On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Song, Young wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> I have a top-level directory called /data existing on a Solaris server
> that I'd like to make browsable and readonly by anybody at my company.
>
>
>
> Let's say I have the following in my smb.conf.
>
>
>
> What if I want to
On 02/04/10 11:34, Arzilla Flavio wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with samba configuration. I have a server with Fedora
11, and few servers Windows 2003, Linux and Apple.
Samba works very well with Linux and Windows but not with Apple Leopard.
In my station I have another linux servers and that
Ankit Sahai wrote:
Hello,
How to configure samba on debian m/c having kernel 2.6.22 as I want to share
a folder on my PC with other linux and windows machines on my network. Also
tell the packages need to be installed.
man apt-cache - documentation for apt-get (how to search package names,
try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathon Doran wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
> I took a look at the /var/log/message log and see:
with ldap ssl = off ???
>>> Yes, as soon as I enable ldapsam as the password DB, even with ldap ssl
>>>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David
Christensen wrote:
I took a look at the /var/log/message log and see:
with ldap ssl = off ???
Yes, as soon as I enable ldapsam as the password DB, even with ldap ssl
= off, smb keeps trying to do a StartTLS.
Did you put "ssl off" in ldap.conf?
--
To un
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David
Christensen wrote:
>>> I took a look at the /var/log/message log and see:
>>
>> with ldap ssl = off ???
>
> Yes, as soon as I enable ldapsam as the password DB, even with ldap ssl
> = off, smb keeps trying to do a StartTLS.
I'm out of ideas and I don't use Fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:52 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Norberto Bensa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:1
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:52 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Norberto Bensa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David
>>> Christensen wrote:
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
>>> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
>> That should be plain. I.e. no tls/ssl.
>
> I'm sorry. That co
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
>
> That should be plain. I.e. no tls/ssl.
I'm sorry. That could be TLS if the server supports it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
That should be plain. I.e. no tls/ssl.
> I intend to deploy with SSL just didn't want to use it during my initial
> tests. So by default with nothing specified in smb.conf TLS is on? If
> so so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:52 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> I am using FDS, it does support TLS, but I never configured either to
>> use TLS as part of my testing. I am using ldapsam.
>
> password backend = ldapsam:ldaps://s
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:52 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> I am using FDS, it does support TLS, but I never configured either to
> use TLS as part of my testing. I am using ldapsam.
password backend = ldapsam:ldaps://something or just ldapsam ?
> Does using ldapsam from the
> gate require TLS?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what this error means:
>>
>> [r...@ldap2 samba]# net getlocalsid
>> [2009/07/07 17:04:00, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smb_ldap_start_tls(600)
>> Failed to is
Quoting Norberto Bensa :
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
Does anyone know what this error means:
[r...@ldap2 samba]# net getlocalsid
[2009/07/07 17:04:00, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smb_ldap_start_tls(600)
Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Protocol error
I completely
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> Does anyone know what this error means:
>
> [r...@ldap2 samba]# net getlocalsid
> [2009/07/07 17:04:00, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smb_ldap_start_tls(600)
> Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Protocol error
What version is your ldap server?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
>> David Christensen wrote:
>>> John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
>> John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
>>> John Drescher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
>>> Christensen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> David Christensen wrote:
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> David Christensen wrote:
John Drescher wrote
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:47 PM, John H Terpstra - Samba
Team wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John H Terpstra - Samba
>> Team wrote:
>>> John Drescher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John H Terpstra - Samba
> Team wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
>>> Christensen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> John Drescher wrot
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John H Terpstra - Samba
Team wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> David Christensen wrote:
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> David Christensen wrote:
>>> John Drescher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> David Christensen wrote:
>>> John Drescher wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Christensen wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
>>> Christensen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
>> Christensen wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> I configured samba to work with an FDS backend using a howto from the
>>> Fed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
> Christensen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I configured samba to work with an FDS backend using a howto from the
>> Fedora Directory Server site. The ho
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David
Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I configured samba to work with an FDS backend using a howto from the
> Fedora Directory Server site. The howto had me create a Administrator
> user in LDAP with UID/GID of 0. Now when
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Matt Burkhardt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:06 +0300, Liutauras Adomaitis wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Matt Burkhardt
> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing this - but I'm having problems setting up some file
>> shares that are limited to certain group
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:06 +0300, Liutauras Adomaitis wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Matt Burkhardt
> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing this - but I'm having problems setting up some file
> > shares that are limited to certain groups. I've done countless searches
> > on setups and on th
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Matt Burkhardt wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing this - but I'm having problems setting up some file
> shares that are limited to certain groups. I've done countless searches
> on setups and on the tree connnect failed error message, and just
> haven't found anything th
Hey Guido, I just wanted to update you in that I got it working.
For /home/admin, I chowned admin:admins, and chmoded 770
After doing this I was able to write to the directory as admin, and also
write to it as admin on XP. Also other users are unable to see the
directory.
Just wanted to say tha
>
> Thanks Guido. I think I'm a little confused though :)
>
> Here's what I added to my smb.conf:
>
> [admin]
> path = /home/admin
> browseable = yes
> public = no
> writable = yes
> nt acl support = no
> valid users = @admin
>
> When I do ls -ld /home/admin I get:
>
Thanks Guido. I think I'm a little confused though :)
Here's what I added to my smb.conf:
[admin]
path = /home/admin
browseable = yes
public = no
writable = yes
nt acl support = no
valid users = @admin
When I do ls -ld /home/admin I get:
drwx--x--x 8 admin wheel
Is hard for me to keep up with what you are doing for the hour here ...
But I can tell you this. If you are going to have a share with multiple
users accessing a directory the best thing you can do is to have a
domain-users like.
So...
For example:
[ADD]
path = /home/ADD
browsea
I think I'm making some progress.. I can now write to the directory.
If I chown admin:"domain admins" admin I can then write to the directory on
the XP side. I can see domain permissions, but cannot edit them.
However in doing this, I can no longer access the directory as my user on
the Linux si
ls -ld /home/admin:
drwxr-xr-x 2 admin domain admins 4096 2009-03-17 21:40 admin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Samba-Configuration-tp22566973p22572372.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fo
ls -ld /home/admin ?
>
> Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
>
> passwd: compat winbind
> group: compat winbind
> shadow: compat winbind
>
> And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
> still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
>
Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
passwd: compat winbind
group: compat winbind
shadow: compat winbind
And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
Output of testparm:
Load smb config f
Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
passwd: compat winbind
group: compat winbind
shadow: compat winbind
And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
Output of testparm:
Load smb config f
Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
passwd: compat winbind
group: compat winbind
shadow: compat winbind
And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
Output of testparm:
Load smb config f
Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
passwd: compat winbind
group: compat winbind
shadow: compat winbind
And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
Output of testparm:
Load smb config f
Thanks for the replies guys. My nsswitch.conf has the following:
passwd: compat winbind
group: compat winbind
shadow: compat winbind
And I am on the hosts allow network. If I remove the valid users, I can
still access the share; I just cannot write to it.
Output of testparm:
Load smb config f
ElihuJ wrote:
> Hi all, for the life of me I cannot figure out this problem. I'm trying to
> get Samba working with my AD environment. No matter what I try I cannot seem
> to get it working. Mind you, I can authenticate to the server if I type
> wbinfo -a username. I was also successful in joining
And you are on the host allow network?
Do you try removing the "valid users"?
The output of testparm?
The output of the log?
>
> Hi all, for the life of me I cannot figure out this problem. I'm trying to
> get Samba working with my AD environment. No matter what I try I cannot
> seem
> to get it w
]
*Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2006 3:26 PM
*To:* Sangoi, Nehal (GE Supply, consultant)
*Subject:* Re: [Samba] Samba Configuration on Linux
Nehal,
"valid users" should work in 3.0.23c, but for testing purposes, I
would comment out "valid users" and "username map", t
Hi
I am using "samba-3.0.23c-4.i386.rpm" .
-Original Message-
From: Dale Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 2:13 PM
To: Sangoi, Nehal (GE Supply, consultant); samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Configuration on Linux
Nehal,
Whi
Nehal,
Which version of Samba are you using? I ask this each time I see "
valid users = " because 3.0.23, 23a, and 23b had issues with this directive.
Dale
Sangoi, Nehal (GE Supply, consultant) wrote:
Hi All
I am trying configuring samba on my linux machine. Below is the smb.conf
file.
Yes, I have machines in same workgroup ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Felix Miata
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:09 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Configuration on Linux
On 2006/12/15 12:33 (GMT-0500
On 2006/12/15 12:33 (GMT-0500) Sangoi, Nehal (GE Supply, consultant)
apparently typed:
> I am trying configuring samba on my linux machine. Below is the smb.conf
> file. After starting the samba services (smbd and nmbd), i am not able
> to access the samba exported folder from my network.
> [glob
Yes, I created respective samba user and samba password too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Felix Miata
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:57 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Configuration on Linux
On 2006/12/15
On 2006/12/15 12:33 (GMT-0500) Sangoi, Nehal (GE Supply, consultant)
apparently typed:
> I am trying configuring samba on my linux machine. Below is the smb.conf
Did you remember to create users with useradd and with smbpasswd -a?
--
"Let your conversation be always full of grace." Colossians 4:
Hi, i never seen this , cause i am installing from bins,
but you can do it all without nocups
cause using this parameters later depends only on your entries in the
smb.conf, but it will be nice to have the choice.
Regards
W. D. schrieb:
After 'make install', this appears:
l samba configur
it should be possible using
include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%I
and defining smb.conf.192.168.0.1 files as a specific configuration file
Stefan Bergner wrote:
Hi!
I want to size a samba-server.
the samba server will become 4 ethernet cards.
The samba-server serves his shares to only ONE subnet.
sub
do you mean a guest share or just no auth in anyway?
what version of smba do you use post your smb.conf study man files of
smb.conf
regards
- Original Message -
From: "Distribution Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:41 PM
Subject: [Samba] S
3:22 PM
To: Didovich, Vitaly
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba configuration
Didovich, Vitaly írta:
Hello Samba team,
I am starting to run samba on unix server for make shearing directories with windows
site.
Regarding with your documentation on unix site samba running ok.
[EMAIL
Didovich, Vitaly írta:
Hello Samba team,
I am starting to run samba on unix server for make shearing directories with windows
site.
Regarding with your documentation on unix site samba running ok.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/opt/samba/bin]# ./smbclient -U% -L buzzard
added interface ip=170.118.85.16 bc
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Sanjay Kumar wrote:
> hi
> i want to install samba server on solaris 2.8 . I have done fallowing
> step
> I have download samba file samba-2.2.0.tar.gz from website & save it
> into the /opt/source/samba
> Then I have unzip & untar the source file
> # gunzip samba*
>
I dont und.. 111.111.111 is name of your linux samba or what?
- Original Message -
From: "Dan De Cotiis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:14 AM
Subject: [Samba] Samba Configuration and Remote Access
> Let me preface by saying that I know I s
Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Allen Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba configuration issues
> Whose rpm?
> If it wasn't Redhat's, no chance it will install you
ba List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba configuration issues
> Allen Crawford wrote:
> > My second question is what is the preferred method of running Samba at
> > startup on a Red Hat 7.2 box? The way I did
According to man smb.conf, these are inverted synonyms.
I guest that means they are the same thing, just equal and opposite.
Joel
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:03:19PM -0500, Allen Crawford wrote:
> I forgot one question. In the share definitions, what is the difference
> between "read only = no"
Whose rpm?
If it wasn't Redhat's, no chance it will install your startup scripts
properly.
This starts up my smbd and nmbd on my caldera 2.4 box just fine.
#!/bin/bash
case "$1" in
start)
killall smbd
killall nmbd
/usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D
/usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D
;;
stop)
Allen Crawford wrote:
> My second question is what is the preferred method of running Samba at
> startup on a Red Hat 7.2 box? The way I did it was added it to the
> /etc/rc.local file (/etc/init.d/smb start).
As root,
/usr/sbin/ntsysv
Check the boxes for things to run on startup, smb in this
66 matches
Mail list logo
