[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling?

2003-08-16 Thread Honza Houstek
Quite interesting. Can you describe any particular case of a different behavior (samba + ext2 vs. samba + reiser)? I really wonder where the roots of such differences are. Sorry to disappoint you, Honza. After I evaluated the major linux fs's I selected reiserfs and used it ever since.

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling?

2003-08-16 Thread Dragan Krnic
I thought that there were no differences in the way of using access times between all linux native filesystems (ext2/3, reiser, xfs, jfs). There shouldn't be any differences. The difference pops up when a 3d party software like Office joins the game. I do not believe this! I looked

Re: [Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-15 Thread Rashkae
Agreed,, ext3 is used in lots of situations where Reiser would probably be a better choice As for nobody loosing data,,, I don't really think it matters what Filesystem you have if your system decides to stick random bits on the hard drive. Staying away from any of them won't help much. On

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-14 Thread Honza Houstek
Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different way than other linux filesystems? It's not supposed to given the same instructions from clients but it appears to because perhaps it elicits different kind of response from Office. Maybe

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-14 Thread Dragan Krnic
Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. But reiserfs doesn´t support ACLs. Does it? Oh yes, it does. Big way. ?? I was under the impression that if i wanted acls, i should use xfs, ext3 (or jsf i believe) but NOT reisersf. Am I wrong? Does (for example) SuSE 8.2 with

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-14 Thread mourik jan c heupink
Dragan Krnic wrote: Yes. 8.2 works out of box. Use mount options acl for ACLs and user_xattr for EAs. cool! couldn't find anything on the reiser website, so i assumed it couldn't do it. After quite some experimenting in the beginning (ext3, jfs, xfs) it soon became clear that reiserfs is by

Re: [Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-14 Thread Christoph
Hi, mourik jan c heupink wrote: [...] and (now that i have your attention... :)) what software do you use to backup your reisersf/acls partitions? as what i read was that you can use basically any backup program to backup the data, but usually the acls are not backed up. i heard amanda is

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling?

2003-08-14 Thread Dragan Krnic
and (now that i have your attention... :)) what software do you use to backup your reisersf/acls partitions? Excellent question. I use tar, but before I start it I do a getfacl --skip-base -R . and save the output in a file that is bound to be the first on tape. When I restore such a

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling?

2003-08-14 Thread Dragan Krnic
Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different way than other linux filesystems? It's not supposed to given the same instructions from clients but it appears to because perhaps it elicits different kind of response from Office.

[Samba] Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

2003-08-14 Thread Dragan Krnic
... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified. It's a weird thing if it happens under normal circumstances ... But if it only happens when you fake the identity from within the Office programs, well, I wouldn't bother really. I totally agree ! Fine. Use reiserfs and don't