RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread daniel . jarboe
-Original Message- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone. The 3.0alpha21 snapshot has been placed

RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember hearing that samba 3 alpha can be installed without affecting the 2.x installation... is this true for the (S)RPM's? Is a 2.2.7 conf likely to be workable for 3.0 alpha21 (winbind, using NT

RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread daniel . jarboe
And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I can run 3.x for a bit, stop it, and turn 2.x smbd back on if needed? I heard this was the case in tarball installation, but is this supported by the RPM? ~ Daniel On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Chris Mason
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember hearing that samba 3 alpha can be installed without affecting the 2.x installation... is this true

RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I can run 3.x for a bit, stop it, and turn 2.x smbd back on if needed? I heard this was the case in tarball

RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread daniel . jarboe
K, thanks for the clarification Jerry! ~ Daniel On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I can run 3.x for a bit, stop it, and turn 2.x smbd back on if needed? I heard this was the case in tarball

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Sylvestre Taburet
Le Mercredi 27 Novembre 2002 16:45, Gerald (Jerry) Carter a écrit : On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I can run 3.x for a bit, stop it, and turn 2.x smbd back on if needed? I heard this was the case

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sylvestre Taburet wrote: Le Mercredi 27 Novembre 2002 16:45, Gerald (Jerry) Carter a écrit : On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I can run 3.x for a bit, stop

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Sylvestre Taburet wrote: Le Mercredi 27 Novembre 2002 16:45, Gerald (Jerry) Carter a écrit : On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what about side-by-side installations? Having both versions installed... so I

[Samba] Samba 3.0 alpha21 released

2002-11-26 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone. The 3.0alpha21 snapshot has been placed on samba.org for download and will be available on mirrors shortly. RedHat RPMS will be uploaded within the hour I think. Just a remember that this release is provided for testing