I have successfully configured winbind in 12.04 on a VM, but when I tried to
install it on a physical box using the exact same process my permissions are
screwed up. On my home directory which is mounted using autofs from an nfs4
file server the permissions are showing nobody:nogroup
I've
Le 24/12/2012 17:33, Michael B. Trausch a écrit :
On 12/20/2012 10:05 AM, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I
want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp
--preserve=mode' copy.
Is there a way to forbid this behaviour
From: Michael B. Trausch m...@naunetcorp.com
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:33:44 -0500
On 12/20/2012 10:05 AM, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I
want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp
--preserve=mode' copy.
Is
On 12/20/2012 10:05 AM, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I
want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp
--preserve=mode' copy.
Is there a way to forbid this behaviour ? Or is there something
wrong in my
Hi,
I've got a strange behaviour on a share when I copy files with files
explorers (like Thunar, Nautilus, ...).
This is the share configuration :
[share1]
comment = Share 01
path = /home/shares/share1
valid users = +share1
From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:16:57 +
Sorry for the top post.
If I only wanted to use ACLs to control access, and not Samba as
indicated in my OP, should I use security = share mode?
Setting particular account as guest account and put permissions to that
: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Permissions
From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:58:22 +
I thought I had this working correctly, but sometimes it randomly breaks.
Here is an example of a share's configuration:
[testshare]
comment = Test Share
From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:58:22 +
I thought I had this working correctly, but sometimes it randomly breaks.
Here is an example of a share's configuration:
[testshare]
comment = Test Share
path = /test/testshare
writeable = yes
create mask =
Hi,
I have a case where I only want to restrict access to SMB shares via filesystem
permissions (and POSIX ACLs). Therefore, I do not want Samba to verify
security in any way at the SMB level. If the filesystem/ACL permissions allow
access to the shared directory, so should Samba. If the
, 2012 7:10 PM
To: Bill Brunt
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] permissions keeping changing
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an
Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:34:46PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
I am using version 3.5.6 so I could use that but obviously don't want to
negate it with an upgrade.
I'm thinking I must crazy to ask for force directory security mode
parameter to come back?
Well they were very confusing, and no
I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an Apple
Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the permissions each
day.
At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to:
root@backblaze02:/share1/QuinceCt/.TemporaryItems# ls -la
total 12
drwxrwx--- 3
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an
Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the
permissions each day.
At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0500, Bill Brunt wrote:
I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an
Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the
permissions each day.
At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to:
When a user from a windows machine connects authentication to a share works
fine.
When they try to say, execute a excel document directly from a directory, user
is presented with read only. If they try to drag the to the desktop from the
share, thats ok
make changes and save, thats ok. move
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 21:45:24, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:08:53AM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed a problem with Debian wheezy + samba 3.6.6 configured
with acl_xattr in my configuration. The following test sequence
causes Windows Explorer
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:09:10PM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 21:45:24, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:08:53AM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed a problem with Debian wheezy + samba 3.6.6 configured
with acl_xattr in my
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 17:52:08, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:09:10PM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 21:45:24, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:08:53AM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed a problem with
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:08:53AM -0600, Walkes, Dan wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed a problem with Debian wheezy + samba 3.6.6 configured with
acl_xattr in my configuration. The following test sequence causes
Windows Explorer to report incorrectly ordered permission entries:
1)Map a
Hi everyone,
I've noticed a problem with Debian wheezy + samba 3.6.6 configured with
acl_xattr in my configuration. The following test sequence causes
Windows Explorer to report incorrectly ordered permission entries:
1) Map a share as with admin user credentials to a drive letter
on a
From: Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:23:48 -0600
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in smb.conf like read only users = or
something like that?
read list = user1 user2
Am 13.12.2011
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in smb.conf like read only users = or
something like that?
Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100,
I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users.
for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users.
and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and
grant read only permissions to user2 and user3
how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that?
my
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, skull skul...@gmx.ch wrote:
I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users.
for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users.
and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1
and
grant read only permissions to user2 and
Hi,
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is it
also the case that the Samba permissions override the Linux permissions?
Example:
I have a samba share called SHARE. This is disabled by default and is
configured for write access by group MY_GROUP
Hi Stephen,
I'm not a Samba expert, but a long-time samba user.
From what you stated, I believe any user would be able to enter the share
and read/write/execute all of its contents.
The three groups of three rwxrwxrwx =
First, what the directory/file owner can do
Second, what the directory/file
...@byshenk.net]
Sent: 26 November 2011 17:44
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Permissions vs Linux Permissions
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:46:02PM -, Stephen Elliott wrote:
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is
it also
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:46:02PM -, Stephen Elliott wrote:
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is it
also the case that the Samba permissions override the Linux permissions?
Example:
I have a samba share called SHARE. This is disabled by default
El 07/11/2011 20:14, Christ Schlacta escribió:
On 11/7/2011 14:59, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
From: Dale Schroederd...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:30:05 -0600
On 11/07/2011 2:13 PM, Orlando Irrazabal wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my print server to Samba.
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my print server to Samba. All is working well
except security. In my domain, some groups are able to print to certain
printers and others to other printers. I tried with write list =
@group but it doesn't worked. How do I configure the permissions on
On 11/07/2011 2:13 PM, Orlando Irrazabal wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my print server to Samba. All is working well
except security. In my domain, some groups are able to print to
certain printers and others to other printers. I tried with write
list = @group but it doesn't
From: Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:30:05 -0600
On 11/07/2011 2:13 PM, Orlando Irrazabal wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my print server to Samba. All is working well
except security. In my domain, some groups are able to print to
On 11/7/2011 14:59, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
From: Dale Schroederd...@briannassaladdressing.com
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:30:05 -0600
On 11/07/2011 2:13 PM, Orlando Irrazabal wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to migrate my print server to Samba. All is working well
except security. In my
Hello all, I have deleted the entire Samba Install directory under
/usr/local/samba and tried to reinstall, however now permissions appear to
be incorrect, as Samba cannot open log files, and dnsupdate cannot open the
required ldb, among other issues. Can someone tell me what the permissions
Well,
I've searched on samba.org why these two versions don't have the same
behaviour and I found that's a bug in 3.3.0.
So now the problem is a little bit different :
I'm on a SAMBA 3.5.6 Server with this share :
[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
Hello all,
I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it. All
shares looks like this :
[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
read only = No
create mask = 0660
On 01/12/2010 11:38, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
Hello all,
I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on
it. All shares looks like this :
[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
read only = No
create mask
Permissions for the share are the same in 3.3.0 and 3.5.6, like this :
drwxrwx--- 21 root info4096 2009-01-17 08:38 partinfo
thx,
Le 01/12/2010 12:14, George Mamalakis a écrit :
On 01/12/2010 11:38, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
Hello all,
I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some
On Tue Aug 31 2010 22:54:17 GMT+0200 Han Solo gforums2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a samba share that has the following permissions:
create mask = 0775
force create mode = 0664
directory create mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0764
5.) I have a basic .txt
On Tue Aug 31 2010 23:02:26 GMT+0200 Nicolas Jungers
nico...@jungers.net wrote:
a mask is a removal of bit in the permission, so you get that a bit
wrong :-)
say you have permissions of 777 which in binary is 111-111-111 and a
mask of 022 which is 000-010-010 you have to do the following to
On 2010-09-01 15:00, alexr wrote:
On Tue Aug 31 2010 23:02:26 GMT+0200 Nicolas Jungers
nico...@jungers.net wrote:
a mask is a removal of bit in the permission, so you get that a bit
wrong :-)
say you have permissions of 777 which in binary is 111-111-111 and a
mask of 022 which is 000-010-010
I have a samba share that has the following permissions:
create mask = 0775
force create mode = 0664
directory create mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0764
1.) Does this means DOS/windows files will be created as rwxrwxr-x per
create mask or rw-rw-r-- per force
On 08/31/2010 10:54 PM, Han Solo wrote:
I have a samba share that has the following permissions:
create mask = 0775
force create mode = 0664
directory create mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0764
1.) Does this means DOS/windows files will be created as
Hi,
Running 3.0.28-0.2-1625-SUSE-CODE10,
if in /etc/samba/smb.conf the hide dot files parameter is set to No then
on the client I see
$ touch hi
touch: cannot touch `hi': Permission denied
$ ls -alh
total 4.0K
drwxrwxr-x 10 500 users0 2010-05-20 14:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 29 root root 4.0K
Hello all,
I want some help, (if you dont mind...)
I have this path shared:
path = /usr/paths/import
valid users = liana anna
writable = yes
public = yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
force group = import
force user = liana
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
How
Hi. Add the users to the group import and
chown -R liana:import /usr/paths/import
In the smb.conf
path = /usr/paths/import
valid users = liana anna
writable = yes
public = yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
force group = import
To my this work
2010/5/13 Pedro Valmor
Greetings list,
I'm having a problem setting file permissions for users connecting to my
samba file server. CentOS 5.4, samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.
I have authentication configured to use winbind, and name services
configured to use LDAP.
I've configured valid users in smb.conf to contain
Sorry folks - false alarm. A bit of searching in the archives showed me
that I needed:
admin users = DOMAIN\username
Fixed the problem.
Carry on...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddy Sturg tride2...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Subject: Samba permissions
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Josh Kelley josh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a very strange permissions problem with Samba 3.4.7 (installed
via backports.org) running on Debian Lenny:
If a Windows 7 or Windows Vista client tries to use Windows Explorer to
access a user's home directory
I'm having a very strange permissions problem with Samba 3.4.7 (installed
via backports.org) running on Debian Lenny:
If a Windows 7 or Windows Vista client tries to use Windows Explorer to
access a user's home directory with permissions 0700, the client gets a
permission denied error.
If the
Dear friends,
I am straight away coming to the point I have a samba
serverhttp://www.linuxforums.org/forum/#and I have created a public
share (with full permissions for every user in
network) and I have mounted it on a RHEL machine. The problem is that
permissions on the mount change when I
I have user who have access to their home directories on the samba server.
The supervisor has access to these home directories.
When the supervisor creates a file the ownership of the file is in his
name and the user cannot access it. (well, she can access it, but
cannot write to it)
Is there
I have user who have access to their home directories on the samba server.
The supervisor has access to these home directories.
When the supervisor creates a file the ownership of the file is in his
name and the user cannot access it. (well, she can access it, but
cannot write to it)
Is
2010/1/26 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com:
I have user who have access to their home directories on the samba server.
The supervisor has access to these home directories.
When the supervisor creates a file the ownership of the file is in his
name and the user cannot access it. (well, she
On 01/26/2010 12:50 PM, Dave Coventry wrote:
I have user who have access to their home directories on the samba server.
The supervisor has access to these home directories.
When the supervisor creates a file the ownership of the file is in his
name and the user cannot access it. (well, she can
On 1/22/2010 4:23 PM, Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/22/2010 3:25 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one
as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using the tdb back end are
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller
one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one
as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both.
I have two shares on the member
I am trying to backup a Windows XP Pro machine
with BackupPC running on a Fedora-11 machine.
Let me say at once that I know very little
about Windows XP;
the machine I want to backup belongs to a relative
who does not run Linux.
The problem seems to lie with reading permission
on my Windows
I have fought with these before. I finally got them down the way that I
wanted them, but I was wanting to set this up a bit different. I want to
make sure that there is no way to do this without actually having to
assign a bunch of different drive letters to shares.
I basically one one Drive
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
I have fought with these before. I finally got them down the way that I
wanted them, but I was wanting to set this up a bit different. I want to
make sure that there is no way to do this without actually having to
assign a bunch of different drive
Jonathan,
Any chance there could be a duplicate user?
getent passwd|grep /user/ would narrow the list down.
Dale
Jonathon Doran wrote:
I am obviously confused about something, and feel like I am chasing
ghosts. Any help or clarification would be appreciated.
When a user logs in we get
Quoting Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com:
Jonathan,
Any chance there could be a duplicate user?
getent passwd|grep /user/ would narrow the list down.
Dale
Thanks for the idea, but no. Just one occurrence.
I'm pretty sure the namespace with the collision is the profile.
While I have a moment, I'd like to followup yesterdays post with
another data point. I backed up one user's profile, then went into
the directory and did chmod -R 777 .. The user is able to login,
and access their profile normally. This really makes me believe this
is an
My apologies for the extra post, but I spoke too soon. I'm on my way
out the door to check on another lab, so I'm trying to summarize where
things are.
With 777 permissions and logging set to 4, I still see the
OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION in the logfile. And upon logout and logging back
in
I am obviously confused about something, and feel like I am chasing
ghosts. Any help or clarification would be appreciated.
When a user logs in we get messages about corrupt recycle bins.
Setting the logging to level 2 for that client, we have errors like:
open_directory: unable to
Hi List
Thanks for all the help. I found a solution. The solution was for to use
force user. Now shared files are owned by the same user and this
solves my permissions problem.
Thanks for the help
Regards,
Dennis
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
hi.
I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba.
I wish to have a 660 permission on new files, instead i've got 664.
also, if i create an empty files it will get 644 permmission, instead of 660.
directory creation instead seems fine.
Below my environmnent and tests.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
hi.
I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba.
I wish to have a 660 permission on new files, instead i've got 664.
also, if i create an empty files it will get 644 permmission, instead of 660.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 04:33:07PM -0400, simo wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:06 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
hi.
I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba.
I wish to have a 660 permission
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:06 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
hi.
I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba.
I wish to have a 660 permission on new files, instead i've got 664.
also, if i create an
I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba.
I wish to have a 660 permission on new files, instead i've got 664.
Server: Debian Lenny, kernel 2.6.26-2-xen-686, samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny2
Client: Ubuntu Jaunty, kernel 2.6.28-11-generic, smbclient 2:3.3.2-
Going linux to
Am Dienstag 26 Mai 2009 11:13:13 schrieb Dennis Duggen:
Hi list
I have trouble setting up the system permissions to be secure. Here my
basic setup.
2 groups: users and staff
/home/user should have the permissions user:users rwx--
/mnt/staff should have the permissions user:staff
Hi
I have a quite similar setup (maybe a littler bit more complex, since my...
My solution was to disable 'nt acl support' by setting:
nt acl support = no
It doesn't do it for me. As soon as i set the permissions to 770 it
breakes again. It seams to me that the creating user has
Hi Liutauras
Then you create new file in [admin] share, what do you get with command
ll /mnt/admin?
I guess you mean ll = ls -la
-rwxrwx--- 1 bj staff 0 May 28 12:00 Ny Tekstdokument.txt
bj is one of the users, his primary group is users but he is member of
the group staff.
So why
Hi,
hm that's strange. I just rethought my setup and I remember having set
posix default ACL's on the folders that permit the reading for the
groups.
I'm not quite sure if this was only to allow proper access to user
coming via SSH/ scp or if it is also needed by samba.
Maybe you wanna give it a
Hi list
I have trouble setting up the system permissions to be secure. Here my
basic setup.
2 groups: users and staff
/home/user should have the permissions user:users rwx--
/mnt/staff should have the permissions user:staff rwxrwx---
For the last one users should'nt have access.
I test
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Dennis Duggen
den...@riberhusprivatskole.dk wrote:
Hi list
I have trouble setting up the system permissions to be secure. Here my
basic setup.
2 groups: users and staff
/home/user should have the permissions user:users rwx--
/mnt/staff should have the
Hi Liutauras
I don't see any share for /home/user and /mnt/staff in your smb.conf.
If create file in a share, what system permissions do you get? Paste rwx
style.
[homes] is the /home
[admin] is the staff one
Dennis
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dennis Duggen
den...@riberhusprivatskole.dk wrote:
Hi Liutauras
I don't see any share for /home/user and /mnt/staff in your smb.conf.
If create file in a share, what system permissions do you get? Paste rwx
style.
[homes] is the /home
[admin] is the staff
Hi,
I have a quite similar setup (maybe a littler bit more complex, since my
users can also save files via SSH) and a problem, that I couldn't
rename/ edit existing office (word/ excel/ ...) documents under windows
XP.
My solution was to disable 'nt acl support' by setting:
nt acl
I have a share created on my linux server. I can connect to it with the
administrator user just fine. I need to be able to create files and
directories with the administrator user, even in directories that are
not owned by administrator. administrator is in the users group.
Everything
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ryan Stille r...@cfwebtools.com wrote:
[websites]
comment = /home/WWW-data
path = /home/WWW-data
read only = no
valid users = rps administrator
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force user = administrator
force group = nobody
It looks
Kyle Rabe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ryan Stille r...@cfwebtools.com wrote:
[websites]
comment = /home/WWW-data
path = /home/WWW-data
read only = no
valid users = rps administrator
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force user = administrator
force group = nobody
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Ryan Stille r...@cfwebtools.com wrote:
...I was forcing the group nobody because I need files that are created
through the samba share to be editable by the web server.
For this purpose, I would use the www-data group or something similar.
The nobody group, in
Hey guys,
Having a problem with permissions on shares I've setup.
I recently migrated a working samba install over to a new box. This new
servers is running the same distro (Gentoo 2008.0), same version (3.0.32),
and using the exact same smb.conf.
I'm trying to get directories to have the
Hi folks :-)
using smbmount //ip/share /home/user0/share -o username=xxx,password=xxx I
can mount the share samba dir on my client but:
if I do: touch temp0 I see:
touch: setting times of `temp0': No such file or directory
or I can create new directory but I can't write on it.
Using konqueror
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Steve Payne wrote:
Folks,
We have a sun server that uses samba for our file shares. Our work
stations are Windows xp and Windows Vista. I have noticed that on vista
when I store files or create files, the permissions on windows vista
shows no
Folks,
We have a sun server that uses samba for our file shares. Our work
stations are Windows xp and Windows Vista. I have noticed that on vista
when I store files or create files, the permissions on windows vista
shows no permissions. What would cause this? Our unix servers are part
of our
Doug Tucker wrote:
From the man
pages, it looks like I can set the share to read only, and use the
directive write list = @groupname to allow certain users write access
to this read only share, but, I don't want to allow everyone read
access, I want to only allow certain other users
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of users
read only
Doug Tucker wrote:
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to
I'm running Samba on Ubuntu server. I know, perhaps it is not related with
Ubuntu Server 8.04, but rather
with Samba itself, but I thought perhaps someone has similar
experience...
I have a couple of shares on Samba on a vfat (fat32) volume. As
everybody knows Linux permissions does not work
Tomas Mackevicius wrote:
I'm running Samba on Ubuntu server. I know, perhaps it is not related with
Ubuntu Server 8.04, but rather
with Samba itself, but I thought perhaps someone has similar
experience...
Actually I don't think it has much to do with samba either.
I have a couple of
solarflow99 wrote:
Hi, snip My question is since I am
using LDAP as the backend, root can't easily be used; does anyone have any
recommendations on how this can be done?
Why don't you create an Administrator user in ldap that has uid 0?
*Michael Heydon - IT Administrator *
[EMAIL
Hi, I am trying to run the addsmbcups command which uses: smbclient,
rpcclient, adddriver, setdriver commands to do its work. It seems like it
expects be be root, since it has to write to various places:
/var/spool/cups/tmp/ and /usr/share/cups/drivers. My question is since I am
using LDAP as
Hi,
I am relatively new to Samba although I've installed it and used it before my
knowledge is very shallow.
Environment:
Samba version is: 3.0.21a
Platform: Sun X4200 M2, AMD Opteron running Solaris 10
Client: Windows Vista
Situation:
I am trying to allow a user to copy folders from her
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
