[Samba] Changing machine password
Hello, does somebody know what process/software is responsible for changing machine password during the process of adding a machine to a domain. This one come to chnaging smbpasswd fron NO PASSWORDXX to actual value. Thanks Pavel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Question regarding the possibility of W2K smartcard logon
Hi! I could not find any documentation about the possibility of W2K smartcard-based logon using Samba as a PDC (no MS on the logon server side). Is it possible? If yes: Is it possible in case of MS CA only? Can I use any other (third party) CAs? Where can I find usable documentation for this? If not: Is the following configuration can work: W2K server acting as a PDC (for performing smartcard-based logons and running the MS CA) and a Samba acting as a file/printer server for the domain? In this case it would be interesting if I can use a third party CA for W2K domain logon - but it is not the question of this list. :) Any piece of information can help. Thank you in advance, Elek Jozsef System Engineer Kopint-Datorg Rt., Hungary -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SWAT could not start
Hi All Folks, RH7.3 I could not start 'swat' on Konsole window # swat - It hanged there. I also tried after having Samba started with the same result # rpm -qa | grep samba-swat samba-swat-2.2.3a-6 It was there. I have re-installed it from RH CD with no improvement Kindly help Stephen Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WinXP Rotate Photo function do not work on Samba server
Dear all, I put all my photo to the Samba Server and everything works fine just like, sometimes better than, my old Win98. There is a Photo Rotate function comes with WinXP File Explorer. (You may rotate your JPG without changing the file modify date and meta data.) This function does not work when the photo is stored in the Samba. When I do that, the WinXP will tell me the Photo File is Read only but I have checked it is not. I have tested the function is work when the photo is stored in another Win98 on the network. Jesse __ Scott Wilson Ltd celebrates its 50th year in Hong Kong! This e-mail and any attachments to it are intended only for the party to whom they are addressed. They may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and delete any digital copies and destroy any paper copies. Thank you. Scott Wilson accepts no contractual liabilities or commitments arising from this e-mail unless subsequently confirmed by fax or letter or as an e-mail attachment giving company name, address, registration number and authorized signatory. __ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Winbind Problem - Permissions?
I'm having some problems with Samba and Winbind (Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.5) I've got winbind working pretty much as it should be I think, all the wbinfo commands work fine and and I can login to the local machine using a domain login/password but it says no HOME directory even when there is one. I've set the home directory chown my domain user and 'Domain Users' group. I can see it in Network Neighbourhood but when I try and access it it says incorrect password or unknown username and prompts me for a username password. I've set up 3 shares, public, temp and IT. With public public = yes and write list = 'DOMAIN+Domain users' I can view, browse, read and write. With Temp it's set to just public = yes and I can't write to it. With the IT share it's set to public = no and write list = 'Domain+IT' and I can view it but can't write to it. If I right click and view properties on all the folders they show up correctly, IT is a valid group and shows up in wbinfo -g and I am a member. I am getting these error messages: [2003/10/02 12:20:40, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416) unable to open passdb database. [2003/10/02 12:20:43, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416) unable to open passdb database. [2003/10/02 12:30:42, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwrid(1416) unable to open passdb database. [2003/10/02 16:49:05, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(357) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group 'WILLOWBROOK+Domain failed. [2003/10/03 10:12:19, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(357) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group 'WILLOWBROOK+Domain failed. [2003/10/03 11:01:07, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(357) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group 'WILLOWBROOK+IT' failed. [2003/10/03 11:01:07, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_sid.c:winbindd_lookupname(90) could not find domain entry for domain 'WILLOWBROOK [2003/10/03 11:01:07, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrnam(211) could not get domain sid for domain 'WILLOWBROOK [2003/10/03 11:01:07, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrnam(211) could not get domain sid for domain 'WILLOWBROOK conf file: [global] workgroup = WILLOWBROOK server string = Debian Samba Server hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 127.0.0.1 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 security = domain socket options = TCP_NODELAY local master = no wins support = no wins server = 192.168.1.2 dns proxy = no password server = WILLOWBROOKLI01 encrypt passwords = yes map to guest = bad user winbind uid = 1-65000 winbind gid = 1-65000 template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/sh winbind separator = + winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes # Share Definitions == [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes valid users = %S # This one is useful for people to share files [Temp] comment = Temporary file space path = /temp read only = no public = yes [IT] comment = IT Staff Only path = /it read only = no public = no writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 write list = 'WILLOWBROOK+IT' [Public] comment = Public Stuff path = /public public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = 'WILLOWBROOK+Domain Users' nt acl support = true Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I guess it must be something fairly simple. TIA Gareth Davies - IT Systems WB Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] valid users and groups with winbind
Andrew, I was having the same problem with getting groups to work, so I tried your solution, but can't get it to work either. 1. I set up a read only share, made sure I didn't have write access. 2. I added write list = WALNETNT_karen and verified that I now had write access. 3. I then changed the write list to give write access to the whole domain users group (which karen is a member of), but I no longer had write permission ... I tried all of the following, but none seemed to work: write list = 'domain\domain users' write list = 'domain\Domain Users' (case sensitivity check) write list = 'WALNETNT\Domain Users' (maybe you meant for me to use my domain name?) write list = 'WALNETNT_Domain Users' (My winbind separator is _ ... Use this?) write list = 'domain_Domain Users' write list = ''domain_domain users' I didn't try taking the quotes off, I didn't think UNIX would deal with the space in the domain group name very well. I logged off and back on as various domain users while testing this to make sure the permissions weren't being cached on the client PC. I'm obviously missing something here, perhaps you can shed some light? Thanks, Karen Wieprecht -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 7:10 PM To: Michael MacIsaac Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] valid users and groups with winbind Michael MacIsaac wrote: Hi, Just starting on this list. I have samba (2.2.5a) on Linux/s390 and winbind authenticating and providing shares. I add the global to smb.conf: valid users = '@Domain Users' Winbind groups start with DOMAIN\, and as a quirk, don't need the @ prefix. So valid users = 'domain\domain users' should do what you want. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1684 - 24 msgs
Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH Co.KG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbstatus
I believe that I have got the section of Using Samba, section 2.5.1 Starting the Daemons by Hand down. It appears that I am going to have to find a way to start memorizing all of the paths administrators typically visit. I am also gaining a comfort level with VI, but it still drives me nuts. I am having trouble when I try the smbstatus utility. I am struggling with the following error: [root@cofr3 /etc]# ssmmbbssttaattuuss connections.tdb not initialised There is no specific man entry for connections.tdb, and I have not found it anywhere else I have looked. Perhaps you have some insight. Thanks in advance for your time. [root@cofr3 samba]# tteessttppaarrmm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [homes] Processing section [printers] Loaded services file OK. Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] coding system = client code page = 850 code page directory = /etc/codepages workgroup = COFRNY.GOV netbios name = MYSQL netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = Samba Server sharing MySQL DB. interfaces = bind interfaces only = No security = USER encrypt passwords = No update encrypted = No allow trusted domains = Yes hosts equiv = min passwd length = 5 map to guest = Never null passwords = No password server = smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd root directory = passwd program = /bin/passwd passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No username map = password level = 0 username level = 0 unix password sync = No restrict anonymous = No lanman auth = Yes use rhosts = No log level = 2 syslog = 1 syslog only = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 timestamp logs = Yes debug hires timestamp = No debug pid = No debug uid = No protocol = NT1 min protocol = CORE read bmpx = No read raw = Yes write raw = Yes nt smb support = Yes nt pipe support = Yes nt acl support = Yes announce version = 4.5 announce as = NT max mux = 50 max xmit = 65535 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast max packet = 65535 max ttl = 259200 max wins ttl = 518400 min wins ttl = 21600 time server = No change notify timeout = 60 deadtime = 0 getwd cache = Yes keepalive = 300 lpq cache time = 10 max smbd processes = 0 max disk size = 0 max open files = 1 read size = 16384 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 stat cache size = 50 total print jobs = 0 load printers = Yes printcap name = /etc/printcap enumports command = addprinter command = deleteprinter command = show add printer wizard = Yes os2 driver map = strip dot = No character set = mangled stack = 50 stat cache = Yes domain groups = domain admin group = domain guest group = domain admin users = domain guest users = machine password timeout = 604800 add user script = delete user script = logon script = logon path = \\%N\%U\profile logon drive = logon home = \\%N\%U domain logons = No os level = 20 lm announce = Auto lm interval = 60 preferred master = True local master = Yes domain master = True browse list = Yes dns proxy = Yes wins proxy = No wins server = 172.16.0.121 wins support = No wins hook = kernel oplocks = Yes oplock break wait time = 0 add share command = change share command = delete share command = config file = preload = lock dir = /var/lock/samba utmp dir = wtmp dir = utmp hostname = %m utmp consolidate = No default service = message command = dfree command = valid chars = remote announce = remote browse sync = socket address = 0.0.0.0 homedir map = time offset = 0 unix realname = Yes NIS homedir = No source environment = panic action = hide local users = No host msdfs = No winbind uid = winbind gid = template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/false winbind separator = \ winbind cache time = 15 comment = path = alternate permissions = No username = guest account =
[Samba] RESPOND-EFAX/Payong Gig
I'm using efax and faxlpr to send faxes from the Windows computers. I need to hire someone to hack RESPOND to create a nice Cover Letter with inforamation in it about each user. Can someone do this hack? Ruben -- __ Brooklyn Linux Solutions __ DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://www.nyfairuse.org http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting http://www.nylxs.com/radio - Free Software Radio Show and Archives http://www.brooklynonline.com - For the love of Brooklyn http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software http://www.nyfairuse.org - The foundation of Democracy http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/mp3/dr.mp3 - Imagine my surprise when I saw you... http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn 1-718-382-5752 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] HOME share behavior
I have a [homes] share with a group of users. One of them is greg. When administrator matt tries to map a share like so: net use \\server\greg h: (I might not have the syntax exactly right, it's been a while.) The function succeeds, but the share actually mapped is MATT's home directory (\\server\matt, not greg. Is this normal behavior for the homes share? This is Samba 2.2.0 a on SuSE Linux on S/390. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] File corruption with write cache enabled - patch included
I recently found out that write caching in samba sometimes leads to
file corruption (the setup program for Sophos Antivirus generates
corrupted files when making a central installation on a Samba
share).
This morning I tracked down the place in the Samba code that leads to
corruption. Here is what happened to me:
write cache size is 8192 bytes. A client opens a new file and writes
byte no. 30959. This byte is cached. Then the program write byte
no. 61919 which is written directly to the disk, since the cache
doesn't go that far. The client then writes bytes no. 0 through
61920. Since these bytes don't fit into the cache they are written
directly to the disk. However, the cached byte at position 30959 is
not discarded. When this byte is later written to the disk, the file
will get corrupted.
The patch below detects this situation and discards the cached
byte(s). I guess that some profiling code should also be added at some
time. The patch is against version 2.2.5.
Perhaps you should warn users of current versions against using write
caching.
I believe that this bug is the same as bug no. 24502 submitted by
Henrik Qwinto [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Best regards, and thank you for making Samba,
Rasmus
--
Rasmus Borup Hansen, system adm. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute for Mathematical Sciences Phone: +45 353 20759
Universitetsparken 5 Cell phone: +45 20829308
DK-2100 Ø, Denmark Office: E208
--- samba-2.2.5/source/smbd/fileio.c.orig Thu Oct 3 10:41:36 2002
+++ samba-2.2.5/source/smbd/fileio.cThu Oct 3 12:45:14 2002
@@ -438,7 +438,21 @@
if ( n = wcp-alloc_size n wcp-data_size) {
cache_flush_needed = True;
} else {
+
ssize_t ret = real_write_file(fsp, data, pos, n);
+
+ /*
+* If the write overlaps the entire
+* cache, then discard the cache.
+*/
+
+ if ( (pos = wcp-offset)
+(pos + n = wcp-offset + wcp-data_size) ) {
+ DEBUG(9,(discarding invalidated write cache:
+fd = %d, off=%.0f, size=%u\n,
+fsp-fd, (double)wcp-offset,
+(unsigned int)wcp-data_size ));
+ wcp-data_size = 0;
+ }
DO_PROFILE_INC(writecache_direct_writes);
if (ret == -1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Urgent: LDAP showstopper : Solved
Actually one of the users entry in LDAP database wasn't complete. Only posix part was inserted. That's why the problem occured. Thanks anyway - Original Message - From: Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Samba [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: [Samba] Urgent: LDAP showstopper I have a Smaba2.2.5+LDAP Setup Many of my newly added users suddenly not able login even I am not able to add any new users. When I run smbpasswd -D 99 e91255 e91255 it gives the foll o/p. This has beame network show-stopper and the users are started complaining. TIA Shekhar [The last few lines may give a hint] Initialising global parameters params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [global] doing parameter workgroup = FREEDOM doing parameter netbios name = CZAR handle_netbios_name: set global_myname to: CZAR doing parameter server string = File Server doing parameter security = USER doing parameter encrypt passwords = Yes doing parameter min password length = 5 doing parameter log level = 10 doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log doing parameter max log size = 25 doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 doing parameter logon script = %U.bat doing parameter logon drive = h: doing parameter logon path = doing parameter domain logons = Yes doing parameter os level = 80 doing parameter preferred master = Yes doing parameter domain master = Yes doing parameter dns proxy = No doing parameter admin users = shekhar root doing parameter announce as = NT Server doing parameter max open files = 2048 doing parameter oplocks = no doing parameter level2 oplocks = no doing parameter ldap suffix = dc=viit,dc=edu doing parameter ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=viit,dc=edu doing parameter domain admin group = @root @admin doing parameter ldap server = 127.0.0.1 doing parameter ldap port = 389 doing parameter ldap ssl = no doing parameter add user script = /scripts/ldap/addmachine %u doing parameter passwd program = /scripts/sync %u doing parameter passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *all* doing parameter unix password sync = yes pm_process() returned Yes lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes set_server_role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC codepage_initialise: client code page = 850 load_client_codepage: loading codepage 850. Adding chars 0x85 0xb7 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xa0 0xb5 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x83 0xb6 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xc6 0xc7 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x84 0x8e (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x86 0x8f (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x91 0x92 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x87 0x80 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x8a 0xd4 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x82 0x90 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x88 0xd2 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x89 0xd3 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x8d 0xde (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xa1 0xd6 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x8c 0xd7 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x8b 0xd8 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xd0 0xd1 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xa4 0xa5 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x95 0xe3 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xa2 0xe0 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x93 0xe2 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xe4 0xe5 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x94 0x99 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x9b 0x9d (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x97 0xeb (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xa3 0xe9 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x96 0xea (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x81 0x9a (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xec 0xed (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0xe7 0xe8 (l-u = True) (u-l = True) Adding chars 0x9c 0x0 (l-u = False) (u-l = False) load_dos_unicode_map: 850 load_unicode_map: loading unicode map for codepage 850. load_unix_unicode_map: ISO8859-1 (init_done=0, override=0) load_unicode_map: loading unicode map for codepage ISO8859-1. tdb(unknown): tdb_brlock failed (fd=3) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13 ldap_open_connection: starting... Initializing connection to 127.0.0.1 on port 389 ldap_open_connection: connection opened ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap server as cn=Manager,dc=viit,dc=edu ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server ldap_search_one_user: searching for:[((uid=e91255)(objectclass=sambaAccount))] get_single_attribute: [uid] = [e91255] Entry found for user: e91255 get_single_attribute: [pwdLastSet] = [1033550079] get_single_attribute: [logonTime] = [0] get_single_attribute: [logoffTime] = [2147483647] get_single_attribute: [kickoffTime] = [2147483647] get_single_attribute: [pwdCanChange] = [0] get_single_attribute: [pwdMustChange] = [2147483647] get_single_attribute:
[Samba] Fw: 'max_four_gig' parameter to normalize to 4GB
Hi all,
sorry for the repost but there was no answer and this is very important
for me and the users of fli4l.
Hi,
at first sorry for my bad english...
I'm working on a little samba package for a routing projekt:
www.fli4l.de
This is a router, which runs from a single floppy. For easier use of
printing functions for Win-Clients and for simple shares my package
comes with Samba, with an very old version (1.9.18p10). I need this
old version because she is very small and fits on the floppy.
New versions of the fli4l-router allow an install on compact flash
and
hard disk drives.
The problem is:
Samba 1.9.18p10 cannot show the real space on big hard disk drives.
There is only shown 4GB (3,96 GB). The dfree command doesn't solve
the problem:
dfree command = /usr/bin/dfree
#!/bin/sh
#df $1 | tail -1 | awk '{print $2 $4}'
set -f
set -- `/bin/df $1 | sed -n '$p'`
echo $2 $4
Here is the output for df and dfree of /dev/hda4:
router 2.0.4 # df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/ram 3899 1032 2867 26% /
/dev/hda263917 5723 58194 9% /opt
/dev/hda131640 4538 27102 14% /boot
/dev/hda4 5913931 212 5913719 0%
/usr/local/data
router 2.0.4 # dfree /dev/hda4
5913931 5913719
This should be a free space of
5913719 / 1024 / 1024 = 5,63976192474365234375 GB
W2K, XP, Win9x/Me only showing 3,96 GB - I don't know why.
With the same Kernelversion, a newer Samba-Version (2.2.5) and the
same dfree command there are correct outputs (www.eisfair.org).
I searched the net for a solution and found Samba cvs messages like
this:
***
smbd/dfree.c: Added 'max_four_gig' parameter to normalize to 4GB when
asked
(used to be the default).
smbd/open.c smbd/reply.c smbd/trans2.c:
Changed to allow a 4GB volume size to be returned on a
trans2
qfsinfo level 1 call. NT clients refuse to do the correct call to
Samba servers
(Herb recons it's the unicode bit) - this allows even a level 1 to
return a
volume size up to 9444732961341243916800 bytes (should be enough for
now,
until we get the unicode support added :-).
Jeremy.
***
I there a way for me to correct the old version 1.9.18p10 for showing
the reals free space on big disks? Your help is very appreciated.
tom
A little bit shorter:
I need a patch for 1.9.18p10 for showing correct free space on big
harddisks (4GB) with or without dfree command. I'm not an expert in C
programming.
Can anybody help me by this?
tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba30alpha20 informations
Hi, I would Like apply policies on XP Pro Clients. Either with Group policies or ntconfig.pol . It seems that Samba can apply ntconfig.pol to a set of machines. if somebody does it with XP Pro can it say to me if that goes well or not? Samba30alpha19 or 20 manages the Group Policies via Active Directory? If somebody uses It , Is what that goes well? Thanks In Advance for your Help, Mo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SambaNT4
Hi I am trying to set the samba service up. After i edit samba.conf and start the service, i could access windowsNT4 clients' resources like files and printer. But when i try connecting samba's share from windows clients. It fails and keeps saying "the network path not found" or "C:\net view linuxSystem error 1234 has occurred. No service is operating at the destination network endpointon the remote system." I have triedsomething related to encrypted passwd and checked subnet mask and broadcast address. they are the same for samba server and windows clients. when i try smbclient -L samba server i can see all the share names of the samba server. I try the following command nmblookup -B broadcast address windows clients's name it is ok but nmblookup -B broadcast address samba server's name it is not ok It seems like all the windows workstations in my domain do not know the netbios name of the samba server. Could anybody here could help me solve this problem so that i could access shares of the samba server from windows clients. Thanks, Huy Pham
[Samba] XP user priviledges with Samba
I've read the achives, but I'm not finding anything. On XP, I can give a local user admin priviledges on his/her local machine when they are logged in to that machine and not the domain. How do I do this when they are logged in to the domain, with Samba as a PDC? Some programs need to create tmp files that they can not if the the user does not have admin privs on his/her machine. Thanks, Jim Durham -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP user priviledges with Samba
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 11:31, Jim Durham wrote: I've read the achives, but I'm not finding anything. On XP, I can give a local user admin priviledges on his/her local machine when they are logged in to that machine and not the domain. How do I do this when they are logged in to the domain, with Samba as a PDC? Some programs need to create tmp files that they can not if the the user does not have admin privs on his/her machine. in samba2 you need to add the domain user to the local admin group. You can map a unix group to Domain Admins or Domain Users groups and add that group to the local admins but you can't have more granularity than than. if you don't mind adding the user to local admin on each machine that is probably the cleanest solution. samba3 can handle arbitrary group mapping brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SWAT could not start -localhost:901
Hi all, Could not start SWAT Browser:- Mozilla (also tried Konqueror) http://locathost:901 Alert !!! The connection was refused when attempting to contact localhost:901 Kindly advise. Thanks Stephen Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 12 msgs
Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH Co.KG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SWAT could not start -localhost:901
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 11:49, Stephen Liu wrote: Hi all, Could not start SWAT Browser:- Mozilla (also tried Konqueror) http://locathost:901 Alert !!! The connection was refused when attempting to contact localhost:901 Kindly advise. Thanks Stephen Liu well locathost vs. localhost might have something to do with it... but i think that's just a typo. you should try running the swat daemon interactively and watch what happens. brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 12 msgs
I had the same problem and was fixed. Just open the readme file in the SWAT folder, and add the needed line to the xinetd file, and then add the line to the services file that will add port 901 to the table listing. I did have the same problem and these items fixed it. Thank You, John Berry, Owner Lantex Voice Data Systems 6093 Horton Dr La Mesa, Ca 91942 phone 619-690-4428 fax 619-741-6823 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1685 - 12 msgs Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH Co.KG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot connect WinXP
Hi All Can't connect WinXP (Remark: Group=SEC WinXP=M40G Samba Server=server.ltsp ipchains stop) # mount -t smbfs //M40G/Shared /mnt/WinXP/ params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 192.168.0.1 M40G params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected end-of-file at: 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Error connecting to 218.188.78.190 (Network is unreachable) 3049: Connection to M40G failed SMB connection failed # testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [test] params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 192.168.0.1 M40G params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected end-of-file at: 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Loaded services file OK. Configure File === #/etc/samba/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2002/08/05 16:52:24 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SEC security = SHARE guest account = M40G [test] comment = test share path = /test writable = yes browseable = yes follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes public = yes read only = No guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes # /etc/hosts # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.0.1 M40G 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Kindly advise. Thanks in advance. Stephen Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] enumports command
Hello, How to use enumports command, you can define enumports command to point to a program which should generate a list of ports, one per line, to standard outputWhat does that mean? Theprogram look like what? Thanks. Didier -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SWAT could not start -localhost:901
Hi Bradley, At 12:15 PM 10/3/2002 -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: - snip - you should try running the swat daemon interactively and watch what happens. Kindly advise how to run swat daemon interactively. Thanks in advance Stephen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] VSS and Samba
Hello, I'd like to set up a working directory on a linux server that is accessible under Visual Source Safe. From VSS, I can see the samba share and I can have users check files out. However, Permissions seem to get mangled. A situation occurs where users check files out but are unable to check files back into VSS. Are there any guidlines for successfully setting up VSS with Samba? Thanks, Al ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] nmbd not starting
Fortunately I found the log. Here it is: [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0] /samba-2.2.3a/source/./nmbd/nmbd.c:main(783) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0, pid=9411, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] /samba-2.2.3a/so urce/./nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(240) create_subnets: No local interfaces ! [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0, pid=9411, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] /samba-2.2.3a/so urce/./nmbd/nmbd.c:main(861) ERROR: Failed when creating subnet lists. Exiting. I entered an interfaces=eth0 statement in the global section of smb.conf and restarted both daemons (smbd and nmbd), but this did not help. Testparm reflects this change and one other to the log file name format. Curiously, the old log file name still captures the updates. Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Regards, Ken Illingsworth -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RESPOND-EFAX/Payong Gig
Ruben Safir wrote: I'm using efax and faxlpr to send faxes from the Windows computers. I need to hire someone to hack RESPOND to create a nice Cover Letter with inforamation in it about each user. Can someone do this hack? Be prepared for grief. This guy posted to the Hylafax list a while back, saying he needed it for Hylafax. I responded, we made a deal, I started working on it, but when I had questions he stopped responding. He made another posting on the same list, I wrote to him again, he claimed to have lost my E-mails. Started work again, had questions, turned out he wasn't sure about what he was running; I needed more detail, told him what files he needed to send me. Got no response (for weeks) until I saw this posting. Maybe someone else will have better luck dealing with this guy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot connect WinXP
Do you really have those last few lines in smb.conf instead of /etc/hosts? If so, I'd have a look there first (/etc/hosts and /path/to/smb.conf are two different files). ~ Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All Can't connect WinXP (Remark: Group=SEC WinXP=M40G Samba Server=server.ltsp ipchains stop) # mount -t smbfs //M40G/Shared /mnt/WinXP/ params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 192.168.0.1 M40G params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected end-of-file at: 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Error connecting to 218.188.78.190 (Network is unreachable) 3049: Connection to M40G failed SMB connection failed # testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [test] params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 192.168.0.1 M40G params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected end-of-file at: 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Loaded services file OK. Configure File === #/etc/samba/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2002/08/05 16:52:24 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SEC security = SHARE guest account = M40G [test] comment = test share path = /test writable = yes browseable = yes follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes public = yes read only = No guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes # /etc/hosts # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.0.1 M40G 192.168.0.254 server.ltsp Kindly advise. Thanks in advance. Stephen Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Profiles and automatic drive mappings
The actual root of this problem is educating your users to put SHORTCUTS on their desktop, not the actual files themselves... poor organization of files, if you ask me. If you don't want to save profiles, turn them off in the smb.conf. I don't think you CAN turn off the Z: mapping; think 'feature' not bug (blame MS). Why not just change the H: to Z: in the logon file? - jb --On Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:01 AM + Aton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a mixed network of 98 and 2000 machines with RH 7.3 and Samba 2.2.5 The problem I'm having is my logon scripts contain a drive map to the user's home directory: net use H: \\server01\dave$ That works great for the 98 machines, but the 2000 machines map H: and Z: to \\server01\dave$ The 2000 machines also write a profile dirctory in that share, and copy the entire desktop contents to it each time the user logs off. For most of the users, this isn't a problem, but some users have a gig of video files on their desktop, and it writing all that crap to the sever is not necessary and slow. How do I make samba stop automatically mapping Z: as their home directory, and how do I make the profile writing to the server stop? Thanks, Aton -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP user priviledges with Samba
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:39 am, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 11:31, Jim Durham wrote: I've read the achives, but I'm not finding anything. On XP, I can give a local user admin priviledges on his/her local machine when they are logged in to that machine and not the domain. How do I do this when they are logged in to the domain, with Samba as a PDC? Some programs need to create tmp files that they can not if the the user does not have admin privs on his/her machine. in samba2 you need to add the domain user to the local admin group. You can map a unix group to Domain Admins or Domain Users groups and add that group to the local admins but you can't have more granularity than than. if you don't mind adding the user to local admin on each machine that is probably the cleanest solution. samba3 can handle arbitrary group mapping A couple of questions: I'm having trouble understanding terminology regarding the group that you are referring to. Are you saying to create a new unix group called admins and add the user to it? Or is this the local admin group on the XP box? Would you recommend upgrading to samba 3? I've got another issue regarding BDC on a different subnet that doesn't seem to work properly with XP and I'm wondering if samba 3 would handle that better. The BDC gets its machine ID file and it's smbpasswd, etc/passwd, /etc/master. passwd and the password databases from the master, but occasionally you suddenly can't log in from the machines on the subnet where the BDC lives. I think it's when the network latency between the main site and the remote LAN is bad. Killing domain logons on the BDC fixes it. Perhaps that is a reason to consider samba3? Thanks, Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] security vs domain in configuration file
Greetings! When I changed the security = domain in the configuration file, from MS windows, I get Access denied those Unix shares. Whereas, it works if security = server (shown below) security = server password server = 10.1.3.15 The Unix Shares are authenticated against NT domain. Any help or clues how to debug this? It has been suggested in this forum it is better to have domain instead of server. Any reasons for that.. Thanks, -Murali -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba HPUX 11.0
Hello, I need configure samba, my system is HP N4000 with HPUX 11.0 No problem for the installation of samba 2.2.3a I have problem with configuration process (I think so), use testparm and is OK, daemons are up and running. tvsaha:/etc # testparm Load smb config files from /opt/samba/lib/smb.conf Processing section [test] Global parameter encrypt passwords found in service section! Loaded services file OK. Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions tvsaha:/etc # ps -ef |grep mbd |grep -v grep root 20971 1 0 17:45:10 ? 0:08 nmbd -D root 20969 1 0 17:45:10 ? 0:00 smbd -D I have the follow message with smbclient command tvsaha:/etc # smbclient -U% -L localhost added interface ip=133.1.13.30 bcast=133.1.13.31 nmask=255.255.255.240 added interface ip=133.1.12.25 bcast=133.1.12.31 nmask=255.255.255.240 added interface ip=16.1.1.1 bcast=16.1.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Domain=[SIMPLE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a] tree connect failed: SUCCESS - 0 I use documentacion for linux. Thank you. Rogelio Cuadros -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:14, Irving Carrion wrote: Not in my case. The add user script worked in the previous version but when I upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to the latest CVS version it no longer worked. The way I got it working was to use the add machine script. Now it works just fine. Anyway, try them both -n- see what ya get. those scripts are great for automating things but if the machine account already exists it's irrelevant... brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] nmbd not starting
Silly question: If you type testparm it tests the /etc/samba/smb.conf file. If you type testparm /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf which is where samba-2.2.3 allocate the smb.file, you test the real smb.file. So if you have had an older version of samba installed, this could be confusing. --- Kenneth Illingsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: Fortunately I found the log. Here it is: [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0] /samba-2.2.3a/source/./nmbd/nmbd.c:main(783) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0, pid=9411, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] /samba-2.2.3a/so urce/./nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:create_subnets(240) create_subnets: No local interfaces ! [2002/10/01 11:40:51, 0, pid=9411, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] /samba-2.2.3a/so urce/./nmbd/nmbd.c:main(861) ERROR: Failed when creating subnet lists. Exiting. I entered an interfaces=eth0 statement in the global section of smb.conf and restarted both daemons (smbd and nmbd), but this did not help. Testparm reflects this change and one other to the log file name format. Curiously, the old log file name still captures the updates. Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Regards, Ken Illingsworth -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba __ Se den nye Yahoo! Mail på http://no.yahoo.com/ Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og Notisbok -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RESPOND-EFAX/Payong Gig
And you said you couldn't do it On 2002.10.03 12:56 Keith G. Murphy wrote: Ruben Safir wrote: I'm using efax and faxlpr to send faxes from the Windows computers. I need to hire someone to hack RESPOND to create a nice Cover Letter with inforamation in it about each user. Can someone do this hack? Be prepared for grief. This guy posted to the Hylafax list a while back, saying he needed it for Hylafax. I responded, we made a deal, I started working on it, but when I had questions he stopped responding. He made another posting on the same list, I wrote to him again, he claimed to have lost my E-mails. Started work again, had questions, turned out he wasn't sure about what he was running; I needed more detail, told him what files he needed to send me. Got no response (for weeks) until I saw this posting. Maybe someone else will have better luck dealing with this guy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- __ Brooklyn Linux Solutions __ DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://www.nyfairuse.org http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting http://www.nylxs.com/radio - Free Software Radio Show and Archives http://www.brooklynonline.com - For the love of Brooklyn http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software http://www.nyfairuse.org - The foundation of Democracy http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/mp3/dr.mp3 - Imagine my surprise when I saw you... http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn 1-718-382-5752 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't mount dir as read/write
On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:14 pm, linux power wrote: Try this. smbmount nbgwu5\\upload '/home/darose/mnt/nbgwu5' -o rw,username=crosen,password=*,workgroup=demo H. Didn't make a difference. I did learn something new about the situation though: I'm able to read and write from the SMB mounted directory as root, but not as any other user. Obviously I'd like to be able to access this as a regular user, so I don't have to go root every time I want to write a file to the share dir. Any other suggestions? Thanks, DR -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Can't mount dir as read/write
Try this: smbmount //nbgwu5/upload /home/darose/mnt/nbgwu5 -o rw,username=crosen,password=*,workgroup=demo,uid=your_unix_username,gid= your_unix_group -Original Message- From: David Rosenstrauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't mount dir as read/write On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:14 pm, linux power wrote: Try this. smbmount nbgwu5\\upload '/home/darose/mnt/nbgwu5' -o rw,username=crosen,password=*,workgroup=demo H. Didn't make a difference. I did learn something new about the situation though: I'm able to read and write from the SMB mounted directory as root, but not as any other user. Obviously I'd like to be able to access this as a regular user, so I don't have to go root every time I want to write a file to the share dir. Any other suggestions? Thanks, DR -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't mount dir as read/write
On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:47 pm, you wrote: Try this: smbmount //nbgwu5/upload /home/darose/mnt/nbgwu5 -o rw,username=crosen,password=*,workgroup=demo,uid=your_unix_username,gid = your_unix_group Whoomp! There it is! Thank you much, Clark! DR -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Print server on all linux network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, everyone - I've been trying for two weeks now to get my print server operational under Samba. After walking through the howtos and tweaking the configs per spec, it just ain't working. Printing from a client machine sends, and then nothing happens. No error messages or anything similar. Printing from the server works fine, but not from the clients. Setup: 4 machine network, 3 clients, 1 samba file/print server SuSE 7.3 running on all machines. HP 2P parallel printer on lp0 of server What else can I tell you to help figure this out? - -Dan Sawyer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9nJ7TaB8ur/y6V8gRArm9AJ9rRc8yhDm5Catchqv4SXedOqs5qwCfSWS/ 2IayciR10uTYysD/3F24UdE= =TMQV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] enumports command
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Didier Brison wrote: How to use enumports command, you can define enumports command to point to a program which should generate a list of ports, one per line, to standard outputWhat does that mean? Theprogram look like what? -cut here-- #!/bin/ echo LPT1: echo LPT2: echo LPT3: -cut here-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Autoreply to samba digest, Vol 1 #1686 - 31 msgs
Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH Co.KG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RESPOND-EFAX/Payong Gig
The only thing I said I couldn't (more like would not/didn't have time to) do was make the frontend (Respond) display PostScript. A quote from your E-mail: The front end should produce a postscript cover page. I explained that with Respond/printfax.pl, the backend produces the PostScript, but that my Respond replacement could provide a preview of the fax. You did not dispute that, and we continued to correspond for a while, so I assumed we were still go on the project. I basically think that you never had a handle on what software you were using or how to express what you wanted. And you apparently had a poor understanding of what I was trying to tell you. That's the charitable interpretation, anyway. But why you dropped the whole issue as I continued to try to get the information I needed to continue, I'm not sure. None of this is a capital crime. But I did find you very difficult to (try to) work with, and I think my warning was proper. Anyway, this list is not the place to continue to discuss this. Not that I want to, or have any desire to continue to (try to) work with you... Ruben I Safir wrote: And you said you couldn't do it On 2002.10.03 12:56 Keith G. Murphy wrote: Ruben Safir wrote: I'm using efax and faxlpr to send faxes from the Windows computers. I need to hire someone to hack RESPOND to create a nice Cover Letter with inforamation in it about each user. Can someone do this hack? Be prepared for grief. This guy posted to the Hylafax list a while back, saying he needed it for Hylafax. I responded, we made a deal, I started working on it, but when I had questions he stopped responding. He made another posting on the same list, I wrote to him again, he claimed to have lost my E-mails. Started work again, had questions, turned out he wasn't sure about what he was running; I needed more detail, told him what files he needed to send me. Got no response (for weeks) until I saw this posting. Maybe someone else will have better luck dealing with this guy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows XP Authentication
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 04:06 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am trying to set up a Samba domain for a windows xp network. I have followd the instructions regarding setting the /etc/password file to setup the pc name. The XP machine then connects to the domain ok. However when we reboot and try to log into the domain the system reports that Windows cannot connect to the domain because the domain controller is down or otherwise inavailable or becuase your computer account was not found. The domain is ok with win98 boxes. It sounds like you didn't put in the xp registry mods ? This is a tiny little file that you need to execute to get rid of some crypto issue in the XP logon process that doesn't work with Samba. I can send it to you if you can't find it. -Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] File corruption with write cache enabled - patch included
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Rasmus Borup Hansen wrote: I recently found out that write caching in samba sometimes leads to file corruption (the setup program for Sophos Antivirus generates corrupted files when making a central installation on a Samba share). This morning I tracked down the place in the Samba code that leads to corruption. Here is what happened to me: write cache size is 8192 bytes. A client opens a new file and writes byte no. 30959. This byte is cached. Then the program write byte no. 61919 which is written directly to the disk, since the cache doesn't go that far. The client then writes bytes no. 0 through 61920. Since these bytes don't fit into the cache they are written directly to the disk. However, the cached byte at position 30959 is not discarded. When this byte is later written to the disk, the file will get corrupted. The patch below detects this situation and discards the cached byte(s). I guess that some profiling code should also be added at some time. The patch is against version 2.2.5. Perhaps you should warn users of current versions against using write caching. I believe that this bug is the same as bug no. 24502 submitted by Henrik Qwinto [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Best regards, and thank you for making Samba, Damn good call ! Very good bugfix. I've committed it to all Samba branches. Thanks a *lot* for this fix ! Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] XP Client Connects to Print Queue, Sends, Fails to Print
Hello everyone, I am having a problem printing to a Xerox Document Centre 440 ST from XP pro Clients thru my RedHat Linux 7.2 server running Samba 2.2.3a. The XP Clients connect successfully to the printer queue, sends the file, but nothing comes out of the printer. At least for most XP Clients. I have one PC that does print, but that person is also an admin on the Linux box. I know the PCs connect because I have also seen other peoples' print jobs in the print queue from the PC that is having trouble. Here is the printer portion of the Samba printer configuration, if it helps: [global] printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = lprng use client driver = yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /usr/spool/samba browseable = yes print command = lpr -b -r -h -P%p %s writeable = no printable = yes valid users = TUMS+DOMAIN USERS TUMS+DOMAIN WEBUSERS How can I fix this problem? All help is welcomed! Thanks. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SWAT could not start -localhost:901
This certainly sounds like a firewall problem or a problem with xinetd. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:49:18PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote: Hi all, Could not start SWAT Browser:- Mozilla (also tried Konqueror) http://locathost:901 Alert !!! The connection was refused when attempting to contact localhost:901 Kindly advise. Thanks Stephen Liu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Print server on all linux network
Do you understand how printing works with samba? Essentially, you just transfer the file to the samba spool directory, and invoke lpr to print the file. You will need to look at your smb.conf file to see what is supposed to happen. I would set up a share just for your printer and not rely on the generic printer share that smb.conf comes with. Here is the sort of printer share I have: This take a postscript file as input, invokes lpr to print to queue ps on the server, which translates postscript files for my lexmark printer. Joel [ps] path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0700 guest ok = yes hosts allow = 192.168. printable = Yes printing = lprng print command = echo %J %p %s/tmp/junkJ;\ a=`echo '%J' | sed s/^.*- //` ;\ echo This is truncated $a /tmp/junkJ;\ /usr/bin/lpr -Pps -J$a %s;\ rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -Pps lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -Pps %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold z53 %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release z53 %j share modes = No use client driver = yes On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:47:27PM -0700, Dan Sawyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, everyone - I've been trying for two weeks now to get my print server operational under Samba. After walking through the howtos and tweaking the configs per spec, it just ain't working. Printing from a client machine sends, and then nothing happens. No error messages or anything similar. Printing from the server works fine, but not from the clients. Setup: 4 machine network, 3 clients, 1 samba file/print server SuSE 7.3 running on all machines. HP 2P parallel printer on lp0 of server What else can I tell you to help figure this out? - -Dan Sawyer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9nJ7TaB8ur/y6V8gRArm9AJ9rRc8yhDm5Catchqv4SXedOqs5qwCfSWS/ 2IayciR10uTYysD/3F24UdE= =TMQV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
Just making all this stuff up off the top of my head. I have never done this, but you could try: Running two smbd daemon, each listening to different ports. Redirecting traffic from port 445 to 139 with some firewall rules. I redirect traffic with ipmasqadm, but there are surely others. Running smbd with (x)inetd and have it listen to both ports. Likely, the delay is because the W2K clients are waiting for a reply, and finally timing out on port 445. Why not try something funky like having telnet or apache listen on port 445. Maybe that will tell the client right away to try a different port, like 139. Let us know how this works out, if you try any of this stuff. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:04:41PM -0500, Jason Joines wrote: I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
man smb.conf / -p Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] security vs domain in configuration file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings! When I changed the security = domain in the configuration file, from MS windows, I get Access denied those Unix shares. Whereas, it works if security = server (shown below) security = server password server = 10.1.3.15 The Unix Shares are authenticated against NT domain. Any help or clues how to debug this? It has been suggested in this forum it is better to have domain instead of server. Any reasons for that.. If you set 'security=domain' you must join the domain first. See smbpasswd -j -Uadmin%pass Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Fw: 'max_four_gig' parameter to normalize to 4GB
Thomas Bork wrote: Hi @all, sorry for the repost but there was no answer and this is very important for me and the users of fli4l. I *really* don't expect you will find 'easy' solutions to the hundreds of bugfixes in Samba since 1.9.18p10. Even if you 'fix' this one, there will be *many* others. There are other approaches to reducing binary size - look into the MAX_DEBUG_LEVEL #define in local.h, and look into making a single binary, using one main() and using argv[0] to distinguish between programs, but getting samba small *is* hard. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Question on Samba--W2k
I am trying to make samba working on RH7.3. I even can see Samba server from my W2k machine. However, when I click on that, I wait a while and get an error message The network path was not found. I don't know why? If I try: smbclient -U laoer -L W2Khostname without any password I got the error: Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED if I try my password I got the error: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_TYPE_NOT_GRANTED If I try: smbclient -M W2kHostname and type some message, I do get those message on my W2kHostname machine. It seems the network connection is working. If I try smbclient -L SambaServer, it is no problem If I try smbclient '\\sambaserver\tmp', it is working and got smb:\' If I test the W2k client with nmblookup ( nmblookup -d 2 -B client '*' ), it's ok and got a positive name query response If I test the network with nmblookup ( nmblookup -d 2 '*' ), it got most of machines's positive response in domain. However, when I try to test with 'net view \\sambaserver', it got The network path was not found. I guess the W2k client has problem but don't know what? Help! Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT Security tab changes
Do I need to patch ACL support into the Linux kernel just to allow users to change permissions on files hosted on the Samba 2.2.5 server? All I really need is to allow users to set read/write/execute on files. Right now, I don't have an ACL-patched kernel installed on the server. My users can see the security tab when they check the preferences on Samba-hosted files, but they can't change anything, even if they own the file. If the check or un-check a box, it just reverts back as soon as they click the Apply button. If I change the file perms using chmod at the server console, logged in as the user in question, it works fine... All users have Windows 2000 Pro (not sure what SP). Samba is authenticating to OpenLDAP, and I'm using nss_ldap. Here's the relevant section of smb.conf: [global] ldap server = localhost ldap port = 389 ldap suffix = o=internet ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,o=internet ldap ssl = no workgroup = IS netbios name = THOR server string = Thor File Server security = server dos filemode = yes encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = No [private] comment = Private File Storage path = /usr/local/fileshare/home read only = No -- Jules Agee System Administrator Pacific Coast Feather Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] x284 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Print server on all linux network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Okay, I've removed the [printers] tab. When I print locally, I do indeed use lpr -Pnec (or at least, that command works very well). However, using that command from the client doesn't do a thing for me (nor does printing from a gui program). I've now modified the .conf so it looks like this: [nec] comment = NEC Superscript 1200 path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168. printable = Yes postscript = Yes print command = lpr -Pnec lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -Pps lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -Pps %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold z53 %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release z53 %j printer name = nec share modes = No What's the next step? - -Dan On Thursday 03 October 2002 16:54, Joel Hammer wrote: I would remove [printers] since neither you or I know what it really does. Now, when you print locally, you print to the queue nec? This will depend on the lpr command (lpr -Pnec) or if you just use lpr the first printer defined in you /etc/princap will be invoked. Joel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9nOFkaB8ur/y6V8gRAj0NAJ9uBivobBUug7ILKnWtvTWFSF7VfACgoE+7 znVXZF5BGzp7IIGXHH19lEo= =0C98 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] RESPOND-EFAX/Payong Gig
I need it to create a front end cover page. It's the only aditional thing I need it to do. Can you do this? On 2002.10.03 16:17 Keith G. Murphy wrote: The only thing I said I couldn't (more like would not/didn't have time to) do was make the frontend (Respond) display PostScript. A quote from your E-mail: The front end should produce a postscript cover page. I explained that with Respond/printfax.pl, the backend produces the PostScript, but that my Respond replacement could provide a preview of the fax. You did not dispute that, and we continued to correspond for a while, so I assumed we were still go on the project. I basically think that you never had a handle on what software you were using or how to express what you wanted. And you apparently had a poor understanding of what I was trying to tell you. That's the charitable interpretation, anyway. But why you dropped the whole issue as I continued to try to get the information I needed to continue, I'm not sure. None of this is a capital crime. But I did find you very difficult to (try to) work with, and I think my warning was proper. Anyway, this list is not the place to continue to discuss this. Not that I want to, or have any desire to continue to (try to) work with you... Ruben I Safir wrote: And you said you couldn't do it On 2002.10.03 12:56 Keith G. Murphy wrote: Ruben Safir wrote: I'm using efax and faxlpr to send faxes from the Windows computers. I need to hire someone to hack RESPOND to create a nice Cover Letter with inforamation in it about each user. Can someone do this hack? Be prepared for grief. This guy posted to the Hylafax list a while back, saying he needed it for Hylafax. I responded, we made a deal, I started working on it, but when I had questions he stopped responding. He made another posting on the same list, I wrote to him again, he claimed to have lost my E-mails. Started work again, had questions, turned out he wasn't sure about what he was running; I needed more detail, told him what files he needed to send me. Got no response (for weeks) until I saw this posting. Maybe someone else will have better luck dealing with this guy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- __ Brooklyn Linux Solutions __ DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://www.nyfairuse.org http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting http://www.nylxs.com/radio - Free Software Radio Show and Archives http://www.brooklynonline.com - For the love of Brooklyn http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software http://www.nyfairuse.org - The foundation of Democracy http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/mp3/dr.mp3 - Imagine my surprise when I saw you... http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn 1-718-382-5752 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Fw: 'max_four_gig' parameter to normalize to 4GB
Hallo Andrew, thanks for your answer: I *really* don't expect you will find 'easy' solutions to the hundreds of bugfixes in Samba since 1.9.18p10. Even if you 'fix' this one, there will be *many* others. The *only* bugfix I need is showing the real size of harddisks ;o) Nothing about security=user|domain and so on, only shares per ip/net (hosts allow). Is it possible, that dfree command worked in 1.9.18p5 but not in 1.9.18p10? OK, I'll try all 1.9.18-versions. There are other approaches to reducing binary size - look into the MAX_DEBUG_LEVEL #define in local.h, Thank you for that. and look into making a single binary, using one main() and using argv[0] to distinguish between This is not a solution because in fli4l-samba-configuration it is possible to use only smbd without nmbd (for people, which don't have enough space on the floppy; only smbd will be copied to the floppy). programs, but getting samba small *is* hard. I know, that's why I want to use this old version... tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Print server on all linux network
Well, you have to talk to the samba server from the client: The basic command is as follows: cat file | smbclient //server/nec -c 'print -' Does this command work for you? The file has to be in a format the printer (queue) can use on the server. If this works, then you can set up print queues on the clients to do this. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:31:28PM -0700, Dan Sawyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Okay, I've removed the [printers] tab. When I print locally, I do indeed use lpr -Pnec (or at least, that command works very well). However, using that command from the client doesn't do a thing for me (nor does printing from a gui program). I've now modified the .conf so it looks like this: [nec] comment = NEC Superscript 1200 path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 192.168. printable = Yes postscript = Yes print command = lpr -Pnec lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -Pps lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -Pps %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold z53 %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release z53 %j printer name = nec share modes = No What's the next step? - -Dan On Thursday 03 October 2002 16:54, Joel Hammer wrote: I would remove [printers] since neither you or I know what it really does. Now, when you print locally, you print to the queue nec? This will depend on the lpr command (lpr -Pnec) or if you just use lpr the first printer defined in you /etc/princap will be invoked. Joel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9nOFkaB8ur/y6V8gRAj0NAJ9uBivobBUug7ILKnWtvTWFSF7VfACgoE+7 znVXZF5BGzp7IIGXHH19lEo= =0C98 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] space in netbios name
Hi everyone, On my network there is no WINS server and I had to set up the lmhost file but some computer have space in their netbios name so when I try to connect to such a server the client is unable to resolve the address. I have tried to put backslashes before the space but it doesn't work. So if anybody could give me the solution I would really appreciate it. Bye, GG -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Print server on all linux network
Try putting a space between print and - Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:32:49PM -0700, Dan Sawyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- thedude@floyd:~ cat kittykey.txt | smbclient //bob/nec -c 'print-' added interface ip=192.168.1.100 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.101 ( 192.168.1.101 ) Password: Domain=[AWP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] print-: command not found -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
am curious and need to configure this and test, any ideas how to make it work, i mean how do start 2 smbd parent process is it port based or something else samba technical group please comment on this if you get chance thanks in advance -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote: I am just curious of running 2 smbds, as i think one parent smbd process runs on 139 and all others are children -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:32 PM To: Jason Joines; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 Just making all this stuff up off the top of my head. I have never done this, but you could try: Running two smbd daemon, each listening to different ports. Redirecting traffic from port 445 to 139 with some firewall rules. I redirect traffic with ipmasqadm, but there are surely others. Running smbd with (x)inetd and have it listen to both ports. Likely, the delay is because the W2K clients are waiting for a reply, and finally timing out on port 445. Why not try something funky like having telnet or apache listen on port 445. Maybe that will tell the client right away to try a different port, like 139. Let us know how this works out, if you try any of this stuff. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:04:41PM -0500, Jason Joines wrote: I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:06:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
The use of multiple backends in passdb has acknowledged issues, and I'm
not particularly fussed if you feel it should not ship with this
functionality enabled. However, please do note that this *is* being
used at present, and cannot be 'just removed'. (We map our non-passdb
users into the system via this method). Volker has some solutions to
this issue however, which look very neat. I'll need to check if they
actually catch it all the cases.
Well it's not being used really, as it's not in a production
release. We don't make guarentees until it gets into a production
release. What non-passdb users are being mapped into the system
via this method ? Surely as a PDC we need passdb entries for every
user we're exporting ?
I mean it's being used by code.
The problem is mainly on the fileserver: For the DC side of things,
every user is in the SAM, or they can't really do much. But on the
fileserver side, we have the problem that a user may select to view the
Owner or the ACL entries of a file.
This file may have a completely arbitrary owner.
- Winbind user? Fine. (we simply lookup the uid-sid with wibnind, and
we simply proxy requests for the name-sid/sid-name to the DC)
- passdb user? Again, OK.
In 2.2, we just used an algorithmic mapping of all such users. Remember
'2*uid+1000'? :-) Names were then looked up in the system get{pw,gr}*
calls
In HEAD, we tried to make this a bit smarter. This may or may not have
been a good thing, because it can be slow. We do getpwuid(uid), then
lookup that name in the passdb. The returned SID is sent to the client.
For names, it's a bit easier, we lookup the SID in passdb then return
the name. The reverse for name-sid. I did it this way to allow for
arbitrary RIDs.
- not in either... Not so pretty:
The tricky bit is users not in passdb. The code that deals with this is
hideous, particularly because we don't have a unified groupdb/passdb,
and mostly because I wanted to support arbitrary RIDs. (Hence one of the
reasons I started trying to rewrite this).
We need to allocate this 'unknown' user or group a RID. We need to
ensure it does not conflict with other users, and that it 'maps back'.
Why? Well, there are system accounts etc, and there are users who
appear in the system via NIS etc. The 2.2 code maps these to
SIDs/Names, and I took this as a requirement that we must do the same in
3.0
The addition of 'unixsam' was designed to put common code together.
Other parts of passdb had to deal with making a SAM entry from a passwd
struct, so I merged the code. I had considered a complete merge with
smbpasswd, but never got that far. Volker has noted a number of areas
in the auth code that could be simplified by exploiting this.
This also assisted in moving our calls to Get_Pwnam() into a very small
number of places. It is very rarely called now.
If required, this code could be split back out again, however we still
have the issue of RID allocation. (the cascading change did not affect
this, it is noted for completeness).
The rids in HEAD are allocated by '2*uid+lp_algorithmic_rid_base()', to
allow the administrator to 'push' the algorithmic space 'out of the
way'. We should look into 'automatic' RID allocation, but I am wary of
inflicting this on all our file-server users.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:15:01AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter': On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:06:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: The use of multiple backends in passdb has acknowledged issues, and I'm not particularly fussed if you feel it should not ship with this functionality enabled. However, please do note that this *is* being used at present, and cannot be 'just removed'. (We map our non-passdb users into the system via this method). Volker has some solutions to this issue however, which look very neat. I'll need to check if they actually catch it all the cases. Well it's not being used really, as it's not in a production release. We don't make guarentees until it gets into a production release. What non-passdb users are being mapped into the system via this method ? Surely as a PDC we need passdb entries for every user we're exporting ? See the pdb_unix backend. We currently map users that are only in the system database as well. This means that you can see files owned by certain users that are not mapped in any of the other loaded pdb' . When a sysadmin tries to update the properties of such a user, it is added to the default pdb backend. Jelmer
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: Plus I have some questions about the current sam interface: - what is all the context thing needed for? I don't like global variables, and this allows us to construct seperate contexts for operations like sam2sam, and testing, without fiddiling with global variables. There's no problem in having global variables, provided they are used correctly. Insisting to not use them in any case just as a preconcept is as wrong as using them too much. It is all a question on how and where you use them. sam2sam operation does not need access checking and interface virtualization, it is an administrative task only anyway, try to put sam2sam above the sam interface instead of making it directly connect to the backends is just a bad idea, it add complexity and potential problems and gain nothing, imho. And sam2 sam is the only case where it could be useful to have 2 backends loaded at the same time. So it is perfectly possible to make it's own init function that load 2 backends into 2 local (to samedit) variables, while still loading the sam backend into a global variable used by the sam interface inside smbd. - what is the handle thing needed for ? Same as the SAM_ACCOUNT in pdb. If it's a SAM_ACCOUNT then call it with it's name. Also I really to not like the private substructure. We are all adult and vaccinated, and must trust each other ability to code and use internal structures properly, trying to say: I do not trust other coders is not a bright move imho, add unneeded complexity, SAM_ACCOUNT structure directly will do so regardless if theres a thing called private or not. Adding this layer only makes the interface a lot more heavier and trickier, make code slower (adds a function call for each parameter to be set into a structure) and the sam interface a lot bigger. Effort should be spent to educate other programmers to use the thing the right way by writing documentation, not by setting artificial barriers. - what is access desired meant to do ? Authorization is a different thing then storage, a backend is a storage! The SAM interface layer is the 'choke point'. If we do not wan't nasty races, then we must reterive things like the security descriptor with the data it applies to. This implies that the ACL checking code must resise either in the SAM backend, or the SAM interface. If we export it above this layer, we *will* get places where we don't check it properly. It must be in the Interface, putting it on the backend is the wrong move for many reasons: - code duplication, you have to implement the access checking into evry backend. - code review, authorization is a critical part of the security in samba, if you have to double check every module to be sure it does things the right way, you simply castrate the potentiality of a loadble module interface, as you put too much responsibility on independent module coders. - consistency every change you need to make to the access checking code, bust be made to any module and will make out of sync any modules not under your control, increasing the module versioning nightmare. - races may be easily solved supporting locks on the backend. - why do we insist to have a thing called unix accounts? It just does not make sense to me. We need real users/groups mapping instead (opposed to created on the fly by winbind based accounts). I'm not sure what you mean here - the current code doesn't even know about unix accounts. They are present in pdb, and I remember at some point of the discussion we had on IRC someone claimed that multiple modules were also a way to solve the unix accounts problem like done in with pdb backends. What Instead I think is that we should not threat unix accounts in any special way, but instead we need to map them to normal users when they are present, if a user do not have a local unix user then it will be created in winbindd, otherwise the uid-SID mapping will be done so that the user is mapped on a unix user. All the mapping should consist ONLY of a SID-[u,g]id mapping imho, and we should discourage using unix groups provided from /etc/group file and use instead winbindd to provide them to the system, but still use them from /etc/group if the administrator want to do so. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:34:47PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter': There is no intention to create a similar backend for the sam. Instead, we do intend to solve this problem in exactly the way you indicate below. There is no intention to provide a 'mulidb' module either. The only way to load more than one module will be to have separate domains. Why? I think having a multidb module would be the perfect solution for when one has multiple backends - it doesn't clutter the interface and provides those people who need it support for multiple backends. Jelmer
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 07:22, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:16:53AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam
backend parameter':
yes a thing I'm not sure has ever been a good idea.
to be able to have sam2sam that is really read a backend + store all
info into another backend we may take several ways.
We never need the 2 backend to be loaded at the same time to do the
operation, we may easily read all the accounts chnage the backend and
store them into the new one, or simply make custom code to load 2
different backends, and use theyr calls.
It's easy to have 2 structures calle backend1 and backend2 that holds
the functon pointers for 2 backends.
Al the context things always seemed to me overcomplicated even for
multiple backend code.
the context stuff has been in passdb since the beginning and is not
at all used for multiple backends - multiple backends are achieved by
having multiple 'methods' structs in one context.
Next to that, a 'multidb' backend will have to use multiple contexts.
We don't want to spoil global name space with the variables
sam_context contains.
If we are removing multiple domain support, we could remove
sam_methods perhaps and move all the functions in sam_methods to
sam_context, but sam_context definitely has to stay...
Jelmer
Ok, I looked back at what do currently context contain in passdb (see
below Appendix A).
It is simply a structure containing the function pointers of the
backend.
Of course it need to stay here, it only have a really bad name that make
you think of a totally different thing :-)
I think pdb_functions could have been a better name (no not methods, we
are programmin in C not in Java ;-)
Simo.
Appendix A:
typedef struct pdb_context
{
struct pdb_methods *pdb_methods;
struct pdb_methods *pwent_methods;
/* These functions are wrappers for the functions listed above.
They may do extra things like re-reading a SAM_ACCOUNT on update */
BOOL (*pdb_setsampwent)(struct pdb_context *, BOOL update);
void (*pdb_endsampwent)(struct pdb_context *);
BOOL (*pdb_getsampwent)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT *user);
BOOL (*pdb_getsampwnam)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT *sam_acct,
const char *username);
BOOL (*pdb_getsampwsid)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT *sam_acct,
const DOM_SID *sid);
BOOL (*pdb_add_sam_account)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT
*sampass);
BOOL (*pdb_update_sam_account)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT
*sampass);
BOOL (*pdb_delete_sam_account)(struct pdb_context *, SAM_ACCOUNT
*username);
void (*free_fn)(struct pdb_context **);
TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx;
} PDB_CONTEXT;
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:06, Andrew Bartlett wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let just remove the multi-domain stuff for now and try and get 3.0 in a shippable state. The 'new SAM' stuff is not being proposed for 3.0! Certainly not yet, we have a *lot* of work to do, before it gets there! Also, *please* don't confuse that with the multi-backend stuff. That has a very different purpose, and was not included in the new SAM design for exactly the reasons people don't want it in passdb. The use of multiple backends in passdb has acknowledged issues, and I'm not particularly fussed if you feel it should not ship with this functionality enabled. However, please do note that this *is* being used at present, and cannot be 'just removed'. (We map our non-passdb users into the system via this method). Volker has some solutions to this issue however, which look very neat. I'll need to check if they actually catch it all the cases. So let me understand: you say sam will not be in 3.0 you see currently passdb has been made so that nobody like it and is not good but you also say we should not end up using a correct solution because you want to maintain the status quo? We have to fix passdb or sam, just let decide on which one we should work on or go for a third way. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well it's not being used really, as it's not in a production release. We don't make guarentees until it gets into a production release. What non-passdb users are being mapped into the system via this method ? Surely as a PDC we need passdb entries for every user we're exporting ? I mean it's being used by code. The problem is mainly on the fileserver: For the DC side of things, every user is in the SAM, or they can't really do much. But on the fileserver side, we have the problem that a user may select to view the Owner or the ACL entries of a file. I think we should simply document the fact the admins should really map each user or groups that own files on the shares, and if they do not do it they may get in troubles. When they do not do it, I think we should simply return a simple Unknown SID allocated for that purpose. This will eliminate the problem and make us not need algorithmic mapping at all, that is however wrong solution, as today also the uid/gid space is 32 bit as rid space so that we can go out of mapping space anyway and need to handle that situation too. Algorithmic mapping should go away completely imho. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:06, Andrew Bartlett wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let just remove the multi-domain stuff for now and try and get 3.0 in a shippable state. The 'new SAM' stuff is not being proposed for 3.0! Certainly not yet, we have a *lot* of work to do, before it gets there! Also, *please* don't confuse that with the multi-backend stuff. That has a very different purpose, and was not included in the new SAM design for exactly the reasons people don't want it in passdb. The use of multiple backends in passdb has acknowledged issues, and I'm not particularly fussed if you feel it should not ship with this functionality enabled. However, please do note that this *is* being used at present, and cannot be 'just removed'. (We map our non-passdb users into the system via this method). Volker has some solutions to this issue however, which look very neat. I'll need to check if they actually catch it all the cases. So let me understand: you say sam will not be in 3.0 I did not say that. I said that I have not yet proposed the SAM for 3.0. I will not propose it for 3.0 until it's ready. you see currently passdb has been made so that nobody like it and is not good I think the structure in the passdb code is OK. The mulibackend issues are minor, and are quite well suited to inclusion in a module. I'll let others comment on what is so broken about it (particularly compared to 2.2) and how to fix it within the current constraints. but you also say we should not end up using a correct solution because you want to maintain the status quo? 'a correct solution'? I am working hard on the 'new SAM' stuff because I believe it to be a 'correct solution'. I am also actively reviewing proposed changes to passdb. We have to fix passdb or sam, just let decide on which one we should work on or go for a third way. I've seen Volker's patches, and I think that passdb can be made to work for the needs of 3.0, but it is messy. I believe the code as it *currently stands* can support 'net rpc vampire', but will consult volker more closely on this matter. I'm very impressed with voker's work in doing many of the things that were not thought possible with passdb. Of course I would much prefer we move directly to the 'new SAM' work, but I'll see the guidance of the release manager on that point, when I think the code is ready. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 12:34, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: It is all a question on how and where you use them. ^^ Except that global variables are particularly nasty in C - we don't have an autoprototyper on them, and we cannot ensure that they are correctly declared in all modules. Also, we cannot validate the input into any such variables, or assume auto-initialisation. The methods employed in the pdb and sam provide this. Honestly, it is a matter of taste. I like the way that pdb (and now the SAM code) has been constructed, and the distinct lack of 'special cases'. If pdbedit becomes a special case, then it is more likely to break. If the rest of Samba has to use that code path, then accidents are less likely to happen. pdbedit is not a special case, it only uses the backend interface and not the sam interface, they will be both quite consistent! No better the backend interface should be even more solid and stable then sam interface as it have to deal with potentially external modules, so i really do not see pdb/sam/gums/**edit to break so easily. | smbd| --- | --- |sam interface| --- | |--| pdbedit | --- | backend | --- Effort should be spent to educate other programmers to use the thing the right way by writing documentation, not by setting artificial barriers. Here we disagree. I take a different approach, were I prefer to make it harder to make mistakes. Harder to make mistake is good only when it does not imply harder to code. I abide to the Keep it Simple Stuipd! religion :-) The use of 'set' routines has also allowed us to (with minimal changes to the interface) track 'default' values for many parameters - avoiding the storage of extra (fixed) values in LDAP. I intend to expand this to every attribute for the new SAM. The set routines may stay at the sam interface level, nobody prohibits you to use them and they are certainly appealing in some situation, even if I do not like them much and would prefer do be able to change a structure directly if I need to do it (again I have to remember we are using C not Java, and an object oriented way to do things is not always a good thing imho). Also I think it is bad you do not put extra values in LDAP, what happen if you discover you need to support that to provide some functionality? A re you going to change the LDAP schema between minor releases? Furthermore, we use the get/set routines to allow the users of the passdb interface to get feedback on the ability to get/set *individual* elements on the SAM handle, rather than the lot. ability to set/get individual values ? What do you exactly mean ? I advocate strong interfaces, because I feel it assists in modular programming. By using the get/set routines, I can ensure that data is correctly 'const', for example. Finally, it allows us to strdup() all assigned strings, and ensure they are not accidentally assigned stack pointers, while avoiding memory leaks. On a project as large as Samba, I prefer all the help I can get in ensuring code quality. You will get more quality documenting it then making barriers into it imho. I'm not saying we do not need clean interfaces, but that we should just not push too much. It must be in the Interface, putting it on the backend is the wrong move for many reasons: - code duplication, you have to implement the access checking into evry backend. - code review, authorization is a critical part of the security in samba, if you have to double check every module to be sure it does things the right way, you simply castrate the potentiality of a loadble module interface, as you put too much responsibility on independent module coders. - consistency every change you need to make to the access checking code, bust be made to any module and will make out of sync any modules not under your control, increasing the module versioning nightmare. - races may be easily solved supporting locks on the backend. We cannot assume locks in the backend. The interface is not designed in isolation - we have to work with the fact that LDAP *will* be a primary backend, and does not support this kind of locking. I prefer to create a solution that does not impose additional constraints on this. We can of course. There are many way to simulate locks even for ldap, as it is clear that people should not be able to change user values if not going through samba. Reading is not a problem, we only need lock on write. Your points are very valid, and I have proposed a solution in the my reply to Jerry's mail. That is, the backend can do it's own ACL checks if it likes, but it passes the security descriptor to the
How prevent many logins
Hi list, How prevent user log many times on different machines? Samba log connections? how read this information on samba? Regards -- Marcus Grando Tecnologia da Informação marcus at big dot univali dot br marcus at sbh dot eng dot br
Re: Explaining the new SAM
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:13, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Jean Francois Micouleau wrote: It's getting clear that you are reinventing something we already have. All your SAM api is simply the SAMR server pipe code. Why do you want to implement a new api as we already have one ? I have a history of doing this - and I intend to continue... I think jfm was criticizing the fact that you are building the interface too much close to samr one, and that we do not have the need to do so. I really do not think the jfm was proposing to use the samr interface for internal use. I agree to this vision, following too much the samr interface make us only more unfriendly to the rest of samba code, that need much greater flexibility as you recognized. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: How prevent many logins
Hi, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Marcus Grando wrote: Hi list, How prevent user log many times on different machines? Samba log connections? how read this information on samba? There is currently no internal mechinism for dealing with this, but a PAM module might be able to construct a suitable solution. (Then setup samba --with-pam and 'obey pam restrictions' in smb.conf). But I dont use pam. Any other method? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- Marcus Grando Tecnologia da Informação marcus at big dot univali dot br marcus at sbh dot eng dot br
Re: Server name being truncated in Winbindd
jerry, Finally got a chance to try upgrade and 3.0alpha20 does resolve the problemThanks, chuck Gerald Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/30/2002 08:58:09 AM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Server name being truncated in Winbindd On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am runing Samba-3.0-alpha18 winbindd and attempting to join a w2k domain that has a 15 character server name.. as you can see from the log below the name gets truncated to 14 characters which then results in the NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME when attempting authenticationI am not at work to look at the code but I did notice the message from convert_string() about requiring 16 character and only 15 being available.. This works fine if the domain name is less than 15 characters... Can you retest against 3.0alpha20 ? Thanks. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sams Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
sendfile profiling patch for utils/status.c
Hello all,
I'm including a tiny patch for utils/status.c , in
diff -u format ... Hope I did this right!
After applying the patch...
# ./bin/smbstatus -P
{snip}
read_bytes: 0
write_count:1
write_time: 166
write_bytes:54
sendfile_count: 4
sendfile_time: 16262
sendfile_bytes: 20480
lseek_count:2
lseek_time: 18
rename_count: 0
{snip}
The patch is attached in the mail. Fell free to all the
required printf where I add them, after the write_bytes,
or anywhere else...
Thank you,
Pierre B.
--- utils/status.c Mon Aug 26 12:08:01 2002
+++ utils/status.c.new Thu Oct 3 09:50:19 2002
-194,6 +194,11
printf(write_count:%u\n, profile_p-syscall_write_count);
printf(write_time: %u\n, profile_p-syscall_write_time);
printf(write_bytes:%u\n, profile_p-syscall_write_bytes);
+#ifdef HAVE_SENDFILE
+ printf(sendfile_count:%u\n,
+profile_p-syscall_sendfile_count);
+ printf(sendfile_time: %u\n,
+profile_p-syscall_sendfile_time);
+ printf(sendfile_bytes:%u\n,
+profile_p-syscall_sendfile_bytes);
+#endif
printf(lseek_count:%u\n, profile_p-syscall_lseek_count);
printf(lseek_time: %u\n, profile_p-syscall_lseek_time);
printf(rename_count: %u\n,
profile_p-syscall_rename_count);
Re: Samba 3.0a20+LDAP-backend group-builit and mapping questions
Ignacio Coupeau wrote: I'm been playing with the groups and LDAP (passdb backend) and found two problems: I found the answer. The problem was caused by unknow type in the group type field. By default the builtin-domain and every new group created is marked as Group type: Unknown type: Domain Admins SID : S-1-5-21-298858960-1863792627-3661451959-512 Unix group: admins Group type: Unknown type Comment : Privilege : SaAddUsers SeMachineAccountPrivilege SaPrintOp With the command smbgroupedit and the flag -t d I solved some of the problems: the groups may be searched/imported from the XP and the ldap database is not enumerated. Ignacio -- Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTI, Director fax:948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAINhttp://www.unav.es/cti/
Re: [PATCH] sam backend parameter
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:25:39PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: I've seen Volker's patches, and I think that passdb can be made to work for the needs of 3.0, but it is messy. I believe the code as it *currently stands* can support 'net rpc vampire', but will consult volker more closely on this matter. I'm very impressed with voker's work in doing many of the things that were not thought possible with passdb. net rpc vampire is one of the most important elements of 3.0. Anything that makes this function easier is a major priority. If fixing the passdb backend gets us there then let's do that and experiment with the SAM stuff later. Jeremy.
[jonas@gnu.org: Bug#162956: libsmbclient-dev: libsmbclient.h doesn't work without client.h]
I imagine those who favor the use of libsmbclient might be interested to know that the header files are currently in disarray. I've verified that this is also a problem in 3.0alpha20. Should libsmbclient.h duplicate the functionality of client.h, or does client.h need to be pulled in as a dependency of libsmbclient.h? Steve Langasek postmodern programmer - Forwarded message from Jonas Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Subject: Bug#162956: libsmbclient-dev: libsmbclient.h doesn't work without client.h Reply-To: Jonas Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: Jonas Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Sender: Jonas Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eloy A. Paris), [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 07:48:01 GMT Resent-Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debian-PR-Message: report 162956 X-Debian-PR-Package: libsmbclient-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by [EMAIL PROTECTED] id=B.103345760724642 (code B ref -1); Tue, 01 Oct 2002 07:48:01 GMT From: Jonas Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:33:23 +0200 Resent-Sender: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-PTS-Package: samba X-PTS-Keyword: bts X-Unsubscribe: echo 'unsubscribe samba' | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (C:75.3595 M:97.0754 P:95.9108 S:26.9476 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:2.) pmCr X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward (good recip) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Package: libsmbclient-dev Version: 2.999+3.0cvs20020906-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I recently did an upgrade of the system, a new libsmbclient was installed that introduced a problem, namely that libsmbclient.h (line 199) accessed a structure called cli_state. This structure is not defined anywhere, which causes compilation to fail when using libsmbclient.h. When looking around, it appears that this structure is defined in client.h, however, I can not find this file in any other Debian package either. If I use a client.h from the samba source package, this introduces additional requirements, so all in all, I'd think that libsmbclient-dev ought to include several more header files, or the appropriate definitions inserted into libsmbclient.h :-) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux fiona 2.4.19 #2 SMP Tue Sep 3 08:17:02 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1 Versions of packages libsmbclient-dev depends on: ii libsmbclient 2.999+3.0cvs20020906-1 Shared library that allows applica -- no debconf information - End forwarded message - msg03500/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
ARRRGGG!!!!!!! Recent Upgrade to Fix SNAP Server Problem
Arrrggg!! Smile =) After upgrading from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0cvs20 I'm experiencing the following problem: When a user logs on they get a message from windows that says the following: Your Roaming profile is not available Then it says Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary profile When the user logs in again none of the settings remain. I have the following to lines in my smb.conf logon path = logon home = What DA HELL AM I SCREWING UP!! Smile =) IRV -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:05 AM To: Irving Carrion Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent Upgrade to Fix SNAP Server Problem Irving Carrion wrote: Greetings! We just recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0cvs20 and are having a few problems. The domain admin group that used to work in the previous version no longer does. According to the docs smb.conf.5.html the command is still there and still active. Obviously I have missed something... can anyone relay some info my way. You are trusting our documentation...? Also testparm has reported that I am using wins support and wins server commands in the smb.conf file, but I am NOT. All I have is wins support = Yes. Known issue Any info on the postscript error below would help but not critical at this point. I'm running testparm on my smb.conf and I get the following errors: ///ERRORS BEGIN Unknown parameter encountered: domain admin group Ignoring unknown parameter domain admin group See smbgroupedit. It handles this stuff for now. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
smbcacl doesn't work for me
Hi, I share an XFS-volume via samba 2.2.4. fetching the acls works like the following for me: hermes:/secrets # smbcacls //hermes/xfs-share test -U TOGO/hzbogdan Password: REVISION:1 OWNER:TOGO\hzbogdan GROUP:TOGO\users ACL:TOGO\hzbogdan:ALLOWED//RW ACL:TOGO\users:ALLOWED//R ACL:\Everyone:ALLOWED//R - When I try to set - or rather modify - the Acl for the group users, I get strange results: - hermes:/secrets # smbcacls //hermes/xfs-share test -U TOGO/hzbogdan -M ACL:TOGO\users:0/0/W Password: Failed to parse ACL ACL:TOGOusers Using various substitutions for type/flags/mask Values didn't get better results. Could someone provide some help? Thanks z. Zoltan Bogdan Zoltan Bogdan - Linux SystemIntegration Kreutzerstr. 71 D-90439 Nrnberg Tel. +49 (0)911 929 191 25 Fax +49 (0)911 929 191 26 Mobil +49 (0)175 521 705 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] winbindd use flat files
HISTORY I've had a little bit of a dilemma ever since Windows XP SP1 came out - roaming profiles that are stored on a Samba server broke. They also broke earlier when Windows 2000 SP2 was released, but was fixed by adding 'nt acl support = no' in the profile's definition. This option (according to previous posts) prevents XP SP1 from using roaming profiles. The reason behind this is the SID returned by the Samba server was the SID of the SAMBASERVER\user account, instead of the DOMAIN\user account. The easy solution was to use winbind. Winbind will map Domain Account SIDs (DOMAIN\user) to UNIX UIDs. The problem I had with this is it dynamically allocates the UNIX UID. This was unacceptable in my situation because we also use NFS, which requires consistent UNIX UIDs across different computers. If we used Winbind, the UIDs are allocated on a 'first come, first serve' basis. SOLUTION I hacked winbindd to use 'flat files', such as /etc/passwd and /etc/group. When winbindd gets a request to map a sid to an uid, it will now check to see if that account already exists in a flat file. If it does, it will map the preexisting UID to the SID. It does the check by seeing if the Windows (user|group)name exists in the (passwd|group) file. If it doesn't find the account, it will do the normal dynamic allocation as before. The attached patches add three configuration options: winbind use flat files (G) This parameter specifies whether winbindd should use flat files to look up UIDs, instead of always dynamically allocating them. If winbindd can not find the uid of the request, it will fall back to the dynamic allocation. Default: winbind use flat files = false Example: winbind use flat files = true winbind password file path (G) This parameter specifies the file it should use to look up user IDs when using flat files. This file has to be a standard UNIX passwd file. Default: winbind password file path = /etc/passwd Example: winbind password file path = /etc/global-passwds winbind group file path (G) This parameter specifies the file it should use to look up group IDs when using flat files. This file has to be a standard UNIX group file. Default: winbind password file path = /etc/group Example: winbind password file path = /etc/global-groups ISSUES This system will fail if it is in a domain with trusts and there are accounts with the same name. I'm not sure exactly what will happen, but I'm pretty sure it won't be what you want. NOTES I did notice on the Samba 3.0 Roadmap, there is 'hook for utilizing a centralized winbindd id map database', and I'm not sure exactly what this is. Or if this may do what was wanted. It sounds like some sort of master (LDAP?) database that all the client winbindds can find a UID/GID. This seemed a little too complex, when all I have to worry about now is distributing the passwd/group files to all the winbindd computers. So, I don't expect this to go into the distribution unless the team deems it very useful. BTW, I'm a Sysadmin, not a programmer. I hope it doesn't show. :) Attached are two patches. one is the patch against samba-2.5, and the other is against samba-3.0alpha20. I've tested the samba-2.5 extensively, I haven't run the samba-3.0 at all; I'm not even sure it compiles. But the places I modified in 2.5 havn't changed in 3.0 (except for some new flags in loadparm.c, which I just copied.) Please comment. I'd like this to be more useful for other people, but it was a way to fix a problem I was having. - Josh samba2.5-winbind-flat-files.patch Description: Binary data samba3.0-winbind-flat-files.patch Description: Binary data
RE: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
am curious and need to configure this and test, any ideas how to make it work, i mean how do start 2 smbd parent process is it port based or something else samba technical group please comment on this if you get chance thanks in advance -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote: I am just curious of running 2 smbds, as i think one parent smbd process runs on 139 and all others are children -Original Message- From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:32 PM To: Jason Joines; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 Just making all this stuff up off the top of my head. I have never done this, but you could try: Running two smbd daemon, each listening to different ports. Redirecting traffic from port 445 to 139 with some firewall rules. I redirect traffic with ipmasqadm, but there are surely others. Running smbd with (x)inetd and have it listen to both ports. Likely, the delay is because the W2K clients are waiting for a reply, and finally timing out on port 445. Why not try something funky like having telnet or apache listen on port 445. Maybe that will tell the client right away to try a different port, like 139. Let us know how this works out, if you try any of this stuff. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:04:41PM -0500, Jason Joines wrote: I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Thu Oct 3 07:25:08 2002 Author: abartlet Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11298 Modified Files: Makefile.in Log Message: VFStest uses all of smbd's .o files, so needs -lpam and crypt. Revisions: Makefile.in 1.547 = 1.548 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/Makefile.in?r1=1.547r2=1.548
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Thu Oct 3 14:23:06 2002 Author: tridge Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30472 Modified Files: ldap.c Log Message: .NET likes both forms of servicePrincipalName in the machine account record Revisions: ldap.c 1.81 = 1.82 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap.c?r1=1.81r2=1.82
CVS update: samba/docs/manpages
Date: Thu Oct 3 16:32:23 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/docs/manpages In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18825/manpages Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 smb.conf.5 Log Message: apply fixes from Herb to do with synonyms in smb.conf(5) Revisions: smb.conf.5 1.103.2.85 = 1.103.2.86 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/manpages/smb.conf.5?r1=1.103.2.85r2=1.103.2.86
CVS update: samba/docs/manpages
Date: Thu Oct 3 16:32:26 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/manpages In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18722/manpages Modified Files: smb.conf.5 Log Message: Document 'hide special files' Revisions: smb.conf.5 1.129 = 1.130 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/manpages/smb.conf.5?r1=1.129r2=1.130
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/manpages
Date: Thu Oct 3 16:52:22 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/manpages In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22735/docbook/manpages Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 smb.conf.5.sgml Log Message: alphabetical ordering of 'use sendfile' Revisions: smb.conf.5.sgml 1.1.2.104 = 1.1.2.105 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml?r1=1.1.2.104r2=1.1.2.105
CVS update: samba/docs/htmldocs
Date: Thu Oct 3 16:52:23 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/docs/htmldocs In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22735/htmldocs Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 smb.conf.5.html Log Message: alphabetical ordering of 'use sendfile' Revisions: smb.conf.5.html 1.15.2.77 = 1.15.2.78 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smb.conf.5.html?r1=1.15.2.77r2=1.15.2.78
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Oct 3 17:30:57 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29510/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmbd_winsserver.c Log Message: Merging tridge's wins fixes. Tridge - we're supposed to be keeping 3.0 up to date :-). Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_winsserver.c 1.51.2.1 = 1.51.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c?r1=1.51.2.1r2=1.51.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
Date: Thu Oct 3 17:31:16 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29574/nmbd Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD nmbd_winsserver.c Log Message: Merging tridge's wins fixes. Jeremy. Revisions: nmbd_winsserver.c 1.38.2.4 = 1.38.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c?r1=1.38.2.4r2=1.38.2.5
CVS update: samba/source/param
Date: Thu Oct 3 17:37:16 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30391/samba/source/param Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 loadparm.c Log Message: make the default printed values for boolean the same for all parameters. Revisions: loadparm.c 1.251.2.118 = 1.251.2.119 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c?r1=1.251.2.118r2=1.251.2.119
CVS update: samba/source/param
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:02:01 2002 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1292/samba/source/param Modified Files: loadparm.c Log Message: make the default printed values for boolean the same for all parameters. Revisions: loadparm.c 1.455 = 1.456 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c?r1=1.455r2=1.456
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:10:16 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3018/docbook Modified Files: Makefile.in Log Message: Fix links in html versions of manpages Revisions: Makefile.in 1.27 = 1.28 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/Makefile.in?r1=1.27r2=1.28
CVS update: samba/docs/htmldocs
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:10:16 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/htmldocs In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3018/htmldocs Modified Files: findsmb.1.html lmhosts.5.html make_smbcodepage.1.html make_unicodemap.1.html net.8.html nmbd.8.html nmblookup.1.html pdbedit.8.html rpcclient.1.html samba.7.html smb.conf.5.html smbcacls.1.html smbclient.1.html smbcontrol.1.html smbd.8.html smbgroupedit.8.html smbmnt.8.html smbmount.8.html smbpasswd.5.html smbpasswd.8.html smbsh.1.html smbspool.8.html smbstatus.1.html smbtar.1.html smbumount.8.html swat.8.html testparm.1.html testprns.1.html wbinfo.1.html winbindd.8.html Log Message: Fix links in html versions of manpages Revisions: findsmb.1.html 1.4 = 1.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/findsmb.1.html?r1=1.4r2=1.5 lmhosts.5.html 1.9 = 1.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/lmhosts.5.html?r1=1.9r2=1.10 make_smbcodepage.1.html 1.8 = 1.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/make_smbcodepage.1.html?r1=1.8r2=1.9 make_unicodemap.1.html 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/make_unicodemap.1.html?r1=1.3r2=1.4 net.8.html 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/net.8.html?r1=1.2r2=1.3 nmbd.8.html 1.14 = 1.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/nmbd.8.html?r1=1.14r2=1.15 nmblookup.1.html1.11 = 1.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/nmblookup.1.html?r1=1.11r2=1.12 pdbedit.8.html 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/pdbedit.8.html?r1=1.3r2=1.4 rpcclient.1.html1.12 = 1.13 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/rpcclient.1.html?r1=1.12r2=1.13 samba.7.html1.10 = 1.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/samba.7.html?r1=1.10r2=1.11 smb.conf.5.html 1.35 = 1.36 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smb.conf.5.html?r1=1.35r2=1.36 smbcacls.1.html 1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbcacls.1.html?r1=1.7r2=1.8 smbclient.1.html1.15 = 1.16 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbclient.1.html?r1=1.15r2=1.16 smbcontrol.1.html 1.11 = 1.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbcontrol.1.html?r1=1.11r2=1.12 smbd.8.html 1.17 = 1.18 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbd.8.html?r1=1.17r2=1.18 smbgroupedit.8.html 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbgroupedit.8.html?r1=1.2r2=1.3 smbmnt.8.html 1.5 = 1.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbmnt.8.html?r1=1.5r2=1.6 smbmount.8.html 1.6 = 1.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbmount.8.html?r1=1.6r2=1.7 smbpasswd.5.html1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbpasswd.5.html?r1=1.7r2=1.8 smbpasswd.8.html1.11 = 1.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbpasswd.8.html?r1=1.11r2=1.12 smbsh.1.html1.6 = 1.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbsh.1.html?r1=1.6r2=1.7 smbspool.8.html 1.8 = 1.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbspool.8.html?r1=1.8r2=1.9 smbstatus.1.html1.11 = 1.12 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbstatus.1.html?r1=1.11r2=1.12 smbtar.1.html 1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbtar.1.html?r1=1.7r2=1.8 smbumount.8.html1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/smbumount.8.html?r1=1.3r2=1.4 swat.8.html 1.10 = 1.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/swat.8.html?r1=1.10r2=1.11 testparm.1.html 1.10 = 1.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/testparm.1.html?r1=1.10r2=1.11 testprns.1.html 1.7 = 1.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html?r1=1.7r2=1.8 wbinfo.1.html 1.6 = 1.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/wbinfo.1.html?r1=1.6r2=1.7 winbindd.8.html 1.14 = 1.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/htmldocs/winbindd.8.html?r1=1.14r2=1.15
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:10:59 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3240/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 fileio.c Log Message: Write cache bugfix from Rasmus Borup Hansen, system adm. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremy. Revisions: fileio.c1.40.2.2 = 1.40.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/fileio.c?r1=1.40.2.2r2=1.40.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:11:12 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3276/smbd Modified Files: fileio.c Log Message: Write cache bugfix from Rasmus Borup Hansen, system adm. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremy. Revisions: fileio.c1.43 = 1.44 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/fileio.c?r1=1.43r2=1.44
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:11:28 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3310/smbd Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD fileio.c Log Message: Write cache bugfix from Rasmus Borup Hansen, system adm. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremy. Revisions: fileio.c1.22.2.6 = 1.22.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/fileio.c?r1=1.22.2.6r2=1.22.2.7
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:37:37 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8294 Modified Files: samba.dsl Log Message: Fix generation of FAQ Revisions: samba.dsl 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/samba.dsl?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/faq
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:37:37 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/faq In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8294/faq Modified Files: sambafaq.sgml Log Message: Fix generation of FAQ Revisions: sambafaq.sgml 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/faq/sambafaq.sgml?r1=1.2r2=1.3
CVS update: samba/docs/faq
Date: Thu Oct 3 18:43:39 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/faq In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9540 Added Files: clientapp.html general.html install.html samba-faq.html Log Message: Add generated files for FAQ Revisions: clientapp.html NONE = 1.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/faq/clientapp.html?rev=1.1 general.htmlNONE = 1.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/faq/general.html?rev=1.1 install.htmlNONE = 1.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/faq/install.html?rev=1.1 samba-faq.html NONE = 1.1 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/faq/samba-faq.html?rev=1.1
