Several things you could try.
1. Set in [global] domain master = yes
2. Use either wins support or wins server, but not both. Based on
what you have in interfaces, if this system is to be the wins server,
then use wins support = yes and eliminate the wins server parameter.
3. Check for
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:30 +0800, blue_sky886 wrote:
Hi,
I want to use library of samba that license is GPLv2 in my program that is
proprietary.
The source code version of samba is 3.0.6.
Is it possible to modify the license to LGPL?
Thanks.
No, it is not possible. We can only
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30:35AM +0800, blue_sky886 wrote:
Hi,
I want to use library of samba that license is GPLv2 in my program that is
proprietary.
The source code version of samba is 3.0.6.
Is it possible to modify the license to LGPL?
I'm afraid not. Your only options are to
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the Samba/CIFS
tools to set them (ie. set them from the client. Don't set them using
Unix permissions on the server).
Your example shows you setting the group to managegroup but your
smb.conf forces the group to management. Which is
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the Samba/CIFS
tools to set them (ie. set them from the client. Don't set them using
Unix permissions on the server).
I don't know if I'm doing it correct. I'm using
On 12/12/12 02:07 PM, J Gao wrote:
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the Samba/CIFS
tools to set them (ie. set them from the client. Don't set them using
Unix permissions on the server).
I don't
On 12-12-12 12:52 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 02:07 PM, J Gao wrote:
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the Samba/CIFS
tools to set them (ie. set them from the client. Don't set them using
Unix
On 12/12/12 05:18 PM, J Gao wrote:
On 12-12-12 12:52 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 02:07 PM, J Gao wrote:
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the
Samba/CIFS
tools to set them (ie. set them from
On 12-12-12 03:02 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 05:18 PM, J Gao wrote:
On 12-12-12 12:52 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 02:07 PM, J Gao wrote:
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to be set correctly, use the
Samba/CIFS
On 12/12/12 08:01 PM, J Gao wrote:
On 12-12-12 03:02 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 05:18 PM, J Gao wrote:
On 12-12-12 12:52 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 12/12/12 02:07 PM, J Gao wrote:
Thank you Gary for the help.
On 12-12-12 09:45 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
If you want the CIFS permissions to
Is this samba 3.x
Samba 3.x domains and domain controllers function like Windows NT4
domains. They are not like Windows 200x Active Directory servers and
domains.
The domain name has to be a simple netbios compatible name. A single
name not fqdn. I do not believe that . are a valid
Many of your questions should be answered on www.samba.org and
wiki.samba.org
Samba4 provides Active Directory functionality. It is free - you
don't have to pay for it, but there is the cost of your time.
On 07/24/12 08:08, Ha Minh Ai wrote:
Dear Mr/Madam,
We have wanted to build
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:25 -0400, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
You may want to set up a test environment.
I have not been able to get NTLMv2 working properly. I believe
enabling NTLMv2 should still systems to negotiate ver 2 but that didn't
happen- at least I was unable to login from a
Hello Alejandro,
Probably to check all the details you need to create a build environment,
at first. It's the general advice. As for your question, I had samba-3.5
server (upgraded from 3.0.28) which was able to authenticate all windows:
from win98 to win7 (domain members). So I think it's
You may want to set up a test environment.
I have not been able to get NTLMv2 working properly. I believe
enabling NTLMv2 should still systems to negotiate ver 2 but that didn't
happen- at least I was unable to login from a Windows 2003 client with
a samba PDC. NTLMv2 uses better encryption
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, vaibhav srivastava
vaibhavcs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Since I want to run Samba without modifying my existing kernel. Please
tell me what are the requirements for the same.
What are the package list required in kernel before installing samba.
thanks in
Have you looked at any of the samba documentation?
What OS ? Most linux distros (as well as solaris unix) have a
precompiled samba version bundled or available.Normally you don't
have to worry about the kernel.
On 05/04/12 09:24, vaibhav srivastava wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:50
Ensure you got the right version and compiler, also, if using a script to
install it use the set -x in the script so you can see where it is
failing.
Suerte,
David
-Original Message-
From: Rocio de los Angeles Ortíz Barrera
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:09 PM
To:
The testparm -v will let you see which smb.conf file is being used
and what the settings are. If the default settings for passwd file and
private directory are not to your liking you can specify the in the
smb.conf file
e.g.
# testparm -v | grep -i priv
Load smb config files from
On 16 February 2012 07:53, Rich rhd...@gmail.com wrote:
I transferred a Xen vm that was running on centos 5.7 with samba 3.6.3 to
a centos 6.2 bare metal server with one E5502 and 16gig of memory. I have
been running Centos for 6 years on different servers for 6 years on several
different
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:17:31AM +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
On 16 February 2012 07:53, Rich rhd...@gmail.com wrote:
I transferred a Xen vm that was running on centos 5.7 with samba 3.6.3 to
a centos 6.2 bare metal server with one E5502 and 16gig of memory. I have
been running Centos for
Hi all,
I need to mount a Windows share locally on my laptop. However, I
cannot
do this via
sudo mount -t smbfs //host_name/share_name /local_mount
because the host_name has two IP addresses with it as shown by
nmblookup
//host_name.
In Windows network adapter settings, disable
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:59:41AM -0700, Carl G. Riches wrote:
I have a Samba domain that is having problems. We have a new NetApp
file server (FAS2040 running NetApp Release 7.3.4) that keeps
dropping its connection to the Samba server. We didn't have this
problem with an older NetApp
Group ownership shows to be studemp, but you are giving share
permissions to studempl.
Is that a typo, or is that the source of your problem?
Dale
On 07/11/2011 11:15 AM, Daulton_Theodore wrote:
Hi all,
Running samba 3.5.5 in a Solaris non-global zone. I have created a folder
I would guess this is ZFS?
I think the problem occurs when samba+zfs interprets unix no rights
granted to the world (other) as deny everyone in windows.
For example, if you have a with unix perms of 770 - this means on the
unix level that the user and group have full permissions, no rights
Hi Dermot,
thanks for your reply.
here below you have the output, nothing strange to my eyes, but
maybe(hopefully) you know more:
pdbedit -P bad lockout attempt
smbldap_search_domain_info: Searching
for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=XXX))]
smbldap_open_connection:
nobody to help?
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 16:56 +0200, Fabio Pardi wrote:
Dears,
Unfortunately it happened again.
Now i see the user has the flags UX, but the system keeps asking for a
password change in loop.
details about pdbedit -L -v
---
Unix username:myuser
NT
On 4 July 2011 16:37, Fabio Pardi f.pa...@portavita.eu wrote:
nobody to help?
I just throwing out ideas here. What is the output from pdbedit -P for
all these policies: minimum password age, reset count minutes,
disconnect time, user must logon to change password, password history,
lockout
Dears,
Unfortunately it happened again.
Now i see the user has the flags UX, but the system keeps asking for a
password change in loop.
details about pdbedit -L -v
---
Unix username:myuser
NT username: myuser
Account Flags:[UX ]
User SID:
Thanks a lot Christ,
a managed using pdbedit. In facts, many accounts were carrying only the
[U], no X (but i clearly remember I changed every user's setting with
password never expires from the srvtool graphical tool :s )
Now the only thing i have to do is waiting
Thanks a lot for your
use pdbedit or your web-based ldap manager to update the account flags
to [UX]. document the previous value before changing the flags. Use
smbldap tools to update the expire time. if none of this fixes it, post
an ldif if an affected user account, as well as all the info from
smbldap-tools
Hi,
?
if you do :?
hostname -f?? = hostname in FQDN
hostname -d = only domainname.
hostname = the hostname itselve.
?
if the command hostname gives the FQDN hostname then set the hostname again
with hostname -F /etc/hostname
in /etc/hostname there should be the FQDN hostname in like
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your detailed and excellent explanation.
Everything goes well now.
Best regards.
Tubo.
At 2011-04-28 14:31:46，L.P.H. van Belle be...@bazuin.nl wrote:
Hi,
if you do :
hostname -f = hostname in FQDN
hostname -d = only domainname.
hostname = the hostname itselve.
if
A dot in hostname is not RFC compliant,
so change the servers hostname.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: tubocurar...@163.com
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens tubocurarine
Verzonden: 2011-04-27 12:03
Aan: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: [Samba] Help: issues about
Thanks for your reply.
But both the wikipeida (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname) and documents
provided by CentOS
(http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s2-sysconfig-network.html)
point out that they should be Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN), such
Another interest thing: if we use a Linux client to access the shares from
server, it connects successfully in all cases.
Don't know why.
Thanks again.
At 2011-04-28 09:06:59，tubocurarine tubocurar...@163.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
But both the wikipeida
...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:26 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication and Samba
After a bit more investigation it seems my issue on the working server is a bit
more complex. If I use any of the three
2011/3/11 Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com:
Hi there, just recently joined this list as I seem to be having a little
trouble that I am hoping someone can help with.
I recently installed a RHEL5.5 server and updated samba to
samba3-3.4.11-42.el5.x86_64.rpm. I had never set up
...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 11:49 AM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication and Samba
2011/3/11 Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com:
Hi there, just recently joined this list as I
On 11 March 2011 13:27, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
When I ran net use \\rhel5u5\tmp /USER:DOMAIN\brian.omahony I get:
The password or user name is invalid for \\rhel5u5live\tmp.
Not the same problem I have then. Shame. I can force the domain and it works.
The
now shows correctly.
However it is still popping up a login box.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:34 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication
...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:02 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication and Samba
When I dig the RHEL server, it actually returns the DC:
160.16.172.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN SOA
On 11 March 2011 16:02, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
When I dig the RHEL server, it actually returns the DC:
160.16.172.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN SOA animal.XXX.com.
hostmaster.XXX.com. 77337 900 600 86400 3600
The system that is working returns its correct
. Especially on a Friday
B
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:22 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication and Samba
On 11 March 2011 16:02, Brian
On 11 March 2011 16:06, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
Turns out something else has gone wrong on me.
The system that previously worked without a login box, now requires it. I
didn't notice this as my machine obviously is cahed. If I put my credentials
in (DOMAIN\user
: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:28 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS authentication and Samba
On 11 March 2011 16:06, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
Turns out
On 11 March 2011 16:33, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
Yep that works. Looks like I have the same issue as you on one server, and
the other is just hosed.
Did yours ever work? Mine worked on Wednesday before I tried to figure out
why the second one didn't work, and
network using net ads join -U
Anything else?
Thanks for the help so far.
B
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:40 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS
Well I changed the server name and it resolved my problem, so I'm
guessing something was left over from the old install. No idea where
though, anyone any clue?
On 11 March 2011 16:47, Brian O'Mahony brian.omah...@curamsoftware.com wrote:
I only installed this server with Base RHEL5.5 last week,
Geoff, did you do the steps below? Was there anything else required?
B
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:59 PM
To: samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help with ADS
cannot find it.
Has anyone an idea where this cache is?
Regards
B
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:05 PM
To: 'Geoff Winkless'; samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:11:22PM -0800, David Broome wrote:
I have an older standalone Samba 3.0.14 system (security = user) with
local users and local home directories and shares. This uses another
'legacy' system for adding linux users accounts. I then use the pam
plug-in pam_smbpass
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Dennis M
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 05:45
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Help needed with Windows7 roaming
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
Im
Auftrag von Dennis M
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 05:45
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Help needed with Windows7 roaming files
Hi Guys,
I've had a check again, looks like roaming profile is already running (sorry
about being misleading), strange though
no local profile is created (this can be found out when i log in as local
admin and go to the User Profile tab in computer
properties), and outlook still complains about
Are you sure it's not a permissions problem? Have the Windows 7 machines
been properly added to the domain? Are the user accounts enabled?
Sorry, I have no Windows 7 clients to test things on. However, whenever
I've had similar problems, it's been an account setup problem, not a
Samba
Hi all,
We've been trying to setup/upgrade a samba PDC (version 3.56) with
OpenLDAP
as backend and roaming profiles for Windows7 (32bit) Clients. windows7
has
no problem
with login after applying the reg patches, however, it seems to
always load
a temporary profile as opposed to roaming
Extra info:
smbd --version
Version 3.0.33-0.19.el4_8.3
Win Server 2003-r2
thx, JD
On 2/16/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Dory wrote:
hello,
I'm having a problem I hope will be easy for someone to explain to me
how to fix. I need to migrate from an old server to a new Cisco Smart
Storage NAS, which
To boil this down a bit, maybe my problem is that my domain users on
the old server are for instance jimd, and on the new NAS they show up as
Domain+jimd. Or in this example, CN+jimd. So if I try to move files to
the NAS, it doesn't recognize those users (without the prefix CN+) as
users. The
Brandon,
I used this as my template in Debian:
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/10951_3502441_2
From my limited experience with Ubuntu, I seem to remember that they
put most of their directives in the common-* files,
so you may have to adjust locations.
Dale
On
Hi, I have samba 3.5.4 in debian lenny, and visual foxpro 8.0 with dbf's (200+)
and 20 workstations and not problem with dbf's, I have oplocks off
kernel oplocks = No
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
strict locking = No
Cheers
From: jourt_flo...@hotmail.com
Subject:
use the ads tool from microsoft to do this stuff.
You need more information I made a thread:
HOWTO samba4 centos5.5 named dnsupdate drbd simple failover
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:41:19 -0500, Mark Sheppard m...@ams.org wrote:
Hi!
I am currently testing a Samba4 Alpha13 server with Windows Vista
You do in /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf
[netlogon]
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/yourdomain/scripts
read only = no
Add a user with the ads tool.
You write for each user with the ads tool the logon.bat or whatever would
be your logon script. See there:
From: Sameer Chawnekar sameer.chawne...@archpharmalabs.com
Can you please provide a step by step guide on installing and configuring
SAMBA on AIX 6.1 server.
http://tinyurl.com/2egmh99
JD
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
According to your page
getent passwd is showing the domain users.
If you try to ssh into your linux machine as ben, with the way
nsswitch.conf is configured, it will try to authenticated you as the
ben in /etc/passwd not the one in the AD domain.
I suggest you try the following
i tried to telnet to sun1(unix) machine..but login failed.
i tried benvin user on AD..not ben
/var/samba/log
[2010/10/04 15:24:06, 6] nsswitch/winbindd.c:(641)
accepted socket 23
[2010/10/04 15:24:06, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:(326)
process_request: request fn INTERFACE_VERSION
[2010/10/04
Support contract..? how much for that
the thing i am doing this is to fix my job..because this this my 1st
project.
i didn't get salery to..anyway can u please give your rate for this..
:(
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:08 PM, d...@penguinfactory.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:24:50PM
You need to ensure that pam is allowing ssh or telnet access, not sure
in Solaris but in RedHat based sistems is inside /etc/pam.d
You will have to allow access through pam only enabled accounts since
usually the access is restricted to shadow by default.
On 10/4/10 7:11 AM, Gaiseric Vandal
Presumably Ben is able to ssh / telnet in for NON-Samba accounts
FYI- I did need to update my /etc/pam.conf on Solaris 10 clients when I
moved to LDAP backend for unix accounts. I had to add an entry to allow
ldap authentication.(I don't think I had to do this for Solaris 9.)
I don't
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:07 +0300, Ben George wrote:
Thanks for your reply..
yea i also want that same thing..give permission to that listed users only..
but when i checked that 3 folders in windows pc.,,only one folder can
accable without password
and when i try to access the other 2
disclaimer: I don't use Samba as an ADS member server. I use samba as
PDC with trusts to an ADS domain. So my observations may not be valuid.
Did you try updating nsswitch.conf
passwd: files winbind
group:files winbind
If you are using a Windows domain and have a user
Thanks for your replay..
yes my client told me like this that's Y..and the manager gave that work to
newly joined me.. :(
i don't have any AD and core unix experience..i have only experience in
linux.not much
may this project will affect my job.. :(
my nsswitch.conf
*passwd: files ldap
Then it sounds like you need the AD integration. If the user's also
login to the linux workstation directly (or via ssh) then you will need
to configure winbind and nsswitch to support unix logins.
Why does nsswitch.conf include ldap? Is this the only linux/unix
machine? Are local users
Sun Solaris 10 (under SPARC)
local users in /etc/passwd
samba 3.4.2 from sunfreeware.com
getent passwd
*ramana:x:100:1::/export/home/ramana:/bin/sh
teju:x:101:1::/export/home/teju:/bin/sh
user1:x:102:1::/export/home/user1:/bin/sh
ben:x:103:1::/home/ben:/bin/sh
*like this*
**
*Thanks
So to clarify the customer has a Sun Solaris 10 UNIX machine and a Linux
workstation?
FOR SOLARIS
I had problems with getting nsswitch+winbind working with the samba from
sunfreeware- I had to recompile from scratch (major headache.) In
hindsight this may not have been necessary for
yes client has Solaris and a windows xp machine under the AD domain
yes i exported the paths to the newly installed /usr/local/samba/lib
me using the new packahes and disabled the default packages
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.comwrote:
So to clarify
Hi
Please clarify the following
- Did you run truss getent passwd command and look for lines with
nss_winbind- just in case it is looking for a file with a different
version.
- Why does nsswitch.conf have ldap references- are you using ldap?
You should also look through the samba logs-
I suspect Oracle won't be much help with 3rd party s/w.I had opened
a ticket with Sun last year (?) when I had with domain trusts with the
samba version they provided (the trusts worked BUT the cache would
expire and not repopulate.) They had a cookie cutter setup for joining
Samba to an
Hi Ben,
Which version of AD are you using? We had no luck integrating Solaris Samba w/
AD 2008 last year, and were forced to use a third-party authentication product
called Centrify DirectControl to facilitate.
This may have changed by now — have you opened a support case with Oracle?
--Rob
HI
Thanks for your reply..me using.2003 server..
when i give the command in unix wbinfo -u ,it shows all the users in AD
and wbinfo -g shows the group..
after that?
bcoz i am beginner with this.actually i am working in linux,and i got job on
sun..so my manager gave this work to me
only
Ben,
If I understand you correctly, you are describing expected behavior.
Using valid users means only
the users listed can access that share. If you want all the users to
have access, don't use valid users.
Dale
valid users (S)
This is a list of users that should be allowed to
Thanks for your reply..
yea i also want that same thing..give permission to that listed users only..
but when i checked that 3 folders in windows pc.,,only one folder can
accable without password
and when i try to access the other 2 folder's,,it says that network not
reachable..u don't have
I have a file server that I authenticate against LDAP/Samba. The
smb.conf looks something like this...(which of course does not include
the shares section of the config...) This configuration assumes using
nss_ldap (for getting user accounts) and POSIX ACL's for permissions
using getfacl
On 08/18/2010 09:37 PM, Hernan Caffera wrote:
Hi, folks !
Perhaps somebody can help me with a litle isuue.
I´ve got a PDC with Ubuntu+Samba 3.5 +LDAP working fine in my network.
But now I’m trying to implement a fileserver that autenticate against my domain
server.
If someone have any idea
Look at my howto : [Samba] HOWTO centOS 5.5 samba4 dns dynamic update of
today in this list
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail:
:Re: [Samba] Help to buy a SAN server
NetGear and Buffalo make lower cost workgroup NAS server. But this isn't
really a samba question. You want to decide SAN vs NAS. There is a big
range of stuff out there - you may want to talk to a reseller if your
company uses one. NetApp
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject:Re: [Samba] Help to buy a SAN server
NetGear and Buffalo make lower cost workgroup NAS server. But this isn't
really a samba question. You want to decide SAN vs NAS. There is a big
range of stuff out there - you may want to talk to a reseller if your
I'm moderating the samba-technical mailing list.
This post is more
appropriate on samba@lists.samba.org
So I'll just answer on this one
and discard the post on samba-technical
Hi,
I have to linux server and using samba beetwen all win xp and win7 clients.
I need to have som SAN box that
: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:36 PM
To: nasrin...@yahoo.com; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help to buy a SAN server
I'm moderating the samba-technical mailing list.
This post is more
appropriate on samba@lists.samba.org
So I'll just answer on this one
and discard the post on samba
: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:36 PM
To: nasrin...@yahoo.com; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help to buy a SAN server
I'm moderating the samba-technical mailing list.
This post is more
appropriate on samba@lists.samba.org
So I'll just answer on this one
and discard the post on samba
On 30 March 2010 23:24, gregory.jo...@exeloncorp.com wrote:
I am getting these errors running:
sh makepkg.sh
can anyone help?
===
root# sh makepkg.sh
Distribution base: /var/tmp/samba-3.0.37
Temp install dir: /tmp/samba-3.0.37-build
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Purnell, Alton J wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone will get this note.
If you are willing to help me, page me @ 800.247.0493 .
I have Samba 2.28 installed and working on 2 Windows Server 2003.
I am having trouble getting users authenticated on Samba via
On 03/11/2010 10:38 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Purnell, Alton J wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone will get this note.
If you are willing to help me, page me @ 800.247.0493 .
I have Samba 2.28 installed and working on 2 Windows Server 2003.
I am having
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05:15AM -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 03/11/2010 10:38 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Purnell, Alton J wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone will get this note.
If you are willing to help me, page me @ 800.247.0493 .
I have
On 03/11/2010 11:31 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05:15AM -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 03/11/2010 10:38 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Purnell, Alton J wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone will get this note.
If you
Ok, i will answer a few of my own questions cause maybe someone still
have those problems, but i would appreciate if someone could lead me
to answer the others .
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 14:29, Salatiel Filho salatiel.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i am trying to migrate my print servers from
If you are doing anything samba related on AIX, I highly suggest that
you look at the pware site.
http://pware.hvcc.edu/
there are some docs on setting up Bill's pWare compile of samba on AIX
here:
http://pware.hvcc.edu/documentation.html
And you can join the pWare mailing list here:
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 11:20 -0500, roxane.b.el...@census.gov wrote:
I am writing from the US Census Bureau in Washington, DC. There is an
immediate need for samba to be implemented on 3 AIX lpars.
Attached is the smb.conf file and testparm for dadsp003.
Here is the scenario:
3 AIX, 6.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Chris_90 wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:45:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris_90 chrischris...@hotmail.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] [HELP] SAMBA as PDC for windows.
Hi guys, well, reason I'm here is because im
Make sure that this settings are as follows:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\Netlogon\Parameters]
“RequireSignOrSeal”=dword:0001
“RequireStrongKey”=dword:0001
It helped solve a problem like the one you're having.
On Thursday 14 January 2010 09:27:08 Richard Basch
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
