Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:16:00PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
On 24/06/11 09:46 AM, John G. Heim wrote:
I'm setting up a new linux fileserver and I was wondering if samba
likes one filesystem more than another. I have to format a 1.8Tb
partition sometime today and I'll
Linda W wrote:
No, it was originally developed over SunOS ufs. I did the
xfs work when I was @ SGI doing the 64-bit Samba port, so
it's one of the older supported filesystems though.
Jeremy.
Sorry, I've been suitably disillusioned
FWIW, I was at Sun for 6 years
On 6/24/2011 5:31 PM, John Drescher wrote:
I would use 'xfs'. I believe samba was originally developed
over xfs, so it's likely the ea-suppot and acl support has had the most
testing there. Especially if your file server is setup with a UPS, then I'd
strongly recommend it. If not,
Quoting Linda W (sa...@tlinx.org):
I regret misinforming anyone.
I don't think you did..:-)
You mentioned xfs as a very well supported FS and we later were
reminded that its support was developed by Jeremy. I think this is
compliant with XFS is very well supported and one can rely on this
On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Linda W (sa...@tlinx.org):
I regret misinforming anyone.
I don't think you did..:-)
You mentioned xfs as a very well supported FS and we later were
reminded that its support was developed by Jeremy. I
Moe, John wrote:
Hello all,
Relevant info up front: Gentoo PC, using 2.6.38 kernel and Samba 3.4.12.
I'm trying to get a FreeRadius instance working for our Windows network.
To do so, I need a Linux box running Samba. I've installed and
configured Kerberos, Samba and FreeRadius, and can get
Need help!!!
I have samba domain controller with samba-3.5.4-4.1.i586
and openldap2-2.4.21-9.1.i586, when trial everything OK, client xp, win7, and
vista can login, join domain, and access other server using auth to ldap, but
now without any changes my client failed to join domain(xp and
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:11 AM, Linda W wrote:
David was trying to view and change permissions on a user that was
already listed on the security tab; he was not adding a user or group.
I did this just now, changed it to full control for the one listed
user and group
Dear All,
Please help me in this regards, Howto Backup Domain Controller (BDC) or
Secondary domain controller for the Primary Domain Controller (PDC) in
Centos 5.6 Openldap+samba 3.3
Please give the step by step.
Regards
kamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Ok, thanks for your replies, frankly I still don't understand why Samba
behaves like this, sounds like an inherent issue, then I can live with that.
2011/6/25 Linda Walsh sa...@tlinx.org
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:11 AM, Linda W wrote:
David was trying to view and change
As for diffs on Security and Advanced tab -- see MS.
(It's a feature...they don't show the exact same info...but close)...
Yes. They are often referred to as molecular and atomic permissions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
As for diffs on Security and Advanced tab -- see MS.
(It's a feature...they don't show the exact same info...but close)...
Atomic vs Molecular permissions
Quoting from http://blog.emagined.com/2009/12/08/windows-security-part-7/
«
(...) Although the exact permissions available depend on
I have a ~100 TB multi server multi SAN XFS/Samba deployment and have been
using it since early fedora core days. EXT4 is now where I would consider
using it instead of XFS. But with XFS and LVM I have trivial and very quick
formatting, partition resizing and partition duplicating. It has been
The branch, master has been updated
via ebd70d8 s3: Fix winbindd_wins_byname
from 3e73ed7 s3:test: don't rely on pyhton being in /usr/bin/python in
the sids2xids test
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
14 matches
Mail list logo
