Lo invitamos a conocer un portal exclusivo en la web que creemos le será de
gran utilidad al electorado mexicano:
Elecciones México - Ver, Saber, Comparar y Elegir.
http://www.eleccionesmexico.com.mx
Todo lo que usted necesita saber acerca de los candidatos para comparar y
elegir al mejor
Hi all,
Getting the following when I attempt to compile samba-3.0.15pre2 with the
following options under Solaris 9:
--with-ldap --with-ads --with-krb5 --with-pam --with-winbind.
---snip--
Compiling lib/hmacmd5.c with -fPIC
Compiling lib/iconv.c with -fPIC
lib/iconv.c: In function
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org writes:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 02:41 +, Andrew Chuang wrote:
We find the samba 3.0.x cmd 'net' can modify the info name:samba
version:3.0.x
to machine account info in Domain Controller after registering samba to
domain
by ldap. But samba 2.2.x
John Zakhar wrote:
The log files are attached, I have NEVER had so much trouble with a
samba PDC before. I need to turn in my unix admin license, this is
pathetic...
Why have all your ldifs got spaces in the dn's ? In your slapd.log you have
this: o=ventusnetworks.com,dc=na
NO SPACES.
Dear samba@lists.samba.org,
Thanks for writing the NetMechanic Webmaster Tips newsletter.
Due to the amount of mail we receive from auto-responders, we do not regularly
check messages sent to this mailbox.
Please visit this page to send us comments, change your email address, or
delete your
Hil list!
I'm trying to authenticate Active Directory Users via freeradius. I
can do it in a general case (user and domain) without
problem. Now I have to do it restricting the authentication to the
members of a group.
I can exect the script (as is put in radiusd.conf) correct from the
command
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 09:28 +0200, Javier Jimenez wrote:
Hil list!
I'm trying to authenticate Active Directory Users via freeradius. I
can do it in a general case (user and domain) without
problem. Now I have to do it restricting the authentication to the
members of a group.
Hi,
I running samba-3.0.13-1 connect to W2k3, attr-2.4.19 and
acl-2.2.27-1.
I've a strange problem with ACL settings, following the data structure.I
would that user1 could read/write only his personal folder, user1 belongs to
domain users and can reach the user folder but he can't see his
Folgende Nachricht wurde fuer Sie hinterlassen:
Please find below a message for you:
Wir haben Ihre E-Mail erhalten und werden Sie in den nächsten 48 Stunden
beantworten.
Bitte haben Sie etwas gedult da wir momentan sehr viele E-Mail´s bekommen.
Bei ganz dringenden fällen können Sie uns auch
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/16/sober_spews_spam/
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hello list,
I would like to know if there is any relation between smbclient and the
server
config file smb.conf.
I'm working with some issues with file locking and staroffice, I'm
working with a default
smb.conf the one shipped with RedHat Enterprise Linux 4. And I'm
wondering if I have to
add
quote who=Peter Szmrecsanyi
OK, I've done the tests I'd said I'd do and here are the results... The
tests were simple, set up a samba share on the computers in question and
use
a windows PC and a Linux (smbclient) PC to read a 350 MB files of the
share:
Setting up a samba server (to share
Hi John, read the chapter 7 (and most of the document, very well written
btw)
I seem to be where I needed to already.
In one of your examples (7.3.4.1)
5. Validate the operation of this configuration by executing: ...
It says that getent passwd administrator SHOULD return the administrator but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Jerome Alet wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:41:36PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long-
When will an up-to-date PDF be available?
Thanks for all the hard work!
__
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
At 08:36 AM 5/16/2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What about ... changing this long standing policy ???
(I've already read the reson for the actual policy)
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members
Customer Service has received your e-mail. Please be assured that your message
is important to us and that one of our correspondence specialists will contact
you as soon as possible if necessary. Our regular business hours are Monday
through Friday, 6:00am to 11:00pm Eastern time.
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin M. Barrett wrote:
|
| Has any consideration been made to converting the
| list to a forum?
There's already Samba forums around so another one
would not be extremely helpful IMO. Plus the preference
for forum vs. mailing list is linked to
I have 6G file on w2003 .
but Linux Server didn't see it correctly on samba
snip
What is your client kernel version? This looks like a very old, and I
believe fixed, issue. If you're running a newish kernel and still having
issues, try the cifs mount instead of smbfs.
--
Paul Gienger
Also, just curious, what's the rough timeframe for the new printed
editions of the How-To and Examples to hit the bookshelves? I just want
to show support for all the quality work with a purchase.
Eric Feldhusen
HK wrote:
When will an up-to-date PDF be available?
Thanks for all the hard work!
here is how i do it. there may be a better way.
1. mount the windows box from the linux box:
/bin/mount -t smbfs -o
username=validusernameonwindowsbox,password=validusernameonwindowsbox'spassw
ord //windowsbox/sharename /unixmountpoint
the values validusernameonwindowsbox,
- Original Message -
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kevin M. Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: SPAM 6.5: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German
overlist address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- Original Message -
From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Sarbanes-Oxley headaches
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 10:44 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
i am currently using samba version 3.0.7 with smbpasswd.
The desktop had FC1 on it, and I only mentioned it because I did the
test initially on that one before realising that the OS version was
different! But the results were the same as on my laptop which has FC3
installed and a similar configuration to the ProLiant, so I decided top
mention it.
I'm seeing a lot of:
[2005/05/16 08:35:46, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250)
Username DOMAIN\SAMBA_CLIENT1$ is invalid on this system
in the logs on my samba server after joining our ad DOMAIN, and
accessing from SAMBA_CLIENT1 (also a member of the ad DOMAIN).
Otherwise, it
On Monday 16 May 2005 07:22, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
Also, just curious, what's the rough timeframe for the new printed
editions of the How-To and Examples to hit the bookshelves? I just want
to show support for all the quality work with a purchase.
August / September is the release time-frame.
On Monday 16 May 2005 07:50, Stuart Highlander wrote:
I gather that OP would be better served by using a tdb or ldap backend.
i am not the original poster, but did ask the question regarding account
lockout and reset using the smbpasswd backend.
i agree that moving to ldap or tdb would
Hi guys,
Thanks for the replies, I just removed the cups-common-1.1-23 package from my
box and installed v 1.1.21-0.rc1.7.4 from rpmseek.com.
Ran Cupsaddsmb and it worked perfectly first time. Funnily enough 1.1.21 was
the version that I first used with point and print on Mandrake 10 and it
We have not worked with Solaris much, and our contract Solaris guy has
very little experience with Winbind. So, we are like two blind people
touching opposite ends of the elephant and trying to come to a
solution. (No comments please on which end I drew...) :-)
The question involves
quote who=Peter Szmrecsanyi
I have a 100Mbps network, which can yeild a maximum tranfer rate of 12
MB/s, if you take the TCP/IP subsystem overhead into account you'll
realise that more than 11 MB/s is bearing on the impossible. Using both
the desktop and the laptop I got nearlly 11 MB/s, one
Hi, I running samba-3.0.13-1 connect to W2k3, attr-2.4.19 and acl-2.2.27-1.
I've a strange problem with ACL settings, following the data structure.I
would that user1 could read/write only his personal folder, user1 belongs to
domain users and can reach the user folder but he can't see his personal
- Original Message -
From: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Sarbanes-Oxley headaches
On Monday 16 May 2005 07:50, Stuart Highlander wrote:
I gather that OP would be better served by using a tdb or
I have been running the same samba conf file for a year. Last week, I
added another network card with the ipaddress 10.0.0.122 to my samba
server. This server is my domain master browser. I then removed it.
Now I am getting errors in my messages log telling me it cannot find the
domain
(SuSE Pro 9.3, Samba 3.0.13-1.1)
(I posted this earlier but didn't get much response so I'm trying again
with a different subject line.)
I have a Samba server set up on a Linux machine. I have four shares set
up, not counting all those system things (homes, profiles, etc). When I
access the
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:19 am, Donald D Henson wrote:
The four shares in question are: [winstuff], [music library], [photo
library], and [uop].
The two that show up okay are: [winstuff] and [uop].
The two that don't show up are: [music library] and [photo library].
An observation: the two
man, 16.05.2005 kl. 16.55 skrev Meli Marco:
Hi, I running samba-3.0.13-1 connect to W2k3, attr-2.4.19 and acl-2.2.27-1.
What's attr-2.4.19? What's acl-2.2.27-1? Would they by any chance be
rpm library versions? What's the OS and distro? Looks as if it might be
late Red Hat. Then again, it
So, what you suggest?
Thanks, Marco.
Marco Meli
IT Dept.
GKN SINTER METALS
Via Verdi, 82
Cernusco s/N
I-20063 (MI) / Italy
% +39 02-929051452
Fax: +39 02-9230690
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
All
Has any consideration been made to converting the list to a forum? in that
way everyone can just check the web site instead of checking the
inbox? For those folk who rather read the mail most forum software can
Somewhat off-topic for the list, and
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members address. There is no
silver bullet to solve this issue without moderating every
post.
But if the policy was only subscriber posting then, we would know
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote:
Hi,
whoever is able to unsubscribe addresses from the list: I am currently
getting lots of spam with nazi content over this mailing list.
Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long-
standing
It is mostly the Sober.Q worm, a new Sober variant that has come out
that is causing all of the trouble. Been getting quite a bit at work but
it has all been tagged as spam.
More info at
http://news.com.com/Sober.Q+spreads+hate+messages+in+German,+English/210
0-7349_3-5708588.html
man, 16.05.2005 kl. 18.13 skrev Meli Marco:
So, what you suggest?
Answer questions? Learn to quote? There could be other things, too ...
--Tonni
--
Nothing sucksseeds like a pigeon without a beak ...
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.billy.demon.nl
They'll love us, won't they? They feed
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and claim to come from a list members address. There is no
silver bullet to solve this issue without moderating every
post.
But if the policy was
Now, I'found another problem, if I put a group with spaceblanks on my
ntlm_auth script on freeradius, cannot authenticate. It recognise just
the first word of the name.
Any idea about what´s happening?
Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Javier Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
For what it is worth, I have a Windows XP Athlon 2600 machine with 1GB RAM and
a 100MBit LAN over CAT5, and a SuSE Linux dual Pentium III 1GHz machine with
1GB RAM running Samba 3.0.10. Actually, a very simple configuration.
I measured my transfer rate from the Linux box to the Windows box by
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much accidental off
list traffic.
-Jason Pyeron
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not spam, then it will be virus that forge headers
and
I have looked for several days and can not find the answer to my problem, but
I'm sure it has to be a simple issue. I'm trying to map drives inside Windows
Server 2003 Terminal Session from a local Samba server but can't get connected.
I figure the problem is in Windows Registry but can't find web
A little more time using Google, and I found the following:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:47:17 -0400, Jeremy Naylor jnaylor at gmail.com
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical wrote:
Hello!
In trying to get a linux machine to join a Win2k3 AD domain, I kept
getting this
-Original Message-
From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much
accidental off
list traffic.
I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which
inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying to
Yes, it's a huge a big difference... Off the ProLiant I can FTP files at
about 8MB/s, so I'm not expecting 10MB/s, but give me at least 6 MB/s,
then I'll be happy!
I remebering checking the BIOS before I installed the system, and I
don't remeber anything about DMA on the Network adapter, but
FYI, this list is already available as a forum at Nabble.com, a new mailing
list archive and discussion forums site:
http://www.nabble.com/Samba-f62.html
One can easily get rid of spam when reading the list as a Nabble forum, by
using their collaborative filtering feature. Just give the spam
I am unable to connect to the SMB server from a WIN XP system. I was able
to join the DOMAIN using the net command.
Here is output I got from the log file.
Thanks,
auth/auth_domain.c:connect_to_domain_password_server
connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the NETLOGON
I have setup samba 3 as a PDC for a set of computers that previously had
Domain Users setup to run as local admins under XP, so that anyone that
has logged into the domain has local admin access. Whats the best way to
replicate this setup so that I don't have to go around to each computer
and
I dont care anymore,
bye.
On Mon, 16 May 2005, David Brodbeck wrote:
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much
accidental off
list traffic.
I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which
inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying to the list is
man, 16.05.2005 kl. 17.33 skrev Chris:
The four shares in question are: [winstuff], [music library], [photo
library], and [uop].
The two that show up okay are: [winstuff] and [uop].
The two that don't show up are: [music library] and [photo library].
An observation: the two that
On Monday 16 May 2005 12:43, Vincent Yonemitsu wrote:
I have setup samba 3 as a PDC for a set of computers that previously had
Domain Users setup to run as local admins under XP, so that anyone that
has logged into the domain has local admin access. Whats the best way to
replicate this setup
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
Please don't do
Hey,
yesterday (on 05/15/2005 at 15:41) you noticed:
AB I'm sorry we can't do much more about this,
AFAI can see from the headers, samba.org uses Spamassassin.
There is already a cf-file available to filter this current
nazi-stuff.
I use it for a day now and it works well so far.
No solution
I want to make a Samba PDC on a win2k Pro network. Ive read people are
having issues using mysql as a samba backend.
[ https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2531 ]. From what I read
there, am I to understand that this is not a problem in samba =
3.0.11? Or is there a workaround to this
Hi Stefan,
as i just read
this nazi spam is invoked by a new sober virus variant
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/59562
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM%5FSOBER%2EUVSect=P
i am afraid this virus will be followed by multiple variants soon
Best Regards
Cool, but I must be missing something. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net rpc group addmem Administrators Domain Users
-S crappyxpbox -Uadministrator%secret
[2005/05/16 15:32:35, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2465)
Unknown parameter encountered: domain admin group
[2005/05/16 15:32:35, 0]
Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
No. All that a challenge response
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of:
[2005/05/16 08:35:46, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250)
Username DOMAIN\SAMBA_CLIENT1$ is invalid on this system
in the logs on my samba server after joining our ad DOMAIN, and
accessing from SAMBA_CLIENT1 (also a member of the ad
To safeguard your email account from possible termination, please see the
attached file.
*** Virus Warning Message from SLTNet Team
**
SLTNet Virus Wall has detected an uncleanable virus in your incoming email
attachment. In order to prevent you from being
On Monday 16 May 2005 12:08, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
man, 16.05.2005 kl. 17.33 skrev Chris:
The four shares in question are: [winstuff], [music library], [photo
library], and [uop].
The two that show up okay are: [winstuff] and [uop].
The two that don't show up are: [music library]
At 11:19 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, Jason Pyeron wrote -=
And add the reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is too much accidental off
list traffic.
-Jason Pyeron
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:50 AM Monday, 5/16/2005, you wrote -=
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
If its not
Ok I figured it out I was also able to guess at delmem to remove Domain
Users from the local Users group, and if I just plain text the Domain
admin account and password into the -Uadministrator%secret thing it
works. but I still get the errors even though it applies the change on
the local
On Monday 16 May 2005 13:30, Vincent Yonemitsu wrote:
Cool, but I must be missing something. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net rpc group addmem Administrators Domain Users
-S crappyxpbox -Uadministrator%secret
[2005/05/16 15:32:35, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2465)
Unknown parameter
Base: Red Hat RHAS3, PDC security = user
Samba 3.0.14a
Cups 1.1.17
Windows XP Pro
Epson C42UX (cheap inkjet) USB to the server
I was looking for an alternative to the immensely complicated Add
Printer Wizard procedure (APW) detailed in chapter 19.6 of the Samba
HOWTO guide. The following is a
Hello,
I have a problem with samba.
I want to restrict the access to a share. But with NT users.
Ex: I have to give write access to users fquintans and epinto (NT users) to the
share testeedu.
I´m using net join command to join the NT domain.
# Global parameters
[global]
Here's another client whose
net ads join
command works but doesn't really, with winbind.log entries of:
libads/kerberos.c:ads_kinit_passwword(146)
kerberos_kinit_password host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed: Client
not found in Kerberos database
nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c: ads_cached_connection(81)
I know this may be a bit out there, but has there been any thought/plans
to implement something along the lines of the Terminal Services profile
path that you get with AD?
--
Paul GiengerOffice: 701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc.
Systems Architect Fax:
On Monday 16 May 2005 04:42 pm, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
I wouldn't mind knowing why my [print$] share doesn't show up, though.
Apologies if I misunderstand but...a trailing $ makes a share hidden, it's
SMSOP (Standard Microsoft Operating Procedure).The default admin shares C$,
etc. are examples
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 20:03 +0200, Javier Jimenez wrote:
Now, I'found another problem, if I put a group with spaceblanks on my
ntlm_auth script on freeradius, cannot authenticate. It recognise just
the first word of the name.
Any idea about whats happening?
Thanks!
Likewise, FreeRadius is
I have a server running SuSE 9.3 (Samba 3.0.13-1.1). The underlying
filesystem is xfs, and the NICs are Netgear gigabit. 2 Gb of ram in a
P4/3.0 Ghz. The workstations are windows XP Pro, with all service
packs installed, on P4 3+ Ghz, 1-2 Gb of ram. (varies a bit by
workstation)
I have one
On Monday 16 May 2005 18:45, Michael W Cocke wrote:
I have a server running SuSE 9.3 (Samba 3.0.13-1.1). The underlying
filesystem is xfs, and the NICs are Netgear gigabit. 2 Gb of ram in a
P4/3.0 Ghz. The workstations are windows XP Pro, with all service
packs installed, on P4 3+ Ghz, 1-2
Hi everyone,
I am wondering what the likelyhood would be to get a delete machine
script implemented in the samba core that would delete a machine upon
successful un-join of a samba domain.
Alternatively, why is this not a good idea?
tom.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:01, tom burkart wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering what the likelyhood would be to get a delete machine
script implemented in the samba core that would delete a machine upon
successful un-join of a samba domain.
Alternatively, why is this not a good idea?
How do you
On Mon, 16 May 2005 18:57:49 -0600, you wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 18:45, Michael W Cocke wrote:
I have a server running SuSE 9.3 (Samba 3.0.13-1.1). The underlying
filesystem is xfs, and the NICs are Netgear gigabit. 2 Gb of ram in a
P4/3.0 Ghz. The workstations are windows XP Pro, with
Samba Server Name: hamilton
Samba Server OS: HP-UX 11.11
Samba Version: 2.2.3.a
Hi All,
I have the same version of Samba running on many of our HP servers with almost
identical smb.conf file and configured the same way. No other Samba server seem
to be having any problems except this one
On May 16, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:01, tom burkart wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering what the likelyhood would be to get a delete machine
script implemented in the samba core that would delete a machine upon
successful un-join of a samba domain.
Alternatively, why is this
Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 18:57:49 -0600, you wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 18:45, Michael W Cocke wrote:
I have a server running SuSE 9.3 (Samba 3.0.13-1.1). The underlying
filesystem is xfs, and the NICs are Netgear gigabit. 2 Gb of ram in a
P4/3.0 Ghz. The workstations
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:47:34 -0700
From: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Ed Kasky wrote:
Date:
Good idea!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JLB
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:54 PM
To: Ed Kasky
Cc: Jason Pyeron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
Date:
Please don't cc me anymore, I have unsubscribed to solve this problem for
me.
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, JLB wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:19, Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 18:57:49 -0600, you wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 18:45, Michael W Cocke wrote:
I have a server running SuSE 9.3 (Samba 3.0.13-1.1). The underlying
filesystem is xfs, and the NICs are Netgear gigabit. 2 Gb of ram in a
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:31, tom burkart wrote:
On May 16, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:01, tom burkart wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering what the likelyhood would be to get a delete machine
script implemented in the samba core that would delete a machine upon
Locking out the Windows folks is counterproductive--those are exactly the
ones we're trying to attract away from MS, for that's the only way we'll
beat MS--by converting its customers.
And now I'm done with this thread; I'm more interested in learning Samba.
Eric Hines
At 05/16/05 21:12, you
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:46:31PM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
Michael W Cocke wrote:
Thanks! The case sensitivity might be a problem, but maybe I can work
something out... Right now the filenames are mixed case and some of
the software that maintains the contents will have to be
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:29, Eric Hines wrote:
Locking out the Windows folks is counterproductive--those are exactly the
ones we're trying to attract away from MS, for that's the only way we'll
beat MS--by converting its customers.
Everybody who receives this samba email signed up for it. Why
The following message sent by this account has violated system policy:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:07:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Word file
The following violations were detected:
--- Scan information follows ---
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File
The filters have been adjusted. From looking at the Samba lists, this
one was the least affected by the sober worm that is spamming in German.
I see only one instance made it through here. Some of the other lists
were mailbombed, and are now getting mis-directed bounces from mail
servers
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-05-16 06:33:37 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6812
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6812
Log:
more talloc portability tweaks
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/talloc/config.m4
Author: jht
Date: 2005-05-16 07:11:57 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 554
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=554
Log:
Another work in progress commit.
Modified:
trunk/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/TOSHARG-TheNetCommand.xml
Changeset:
Sorry, the
Author: vlendec
Date: 2005-05-16 09:46:51 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6813
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6813
Log:
Remove some code duplication, sid2uid and sid2gid have _async functions.
Volker
Modified:
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-05-16 10:21:32 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6814
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6814
Log:
fill in two more unknown values in cldap responses
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/librpc/idl/nbt.idl
Changeset:
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-05-16 10:30:51 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6815
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6815
Log:
fill in values in cldap server as well
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/cldap_server/netlogon.c
Changeset:
Modified:
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-05-16 11:16:48 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6816
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6816
Log:
- fixed debug display of ndr netlogon union
- send a username when scanning to make structure elements clearer
Modified:
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-05-16 11:17:57 + (Mon, 16 May 2005)
New Revision: 6817
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=6817
Log:
- fixed empty ldap search elements in filters
- added support for guids in cldap netlogon searches.
the cldap server now
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
