On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:36:09AM +0100, Björn JACKE wrote:
On 2011-12-05 at 10:27 -0800 Jeremy Allison sent off:
We could extend the acl_tdb and acl_xattr modules so
that they never consider the underlying file system permissions,
but that would completely divorce the Windows permissions
On 2011-12-05 at 10:27 -0800 Jeremy Allison sent off:
We could extend the acl_tdb and acl_xattr modules so
that they never consider the underlying file system permissions,
but that would completely divorce the Windows permissions
from the local filesystem permissions. We dont' do that
yet (it
Il 05/12/2011 19:27, Jeremy Allison ha scritto:
If we didn't do this NFS access or local process access
would completely ignore the Windows permissions (which is
not what most people want).
Then why not drop completely TDB storage of permissions and rely on
filesystem alone?
Denormalization is
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:57:26AM +0100, NdK wrote:
Il 05/12/2011 19:27, Jeremy Allison ha scritto:
If we didn't do this NFS access or local process access
would completely ignore the Windows permissions (which is
not what most people want).
Then why not drop completely TDB storage of
Hi Jeremy,
I'm going to check your patchs on Wednesday.
So I understand that ACL TDB are also limited by filesystem?
Cheers
/Adrian Berlin
Dnia 3 grudnia 2011 2:12 Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org napisał(a):
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:55:48AM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
That's a really
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:00:01PM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I'm going to check your patchs on Wednesday.
Thanks. I'm going to be in the UK from Tues - Tues (1 week)
with limited access to email, so please be patient with
responses to queries.
So I understand that ACL TDB are
Hi Jeremy,
I can understand the limit of acl_xattr because every specific file system
may impose a limit on number of extended attributes. But now that with
acl_tdb ACLs are stored in tdb file, should not there be nothing to do with
file system?
Regards
-David
2011/12/6 Jeremy Allison
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 02:16:34AM +0800, David Roid wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I can understand the limit of acl_xattr because every specific file system may
impose a limit on number of extended attributes. But now that with acl_tdb
ACLs
are stored in tdb file, should not there be nothing to do
Got it, thanks for the clarification.
2011/12/6 Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 02:16:34AM +0800, David Roid wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I can understand the limit of acl_xattr because every specific file
system may
impose a limit on number of extended attributes. But now
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:55:48AM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
That's a really interesting document. I'd like to work
on that with you to make Samba behave exactly how you
expect.
This is a very good idea :) How can I help you?
Keep reporting bugs and testing my patches for them :-).
That's a really interesting document. I'd like to work
on that with you to make Samba behave exactly how you
expect.
This is a very good idea :) How can I help you?
I have a jumbo patch for 3.6.x which should fix the
issues you're having with READ_ATTRIBUTES/WRITE_ATTRIBUTES.
Where I
Hi!
Do you have any update?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
Dnia 24 listopada 2011 12:43 adrian.berlin adrian.ber...@o2.pl napisał(a):
Hi!
1. To check acl_tdb limits I used this script (on Windows):
@echo off
for /l %%i in (1,1,10) do (
icacls.exe \\IP_address\smb_share\folder
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:19:16AM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
Hi!
Do you have any update?
Best regards
/Adrian Berlin
Dnia 24 listopada 2011 12:43 adrian.berlin adrian.ber...@o2.pl napisał(a):
Hi!
1. To check acl_tdb limits I used this script (on Windows):
@echo off
Hi!
1. To check acl_tdb limits I used this script (on Windows):
@echo off
for /l %%i in (1,1,10) do (
icacls.exe \\IP_address\smb_share\folder /grant user%%i:F
I could write only 22 entries.
2. Please see document on scribd http://www.scribd.com/doc/73654474/vfs-acls
Cheers
/Adrian
Hi!
I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr):
1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb (now I can write 22
user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users and everyone)
2. Do you plan to fix few ACLs eg. Traverse folder / Execute file
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:15:46PM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote:
Hi!
I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr):
1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb
(now I can write 22 user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users
and
16 matches
Mail list logo
