I have downloaded, build and installed samba-4.0.9 from source on two separate
boxes running RHEL6.4. My problem is that despite having identical
configurations, swat is running on one server and not on the other.
Here is my xinetd conf
service swat
{
port = 901
socket_type =
|Hi
Running SWAT aginst samba produces the following error. The browser
would only display
the SAMBA-header and no configuration-details at all.
Any hint?
Thanks
Urs
|//|
Aug 4 17:38:17 beech swat[1086]: connect from 192.168.51.36 (192.168.51.36)
Aug 4 17:38:20 beech swat[1087]: connect
Hy Everyone
Iam a beginer in samba. We recently upgraded o mac os x lion and a few days
later we figured out that the samba in it is not THE real samba. So we
decided to install the new samba by ourselves. Everything is fine now (we
needed about 10 to 12 reinstall to get that), samba running swat
Hi all,
I want to use SWAT for user to change password.
I have setup 2 identical Samba server on Ubuntu 10.04.
samba1, samba2
Just a basic smb.conf.
Locally SWAT works.
But, when I try the Client/Server Password Management
from samba1 to change password on samba2, nothing happens.
In samba1
Solved it.
In unrelated article, I saw that the libwbclient.so.0 from the samba
complied source needs to replace the on in /usr/lib64. Once I did this
swat now sees the samba processes just fine.
On 12/3/11 1:10 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
I take it no one has seen this issue before? If helps
I take it no one has seen this issue before? If helps running this on
Scientific Linux 6.1.
Just install Samba 3.5.9 with no issues. I have swat setup and can
connect to the web gui. Problem is that when I start smbd and nmbd from
the web gui, swat still shows
Just install Samba 3.5.9 with no issues. I have swat setup and can
connect to the web gui. Problem is that when I start smbd and nmbd from
the web gui, swat still shows that processes are not running. But in
fact on the server they were started, and the logs show no errors.
Any reason why
bind failed (Address already in use (errno = 98)). service = swat
# netstat -nat | grep 901
Edit /etc/xinetd.d/swat
Insert
Bind = correct IP adres
Met vriendelijke Groeten,
Tom Adriaansen | Linux (RHCSA), VMware (VCP4) and Storage Engineer
Global Business Infrastructure
I have Samba installed on Linux and brought up the SWAT. This is on SLES 11 SP
1.
Should be easy.
I tried using the default adduser script (adduser.local).
I do see that I'm executing it. (I put an echo in it.)
However, it seems to only get 1 parm, which is the user to add.
The script shows
On May 30, 2010, at 1:36 PM, zoolook wrote:
2010/5/30 YES NOPE9 y...@nope9.com:
What might I do to get Computers B and C to match A ?
login as root
Thanks for the idea. I logged on as root and SNAFU.
Still looking for ideas.
Gus in Denver
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
I installed SAMBA and SWAT on three computers running Debian squeeze.
On computer-A SWAT comes up with the following buttons..
Home
Globals Shares PrintersWizard
Status ViewPassword
Status shows
smbd : running
nmbd : running
winbindd : running
Computers B and
2010/5/30 YES NOPE9 y...@nope9.com:
What might I do to get Computers B and C to match A ?
login as root
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
I installed SAMBA and SWAT on three computers running Debian squeeze.
On computer-A SWAT comes up with the following buttons..
Home
Globals Shares PrintersWizard
Status ViewPassword
Status shows
smbd : running
nmbd : running
winbindd : running
Computers B and
On 18/05/2010 12:47, Terry wrote:
I need samba users to be able to change there own password I have swat
running I can login as root and changes users passwords fine. But if I login
into swat as a normal user and try to change a password I get
machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password
I need samba users to be able to change there own password I have swat running
I can login as root and changes users passwords fine. But if I login into swat
as a normal user and try to change a password I get
machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : Password
restriction.
My husband has installed Samba - swat and wants to link all the computers in
the house, so he can back them up daily.
I read the About info on your website, but still have a few questions:
1. I work online, can Samba capture any information (passwords, screen shots,
personal information
Answers below
--
Damien Dye BSC(hon)
On 16 April 2010 13:54, Lucy Little lucyann.lit...@yahoo.com wrote:
My husband has installed Samba - swat and wants to link all the computers
in the house, so he can back them up daily.
I read the About info on your website, but still have a few
Lucy Little put forth on 4/16/2010 7:54 AM:
My husband has installed Samba - swat and wants to link all the computers in
the house, so he can back them up daily.
I read the About info on your website, but still have a few questions:
1. I work online, can Samba capture any information
hir sir,
m using redhat linux 5.3 enterprises. m facing problem in samba-swat installtion
i found system-administrator-server settings-samba
now i want to install or use swat for configuration domain as pdc
when i put find / -name swat
i cant found any result.
and when i check manually
Am 25.11.2009 06:29, schrieb muhammad wasim:
m facing problem installing swat on redhat enterprise 5.3 samba is
already installed
some body help me m new in linux
yum -y install xinetd (need for swat)
and edit the /etc/xinetd.d/samba as
# SWAT is the Samba Web Admin Tool.
service swat
{
From: muhammad wasim samimalik...@gmail.com
m facing problem installing swat on redhat enterprise 5.3 samba is
already installed
some body help me m new in linux
And what would be this problem...?
What about: yum install samba-swat
JD
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
m facing problem installing swat on redhat enterprise 5.3 samba is
already installed
some body help me m new in linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Dear All
I am running Samba (3.41) with swat on Fedora 11 and both are working
fine. Now I want my users to be able to change their password through
web based application. I have tried many option but none of them
working perfectly with the latest version of Samba.
Finally, I zeroed down to SWAT,
On 9/5/2009 1:06 AM, Barry L. Bond wrote:
Gary,
SWAT is neato! This is a wonderful summarizing and helping tool! I
didn't know about it at all!
I thought SWAT was deprecated/unmaintained as of a LONG time ago?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 02:03:28PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/5/2009 1:06 AM, Barry L. Bond wrote:
Gary,
SWAT is neato! This is a wonderful summarizing and helping tool! I
didn't know about it at all!
I thought SWAT was deprecated/unmaintained as of a LONG time ago?
On 9/5/2009 7:02 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I thought SWAT was deprecated/unmaintained as of a LONG time ago?
Nope, not true. We still ship and support it. It's not exactly
recommended but it still works and is maintained.
Hmm, ok, weird... it must have been a comment from someone more solidly
Hi
I have a PDC with an LDAP backend that i want to use SWAT to give
users the option to change their password via the web interface.
I cant seem to be able to get SWAT to authenticate any users it
always gives me an authorization error.
Is swat with an LDAP backend supported?
Cheers.
On 2/4/2009, David Markey (dmar...@dodds.dmarkey.com) wrote:
I have a PDC with an LDAP backend that i want to use SWAT to give
users the option to change their password via the web interface.
Hasn't SWAT has been deprecated/unmaintained for a long time?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To
Hello David,
unfortunately no answer to your question - but once I had the same
problem and I've used http://www.karylstein.com/phpLdapPasswd
successfully with a bit of hacking (I can't remember exactly what was
not working but there were a few patches in the search results when
googling for
Actually i've created my own piece of software (based on phpLdapPasswd)
called phpSmbPasswd which uses smbpasswd as a backend. If anyone wants to
test it out give me a shout.
I was just wondering about SWAT, if LDAP isnt supported then the man pages
should be updated to communicate that fact.
Stefan Dengscherz wrote:
Another alternative would be to use more mature LDAP Account
management web utils:
- GOSA
- phpLdapAdmin (don't know if it supports user login change Samba
password hash)
LAM Pro (not the free one) also has a user self-service component. It
can also let users change
Dont think its an option, we use heimdal and smbk5pwd. LAM would have to
support EXOP which i dont think it does
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:07:12 +1100, Tim Bates t...@new-life.org.au wrote:
Stefan Dengscherz wrote:
Another alternative would be to use more mature LDAP Account
management web
Hi All,
I'm a new user to Samba and I'm just having trouble with one or two
things. I've been able to sort most of them out myself but I was wondering
how can you get full access to Swat. Obviously the root user gets all the
access requiremnts but my own unix user only gets the Samba
Hi everyone!
i used slackware version 12.1 and kernel version 2.6.24.5.
When i upgrade samba to version 3.2.4.
i want to use swat to configure my samba server,
and i got the message swat cann't load share file libtalloc.so.1:no such file
or directory
How can i soultion thih problme？ thanks
Hello all,
I'm having trouble logging into swat. Not even root can login! I'm using
Rocks 4.1 (linux cluster based on CentOS) Has anybody experienced this?
Thanks in advance!
Santiago
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hello all,
I'm having trouble logging into swat. Not even root can login! I'm using
Rocks 4.1 (linux cluster based on CentOS) Has anybody experienced this?
Thanks in advance!
Santiago
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:16:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Karolin (and Volker as well), what are the differences between the
SerNet .deb packages and those on main samba sites?
the main difference is that we recently decided to drop the FHS patches.
Additionally there,
Hi Axel,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:41:32AM +0100, Axel Machens wrote:
i run a Debian etch system. I upgrade my samba to the sernet deb packages.
All runs fine but i have a error message with SWAT. If i open swat in browser
it tells:
ERROR: Can't open include/header.html
It is only a
Quoting Karolin Seeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am afraid this might be a bug in the SerNet packages. We will have a
look at this next week (after Easter) and give you a report.
Karolin (and Volker as well), what are the differences between the
SerNet .deb packages and those on main samba sites?
Hi Axel,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:41:32AM +0100, Axel Machens wrote:
Hi list members,
i run a Debian etch system. I upgrade my samba to the sernet deb packages.
All runs fine but i have a error message with SWAT. If i open swat in browser
it tells:
ERROR: Can't open include/header.html
Hi list members,
i run a Debian etch system. I upgrade my samba to the sernet deb packages. All
runs fine but i have a error message with SWAT. If i open swat in browser it
tells:
ERROR: Can't open include/header.html
It is only a white background in my browser and i can´t open help files.
I
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:41:32AM +0100, Axel Machens wrote:
i run a Debian etch system. I upgrade my samba to the
sernet deb packages. All runs fine but i have a error
message with SWAT. If i open swat in browser it tells:
ERROR: Can't open include/header.html
It is only a white
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Heydon wrote:
Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Heydon wrote:
Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there
Paul Venzke wrote:
On Mon March 10 2008 10:07, Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's running,
but any
Bit schreef:
Paul Venzke wrote:
On Mon March 10 2008 10:07, Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's running,
Bit wrote:
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
snip
I didn't think this would really matter though. This raises other
questions for me.
1) I don't get it. Why does swat have to be launched via xinetd?
Probably to keep it simple, no need to worry about creating listening
ports, spawning worker
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's running,
but any attempt to use telnet to the port or point my browser at it
On Mon March 10 2008 10:07, Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's running,
but any attempt to use telnet to
Bit wrote:
Hey everyone,
If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Whenever I try to start swat (from the command-line by invoking
/usr/sbin/swat), it sits there for a very long time as if it's
running, but any attempt to use telnet to the port or point my browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AFAIK, swat uses the root password. This is what I've seen, anyway. I'm
assuming you tested the root password?
Antoni Mont wrote:
Hi all,
After a new installation (suse 10.3) I can't enter swat. Password root
doesn't work and I haven't the
Hi all,
After a new installation (suse 10.3) I can't enter swat. Password root
doesn't work and I haven't the slightless idea about how I arrived at that
point and how can I set up a new password. I would be gratefull if someone
could help me to fix the problem.
Regards,
Toni
--
To
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This is not possible, in part due to concerns over the chicken-and-egg
problem of setting up Samba to use smbpasswd while authenticating
against smbpasswd, and mostly because that codepath hasn't been altered
since 2001, when we didn't have 'encrypt
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:16 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007 20:44:23 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Stupid question but is it possible to make SWAT use the smbpasswd file
to authenticate users instead of the system passwd file?
Hey guys.
I'd just like to know if it's
On Monday 17 September 2007 20:44:23 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Stupid question but is it possible to make SWAT use the smbpasswd file
to authenticate users instead of the system passwd file?
Hey guys.
I'd just like to know if it's possible, please.
Thanks.
--
Antoine
--
To unsubscribe from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007 20:44:23 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Stupid question but is it possible to make SWAT use the smbpasswd file
to authenticate users instead of the system passwd file?
Hey guys.
I'd just like to
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
I don't know -- did you read SWAT's manual? For the record, I do believe
I did read SWAT man page of course.
It's not really precise on the subject.
that I had SWAT authenticating off of SMB. Did I do it without PAM like
you are trying to do?
Hi.
Stupid question but is it possible to make SWAT use the smbpasswd file
to authenticate users instead of the system passwd file?
To clarify my request, my users use kerberos password and so don't have
any password set on the local system. But I'd like them to be able to
log in into SWAT
In case anyone was wondering about this one...
we were using
socket address = x.x.x.x
Once we let this default to use all addresses, the status of nmbd in
SWAT was correctly displayed.
Question for the group:
Is any performance improvement realized by specifying the socket
address?
We are running
Version 3.0.25a-SerNet-RedHat
In SWAT nmbd shows as not running when in fact it is.
Is this a possible misconfiguration on our part or a bug?
Helen
--
Helen P. Nulty
Systems Analyst
UNC-CH School of Public Health
Instructional Information Systems
CB# 7400
Chapel Hill, NC
Hello,
I am trying to set up a samba server for a few shared directories on AIX 5.3.
It is running in a Windows 2000 domain. It now seems to share properly, but
swat does not accept any login ID. I set up swat with the /etc/services and
/etc/inetd.conf entries as per the manual. When I use a
Author: derrell
Date: 2006-12-16 19:07:37 + (Sat, 16 Dec 2006)
New Revision: 20220
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=20220
Log:
Apply patch from Brad Henry with some additional qooxdoo/json-rpc SWAT
functionality: basic admin console.
Added:
Author: derrell
Date: 2006-10-15 21:09:42 + (Sun, 15 Oct 2006)
New Revision: 19295
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=19295
Log:
ldbbrowse: the search tab is now doing something vaguely reasonable.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/services/request.esp
OK, I'm a Samba Noob, so be gentle with me. ;-)
I've finally (mainly because I'm an idiot) gotten samba (Version
3.0.14a-Debian) working on a Debian Stable system (uname -a ==
Linux files 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Aug 17 09:33:35 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux )
and I have several userid's shares built
PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] SWAT is working but shows smbd/nmbd: not running
Jörg Nissen wrote:
It is most probably not a mainboard issue. You should post your
smb.conf here as SWAT communicates with smbd/nmbd over 127.0.0.1 and
ports
/tcp open domain
110/tcp open pop3
111/tcp open rpcbind
139/tcp open netbios-ssn
199/tcp open smux
445/tcp open microsoft-ds
631/tcp open ipp
901/tcp open samba-swat
953/tcp open rndc
5801/tcp open vnc-http-1
5901/tcp open vnc-1
5902/tcp open vnc-2
Nmap finished: 1 IP address
to
interfaces =
hosts allow =
?
MfG
Jörg Nissen
- Original Message -
From: Zoran Ljubisic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jörg Nissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] SWAT is working but shows smbd/nmbd: not running
Jörg Nissen wrote
.
MfG
Jörg Nissen
- Original Message -
From: Zoran Ljubisic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jörg Nissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] SWAT is working but shows smbd/nmbd: not running
Jörg Nissen wrote:
It is most probably not a mainboard issue. You
]
Newsgroups: mailing.unix.samba
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:02 PM
Subject: [Samba] SWAT is working but shows smbd/nmbd: not running
Hi all,
I had nForce3 motherboard that has broken. Than I bought nForce4
motherboard. I connected old hard disk to this new nForce4 motherboard.
For
net
Hi all,
I had nForce3 motherboard that has broken. Than I bought nForce4
motherboard. I connected old hard disk to this new nForce4 motherboard. For
net and sound support I download drivers from nvidia.com site. This driver
asks kernel source to be on local disk and gcc compiler.
After I
tengo un error con elsamba 901
como se configura de otra forma
--
bernardino hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
, 2006 11:18 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] swat error
tengo un error con elsamba 901
como se configura de otra forma
--
bernardino hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
This is what i've made for xinetd.d/swat and everything goes find
service swat
{
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/local/sbin/swat
server_args =
.
Guillermo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of fonteneau
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] SWAT + FC4 = Not working
This is what i've made for xinetd.d/swat and everything
Hitting a big mystery here. I've configured samba properly but I would like
to run swat. The /etc/xinetd.d/swat file contains:
service swat
{
disable = no
port= 901
socket_type = stream
wait= no
only_from = 127.0.0.1
First of all trying to get samba-3.0.14 working on FC4 (SELINUX on). smbd and
nmbd running, but my user can't browse from W2K. I have a working samba-2.2.7
server on RH 8.0, users connect no problem.
The smb.conf file seems a little different and tried to use swat to configure.
Tried to start
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:19:40PM -0800, Jeremy Koski wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:12:27PM -0800, Jeremy Koski wrote:
Not sure when this started happening, but we first noticed it about 3
months ago. We have two seperate Samba servers,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:12:27PM -0800, Jeremy Koski wrote:
Not sure when this started happening, but we first noticed it about 3
months ago. We have two seperate Samba servers, both having the same
problem when using swat. Both are running
Not sure when this started happening, but we first noticed it about 3
months ago. We have two seperate Samba servers, both having the same
problem when using swat. Both are running 3.0.21a.
When clicking on Status after logging into to swat, the Open Files
section isn't displaying
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:12:27PM -0800, Jeremy Koski wrote:
Not sure when this started happening, but we first noticed it about 3
months ago. We have two seperate Samba servers, both having the same
problem when using swat. Both are running 3.0.21a.
When clicking on Status after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Samba User wrote:
Does anyone know when the brocken helpfiles are going to be fixed?
Or maybe where I can copy them to make them work?
I am running 3.0.21a and the Changelog states that it should be fixed,
however I don't see it that way...
What
Does anyone know when the brocken helpfiles are going to be fixed?
Or maybe where I can copy them to make them work?
I am running 3.0.21a and the Changelog states that it should be fixed,
however I don't see it that way...
Thanks for any pointers...
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
I'm running Ubuntu with samba 3.0.21a. Ubuntu has both Webmin and
Samba-Swat for Samba Administration, but I prefer to use Samba-SWAT. The
problem I have with Ubuntu, is the root user in deactivated. When I go
to run Samba-Swat, I have to log on as a regular user, and I end up not
having Global
On dom, 2006-01-08 at 11:44 -0500, Roberto Mason wrote:
I'm running Ubuntu with samba 3.0.21a. Ubuntu has both Webmin and
Samba-Swat for Samba Administration, but I prefer to use Samba-SWAT. The
problem I have with Ubuntu, is the root user in deactivated. When I go
to run Samba-Swat, I have
Hello :)
I have a problem with swat on a ubuntu machine (I installed swat per
apt-get)
When swat is running it doesn't print out anything (I guess that should be
ok though) but after a while it just prints Alarm Clock and quits. When I
try to connect to localhost:901 (before it says alarm clock
dave s wrote:
On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /etc/samba/tmp
read only = no
Good Morning,
I am trying to setup a basic samba config by first starting up swat. I have
followed the guide http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch02.html but
have problems.
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /etc/samba/tmp
read only = no
guest ok = yes
I have a /etc/samba/tmp directory,
I am user dave
At 12/18/05 09:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /etc/samba/tmp
read only = no
guest ok = yes
I have a
On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /etc/samba/tmp
read only =
On Sunday 18 December 2005 16:47, Eric Hines wrote:
At 12/18/05 09:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
path =
At 12/18/05 10:58, dave s wrote:
On Sunday 18 December 2005 16:47, Eric Hines wrote:
At 12/18/05 09:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
encrypt passwords = yes
[test]
comment = For
On Sunday 18 Dec 2005 17:32, Eric Hines wrote:
At 12/18/05 10:58, dave s wrote:
On Sunday 18 December 2005 16:47, Eric Hines wrote:
At 12/18/05 09:49, Mathew D. Watson wrote:
dave wrote:
I am running kubuntu, samba 3.0.14a, my smb.conf file is ...
[global]
workgroup = METRAN
only_from = 127.0.0.1
It looks like this option is only allowing users to access swat from the
localhost (127.0.0.1).
You will need to change this option.
Kenny Sanders wrote:
Hello,
I am not able to access SWAT from any other host besides the one running
the SWAT daemon.
No firewall
My guess is the line only_from = 127.0.0.1 is stopping you since that is the
address of local host. Try adding in your network IP's.
DG
-Original Message-
From: Kenny Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:44 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:44 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] SWAT not accessible from remote sites
Hello,
I am not able to access SWAT from any other host besides the one running the
SWAT daemon.
No firewall blocking access on either side.
# netstat
Hello,
I am not able to access SWAT from any other host besides the one running
the SWAT daemon.
No firewall blocking access on either side.
# netstat -lnt | grep 901
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:901 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
works fine connecting from localhost using:
On Monday 07 November 2005 07:43, Kenny Sanders wrote:
Hello,
I am not able to access SWAT from any other host besides the one running
the SWAT daemon.
No firewall blocking access on either side.
# netstat -lnt | grep 901
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:901 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Schwartzman wrote:
| Clicking on the smbd link resolves
| to http://localhost:901/swat/help/manpages/smbd.8.html
| which gives me the 404 error, but should resolve to
| /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/htmldocs/manpages-3/nmbd.8.html.
It was my
All SWAT local help hyperlinks produce a 404 File not found error. I'm
using a new install of SuSE 10.0; SuSE 9.x did not have this problem. I
have installed samba-doc.
The page source of the Welcome to SWAT! page contains the following
hyperlinks:
libDaemons/b
ul
lia
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
