapper for the passwd tool. As simple as:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/passwd -l $1
echo Password Changed
Call the file
Bleh, sorry folks. Two days troubleshooting this and I find the problem
ten minutes after posting. Fixed it by synchronising the time with the
PDC and rebooting the Solaris box. All my users are listed fine now in
getent passwd, and I can browse to the shares.
... now I just need to work out
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
I guess that for backtrace I have to compile samba with debugging
symbols, haven't I?
Yep - that definately helps :-).
I am sorry but I cannot compile samba with debugging symbols on Gentoo :-(
GDB always
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
I guess that for backtrace I have to compile samba with debugging
symbols, haven't I?
Yep - that definately helps :-).
I am sorry
Adam Williams wrote:
What about just having a dc=ldap,dc=your,dc=domain with all the user
accounts in it, and then every samba PDC use passdb backend =
ldapsam:ldap://ldap.your.domain
Basically I just want it so all the username/passwords are in a central
location so when a user does
i think you should be able to do that with winbind. see figure 12.1 at
http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#id367144
or page 232 here http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf
Orion Poplawski wrote:
Adam Williams wrote:
What about just having
Hi Fabiano,
As long as pwdmustchange implementation has been changed you should use
an earlier version of smbldap-tools.
What do you mean ? Which pwdmustchange implementation ?
I quite sure, that this password stuff was working in earlier versions
of samba (e.g. 3.0.23c). I used this
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:19:22PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
Hi there,
I have found a problem with my Samba server 3.0.28. This problem appeared
suddenly without any changes in configuration or server update.
NMBD becomes unresponsive in some minutes after startup
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
I guess that for backtrace I have to compile samba with debugging
symbols, haven't I?
Yep - that definately helps :-).
I'll do my best. But samba runs on a server bit meny users and I don't like
there
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:27:46PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
I guess that for backtrace I have to compile samba with debugging symbols,
haven't I?
Yep - that definately helps :-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:56:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is this a problem practically, or is it a matter of the Samba Team's
licensing policy?
As this is a stand-alone shell script, I wouldn't expect there to be any
license compatibility issues; but if it's a requirement that even
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 11:54 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:56:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is this a problem practically, or is it a matter of the Samba Team's
licensing policy?
As this is a stand-alone shell script, I wouldn't expect there to be any
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:54:14AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:56:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is this a problem practically, or is it a matter of the Samba Team's
licensing policy?
As this is a stand-alone shell script, I wouldn't expect there to be any
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 12:15 -0800, Ephi Dror wrote:
Hello,
Does samba support the use of S4U?
What do we need to configure in SAMBA or krb5 to support getting a
ticket obtained by S4U. We are using 3.0.25 and krb5-1.4.1
We are getting the following error:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 13:58 -0800, Todd Stecher wrote:
From my readings, only the Heimdahl Kerberos distribution has S4USelf
support, at least in the Samba 4 code base. MIT tries to stay away
from being PAC-cognizent.
In terms of Samba4's KDE, S4USelf is something that I need to finish
Paul Rijke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have currently a department called HRM which have their own share
/data/hrm
Within that share is a folder called recruitment.
We recently hired an external recruiter to do some work for us. The folder
is
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
That is actually a good point because today I wanted to switch to cifs
on all my mount scripts for work and I got:
sudo mount -t cifs -o uid=lucas -o username=myusername
//192.168.1.196/c$ /home/lucas/Desktop/C
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Refer to the
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
Finally after searching for another 30min I found one example in which
domain option was added.
You need to add a domain option!
That particular node making the cifs connection, what was that node's domain
setting in its /etc/samba/smb.conf?
On Linux client boxes, the
On Feb 19, 2008 11:31 AM, Michael Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
That is actually a good point because today I wanted to switch to cifs
on all my mount scripts for work and I got:
sudo mount -t cifs -o uid=lucas -o username=myusername
//192.168.1.196/c$
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:00:36AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
In short, we (Ubuntu and Debian maintainers) are dropping support for
smbfs. This code caused many regressions in recent security fixes as
it is essntially unmaintained in the
On Feb 19, 2008 12:16 PM, Michael Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
Finally after searching for another 30min I found one example in which
domain option was added.
You need to add a domain option!
That particular node making the cifs connection, what was that node's
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
At least considering to distribute it (or a derived work) as part of
the samba distribution could help samba users to switch from smbfs to
cifs?
Sorry, we can't. Looks nice, but is GPLv2 only.
Volker
pgpZS0qIXcpoZ.pgp
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
At least considering to distribute it (or a derived work) as part of
the samba distribution could help samba users to switch from smbfs to
cifs?
Sorry, we can't. Looks nice,
!
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Whit Blauvelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: winbind - not ready for prime time?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:22:42PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote
Michael Lueck wrote:
Could you elaborate on what exactly you are suggesting to do?
I did some digging since I asked that and discovered the following lines for
smb.conf shares:
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
Volker Lendecke wrote:
The problem is -- where would you host smbmount if we
removed it from the samba release?
hhhmmm, I see smbmount is indeed a file in the smbfs package.
So smbmount is relied on by cifs? In that case I can see the need to install smbfs in
order to be able to mount -t
simo wrote:
There is no interdependency at all, when compiling samba you can choose
to build either or both helpers, it is a packaging choice. Most
distributions are slowly killing smbfs and stopping building the
smbmount helper in the samba packages.
I unmounted all cifs connections, then I
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Guenter Kukkukk:
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Michael Lueck:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o
credentials=/home/mdlueck/.smbcredentials,uid=mdlueck,gid=mdlueck
//ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
And received this type of error:
mount:
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 schrieb Michael Lueck:
simo wrote:
There is no interdependency at all, when compiling samba you can choose
to build either or both helpers, it is a packaging choice. Most
distributions are slowly killing smbfs and stopping building the
smbmount helper in
Michael Lueck wrote:
simo wrote:
There is no interdependency at all, when compiling samba you can choose
to build either or both helpers, it is a packaging choice. Most
distributions are slowly killing smbfs and stopping building the
smbmount helper in the samba packages.
I unmounted all
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 19:44 -0500, Michael Lueck wrote:
simo wrote:
There is no interdependency at all, when compiling samba you can choose
to build either or both helpers, it is a packaging choice. Most
distributions are slowly killing smbfs and stopping building the
smbmount helper
/bin/mount -t cifs -o
credentials=/home/mdlueck/.smbcredentials,uid=mdlueck,gid=mdlueck
//ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
And received this type of error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //ldslnx01/data,
missing codepage or other error
simo wrote:
Ask Ubuntu maintainers, they decided to package both helpers in the same
packet, so if you remove one, you remove the other too.
both helpers in the same package is a sufficient answer to my question. (Yes,
finally, light bulb goes on!)
I am certainly not going to nit-pick how
On Monday 18 February 2008, Michael Heydon wrote:
You need helpers
(mount.cifs) in order to mount a smbfs or cifs share.
Not necessarily. You can, at least with cifs, mount without a helper
although there is much less flexibility.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Quoting Michael Lueck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
both helpers in the same package is a sufficient answer to my question.
(Yes, finally, light bulb goes on!)
I am certainly not going to nit-pick how the Ubuntu packagers decided to do
things, just was trying to fully understand these things.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:00:36AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
In short, we (Ubuntu and Debian maintainers) are dropping support for
smbfs. This code caused many regressions in recent security fixes as
it is essntially unmaintained in the samba code.
To make it even clearer -- would
Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
specifics raised. I'm not looking for a flame war. I'm looking for some
recognition that the Samba project may have gone astray in the decision to
package winbind as part of the main package, given the many specific
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 16:33 -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
My ethic has always been: If there's a rock in the path, I remove it so the
next person along doesn't trip over it. If something's clearly not
documented, or not performing according to common sense expectations and a
fair reading of the
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
I'm looking for somerecognition that the Samba project may have gone astray in
the decision to
package winbind as part of the main package, given the many specific
shortcomings
No problems with doing that. I'm pretty sure some of the little tools,
scripts and gadgets for
Neeraj,
This is the type of question better directed to the general user
community. The developers here try to spend their time focusing on
development and design. The user list is a more appropriate list. I
have copied that list as well.
FYI - If you have not read the Samba documentation yet
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
specifics raised.
You raised no specifics. All you posted was a general whine
I can't make it work. Well poor you. You obviously have
no concept of the
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
specifics raised.
You raised no specifics. All you posted was a general whine
I can't make it work. Well poor you. You
Jeremy,
I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless make
something that works with it. Samba's developers, of all the
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:22:42PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Jeremy,
I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless make
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you have a specific issue, ask it. If you have a specific
bug, report it. You did none of those things.
Im not a developer, Im a sysadmin and I been using samba for a lot of
years know.
When I read the post, I wasn't going to answear,
Christian McHugh wrote:
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you have a specific issue, ask it. If you have a specific
bug, report it. You did none of those things.
Im not a developer, Im a sysadmin and I been using samba for a lot of
years know.
When I read the post,
Christian McHugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy all,
I was wondering if there was a known bug with the everyone acl. When
looking at the security tab on windows the everyone acl has the read
permission. If I unselect it to give everyone no permission and hit
Jamrock wrote:
Perhaps this article will shed some light on the issue. It explains how
Samba works with Windows ACL's.
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1080966,00.htm
I understand how the acls should work. My issue seem to be more of a bug.
For example:
If I
Similar problem here, running Ubuntu Workstation 7.10 (so, also Debian). But
it looks like I'm failing a stop beyond you.
Works
kinit
wbinfo -u
wbinfo -g
wbinfo -t
Fails - but note last line is a different result:
wbinfo -a whit%pass
plaintext password authentication failed
error
Actually I found the solution and posted it here. Install winbind and
add wins to nsswitch.conf hosts line.
http://lucasmanual.com/mywiki/SambaDomainController#head-8ae23b786749b4d46ef0e9ed22148e63eeab95e7
Every pc can ping each other using the netbios name which coresponds
to ip address.
In
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available to a collocated
production
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I get the idea from man smbmount that smbmount is merely a wrapper
invoking mount -t cifs.
Would you expect different results if I were using the smbmount
binary instead?
In the sense that it would invoke the deprecated mount -t smbfs
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
What are the samba server side settings(smb.conf) for the share you
are mounting?
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0777
Do you
Chris Smith wrote:
In the sense that it would invoke the deprecated mount -t smbfs
instead of mount -t cifs, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Aaahhh, so smbclient from the Samba developers is hard coded to not use current
smb protocol code? Confusing!
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
Aaahhh, so smbclient from the Samba developers is hard coded to not
use current smb protocol code? Confusing!
Smbclient is new to the conversation, which until now has been about
smbmount which
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct way
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Drats, it looks like you're setup fine. I was hoping it would just be a
bad configuration. I don't know what else it could be.
Thanks for at least checking everything is configured correctly.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
To
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available to a
Chris Smith wrote:
Smbclient is new to the conversation, which until now has been about
smbmount which
My error. Yes, I meant smbmount and not smbclient.
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct way to make a
connection?
It is considered the best way under the vast majority of
Michael Heydon wrote:
Historically I set those perms on the share, and that has always
worked with Windows clients.
Windows does not use unix style permissions, it has no equivilant to the
fmask/dmask settings.
I understood that defined on the share, that is the way to specify what the
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available to a collocated production
environment comprising
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
I once heard a quote (which I'd like to attribute to Jeremy Allison for
some reason) to the effect of The Windows SMB network stack is like a
canary in a coal mine, when you have network troubles it's the first thing
to die.
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings-
I am working through coming up with a Linux client integration to Samba
PDC's.
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o
credentials=/home/userid/.smbcredentials,uid=userid,gid=userid,dmask=0777,fmask=0666
//ldslnx01/data
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Could it be that '/' is mounted with an explicit permission setting
that is shadowing your mount settings?
I do not think so, but have a look. This share happens to be on the /srv
partition.
/dev/sda1 / xfs defaults
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
That may be possible, but like I said, sometimes it works and sometimes it
doesn't. Sometimes the span between the two is only a few seconds.
From: Scott Lovenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:05 PM
To: Trimble, Ronald D
Cc:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Could
it be that '/' is mounted with an explicit permission setting that is
shadowing your mount settings?
I do not think so, but have a look. This share happens to be on the /srv
partition.
/dev/sda1 / xfs defaults0 1
/dev/sda9
Steven Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a windows 2003 AD domain and a server joined to that domain.
Winbind is being used as an idmap. Most everything seems to work fine.
My user can connect to the samba share from a windows host without
entering
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs
Subject line is misleading: smbmount != cifs.
I get the idea from man smbmount that smbmount is merely a wrapper invoking
mount -t cifs.
Would you
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
What are the samba server side settings(smb.conf) for the share you are
mounting?
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0777
Do you have inherit
Hello,
Does samba support the use of S4U?
What do we need to configure in SAMBA or krb5 to support getting a
ticket obtained by S4U. We are using 3.0.25 and krb5-1.4.1
We are getting the following error:
decode_pac_data: Name in PAC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does not match principal name
On 2/7/08, Shirish Pargaonkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/08, Shirish Pargaonkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not exactly samba but related to ntfs acls, so hope do not get flamed!
Recently I am seeing a response to get security descriptor query to Windows
server as Malformed
On 2/7/08, Shirish Pargaonkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not exactly samba but related to ntfs acls, so hope do not get flamed!
Recently I am seeing a response to get security descriptor query to Windows
server as Malformed Packet in wireshark trace and the number of aces
in the dacl
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: samba-3.0.23d, smbpasswd, and NO PASSWORD
behaviour
The way it's documented to work in the smbpasswd man page, and the way
it used to work for us with older samba releases is: when a user has a
null password, and smb.conf null passwords = no, the user can _not_
make an smb
Michael == Michael Heydon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Maybe the audit vfs module so you can see exactly which files it
trys
Michael to access (if it tries) and why it can't.
Good suggestion.
Michael You don't have the client drivers setting enabled in your smb.conf
do
.
Is this samba documentation incorrect?
Or am I doing something incorrectly?
cheers,
Todd
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:59:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: samba-3.0.23d, smbpasswd, and NO PASSWORD
behaviour
The way it's documented
Michael == Michael Heydon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM * first time, windows complains that the server doesn't have the
drivers.
Michael This is odd and you will probably have to fix it before other
things
Michael work smoothly.
I guess fixing this should be my first priority
.
Is this samba documentation incorrect?
Or am I doing something incorrectly?
cheers,
Todd
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:59:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Todd Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: samba-3.0.23d, smbpasswd, and NO PASSWORD
behaviour
The way it's
Brian May wrote:
Michael == Michael Heydon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM * first time, windows complains that the server doesn't have the
drivers.
Michael This is odd and you will probably have to fix it before other
things
Michael work smoothly.
I guess fixing this
On Jan 28, 2008 6:18 PM, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been reading the Official How-To, Chap. 6, Joining an NT4-type Domain
with Samba-3 because I want to join my current Samba3 PDC server and all its
users (on Win XP Pro machines) to an MS Server 2003 domain.
What I want to accomplish
801 - 900 of 8464 matches
Mail list logo
