Hello,
i need some help. A samba3 (3.6.9-151.el6_4.1) ADS member (WIN 2008 AD
Master) Server did his work for years. Since hours some Clients can not
connect to the name (\\fileserver)
connecting to \\192... sometimes work.
Log say:
2013/10/09 09:54:27.735101, 3]
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
Hello,
i need some help. A samba3 (3.6.9-151.el6_4.1) ADS member (WIN 2008
AD Master) Server did his work for years. Since hours some Clients
can not connect to the name (\\fileserver)
connecting to \\192... sometimes work.
Hallo, Katariya,
Du meintest am 24.03.11:
I am unable to change owner to Administrator of the file through
smbcacls command.
CIFS share is in french domain.
SMBACLS for the file are:
==
smbcacls -n //10.10.18.19/Rahulk\
password is having ascii characters. But path is non-ascii.
I am able to mount it as password is in ascii.
I am not able to change owner of the file to Administrator.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:32:31 +0530 Helmut Hullen lt;hul...@t-online.degt;
wrote
gt;Hallo, Katariya,
gt;
gt;Du meintest am
Hi ,
I am unable to change owner to Administrator of the file through smbcacls
command.
CIFS share is in french domain.
SMBACLS for the file are:
==
smbcacls -n //10.10.18.19/Rahulk\ test /test.txt -U
Hello,
rejoining was not possible (semaphore timeout when trying to rejoin). I
tried to use .deb file for ubuntu 8.04 (Samba 3.0.28). Samba worked
better but logging into domain was still not possible. So I tried to use
deb file from Dapper Ubuntu (6.06) - Samba 3.0.22 (which was first
Hello,
2010/5/30 Igor R. igor.rak...@gmx.com
hello!
I need urgent help. I upgraded from dapper to lucid (samba version 3.0 -
3.4). Now I cannot log in to domain anymore (domain controller not available
message), also new clients cannot join domain (semaphore timeout message
after typing
hello!
I need urgent help. I upgraded from dapper to lucid (samba version 3.0 - 3.4).
Now I cannot log in to domain anymore (domain controller not available
message), also new clients cannot join domain (semaphore timeout message after
typing root username and password). If I take LAN cable
So... a LOT has changed. Your best bet is to revert that machine back
to a samba 3.0 and build up a test machine with samba 3.4.
I don't know what's wrong with your setup (don't have one like it), but
i do know that having time to work on a system is much easier to deal
with than to do it
do your users still have Samba rights?
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/rights.html
On May 29, 2010 5:06 PM, Igor R. igor.rak...@gmx.com wrote:
hello!
I need urgent help. I upgraded from dapper to lucid (samba version 3.0 -
3.4). Now I cannot log in to domain anymore
SNIP
I need urgent help. I upgraded from dapper to lucid (samba version 3.0
- 3.4). Now I cannot log in to domain anymore (domain controller not
available message), also new clients cannot join domain (semaphore
timeout message after typing root username and password). If I take
LAN cable
Hi,
I am Planning to install samba (3.0.21b
http://us5.samba.org/samba/ftp/stable/samba-3.0.21b.tar.gz given in
the below link for Clear Case 7.1.x on Solaris 8)
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21302974#Supported%20SM
B%20Server%20Products
I am getting lots of errors and could
Am Monday 29 March 2010 14:56:13 schrieb John H Terpstra:
Richi,
Please file a detailed bug report on https://bugzilla.samba.org with
clear steps so that one of the developers can reproduce your problem.
Is your installation new, or was is migrated from an earlier version of
Samba?
-
Good morning John,
here is the Output:
server-b10:/# ls -al /lib*/libc-*so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1375536 14. Jän 07:51 /lib64/libc-2.7.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1375536 14. Jän 07:51 /lib/libc-2.7.so
server-b10:/# uname -a
Linux server-b10.intern.bilcom.at 2.6.32-vs2.3.0.36.26 #1 SMP Thu Dec 10
On 29 March 2010 08:45, Richard Lamboj richard.lam...@bilcom.at wrote:
Good morning John,
here is the Output:
server-b10:/# ls -al /lib*/libc-*so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1375536 14. Jän 07:51 /lib64/libc-2.7.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1375536 14. Jän 07:51 /lib/libc-2.7.so
server-b10:/#
Am Monday 29 March 2010 11:12:02 schrieb Michael Wood:
On 29 March 2010 08:45, Richard Lamboj richard.lam...@bilcom.at wrote:
Good morning John,
here is the Output:
server-b10:/# ls -al /lib*/libc-*so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1375536 14. Jän 07:51 /lib64/libc-2.7.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root
reetings List,
I am a newbie in this list so please be indulgent.
I am actually about running a samba (PDC) with OpenLDAP in Debian. I
installed it (Samba) and configured it, but it didn't still work. Here are
some outputs:
from *net getlocalsid*
csiidebian:~# net getlocalsid
[2010/03/29 17:57:33,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:30:00AM +, Johnny R wrote:
reetings List,
I am a newbie in this list so please be indulgent.
I am actually about running a samba (PDC) with OpenLDAP in Debian. I
installed it (Samba) and configured it, but it didn't still work. Here are
some outputs:
from *net
Thanks Volker,
But it still won't work ...
csidebian:~# smbpasswd -W ldapadmin
Setting stored password for cn=admin,dc=csimaroc,dc=net in secrets.tdb
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
csidebian:~# net getlocalsid
[2010/03/29 18:40:46, 0] lib/smbldap.c:1086(smbldap_connect_system)
Richi,
Please file a detailed bug report on https://bugzilla.samba.org with
clear steps so that one of the developers can reproduce your problem.
Is your installation new, or was is migrated from an earlier version of
Samba?
- John T.
On 03/29/2010 01:45 AM, Richard Lamboj wrote:
Good
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:43:35AM +, Johnny R wrote:
Is there any way to verify if the connexion between samba and ldap is ok?
Actually I am reading the samba official how to.
All the best.
You might try to authenticate with ldapsearch:
ldapsearch -x -s base -b -h 127.0.0.1 -D
Hello everyone,
I have the exact same problem, but without any solution :
Le 12.03.2010 08:03, Richard Lamboj a écrit :
Its definitly a signed 32 bit int:
net sam policy set maximum password age 4294967291
Account policy maximum password age value was: -1
Account policy maximum password age
Please will all who have this problem respond with the output of
executing the following:
1) smbd -V
2) ls -al /lib*/libc-*so
3) uname -a
Thanks.
- John T.
On 03/28/2010 07:33 AM, Denis BUCHER wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have the exact same problem, but without any solution :
Le
No ideas, anyone???
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Weinmann
Sent: 02 October 2009 14:48
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] URGENT HELP NEEDED!!! PLEASE!!
Hi,
I have a big big problem. I compiled
No ideas, anyone???
With a subject like that I think we all assumed it was spam ;-)
Probably best to choose a more accurate subject next time.
Under Solaris 8 i get all groups of a user. Under Solaris 10 I can only
see the primary group set under the Unix Attributes Tab in W2k3.
I'm using
10/05/2009 09:58 AM, Adam Nielsen::
No ideas, anyone???
With a subject like that I think we all assumed it was spam ;-)
Probably best to choose a more accurate subject next time.
+1
Wherever I lurk, I never answer to messages with
help AND urgent AND please.
Although they are not spam, they
Hi,
I have a big big problem. I compiled Samba 3.2.6 for Solaris 8 and 10.
Environment is Windows 2003 SFU. So far it looked like everything works
as expected.
Under Solaris 8 i get all groups of a user. Under Solaris 10 I can only
see the primary group set under the Unix Attributes Tab in W2k3.
Hi
2009/9/4 William Jojo w.j...@hvcc.edu:
I (cross-)posted a few days ago about TDB files growing for individual
printers. These TDB files are holding onto information about previous jobs
after they have been printed.
[...]
Is there a way to remove this old information from the TDB file?
I (cross-)posted a few days ago about TDB files growing for individual
printers. These TDB files are holding onto information about previous
jobs after they have been printed.
This is on AIX 5.3 that was just upgraded from 3.0.31 about 20 days ago.
The problem now is we are bumping up
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 10:39 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Ok. i got it. I had to change the parameter for:
krb5_ccache_type = FILE
now
Hi,
the server is not linux. It's a NETAPP Filer.
Regards,
Oli
-Original Message-
From: simo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2008 17:47
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Cc: Oliver Weinmann; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
Hi,
I'm running winbind (3.0.28a) on SLES9 with heimdal Kerberos. Everything works
fine so far. Now i need to have the host keytab generated by winbind to be in
the default /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab in order to use nfs with kerberos security.
The problem is i have set the parameter in smb.conf:
PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2008 11:39
To: Oliver Weinmann
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running winbind (3.0.28a) on SLES9 with heimdal Kerberos. Everything
works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running winbind (3.0.28a) on SLES9 with heimdal Kerberos. Everything
works fine so far. Now i need to have the host keytab generated by winbind to
be in the default /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab in order to use nfs with
:18 rhel4wbtest1 sshd[4542]: pam_krb5: authentication fails for
`tuser'
does winbind by default use: rc4-hmac?
-Original Message-
From: Guenther Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2008 11:39
To: Oliver Weinmann
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm running winbind (3.0.28a) on SLES9 with heimdal Kerberos.
Everything works fine so far. Now i need to have the host keytab
generated by winbind to be in the default /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab in order
to use nfs with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
| Yes the net ads keytab create created the keytab file now. But in
the logs i can see that the encryption type used is not good:
|
| Apr 2 12:37:18 rhel4wbtest1 sshd[4542]: pam_krb5: error reading keys
for
To: Oliver Weinmann
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm running winbind (3.0.28a) on SLES9 with heimdal Kerberos.
Everything works fine so far. Now i need to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Hi and thanks for you answer.
here is the output about the encryption used:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] krb5]# klist -e -k
Keytab name: FILE:/etc/krb5/krb5.keytab
KVNO Principal
Enctypes look fine.
i have to use pam_krb5
Weinmann
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Hi and thanks for you answer.
here is the output about the encryption used:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] krb5]# klist -e -k
Keytab name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
how? when i use pam_winbind to login and automount to mount a users home
with kerberos security i dont get a TGT at login. So this doesn't seem
to work with pam_winbind or?
Install examples/pam_winbind/pam_winbind.conf to
: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
how? when i use pam_winbind to login and automount to mount a users
home with kerberos security i dont get a TGT at login. So this doesn't
seem to work with pam_winbind
] On Behalf
Of Oliver Weinmann
Sent: 02 April 2008 16:31
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
Sounds cool.
i made the changes. When i login as an ad user i don't get a ticket? Is
there anything else i need to set
April 2008 16:31
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Urgent... winbind and keytab file creation
Sounds cool.
i made the changes. When i login as an ad user i don't get a ticket? Is
there anything else i need to set?
Cheers
-Original Message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Ok. i got it. I had to change the parameter for:
krb5_ccache_type = FILE
now the users get a cached ticket at login. COOL :)
but when the automount daemon tries to mount their home it fails:
Apr 2 16:41:09
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 10:39 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Ok. i got it. I had to change the parameter for:
krb5_ccache_type = FILE
now the users get a cached ticket at login. COOL :)
but when the
Hi All,
I have installed SAMBA 3.0.24 in my UNIX server. When I try to login
through an WINDOWS XP client, I found NO NT password stored for user
in the log, meant for my cleint name.
The log entry:-
[2008/03/07 15:51:32, 3] libsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(189)
ntlm_password_check: NO
Do you have any policy set about password changing?
Users are allowed to change their passwords every 7 days.
*Jason Baker
*/IT Coordinator/
*Glastender Inc.*
5400 North Michigan Road
Saginaw, Michigan 48604 USA
800.748.0423
Phone: 989.752.4275 ext. 228
Fax: 989.752.
www.glastender.com
Also, If I run the command:
pdbedit --pwd-must-change-time=2007-07-14 --time-format=%Y-%m-%d jrolfe
It doesn't have any effect. I run pdbedit -Lv -u jrolfe and get:
---cut
Logoff time: never
Kickoff time: Tue, 31 Dec 2030 08:00:00 EST
Password last set:Mon, 01
In case anyone was following this thread, I finally did find the solution.
Apparently you can no long expire a user's password by issuing the command:
pdbedit --pwd-must-change-time...
If you want to require a user to change their password at next login,
you need to issue the command:
I have been having some problems since I updated from Samba 3.0.23 to
3.0.25b. I have installed the latest version of smbldap-tools but I am
still not able to make certain changes to a user's account. I have
created a new user named JROLFE.
After I set up a new user, I will set it so they are
Jason Baker escreveu:
I have been having some problems since I updated from Samba 3.0.23 to
3.0.25b. I have installed the latest version of smbldap-tools but I am
still not able to make certain changes to a user's account. I have
created a new user named JROLFE.
After I set up a new user, I
Edmundo Valle Neto escreveu:
Jason Baker escreveu:
I have been having some problems since I updated from Samba 3.0.23 to
3.0.25b. I have installed the latest version of smbldap-tools but I
am still not able to make certain changes to a user's account. I have
created a new user named JROLFE.
Hi list,
we have spotted a serious problem with our Samba
(Debian version 3.0.24-6) on linux 2.4.31, ext2 with ACLs enabled.
We use hide unreadable = yes to reduce clutter for our
users. Today we noticed that with this option enabled any
linux client can access and read *all* directories under
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 06:30:02PM +0200, moe wrote:
Hi list,
we have spotted a serious problem with our Samba
(Debian version 3.0.24-6) on linux 2.4.31, ext2 with ACLs enabled.
We use hide unreadable = yes to reduce clutter for our
users. Today we noticed that with this option enabled
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:40:44AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 06:30:02PM +0200, moe wrote:
Hi list,
we have spotted a serious problem with our Samba
(Debian version 3.0.24-6) on linux 2.4.31, ext2 with ACLs enabled.
We use hide unreadable = yes to reduce
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:42:55PM +0200, moe wrote:
I have seen that in the release notes but didn't
relate to my particular problem. My bad after all,
apologies.
FYI: To anyone following this - Moe reported that
this was the bug that was fixed in 3.0.25.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
--
To
PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Windows Server 2003 SP2 broke samba
On Monday 25 June 2007 12:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After applying SP2 to our Windows Server 2003 domain controller, we
are
unable to access Samba Version 3.0.4 shared user
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the How To Compile Samba leads me to this question. Must I compile
Samba with AD support as described in that document in order for the Samba
server to be able to have userids/passwords authenticated by a W2K3/SP2 AD?
I only need to be
Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 7:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Windows Server 2003 SP2 broke samba
On Monday 25 June 2007 12:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After applying SP2 to our Windows Server 2003 domain controller, we
are
unable
After applying SP2 to our Windows Server 2003 domain controller, we are
unable to access Samba Version 3.0.4 shared user diectories.
Access fails with these message:
unable to validate password for user USER in domain DOMAIN to Domain
controller \\DOODAH. Error was
Hello Charles,
What does your log say when you run wbinfo -g ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After applying SP2 to our Windows Server 2003 domain controller, we
are unable to access Samba Version 3.0.4 shared user diectories.
Access fails with these message:
unable to validate password for
On Monday 25 June 2007 12:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After applying SP2 to our Windows Server 2003 domain controller, we are
unable to access Samba Version 3.0.4 shared user diectories.
Access fails with these message:
unable to validate password for user USER in domain DOMAIN to Domain
Hallo!
after migrating the pdc from nt to samba+ldap my member fileserver doesn't see
the groups anymore.
I set it up with nss as shown in:
http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/unixclients.html#ch9-sdmnss
getent passwd + group show all user and groups correctly
wbinfo -u shows all
Samba 3.0.24 on Debian Etch 4 - PDC security=user
When I execute pdbedit -L there are a strange error:
lookup_global_sam_rid: looking up RID 513.
pdb_getsampwrid (TDB): error looking up RID 513 by key RID_0201.
Error: Record does not exist
store_gid_sid_cache: gid 1005 in cache -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Chamorro wrote:
Samba 3.0.24 on Debian Etch 4 - PDC security=user
When I execute pdbedit -L there are a strange error:
lookup_global_sam_rid: looking up RID 513.
pdb_getsampwrid (TDB): error looking up RID 513 by key RID_0201.
, 17 Feb 2007 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Need to move Samba to another computer
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
Use the smbclient command with the -J option. Try it first with no
options to get a list of options, or try man smbclient.
smbpasswd -j domain -r
, in advance, for your help!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Need to move Samba to another computer
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
Use the smbclient
smbpasswd -j boxyzzy.doodah.edu -r boxy2k3a -u administrator - Failed
with the exact same messages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Need to move Samba to another computer
(Error
@lists.samba.org
Sent: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Need to move Samba to another computer
(Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT)
You could try it with -u administrator:
smbpasswd -j boxyzzy.doodah.edu -r boxy2k3a -u administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From domain
On Friday 16 February 2007 23:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since 2004, I've been running Samba 2.0.7 on a Solaris 8 computer as a
member of a Windows 2003 Server domain - nothing fancy, just mapping
Unix home directories to PC users. Now I must QUICKLY move this same
Samba config to another
Use the smbclient command with the -J option. Try it first with no
options to get a list of options, or try man smbclient.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since 2004, I've been running Samba 2.0.7 on a Solaris 8 computer as a
member of a Windows 2003 Server domain - nothing fancy, just mapping
Unix
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
Use the smbclient command with the -J option. Try it first with no
options to get a list of options, or try man smbclient.
smbpasswd -j domain -r server
might be more appropriate.
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
-b xmit/send buffer changes the transmit/send buffer
(default: 65520)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] URGENT! Need to move Samba to another computer
Use the smbclient command with the -J option
Since 2004, I've been running Samba 2.0.7 on a Solaris 8 computer as a
member of a Windows 2003 Server domain - nothing fancy, just mapping
Unix home directories to PC users. Now I must QUICKLY move this same
Samba config to another computer, and (for the life of me!) I can't
recall the steps
Hi!
Since the upgrade from 3.23d to 3.24 I can't log into a XP machine
(Domain controller not found or machine account not valid ...)
Samba shows:
eb 6 09:48:03 rk01 smbd[14115]: [2007/02/06 09:48:03, 0]
rpc_server/srv_dce_funnel.c:ncalrpc_open_funnel_socket(68)
Feb 6 09:48:03 rk01
On 2/6/07, Martin Hochreiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since the upgrade from 3.23d to 3.24 I can't log into a XP machine
(Domain controller not found or machine account not valid ...)
Is the samba box you upgraded also the domain controller? Are you using ldap?
John
--
To unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Hi!
Since the upgrade from 3.23d to 3.24 I can't log into a XP machine
(Domain controller not found or machine account not valid ...)
Samba shows:
eb 6 09:48:03 rk01 smbd[14115]: [2007/02/06 09:48:03, 0]
Hi Jerry, hi John!
The error occurs on 4 machines (all Suse - 9.3 and 10.1); all installed with
Suse rpm's and all 4 machines Domain Controller with ldap backend.
The rpm's (for 10.1) are from
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/3.0/10.1/i386
@john - yes, as I mentioned above they are domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Hi Jerry, hi John!
The error occurs on 4 machines (all Suse - 9.3 and 10.1);
all installed with Suse rpm's and all 4 machines
Domain Controller with ldap backend.
The rpm's (for 10.1) are from
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:47:46AM -0600, Gerald Carter wrote:
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
The error occurs on 4 machines (all Suse - 9.3 and 10.1);
all installed with Suse rpm's and all 4 machines
Domain Controller with ldap backend.
The rpm's (for 10.1) are from
I've gone further down the food chain in diagnosing the problem:
A net rpc join command works but wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g fails:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# net rpc join -U Administrator
Password:
Joined domain MERCURY.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# net rpc info -U Administrator
Password:
Domain Name:
From: Michael St. Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've gone further down the food chain in diagnosing the problem:
A net rpc join command works but wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g fails:
...
I've tried removing the server from the domain and rejoining it to no avail.
The domain has a Windows ADS
: Re: [Samba] Urgent help request!
From: Michael St. Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've gone further down the food chain in diagnosing the problem:
A net rpc join command works but wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g fails:
...
I've tried removing the server from the domain and rejoining it to no
avail
: maandag 13 november 2006 16:54
Aan: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] URGENT problem in production enviroment 3.0.23c-1
Thanks for the pointer, I'm going to check this out tonight or early
tomorrow!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
Verzonden: zondag 12 november 2006 19:18
Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] URGENT problem in production enviroment 3.0.23c-1
Problem seems to be with the changed acl group control parameter. When
I try to change rights of a file from within Windows I get an access
denied (I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
Problem seems to be with the changed acl group control parameter.
Try this patch.
http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=19627
cheers, jerry
Thanks for the pointer, I'm going to check this out tonight or early
tomorrow!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 13 november 2006 16:18
Aan: Sander van Harmelen
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] URGENT problem
Problem seems to be with the changed acl group control parameter. When
I try to change rights of a file from within Windows I get an access
denied (I'm not the owner of the file but I am a member of a group who
has rwx rights).
How can I regain this functionality? dos filemode = yes is already
S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
Really hope someone can spare a few minutes!!
Sorry that I don't have any answers to your problem. However, if you
have an urgent Samba-related problem that affects your core business,
why not try commercial Samba support:
http://samba.org/samba/support/
(Note:
Hi
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: [2006/10/19 11:47:58, 0]
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(866)
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: oplock_break: receive_smb timed out
after 30 seconds.
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: oplock_break failed for file
SINS/Textes.mmo (dev = 306, inode = 1556602,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:02:39PM +0200, Noc Phibee wrote:
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: [2006/10/19 11:47:58, 0]
smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(866)
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: oplock_break: receive_smb timed out
after 30 seconds.
Oct 19 11:47:58 gw smbd[20819]: oplock_break failed
Version: 3.0.14a (debian stable: 3sarge1)
I'm just about finished converting our company's network from NIS to
LDAP. Part of that involved updating Samba to use that same directory
so all the information is maintained in one place.
Most everything is good, except that my roaming profiles
Version: 3.0.14a (debian stable: 3sarge1)
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
I'm just about finished converting our company's network from NIS to
LDAP. Part of that involved updating Samba to use that same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian White wrote:
Version: 3.0.14a (debian stable: 3sarge1)
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
Use %U. Be watch out as this will actually become deprecated
However, it semes that Samba is NOT substituting the %u in this case
even though it was when LDAP was not in use. At least logon path
and logon home are affected; maybe more.
Okay, guess what! Both %L and %U (capital) get substituted correctly.
I guess I'll just use %U instead of %u -- the
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
Use %U. Be watch out as this will actually become deprecated
functionality in future releases.
Just figured that out. Thanks!
Why is this being depricated?
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:37:33PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
Version: 3.0.14a (debian stable: 3sarge1)
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
I'm just about finished converting our company's network from NIS to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian White wrote:
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
Use %U. Be watch out as this will actually become deprecated
functionality in future releases.
Just figured
I just upgraded to 3.0.22 (debian testing) and have the same problem.
I could really use some help on this one!!!
Use %U. Be watch out as this will actually become deprecated
functionality in future releases.
Just figured that out. Thanks!
Why is this being depricated?
The variable
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
