Yes - but the same error as before ...
Anyone else have another idea?
best regards
Jan
cuicui schrieb:
Jan a écrit :
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
Jan wrote:
Jan schrieb:
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified in smb.con
via the eth2 interface.
i tried to bind it like this:
*interfaces = lo eth2
I'm not this stupid okay? :) - the syntax and interface are formated
correctly.
the netbios broadcasts are send by the specified interface but however a
data transfer
starts the complete traffic goes over the eth1 device. It's really
strange isn't it?
Would someone please check if it's the
Hey Bjørn,
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
eth2 is not configurated with an default route. could this be the failure?
(i don't think
On 8/4/07, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not this stupid okay? :) - the syntax and interface are formated
correctly.
Sorry, I not intended this.
Have you checked how clients are resolving netbios names?
As both interface are in the same networks, maybe due to same names
set in /etc/hosts or
Hallo, Jan,
Du (jan) meintest am 04.08.07:
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
That's no good configuration - try to work with one card
Helmut Hullen schrieb:
Hallo, Jan,
Du (jan) meintest am 04.08.07:
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
Bjørn Tore Sund schrieb:
Jan wrote:
Hey Bjørn,
Hey Jan,
If you bottom-quote and edit when you respond to me, it becomes that
much easier to reply _in_ your email and address specifics there.
Alright! The next time, i will do so :)
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 =
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had seen
that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified in smb.con
via the eth2 interface.
i tried to bind it like this:
*interfaces = lo eth2
*
in smb.conf ... any
Jan a écrit :
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had seen
that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified in smb.con
via the eth2 interface.
i tried to bind it like this:
*interfaces = lo eth2
*
in
Yes - but the same error as before ...
Anyone else have another idea?
best regards
Jan
Jan schrieb:
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had seen
that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified in smb.con
via
Yes - but the same error as before ...
Anyone else have another idea?
best regards
Jan
cuicui schrieb:
Jan a écrit :
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user-server / server-user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified
12 matches
Mail list logo
