zoolook wrote:
Also, the color combination (specially on the wiki) is awful; red on
gray, really hurt my eyes. I hope it can be improved soon.
Regards,
Norberto
I also found the red/white/gray combination difficult. It took me a
while to realise that the big red blocks on the left were menu.
Quoting Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net):
That's what http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-sambaorg1005.png was supposed to be.
How does the depiction fall short?
Please accept some excuses here. In the next messages, you gave
ecidence of you will to contribute constructively.
Maybe the apparent
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:44:01PM -0400, David Eisner wrote:
For purposes of comparison, here is what the samba.org site looks like
on my browser (Chrome on Vista):
http://www.pointland.org/images/samba_org_sc.png
And here is what your modification looks like:
Quoting Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net):
Special thanks go to Blackbit [4] for creating the new design,
Special chide to Blackbit for the outcome. :~(
.../...
There are two ways to react after improvements or changes when one has
trouble with them: constructive criticism, given with a
zoolook wrote:
2010/5/18 Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org:
[1] http://samba.org/
Do you have a sans-serif version of it?
Hmm, only the headlines are in serif fonts.
All the text bodies are sans-serif.
Are you speaking of the headlines?
Cheers - Michael
pgpx4xCvt4kDW.pgp
Description:
On 2010/05/19 07:00 (GMT+0200) Christian PERRIER composed:
Quoting Felix Miata:
Special thanks go to Blackbit [4] for creating the new design,
Special chide to Blackbit for the outcome. :~(
There are two ways to react after improvements or changes when one has
trouble with them:
. mai 2010 09:10
À : zoolook
Cc : sa...@samba.org
Objet : Re: [Samba] samba.org has been revised!
zoolook wrote:
2010/5/18 Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org:
[1] http://samba.org/
Do you have a sans-serif version of it?
Hmm, only the headlines are in serif fonts.
All the text bodies are sans
2010/5/19 Viatte Frédéric frederic.via...@rpn.ch:
Another quick question, you must configure LDAP? For I see in the LDAP HOWTO
that talks about a moment! Otherwise I see no mistake I am!
I think you replied to the wrong message :)
No, it is not necessary to configure LDAP. Samba4 comes with
Hello Michael,
2010/5/19 Michael Adam ob...@samba.org:
zoolook wrote:
2010/5/18 Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org:
[1] http://samba.org/
Do you have a sans-serif version of it?
Hmm, only the headlines are in serif fonts.
All the text bodies are sans-serif.
Are you speaking of the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Not even close. Arguably it's attractive, as long as you don't actually need
to use it or read anything on it. Pray your eyes are as good as a 15 year old
or you aren't using a high resolution device to access it if so.
On 2010/05/19 09:12 (GMT-0400) David Eisner composed:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Not even close. Arguably it's attractive, as long as you don't actually need
to use it or read anything on it. Pray your eyes are as good as a 15 year old
or you
I really love how all this criticism comes from someone who's website looks
like something out of the 90's. Animated gifs are 20 years old now! The
design on your pages suck, it is not easy on the eyes, I'm not drawn to what
is important. Yes I can read it (the text is legible), but just barely
On 05/19/2010 09:48 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2010/05/19 09:12 (GMT-0400) David Eisner composed:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Not even close. Arguably it's attractive, as long as you don't actually need
to use it or read anything on it. Pray
On 2010/05/19 12:51 (GMT-0500) John H Terpstra composed:
I respect your right to have and express your opinions regarding the new
look of the Samba web site. I also wish to point out the great freedom
we have and exercise in the open source community - that of contributing
something better.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:20:58PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
As usual, there has been no feedback from citing a mirror of my opinion by
one of the few competent usability experts accessible to web researchers.
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/designmistakes.html is not theoretics or
opinion. It's
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:20:58PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Tmp/Smb/sambaorghome.html mainly also touches fonts,
and works decently with default font sizes not far removed from standard. As
default size is increased, the px-fixed widths begin crowding the content.
Felix Miata schreef:
http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Tmp/Smb/sambaorghome.html mainly also touches fonts,
and works decently with default font sizes not far removed from standard. As
default size is increased, the px-fixed widths begin crowding the content.
this one look realy cool, and invites
On 2010/05/19 11:10 (GMT-0600) Robert LeBlanc composed:
I really love how all this criticism comes from someone who's website looks
like something out of the 90's.
Your opinion. It's different from all the cookie cut mousetype magazine pages
hosted on the web on purpose. Deviation from normal
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/Tmp/Smb/sambaorghome.html mainly also touches fonts,
and works decently with default font sizes not far removed from standard. As
default size is increased, the px-fixed widths begin crowding the
On 2010/05/18 15:40 (GMT+0200) Karolin Seeger composed:
As some of you might have noticed, the official Samba web site [1] has been
revised during the sambaXP conference [2]. The web design was revamped and
a new logo has been created. Some of the related pages (e.g. the Wiki [3])
have
2010/5/18 Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org:
[1] http://samba.org/
Do you have a sans-serif version of it?
Regards,
Norberto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
21 matches
Mail list logo
