check the rights of your spooler directory of samba (path =)
Tim Thaler schrieb:
Hi,
I have a Win2k client that should be able to print to a printer
connected to a SuSE 8.1 Linux box.
The situation:
- 'root' is able to print from Win2k to the Linux, user 'tim' is not.
- Both, 'root' and 'tim'
here's a mail, which was posted in this list...
all exact ports arel listed in /etc/services.
the ports u need where postet a view days ago in this list.
please somebody correct, if i'm wrong:
netbios-ns 137/tcp# NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| This is a note for all those people out there who had to turn off their
| firewalls (iptables) to get Samba to work. First start the GUI
| interface to the firewall by typing
- - Your hint should only apply to a firewall that serves
Need help.
I cannot make directory writeable from Windows NT, despite trying read only = no and
writeable = true in smb.conf file in this [directory]. Is this because of user is
invalid (user = nobody in [global]) or something else is wrong with my smb.conf file.
I ran testparm and all went OK.
Testing
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
hmmm..did you try running ...tcpdump -i eth0 ..on your samba box?
(assuming eth0 is samba lan interface?) then you can see what is
happening at the time..
regards
Richard Coates.
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 04:13, Brian White wrote:
so if you reboot you get a successful logon? xp -pre sp1 ?
I've installed Samba 2.2.7a on my SuSE 8.1 system in an effort to
persuade it to act as a print server on my LAN, which consists of it
and 6 Windows desktops of various flavors. Right away it seemed to
allow file sharing and printing from DOS and became browsable from the
Network
I do not know to do.
I have around 50 logados users and would like to know the names of who are logados at
the moment.
I thank any aid.
Diego.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Have you tried smbstatus?
-Original Message-
From: Diego S. Soares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 March, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] how to view users logged in samba server??
Importance: High
I do not know to do.
I have around 50 logados users
yes. I don't have services or mapping in my server. It only PDC domain and
proxy authentication .
smbstatus brings active connections...
- Original Message -
From: Peter Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Diego S. Soares' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13,
Since I haven't got any answers on this I try again...
We have an Redhat 8.0 machine who acts as an printserver.
I'm sharing printers via Samba and using CUPS.
Samba is 2.2.7a and CUPS 1.1.8.
The Microsoft clients (Win9x, Win NT, Win 2k) is downloading the
driver from the server.
I had no
I've been having a few problems with samba-2.2.8pre2-1 --with-winbind
--with-winbind-challenge-response
Rh 7.2, 2.4.9-38 on s/390, glibc-2.2.4-31
rpcclient segfaults on enumdrivers 3... I hadn't tried it with earlier
versions of samba, but the man pages indicate enumdrivers 1, 2, and 3
are
I have set up a Samba as PDC and everything working flawless except for
Win2000 clients.
WinNT workstations and servers join the domain without problems.
Win98 clients log on without problems.
Win2000 clients can join the domain.
BUT
When Win2000 restart and I try to log on, I get a message,
Hello all,
When I try to join Win2K workstation to a SAMBA PDC from the
workstation (with Network ID wizard), I get a error The account used
is a computer account. Use your global user account bla-bla-bla.
When I adding machine manually by editing /etc/passwd and so on,
everything is OK.
What
Hum...
The 2K machines it has that to exist in the server:
# useradd -d /dev/null -c MAQ_709 -m -s /bin/false MAQ_709$
# smbpassword -m -a MAQ_709
Maybe this can help you: http://www.linuxrapido.kit.net/dicas_samba.htm
Regards
Tiago Cruz
Em Qui, 2003-03-13 às 10:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not to try and break any records, but we have servers that each serve up
~1500 printers under 2.0.X. Needless to say, attempts to upgrade to 2.2
resulted in some difficulty (servers coming nearly instantly to their
knees as dozens of Windows boxes attempted to initiate RPC, etc.). But
performance
The 2K machine account is created automaticly, when joining the domain from
Win2000.
The problem has something to do with Win2000 not seeing the Samba Server as
PDC, or not reaching the PDC at all.
I have set the Win2000 client to use netbios compability.
Regards
Jacob
I have a Slackware 8.1 with Samba 2.2.4 configured as PDC on my network.
I have a Windows95 client (OSR2, USB supplement) that can't get the list
of domain users for defining a share, I get the message:You cannot view
the list of users at this time. Please again later
Windows98 clients can get
Hi everyone,
First of all, sorry if this is something which the man pages or other
documentation answer. I could not find a simple solution.
I am running 3.0alpha22 on Linux joined to a W2k domain with a Windows
2000 Server domain controller. Authentication is done with Kerberos,
clients are
http://quics.qnx.com/cgi-bin/print_des.cgi?/usr/free/qnx4/tcpip/utils/+s
amba-qnxbin-2.0.7.tgz
You should also read the samba docs. Especially those concerning WinNT,
Win98 and W2K where encrypted password negotiation is used by default.
It's all explained in the docs how to revert back to
I have a question about setting up a samba BDC
(with a samba PDC).
I am running Samba as the PDC on a small network.
Other Unix boxes on the network are running
with:
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = Yes
password server = 192.168.1.5
Samba Ver: 2.2.7a
GCC Ver: 3.2
OS: HPUX-11
Hello List,
I've been having trouble trying to compile Samba. The configure phase goes
well, but during the gmake phase I always get this error:
Compiling lib/snprintf.c
lib/snprintf.c:790: conflicting types for `snprintf'
Hi,
I have a TNG-controlled domain which works fine with Win2k and samba 2.2.7
workstations.
Now when I try to join a samba 3.0 workstation to this domain doing:
net rpc join -U abakus\\root
it fails.
Setting the log level to 10 I get a lot of debug messages on the console
including:
...
Still me! :)
The solution: for anyone who might have to solve such a problem: I've
installed Dcom95.exe update for Win95 an now it gets the list of domain
users like a Win98 wkst. does.
HTH someone.
Emil
- Original Message -
From: Emil Furniga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Did you give 0777 permission to your share folder?
- Original Message -
From: Slawomir Stys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:41 AM
Subject: [Samba] help needed
Need help.
I cannot make directory writeable from Windows NT, despite trying read only
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Kenny Mann wrote:
http://quics.qnx.com/cgi-bin/print_des.cgi?/usr/free/qnx4/tcpip/utils/+s
amba-qnxbin-2.0.7.tgz
2.0.7 is way ancient - do you not have a more up to date version?
In any case Samba has it's own crypto routines for MS Windows clients.
Does your version have
I'd like to use the recycle as a per machine recycler using the option
'name = .recycle/%m' (because we just use some usernames
without passwords, and not because of the adminstrators abilties, but for a better
workflow with a lot of different projects and people working on them.)
But if a
I have two version 2.2.7a servers running on a unix/NT network (NT PDC)
One server behaves correctly and the other server doesn't.
The misbehaving one lets me see the shares, files, etc, but if I
right-click on a share or file and select properties, I get a dialog box
saying:
The server
-[ Marcel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 3/13/2003 4:50 PM +0100 ]-
But if a directory is created the vfs recycle uses the rights 700, and i have found
no way around it (maybe editing recycle.h or vfs.h, but i don't think im good
enough).
Read:
smbstatus -b gives all logged users...
Diego S. Soares schrieb:
I do not know to do.
I have around 50 logados users and would like to know the names of who are logados at the moment.
I thank any aid.
Diego.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
1) *check, if the name u use to join the domain is root*
2) check if all network drive mappings are removed.
3) check, thats the workgroup, which is setted now, is not the same name
as the domain...
3) check if username and machinename is not the same
Alexey Raevsky schrieb:
Hello all,
When I
I have a Linux Samba server I access from a Win2K system.
I want to allow a process started from a Windows service
to access a share on the Samba server. The Windows service
is set to run as LocalSystem instead of a specific userID.
What userID do I need to define on the Samba server to
allow
hello,
using SuSE 7.3 with all Patches and SAMBA 2.2.7a-SuSE
after a couple of days too many files are opend (bejond 16000) and samba hast to
be totally stopped and restartet.
the log tells us the following:
[2003/03/13 09:21:44, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(919)
Hi All,
I set up a samba server to talk to various wint NT
clients so they can access data off the serever. its a
Solaris 8 server.As you can see from the smb.conf
below I have Security = share but the only way to
access it is to make the share wide open 777 and
that is not good.
Any advice
Sun's Forte C 6.2 Solaris 9 (sparc64),
CVS of 2.2 as of Weds 13th March about 1130 UK time
CC=cc ./configure --with-readline=/usr/local/ --with-quotas --with-utmp
--with-acl-support --with-syslog --with-libsmbclient --with-automount --without-winbind
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude
I have a very strange problem, which no one has been able to fathom to
this point so I'm hoping that someone here may have encountered
something similar. I'd better note down some background details first.
Relevant machines involved:
Win2K Adv. Server SP3 (acting as Active Directory
For some reason when I try to copy some files from a windows machine to a
samba share on a particular Linux server it creates the filename on the
share and then gives me the following error:
This folder already contains a file named foo.exe
Would you like to replace the existing file which is 0
John,
I would like to figure out how to do this
gpedit.msc+AD+gpc+gpt magic for
win2k/xp with linux+samba(2.2/3.0/tng)+openldap and is it possible at
all?
We use local (!) GPOs on our Win2k clients with great success:
- log on to master workstation as administrator
- create a link to the
File on SAMBA with 664 permissions, UserA and GroupA - No Extended ACLS.
-rw-rw-r-- 1 b321972sysadmin 4 Mar 13 09:35 junk1.txt
UserB open's this document in Word 2000 (under Win2K) and Saves.
Extended ACLS are set AND owner is changed...
-rw-rwxr--+ 1 b432291sysadmin10
Hi All,
Files that I create from win are assigned user nobody
how can I change that to a valid unix name .. Thanks
--- Ben Bays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I set up a samba server to talk to various wint NT
clients so they can access data off the serever. its
a
Solaris 8 server.As you
Dear Samba List readers.
I have a working Samba PDC, and am using it (I have file access)
successfully with a Windows XP Pro machine. The PDC is from the Pink Tie
(i.e. Redhat) Linux 8.0 Distribution.
I am now setting up a second Windows XP machine to attach to the same
Samba PDC. I have chosen
I have looked around for a few days to try to find a solution to this.
I have to map the nt group power users to a unix group.
so far I have tried adding
domain group map = /foo/bar
to smb.conf file.
also in the username map = /foo/bar
I added a line
testgroup = @power users
It was
Damian Hickey wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to use Samba with LDAP support so I can't use the CIFS
binaries.
I are having an issue with compiling samba-2.27.a (patched) on our HPUX
server.
I am configuring it with these Samba option flags:
--prefix=/opt/samba
--libdir=/etc/opt/samba
Just an update on this - I removed Samba 2.2.7 from the RH8 system and
reinstalled it using the Samba 2.2.1a-4 version from my Redhat 7.2 CDs,
and the problem has miraculously disappeared...
So what got broken between 2.2.1a-4 and 2.2.7-2?
Kier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
TEST:
=
SAMBA STRESS OVER GIGABIT NETWORK: This is a simple
Read/Write/Compare/Delete kind of test over the network via Samba. Multiple
clients with multiple threads try to read/write/compare/delete(in a loop) a
finite sized file (64K block size) over samba for a prolonged period of time
in
Hi TJ Davis,
you wrote:
For some reason when I try to copy some files from a windows machine
to a samba share on a particular Linux server it creates the filename
on the share and then gives me the following error:
This folder already contains a file named foo.exe
Would you like to
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:40:03PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TEST:
=
SAMBA STRESS OVER GIGABIT NETWORK: This is a simple
Read/Write/Compare/Delete kind of test over the network via Samba. Multiple
clients with multiple threads try to read/write/compare/delete(in a loop) a
finite
Hi all.
I am running Samba on OSX.
Everything runs well except I get the occasional reports from my users
that they cannot open Excel files (Office2000 on Windows2000/XP
clients) . They will try a second, and maybe a third time time and the
file will open.
The error message in the windows
Hi.
Sorry: my level of english is not enough good. I hope you understand
what I mean.
My question is: it's possible to share a subdirectory (and only one
subdirectory for every user) in the section [homes]?
The version of samba which i'm working is 2.2.7a, over Solaris 8.
Thanks
Hi,
I'm using samba as a file server for my network. Samba 2.2.6 is
running on a linux/2.4.18 and all my clients access the share as guest.
I want to log every file modification/upload/delete and the machine
that did it, there's any way to do that?
Thanks alot
Thiago
Hello Maria!
Yeah! See a example in /etc/samba/smb.conf:
--
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No
[2k]
comment = Programas 2K para teste em servidor Linux
path = /home/tiago/2k
public =
Hi All,
Files that I create from win are assigned user nobody
how can I change that to a valid unix name .. Thanks
On most systems, nobody is a perfectly valid unix name
Does
$ id nobody
return a uid/gid? Or does it say no such user?
You probably want to do a man smb.conf, and from there
Having trouble connecting to print ques on AIX 4.3.3 running samba 2.2.5.0
with Windows XP client. All other OS's (95,98,ME) can print and Windows XP
CAN interface with disk shares. Not sure what is going on.
smb.conf file:
[global]
printing = AIX
printcap name = /etc/qconfig
load
Thank You ... that worked but I still have a problem
with the file permission being 777 to access the mount
points security = share. If I change this to user will
that mean I have to create an account for everyone who
uses it ans well as do smbpasswd?
thanks
for your help
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Not to sound jonny come lately, but you should have
security = user as accounts in passwd as well as
smbpasswd.
With the appropriate uid/giu and force create
statements, you will have an elegant security
solution.
I havn't messed with ACL feature in Samba yet but I
understand its also
I am trying to get samba to work with winbind and still have the DC (w2k)
use restrict anonymous.
If I run wbinfo -A it will allow me to enumerate all the user accounts and
groups but I still get prompted for a password when I try to access samba
shares. I can turn off restrict anonymous and I
Is there a way to syncronise the Windows Domain passwords
with the linux account passwords?
SAMBA passes authentication to an NT box
password server = *
Users have local accounts on the Linux box and get access to SAMBA shares
depending on which group (linux) they belong to and if their
Hi,
I've finally been dragged kicking and screaming into the wonderful world of XP.
I've been able to join a domain and login with the help of the docs on samba.org and
gleaning info from this list. Google and I don't get along.
My question is How do I get the logon script to run when XP logs
Hi,
I'm trying to copy printer driver files to the server in a way that workstations can
install from the server just by right-clicking on the printer icon and choosing
Install.
I created the [printers] share and created the W32X86, etc directories. In XP I
right-clicked on the printer icon and
John:
I thought it would be a good idea to follow up with how I came out with my problem of
getting Samba configured correctly as a PDC.
While I hate to admit it publicly, the main stumbling block in my attempts to get
Samba working correctly was my lack of understanding on how Samba shares
Diego,
An alternative approach is to compile Samba form source with the configure
option --with-utmp or use a precompiled package, which has utmp support
enabled. The command who | grep smb | cut -f 1 -d ' ' | uniq will then
list users with connections to Samba shares (who is part of GNUs
Okay, I've been chasing performance for a while now. I have no idea if I
should be trying to get better performance or if I'm getting all I can out
of my hardware. Here is the information:
/sbin/hdparm -I /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number:
see bottom
Bob Crandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've finally been dragged kicking and screaming into the wonderful world
of XP.
I've been able to join a domain and login with the help of the docs on
samba.org and
gleaning info from this list. Google and I don't get along.
My question is
From Google searches, it seems that using SAMBA 2.2.7 + Open LDAP on Linux
patched for POSIX ACL support delivers a functional PDC/BDC pair, and that
directory replication can take place automatically once set up.
Could someone please confirm that this actually works?
The background to this
Antti,
I want to be able to change the unix group ownership on directories
and files from the Windows 2000/XP clients connecting to Samba. That
is, if a directory is owned by the unix group unixgroup1 on the
machine Samba is running on, I want to be able to change it to
unixgroup2 from the
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, aragonx wrote:
Okay, I've been chasing performance for a while now. I have no idea if I
should be trying to get better performance or if I'm getting all I can out
of my hardware. Here is the information:
/sbin/hdparm -I /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd:
ATA device, with
Hi,
just wondering if anyone had ever though about making a port of Samba
for windows. Now you may think What's the point? Well I'll tell you if
you had as much control over smb as you have with Samba then you wouldn't
need it for windows.. but you don't. Not unless you buy Windows 2000
Thanks so much, that worked!
All the way from Australia, users helping users!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Simeonidis, Steve
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] want to
If I change
logon script = %U.bat
to
logon script = %U.cmd
Will the login script still work for Win 98?
Thanks
Zuber Sidiyot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Bob
Try Extension .cmd instead .bat
Zuber
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob
Kyle Loree ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
see bottom
Bob Crandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've finally been dragged kicking and screaming into the wonderful world
of XP.
I've been able to join a domain and login with the help of the docs on
samba.org and
gleaning info from this list. Google
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:37:26PM +1100, Kuan Bartel said:
Hi,
just wondering if anyone had ever though about making a port of Samba
for windows. Now you may think What's the point? Well I'll tell you if
you had as much control over smb as you have with Samba then you wouldn't
need
I tried adding the [printers] section to my conf file as John suggested, but
this didn't solve the problem.
Still able to print from NT, 2000, XP and not from Win95, 98
just recapping - am able to print from all clients with the old version (2.0.6)
which we are still using in production
With
How do you do !!!
Already several days are beaten with such problem:
Beside me Windows 2000 Domain - with server Windows 2000 in own mode,
want to install samba as BDC, came to conclusion that necessary to use Samba
3 + ADS.
Has Compiled samba-3.0alpha22 with with the following option:
How do you do !!!
Already several days are beaten with such problem:
Beside me Windows 2000 Domain - with server Windows 2000 in own mode,
want to install samba as BDC, came to conclusion that necessary to use Samba
3 + ADS.
Has Compiled samba-3.0alpha22 with with the following option:
Hi,
I have compiled and am running samba version 2.2.7.a on Redhat linux 7.3. I
am having some performance issues with it and was wondering if I was doing
something wrong.
I have noticed that if I use samba in security = server mode, every time a
new connection is made to the server from the
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:07:43 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been able to find the block of code that will be called if an open
connection receives an indication that the peer has gone away
(i.e. shutdown, crashed, cable cut, etc.).
More specifically, if I have an open,
Have anybody seen that problem ? We have that in an NT40Serverfarm with
samba 2.2.7a as BDC.
during the start of winbind we saw also following message:
could not get sid of domain ...
The users get access to there shares but the policies dont work corectly
We have an IP-Segmented network, the
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably manage that.
How does that work? Any major wrinkles?
I'm not feeling really comfortable with winbind assigning all
UIDs and GIDs on a system,
At 00:22 13.03.2003 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
If someone want to apply this patch please ask for an actuall patch against
the latest HEAD.
I merged in jra's unsigned fixes and some little formatting fixes to my
local tree.
metze
Michael Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably manage that.
How does that work? Any major wrinkles?
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 10:38, Michael Fair wrote:
I haven't done much work in this are yet so please feel
free to correct me as you see fit, but as I understand it,
part of the problem we face is that the equivalents of
the UID and a GID
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 20:29, Michael Fair wrote:
Michael Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 20:46, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 10:38, Michael Fair wrote:
I haven't done much work in this are yet so please feel
free to correct me as you see fit, but as I understand it,
part of the problem we
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
Oh yes, entirely! Nothing I mentioned was an attempt
to put winbind in control of all the UID/GIDs on a system.
I personally have never used, nor even heard of a system
that used UID/GIDs 100,000,000 and above. That's the address
space that winbind would be
Hi,
like I have tested, Printer driver download from W2000 works fine know
(Solaris , samba-2.2.8-pre2)
But I have another Solaris specific problem with W95 drivers (works fine
under Linux)
The W95 Client opens the addprinterwizzard, when downloading the driver.
Samba reports (see below):
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with this message:
the data area passed to a
On March 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with
--- Environment
HP ALPHA XP100 (fomerly Compaq)
TRU64 5.1A PK 3
Samba 2.2.5
In directory /tmp I found some files which I dont know who created them:
drwxr-xr-x 2 root system 8192 Mar 11 09:26 .winbindd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root system 0 Mar 8 00:16
Does anyone know about this?
- Forwarded message from Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: amigasamba
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:28:49 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is anyone aware of Windows applications that will only deal with 8.3 names
and cannot deal with long file names?
Modern apps, no. Lots of Windows 3.1 apps (e.g. Quicken versions from back in
the day) couldn't deal with long file names when moved onto
I look into this in a few days.
Use www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba as mirror
I'm on vacation and don't have the info here.
--
Ulf
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most setup.exe programs are stubs that are 16-bit executables, and want 8.3
filenames.
ERX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g]On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Applications that want
schmieder, holger wrote:
Have anybody seen that problem ? We have that in an NT40Serverfarm with
samba 2.2.7a as BDC.
during the start of winbind we saw also following message:
could not get sid of domain ...
The users get access to there shares but the policies dont work corectly
We
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sit in two camps on this one - for local UIDs/GIDs, I actually like
the 'algorithmic', but it's confined to a single uid/gid space.
For winbindd, I'm convinced that the tdb mapping is the best way
forward, but that
I hadn't realized that an SID is actually 256 bits and we at
best only have 32 bits to work with I I was only thinking
about the RIDs).
A SID is variable length, really.
-- Luke
--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Is anyone aware of Windows applications that will only deal with 8.3
namesand cannot deal with long file names?
erx wrote:
Most setup.exe programs are stubs that are 16-bit executables, and want 8.3
filenames.
And some of the ones that can handle storing long filenames
Hi,
Someone asked me what some messages like getsmbfilepwent: malformed
password entry (uid not number) meant when using the smbpasswd command.
Not knowing, I went searching the source code to find:
if (!isdigit(*p)) {
DEBUG(0, (getsmbfilepwent: malformed password entry (uid not
Without knowing what is using the internal routine, I do
not know if it will remain, will be removed, or if changes to RMS will
leave it totally or partially non-functional.
Actually, this internal routine uses a feature of the XQP, not of RMS, but
it's a detail.
It may work for now, but as it
If another way of doing it is desired, perhaps the following could
be considered.
The general description of the method is to use the lock manager in
a way that is compatible with how RMS uses it.
What you'd do is to take out a lock in PR (protected read) mode on
the RMS resource that represents
How does Pathworks do this? Since HP/Compaq will probably maintain
Pathworks as a layered product, the Pathworks method will continue to be
supported internally (unless there is a major change in Pathworks itself).
Mike Ober.
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
