Re: [Samba] Difference between real and reported disk usage
Berni Ced ced at bernispa.com writes: For example, i've analized the data copied with strict allocation activated and i've found that Windows Server 2008 make files space allocation in 1024 kiB blocks. Err, i meant Windows Server 2003, not 2008. In the meantime i've tested that Windows 7 behave as Windows Server 2003. Here are the results of the test i've mentioned in my previous message: Files copied from Windows 2000 Pro: # ls -lks w2000/ total 317572 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 1032 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 2056 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 3080 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 4104 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 5128 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 6152 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 7176 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 8200 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 9224 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 10248 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 102408 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w2000/ 311Mw2000/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w2000/ 311Mw2000/ --- Files copied from Windows Server 2003: # ls -lks w2k3 total 328792 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 11268 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 103428 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w2k3/ 322Mw2k3/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w2k3/ 311Mw2k3/ --- Files copied from Windows 7 Pro: # ls -lks w7 total 328792 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 11268 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 103428 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w7/ 322Mw7/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w7/ 311Mw7/ --- I hope to hear opinions on that topic. Also, do you know a command that can restore back
Re: [Samba] Difference between real and reported disk usage
Berni CED ced at bernispa.com writes: Also, do you know a command that can restore back the 11 MB wasted in the latter two cases? Obviously, having enough space, i can make a copy of the entire folder hosting the share: cp -a origin-folder dest-folder But my question is if there is a command i can run in place, something i can use with cron, hopefully on a running samba file server. Cesare. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] [Announce] Samba 3.5.20 Available for Download
Please not that this will probably be the last bugfix release of the Samba 3.5 release series. Details about the release planning are available on http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning == We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we're curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths. Walt Disney == Release Announcements = This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.20 include: o Fix segfaults in log level = 10 on Solaris (bug #9390). o Apply ACL masks correctly when setting ACLs (bug #9236). Changes since 3.5.19: - o Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org * BUG 7781: Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase (sharename) when adding new share via MMC. * BUG 9236: Apply ACL masks correctly when setting ACLs. * BUG 9455: munmap called for an address location not mapped by Samba. o Björn Baumbach b...@sernet.de * BUG 9345: Fix usage of smbconfoption tag. o Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org * BUG 9390: Fix segfaults in log level = 10 on Solaris. * BUG 9402: Fix dns updates against BIND9 (used in a Samba4 domain). ## Reporting bugs Development Discussion ### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems then please try to send high quality feedback. If you don't provide vital information to help us track down the problem then you will probably be ignored. All bug reports should be filed under the Samba 3.5 product in the project's Bugzilla database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). == == Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. == The Samba Team == Download Details The uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed using GnuPG (ID 6568B7EA). The source code can be downloaded from: http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/stable The release notes are available online at: http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.20.html Binary packages will be made available on a volunteer basis from http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. (https://bugzilla.samba.org/) --Enjoy The Samba Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] not able to log on (PDC with ldap backend)
Hello, I set up my first PDC with LDAP as backend. I'm able to join a vista client to the domain. However, when want to log onto after rebooting the client, it claims that the logon server is n/a. My smb and slapd.confs are attached. Any ideas what i did wrong or missed to configure? Thx, Ingo My samba Version is: 3.5.4-5.11.1-2573-SUSE-SL11.3-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Difference between real and reported disk usage
On 17/12/2012 21:07, Berni CED wrote: Berni Ced ced at bernispa.com writes: For example, i've analized the data copied with strict allocation activated and i've found that Windows Server 2008 make files space allocation in 1024 kiB blocks. Err, i meant Windows Server 2003, not 2008. In the meantime i've tested that Windows 7 behave as Windows Server 2003. Here are the results of the test i've mentioned in my previous message: Files copied from Windows 2000 Pro: # ls -lks w2000/ total 317572 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 1032 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 2056 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 3080 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 4104 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 5128 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 6152 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 7176 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 8200 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 9224 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 10248 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 102408 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w2000/ 311Mw2000/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w2000/ 311Mw2000/ --- Files copied from Windows Server 2003: # ls -lks w2k3 total 328792 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 11268 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 103428 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w2k3/ 322Mw2k3/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w2k3/ 311Mw2k3/ --- Files copied from Windows 7 Pro: # ls -lks w7 total 328792 1028 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1024 Dec 16 18:41 001M.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 1025 Dec 16 18:49 001M1k.txt 2052 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2048 Dec 16 18:42 002M.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 2049 Dec 16 18:50 002M1k.txt 3076 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3072 Dec 16 18:42 003M.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 3073 Dec 16 18:50 003M1k.txt 4100 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4096 Dec 16 18:42 004M.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 4097 Dec 16 18:50 004M1k.txt 5124 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5120 Dec 16 18:42 005M.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 5121 Dec 16 18:51 005M1k.txt 6148 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6144 Dec 16 18:42 006M.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 6145 Dec 16 18:51 006M1k.txt 7172 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7168 Dec 16 18:43 007M.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 7169 Dec 16 18:51 007M1k.txt 8196 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8192 Dec 16 18:43 008M.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 8193 Dec 16 18:51 008M1k.txt 9220 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9216 Dec 16 18:43 009M.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 9217 Dec 16 18:51 009M1k.txt 10244 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10240 Dec 16 18:43 010M.txt 11268 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 10241 Dec 16 18:52 010M1k.txt 102404 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102400 Dec 16 18:44 100M.txt 103428 -rwxrwx--x 1 root root 102401 Dec 16 18:52 100M1k.txt # du -s -h w7/ 322Mw7/ # du -s -h --apparent-size w7/ 311Mw7/
Re: [Samba] About new test cases for Durable handle version 2
Hi Santanu, I am not sure if I am addressing to the correct audience. So apologize for the that. I found in the existing smbtorture test suit do not have much test cases related to durable handle version 2 that is supported for SMB version 3 . I have done some work on that and would like to contribute on that filed. Can anyone let me know the process for that? We have test... v4-0-test$ bin/smbtorture --list |grep durable-v2 smb2.durable-v2-open.open-oplock.open-oplock smb2.durable-v2-open.open-lease.open-lease smb2.durable-v2-open.reopen1.reopen1 smb2.durable-v2-open.reopen2.reopen2 smb2.durable-v2-open.persistent-open-oplock.persistent-open-oplock smb2.durable-v2-open.persistent-open-lease.persistent-open-lease metze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] About new test cases for Durable handle version 2
Thanks Stefan, I was started adding testcase back on September on samba-4.0.0beta6 version. At that point of time I found that samba had only some preliminary framework for persistent handle tests. But those didn't test any particulate persistent open/reopen scenario. Hence I have added some particulate cases to test persistent/open/reopen/defend scenario. As you have mentioned I can see that now samba has tests cases related to persistent open/reopen. I need to go through all of these test cases and find if I have anything extra other than already incorporated test cases. What I feel that we still not have test cases where persistent open is done with parent lease(directory leasing) key. In case I have extra test cases other than currently added one I will get back to you. Thanks and regards, Santanu On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher me...@samba.orgwrote: smb2.durable-v2-open.open-oplock.open-oplock smb2.durable-v2-open.open-lease.open-lease smb2.durable-v2-open.reopen1.reopen1 smb2.durable-v2-open.reopen2.reopen2 smb2.durable-v2-open.persistent-open-oplock.persistent-open-oplock smb2.durable-v2-open.persistent-open-lease.persistent-open-lease -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4, Winbind RFC2307
Hello, I was able to get back to the original (incorrect 4294967295) uids/gids on the 4.0 member with 'net cache flush'. I remove the 4.0 member from the domain, compiled 3.6.10 and re-joined. Unfortunately, that doesn't work either. I have no idea what to do at this point. 3.6.10 output [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -u administrator tuser1 tuser2 tuser3 krbtgt guest [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -i tuser1 failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for user tuser1 [root@ALW2 samba]# getent passwd|grep tuser1 [root@ALW2 samba]# [root@ALW2 samba]# smbclient -Llocalhost -UAdministrator%P4\$\$w0rd session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE My 3.6.10 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com preferred master = no server string = ALW2 security = ads encrypt passwords = yes idmap config TESTDOM : default = yes idmap config TESTDOM : backend = ad idmap config TESTDOM : schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config TESTDOM : range = 10-20 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind nested groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/sh If I add (and change nothing else): * * *idmap config * : range = 3-4* *idmap config * : backend = tdb* [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -i tuser1 tuser1:*:30005:30006:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 samba]# getent passwd|grep tuser tuser1:*:30005:30006:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh tuser2:*:30001:30006:Test User2:/home/tuser2:/bin/sh tuser3:*:30002:30006:Test User3:/home/tuser3:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 samba]# smbclient -L localhost -U Administrator%P4\$\$w0rd Domain=[TESTDOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.10] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$IPC IPC Service (ALW2) Domain=[TESTDOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.10] Server Comment ---- WorkgroupMaster ---- On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote: I am seeing similar behavior on an S4 member server. In this case, every uid and gid is reported as 4294967295. As best I can tell, my smb.conf is ok. [root@ALW2 etc]# wbinfo -u administrator tuser1 tuser2 tuser3 krbtgt guest [root@ALW2 etc]# wbinfo -i tuser1 tuser1:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 etc]# getent passwd|grep tuser tuser1:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh tuser2:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User2:/home/tuser2:/bin/sh tuser3:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User3:/home/tuser3:/bin/sh [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com preferred master = no server string = ALW2 security = ads encrypt passwords = yes idmap config TESTDOM:backend = ads idmap config TESTDOM:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config TESTDOM:range = 1000-99 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind nested groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/sh If I add: idmap backend = tdb idmap uid = 100-199 idmap gid = 100-199 then I get uids and gids generated from this range. When I remove the options, my users keep the generated uids and gids. I'm not sure how to revert? Thank you all for your help. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote: acl:search = false is commented out there, but the behavior is the same either way. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.comwrote: I am using 'template homedir' and 'template shell' for these attributes, which I'm fine with. It's the uidNumber and gidNumber that I'm primarily concerned with. My global section: [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com netbios name = ADC1 server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 10.10.65.1 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes #acl:search = false template homedir = /home/%ACCOUNTNAME% template shell = /bin/sh On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.orgwrote: On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 16:51 -0500, Thomas Simmons wrote: Hello Andrew, If functionality is not there, I certainly understand and can work around it. I just want to make sure I am not misunderstanding something. When you say I should set idmap_ldb:use rfc2307=yes in smb.conf on the DC, do you mean that by doing so I can use winbind (and the rfc2307 attributes) for *nix authentication on the DC? I am confused because I already
[Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but lots of NTLMSSP NTLM2 errors
samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. My log.samba file is full of the following; I'm not certain of the significance of these. [2012/12/17 05:59:09, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:35:30, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:55:58, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:59:10, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 07:44:14, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 07:58:31, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 08:10:11, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=pc02541,OU=Industries Workstations,DC=micore,DC=us: error in module acl: Constraint violation (19) [2012/12/17 08:26:00, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 08:37:30, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 08:41:42, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 09:15:32, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=pc02541,OU=Industries Workstations,DC=micore,DC=us: error in module acl: Constraint violation (19) [2012/12/17 09:24:47, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=chrisxpprovm,OU=Industries Workstations,DC=micore,DC=us: error in module acl: Constraint violation (19) -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but no DNS auto-registration
samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. Automatic DNS update is not working. Workstations seem to be registering their names but joining a server to the domain works but fails with a error - and the DNS record is *not* added. [root@crew etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- BACKBONE Joined 'CREW' to realm 'micore.us' DNS update failed! -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 - Windows 200x DNS Migration
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 15:58 -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: Windows 200x AD DC's do not require that the DNS master is on a WIn 2003 AD server. You need a BIND9 compatible server with dynamic updates preferably enabled. If dynamic updates are not enabled then when a Windows machine joins the DC it will dump out DNS records that need to be added to the DNS master. As long as the Samba4 DNS server support dynamic updates it should work fine for supporting other domains No, my question was about adding a Windows 200x DNS server to the mix. If the DNS records registered on the Samba DNS server will replicate / transfer. From other reading it appears that this *should* happen, so I believe I have answered my question. On 12/13/12 13:56, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Has anyone been able to migrate DNS from a Samba4 DC to a Windows 200x server? I've looked around the wiki, etc... and haven't found any pertaining to moving DNS between platforms. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] not able to log on (PDC with ldap backend)
Hi Attachments are not supported on the mailing list. Does the pdbedit -Lv /machinename$/ command on the samba server show the machine account?The account flags should be [W ] only. In LDAP, you should see the following attributes objectClass=sambaSamAccount sambaNTPassword samabSID sambaAccountFlags= [W ] sambaPrimaryGroupSID I found that with Samba 3.5.x some of the ldap attributes were not set correctly and I had to manually fix the sambaAccountFlags entry. Have you specified any ports in the smb.conf. You should stay with the default smb ports = 445 139 Windows clients may try initially connecting on port 445 (SMB over TCP) then connect to 139 (SMB over Netbios over TCP.) In theory, you shouldn't need 445 but find disabling in on samba sometimes confuses windows clients. On 12/17/12 04:31, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hello, I set up my first PDC with LDAP as backend. I'm able to join a vista client to the domain. However, when want to log onto after rebooting the client, it claims that the logon server is n/a. My smb and slapd.confs are attached. Any ideas what i did wrong or missed to configure? Thx, Ingo My samba Version is: 3.5.4-5.11.1-2573-SUSE-SL11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] not able to log on (PDC with ldap backend)
Hi, I just posted my smb.conf to pastebin: http://pastebin.com/r29mgMcK I haven't specified ports - I assumed the default ones should do. I guess I ran more into a client side issue but I actually don't know. pdbedit -Lv shows the Administrator and the respective machine account. The only attribute I miss is the [A] for the Administrator account, it shows a [U] only. But thats cannot be the reason why I cannot logon. Im also able to ping the client from the server. So the client is basically able to connect. Thx, Ingo Hi Attachments are not supported on the mailing list. Does the pdbedit -Lv /machinename$/ command on the samba server show the machine account?The account flags should be [W ] only. In LDAP, you should see the following attributes objectClass=sambaSamAccount sambaNTPassword samabSID sambaAccountFlags= [W ] sambaPrimaryGroupSID I found that with Samba 3.5.x some of the ldap attributes were not set correctly and I had to manually fix the sambaAccountFlags entry. Have you specified any ports in the smb.conf. You should stay with the default smb ports = 445 139 Windows clients may try initially connecting on port 445 (SMB over TCP) then connect to 139 (SMB over Netbios over TCP.) In theory, you shouldn't need 445 but find disabling in on samba sometimes confuses windows clients. On 12/17/12 04:31, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hello, I set up my first PDC with LDAP as backend. I'm able to join a vista client to the domain. However, when want to log onto after rebooting the client, it claims that the logon server is n/a. My smb and slapd.confs are attached. Any ideas what i did wrong or missed to configure? Thx, Ingo My samba Version is: 3.5.4-5.11.1-2573-SUSE-SL11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4, Winbind RFC2307
At least in the case of 3.6, it seems this is my problem: Error loading module '/usr/local/samba/lib/idmap/ad.so': /usr/local/samba/lib/idmap/ad.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Indeed, it does not exist: [root@ALW2 ~]# find /usr/local/samba/|grep ad.so /usr/local/samba/lib/vfs/readahead.so /usr/local/samba/lib/vfs/readahead.so.old [root@ALW2 ~]# find install_files/samba3/samba-3.6.10/|grep ad.so install_files/samba3/samba-3.6.10/source3/bin/readahead.so I recompiled --with-ads, but it made no difference. On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was able to get back to the original (incorrect 4294967295) uids/gids on the 4.0 member with 'net cache flush'. I remove the 4.0 member from the domain, compiled 3.6.10 and re-joined. Unfortunately, that doesn't work either. I have no idea what to do at this point. 3.6.10 output [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -u administrator tuser1 tuser2 tuser3 krbtgt guest [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -i tuser1 failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for user tuser1 [root@ALW2 samba]# getent passwd|grep tuser1 [root@ALW2 samba]# [root@ALW2 samba]# smbclient -Llocalhost -UAdministrator%P4\$\$w0rd session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE My 3.6.10 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com preferred master = no server string = ALW2 security = ads encrypt passwords = yes idmap config TESTDOM : default = yes idmap config TESTDOM : backend = ad idmap config TESTDOM : schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config TESTDOM : range = 10-20 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind nested groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/sh If I add (and change nothing else): * * *idmap config * : range = 3-4* *idmap config * : backend = tdb* [root@ALW2 samba]# wbinfo -i tuser1 tuser1:*:30005:30006:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 samba]# getent passwd|grep tuser tuser1:*:30005:30006:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh tuser2:*:30001:30006:Test User2:/home/tuser2:/bin/sh tuser3:*:30002:30006:Test User3:/home/tuser3:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 samba]# smbclient -L localhost -U Administrator%P4\$\$w0rd Domain=[TESTDOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.10] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$IPC IPC Service (ALW2) Domain=[TESTDOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.10] Server Comment ---- WorkgroupMaster ---- On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote: I am seeing similar behavior on an S4 member server. In this case, every uid and gid is reported as 4294967295. As best I can tell, my smb.conf is ok. [root@ALW2 etc]# wbinfo -u administrator tuser1 tuser2 tuser3 krbtgt guest [root@ALW2 etc]# wbinfo -i tuser1 tuser1:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh [root@ALW2 etc]# getent passwd|grep tuser tuser1:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User1:/home/tuser1:/bin/sh tuser2:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User2:/home/tuser2:/bin/sh tuser3:*:4294967295:4294967295:Test User3:/home/tuser3:/bin/sh [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com preferred master = no server string = ALW2 security = ads encrypt passwords = yes idmap config TESTDOM:backend = ads idmap config TESTDOM:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config TESTDOM:range = 1000-99 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind nested groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/sh If I add: idmap backend = tdb idmap uid = 100-199 idmap gid = 100-199 then I get uids and gids generated from this range. When I remove the options, my users keep the generated uids and gids. I'm not sure how to revert? Thank you all for your help. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.comwrote: acl:search = false is commented out there, but the behavior is the same either way. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.comwrote: I am using 'template homedir' and 'template shell' for these attributes, which I'm fine with. It's the uidNumber and gidNumber that I'm primarily concerned with. My global section: [global] workgroup = TESTDOM realm = internal.testdom.com netbios name = ADC1 server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 10.10.65.1
Re: [Samba] Samba4 Domain UP, but no roaming profiles
Hi, The problem is your smb.conf [profiles]. The only options you need are the path and read only = no. Control access from Windows with an ACL applied to the profiles share security properties rather than forcing permissions from Samba. S4 is different from S3. I'm not sure if those mask options work in S4 but, if they do, those values will deny all access set through extended ACLs because those are applied through the group class. Fix smb.conf and start with an empty profiles directory with drwxr-xr-x. root:root. Browse to the profiles share from a Windows client in the domain and open the security properties (as Administrator). You can remove entries for Everyone, CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, etc. Leave the entry for Administrator. Add an entry for Domain Users with read/execute/write permissions for this folder only. If you look at the profiles directory from linux it will now look like drwxrwx---+ root:root. getfacl will show you the Posix ACLs created from Windows. From Windows ADUC add the roaming profiles path to the user's profile. When you login as the user his profile folder will be created automatically. If you browse the profiles share again and look at the security settings of the user's folder it will show only the user and SYSTEM, both with full control. This gives the access control you are trying to achieve. Tip: There is a GPO setting under computer-policies-templates-system-user profiles to add the administrators group to roaming profiles. This is a good idea, otherwise administrators cannot browse the profile folders. Regards, Stephen Jones Lloyd Systems Engineering On Sat, Dec 15, 2012, at 01:57 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I've performed a *successful* domain migration from S3/LDAPSAM to S4.0.0. Yay! I can browse and connect to the server from a workstation [logged in as a local account]. DNS looks good. kinit klist work. I was able to *add* a workstation to the domain. But I can't get roaming profiles to work. On the server the roaming profile looks like - [profiles] path = /opt/s4/var/profiles read only = No profile acls = Yes writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] not able to log on (PDC with ldap backend)
But do you see Account Flags: [W ] for the Vista machine account? Did you also see a machine account for the samba PDC itself? It should include Account Flags:[S ] Are is the Vista client configured to use WINS? On 12/17/12 10:29, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hi, I just posted my smb.conf to pastebin: http://pastebin.com/r29mgMcK I haven't specified ports - I assumed the default ones should do. I guess I ran more into a client side issue but I actually don't know. pdbedit -Lv shows the Administrator and the respective machine account. The only attribute I miss is the [A] for the Administrator account, it shows a [U] only. But thats cannot be the reason why I cannot logon. Im also able to ping the client from the server. So the client is basically able to connect. Thx, Ingo Hi Attachments are not supported on the mailing list. Does the pdbedit -Lv /machinename$/ command on the samba server show the machine account?The account flags should be [W ] only. In LDAP, you should see the following attributes objectClass=sambaSamAccount sambaNTPassword samabSID sambaAccountFlags= [W ] sambaPrimaryGroupSID I found that with Samba 3.5.x some of the ldap attributes were not set correctly and I had to manually fix the sambaAccountFlags entry. Have you specified any ports in the smb.conf. You should stay with the default smb ports = 445 139 Windows clients may try initially connecting on port 445 (SMB over TCP) then connect to 139 (SMB over Netbios over TCP.) In theory, you shouldn't need 445 but find disabling in on samba sometimes confuses windows clients. On 12/17/12 04:31, ingo.schm...@binarysignals.net wrote: Hello, I set up my first PDC with LDAP as backend. I'm able to join a vista client to the domain. However, when want to log onto after rebooting the client, it claims that the logon server is n/a. My smb and slapd.confs are attached. Any ideas what i did wrong or missed to configure? Thx, Ingo My samba Version is: 3.5.4-5.11.1-2573-SUSE-SL11.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Following symlinks
On 12/14/2012 11:12 PM, James Pifer wrote: I'm struggling with following symlinks with samba on the recent versions. I cannot use mount -bind as I've seen others suggest. This is for my mythtv backend, so I'm using the rename script to create nice names for the recordings. Anyway, I can map the drive from Windows XP and Windows 7, and see symlinked files, but I cannot open or copy them as I used to be able to do. My system is opensuse 12.2. My smb.conf looks like: [global] unix extensions = no workgroup = WORKGROUP printing = cups printcap name = cups printcap cache time = 750 cups options = raw map to guest = Bad User include = /etc/samba/dhcp.conf logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile logon drive = P: usershare allow guests = No wins server = wins support = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S, %D%w%S browseable = No read only = Yes inherit acls = Yes follow symlinks = Yes wide links = Yes Thanks, James bump... Can anyone help me here? Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4, Winbind RFC2307
I got 3.6.10 working! I had to recompile with: --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4, Winbind RFC2307
After recompiling --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad, my S4 member also works. It made no difference on the DC. On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Simmons twsn...@gmail.com wrote: I got 3.6.10 working! I had to recompile with: --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba4: Upload an Administrative Policy Template?
We'd like to add an adm (administrative template) to our Samba4 server.
I see where the .adm files are in the filesystem -
/opt/s4/var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/conf.adm
- but how can I add a new ADM file?
The ADM file in question allows the controlling of IE Favorites and a
few other items on XP (not available in the default templates for XP).
We previously did this via ugly old POLEDIT.
--
Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] using samba4 as an authentication source
Hi, i have to deploy a integrated services platform consisting of a samba3, web-groupware and email (exim+cyrus) service, which has very limited options for user management. This new server is to replace a windows 2008 server. I am free to create all users anew. I'll try to configure it to use an external source as a single source of authentication and join the samba3 to a samba4-Domain but i'm unsure about the mail and webservices: should i/can i use samba4's build in ldap server? Or would it be better to use the kerberos service? Or winbind? I would appreciate any advice for the most standard conformant way to get things working. Thanks a lot Malte -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] using samba4 as an authentication source
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 20:54 +0100, Admin wrote: Hi, i have to deploy a integrated services platform consisting of a samba3, web-groupware and email (exim+cyrus) service, which has very limited options for user management. This new server is to replace a windows 2008 server. I am free to create all users anew. I'll try to configure it to use an external source as a single source of authentication and join the samba3 to a samba4-Domain but i'm unsure about the mail and webservices: should i/can i use samba4's build in ldap server? Or would it be better to use the kerberos service? Or winbind? I would appreciate any advice for the most standard conformant way to get things working. When deployed as an AD DC, all of these will work, and work well. You can do 'ldap authentication' as a simple bind, you can get a kerberos ticket (even better is to accept a kerberos ticket, from kerberos-enabled clients, but I know that's probably not what you are after), or you can use pam and winbind via a domain join. The more secure options are kerberos (as long as you actually validate the ticket you get back) and winbind (which will perform the authentication across the secure channel). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 - Windows 200x DNS Migration
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:38 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 15:58 -0500, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: Windows 200x AD DC's do not require that the DNS master is on a WIn 2003 AD server. You need a BIND9 compatible server with dynamic updates preferably enabled. If dynamic updates are not enabled then when a Windows machine joins the DC it will dump out DNS records that need to be added to the DNS master. As long as the Samba4 DNS server support dynamic updates it should work fine for supporting other domains No, my question was about adding a Windows 200x DNS server to the mix. If the DNS records registered on the Samba DNS server will replicate / transfer. They are meant to, but the note in the WHATSNEW is there for a reason - we have not always had this work perfectly, so just keep an eye out for dragons. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but lots of NTLMSSP NTLM2 errors
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:35 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. My log.samba file is full of the following; I'm not certain of the significance of these. [2012/12/17 05:59:09, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! [2012/12/17 06:35:30, Any idea what client is giving these? I thought we managed to silence these a while back - there was a case where this was happening on LDAP. Failed to modify SPNs on CN=pc02541,OU=Industries Workstations,DC=micore,DC=us: error in module acl: Constraint violation (19) [2012/12/17 09:24:47, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/writespn.c:237(dcesrv_drsuapi_DsWriteAccountSpn) Failed to modify SPNs on CN=chrisxpprovm,OU=Industries Workstations,DC=micore,DC=us: error in module acl: Constraint violation (19) These are different to the above, and it is a known issue. We have a set of patches, but they need much more work before we can fix that. It happens when the client is trying to change only the case of the servicePrincipalName over DRS. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] LDAP Account Manager 4.0 released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 LDAP Account Manager (LAM) 4.0 - December 17th, 2012 LAM is a web frontend for managing accounts stored in an LDAP directory. Announcement: - - All account profiles and PDF structures are now saved separately for each server profile. LAM Pro supports QMail, MIT Kerberos and custom fields for the admin interface (allows you to manage your own object classes). Full changelog: https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/lamcms/changelog Download: https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/lamcms/releases Features: - - * management of various account types * Unix * Samba 3 * Kolab 2 * Asterisk * Zarafa * DHCP * SSH keys * profiles for account creation * account creation via file upload * automatic creation/deletion of home directories * setting quotas * PDF output for all accounts * editor for organizational units * schema browser * tree view * multiple configuration files * multi-language support: Catalan, Chinese (Traditional + Simplified), Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Slovak and Spanish * support for LDAP+SSL/TLS Demo installation: - -- You can try our demo installation online. https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/lamcms/liveDemo Support: - If you find a bug please file a bug report. For questions or implementing new features please use the mailinglist and feature request tracker at our homepage https://www.ldap-account-manager.org. Authors Copyright: - Copyright (C) 2003 - 2012: Roland Gruber p...@rolandgruber.de LAM is published under the GNU General Public License. The complete list of licenses can be found in the copyright file. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDPixwACgkQq/ywNCsrGZ5HFgCfYL0i9HZ8hgOsSVGmKYt+H/aY xnMAoICOSJ+W7KVUgn3ClSOqKR4//hDQ =Fx7d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but no DNS auto-registration
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:36 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. Automatic DNS update is not working. Workstations seem to be registering their names but joining a server to the domain works but fails with a error - and the DNS record is *not* added. [root@crew etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- BACKBONE Joined 'CREW' to realm 'micore.us' DNS update failed! When using the BIND server, but not the internal DNS server, this happens for Samba clients only. We have modified the Samba client in 4.0 to also work with BIND, and we need to get back to the BIND folks about the issue. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Checking data migration from samba3 to samba4
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 17:56 +1300, Mario Codeniera wrote: How do we check the data from Samba4 that the data from Samba3 successfully migrated? I dunno if it successfully migrated coz got these (last part): No, the database has not been successfully migrated. The script has not completed successfully. [root@gaara LiveData]# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/srv/LiveData/var_lib_samba/samba --use-xattrs=yes --realm=kazekage.sura.sandbox.local --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL /srv/smb.conf Once the above files are installed, your Samba4 server will be ready to use Admin password:c#NR4;RRqfO;VSp5NKV3A)D+C?r!R Server Role: active directory domain controller Hostname: gaara NetBIOS Domain:KAZEKAGE DNS Domain:kazekage.sura.sandbox.local DOMAIN SID:S-1-5-21-1511653421-423844657-761698953 Importing WINS database Importing Account policy Importing idmap database Importing groups Group already exists sid=S-1-5-21-1511653421-423844657-761698953-512, groupname=Domain Admins existing_groupname=Domain Admins, Ignoring. Group already exists sid=S-1-5-21-1511653421-423844657-761698953-514, groupname=Domain Guests existing_groupname=Domain Guests, Ignoring. Group already exists sid=S-1-5-21-1511653421-423844657-761698953-515, groupname=Domain Computers existing_groupname=Domain Computers, Ignoring. Group already exists sid=S-1-5-32-544, groupname=Administrators existing_groupname=Administrators, Ignoring. Group already exists sid=S-1-5-32-546, groupname=Guests existing_groupname=Guests, Ignoring. ERROR(type 'exceptions.KeyError'): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py, line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py, line 1318, in run useeadb=eadb, dns_backend=dns_backend, use_ntvfs=use_ntvfs) File /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/upgrade.py, line 879, in upgrade_from_samba3 add_group_from_mapping_entry(result.samdb, g, logger) File /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/upgrade.py, line 264, in add_group_from_mapping_entry str(groupmap.sid), groupmap.nt_name, msg[0]['sAMAccountName'][0]) For some reason, we do not have a sAMAccountName attribute on this record. We need to work out which record this is, and what is different about it. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4 GA upgrade - auth failing
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 01:06 -0600, Kristofer wrote: --Apple-Mail=_5451A272-9820-42BF-A54B-E864FA9CD7AB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Update: I downgraded back to RC4, and the servers are able to authenticate once = again. Something definitely broke things in one of the recent updates = for me. I just need to figure out what and why. This is very odd - the changes made since RC4 really should not have hit this area. Do you have the energy to try and to a git bisect between the two versions? Otherwise and additionally, can you try setting 'acl:search=false' and see if that helps (this disables ACL enforcement for reads, which was the major change we made between these versions). Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Difference between real and reported disk usage
Pieter De Wit pieter at insync.za.net writes: What is the underlying file system, ext4 ? I wonder if it will be worth trying this on XFS, perhaps it behaves better with newer Windows clients ? Is this an option for you ? Hi Pieter! Yes i'm using ext4 but since the file transferring was done on a test PC, i've repeated all the work without strict allocate. So the problem is resolved for me (and i've learnt not to use that option). ;-) I've simply posted here the details about the trouble i had because i wasn't sure if it was a normal or a bogus behaviour that deserve to file a bug. And i'm not sure yet but from the reply i had looks the former. Cheers. Cesare. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but no DNS auto-registration
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 08:27 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:36 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. Automatic DNS update is not working. Workstations seem to be registering their names but joining a server to the domain works but fails with a error - and the DNS record is *not* added. [root@crew etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- BACKBONE Joined 'CREW' to realm 'micore.us' DNS update failed! When using the BIND server, but not the internal DNS server, this happens for Samba clients only. We have modified the Samba client in 4.0 to also work with BIND, and we need to get back to the BIND folks about the issue. But I am using the internal Samba DNS server, not Bind. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4 GA upgrade - auth failing
Andrew, I posted a note to another thread when I saw your post re: acl:search = false. I did a step-by-step upgrade through all of the RC's, and RC6 is what broke me. Once I saw that post the other day, I threw that config option in and everything was back to normal. I guess I will just have to wait for a script to update my ACL's before that feature will be good for me. Just some background about our environment (in case development cares for any reason): 14 AD servers ~ 800 users 50 Linux machines authenticating with winbindd (from RHEL and CentOS 6.3 and 5.8 repo). Currently about 10 Windows 7 machines, and 5 Windows 2008 servers joined to the directory. In the coming months, we will have 400 Windows 7 machines joined. - Original Message - From: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org To: Kristofer kristo...@cybernetik.net Cc: samba list samba@lists.samba.org Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 3:33:21 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 GA upgrade - auth failing On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 01:06 -0600, Kristofer wrote: --Apple-Mail=_5451A272-9820-42BF-A54B-E864FA9CD7AB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Update: I downgraded back to RC4, and the servers are able to authenticate once = again. Something definitely broke things in one of the recent updates = for me. I just need to figure out what and why. This is very odd - the changes made since RC4 really should not have hit this area. Do you have the energy to try and to a git bisect between the two versions? Otherwise and additionally, can you try setting 'acl:search=false' and see if that helps (this disables ACL enforcement for reads, which was the major change we made between these versions). Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] S4 AD Domain Up; but no DNS auto-registration
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 16:37 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 08:27 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:36 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3 My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues. Automatic DNS update is not working. Workstations seem to be registering their names but joining a server to the domain works but fails with a error - and the DNS record is *not* added. [root@crew etc]# net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- BACKBONE Joined 'CREW' to realm 'micore.us' DNS update failed! When using the BIND server, but not the internal DNS server, this happens for Samba clients only. We have modified the Samba client in 4.0 to also work with BIND, and we need to get back to the BIND folks about the issue. But I am using the internal Samba DNS server, not Bind. Then all I can suggest is that we get a network trace, keytabs, the client and server-side logs, and hope something makes sense. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4: Upload an Administrative Policy Template?
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 14:40 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
We'd like to add an adm (administrative template) to our Samba4 server.
I see where the .adm files are in the filesystem -
/opt/s4/var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/conf.adm
- but how can I add a new ADM file?
The ADM file in question allows the controlling of IE Favorites and a
few other items on XP (not available in the default templates for XP).
We previously did this via ugly old POLEDIT.
Never mind, it works now. :) The ADM template file was broken somehow,
another copy loaded and applied without issues.
./var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/system.adm
./var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/wmplayer.adm
./var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/ie_favorites_location.adm
./var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/inetres.adm
./var/locks/sysvol/micore.us/Policies/{ED429C7D-156A-4F75-B21D-92DB8E10ACAB}/Adm/wuau.adm
Awesome. I'm really impressed with how slick this works, way better
than the RC4! :)
--
Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba3 joining W2k3 as member server
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 17:00 +1300, Pieter De Wit wrote: Hi list, I have tried with all my might to get a samba3 server (Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS) to join a Windows 2003 domain as a member server, without any luck. I have used,from memory, the official way of doing this (aka, from the samba.org website). No matter what settings I use in smb.conf, the server always joins as a domain controller. This doesn't seem to break the domain how ever. All I am after is that my users do not need to enter a username/password for access from a domain PC to shares on my Linux box. Any pointers please or is this intended as the server does single sign? If you can list exactly the steps you took, we might be able to help. But to answer your question: Yes, Samba will happily join Windows 2003 as a domain member. The key command is 'net ads join'. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Error with active Libvirt Bridge (virbr0)
Just want to report an error in samba configuration / setup. I installed Samba 4 GA on a fresh installation of Ubuntu 12.04. The server is a testbed and has the virtualization package installed also. I have two network interfaces exept lo: eth0 and virbr0. In the provisioning step samba correctly finds my eth0 network interface: Looking up IPv4 addresses More than one IPv4 address found. Using 172.20.10.19 After I provision Samba I try to test according to the HOWTO and host lookup fails: # host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.hrt.local ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached After i disable virbr0 everything works as intended (i reran the provisioning step, haven't checked if that was nessesary). host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.hrt.local _ldap._tcp.hrt.local has SRV record 0 100 389 hrmfile.hrt.local. cheers BJ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba4: wins hook wins support ???
Does wins support and wins hook still work on Samba4? I hjave wins support enables [set to yes] and a wins hook script, but it never seems to be getting fired. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Bash question about find out all accessible shares on Samba server
Hello, I am working on a bash script to help user mount Samba share on his/her local Linux (Ubuntu) system. Now I can list all the Samba shares by command: #smbclient -N -gL \\sambaserver 21 | grep -e Disk| | cut -d'|' -f2 The problem is we have too many shares on the server so this come out a very long list of all the shares. Now I only want to list the user accessible shares and hide all others. I can use read to get user's login name/password for Samba authorization. Is there a way I can get the share list based on user's permission? Thanks for help. Gao -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4: wins hook wins support ???
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 17:00 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Does wins support and wins hook still work on Samba4? I hjave wins support enables [set to yes] and a wins hook script, but it never seems to be getting fired. The parameters appear to be hooked in, but I suspect that wins hook isn't currently tested. A test would be the best way to keep this working. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Announce] Samba 3.5.20 Available for Download
Please not that this will probably be the last bugfix release of the Samba 3.5 release series. Details about the release planning are available on http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning == We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we're curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths. Walt Disney == Release Announcements = This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.20 include: o Fix segfaults in log level = 10 on Solaris (bug #9390). o Apply ACL masks correctly when setting ACLs (bug #9236). Changes since 3.5.19: - o Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org * BUG 7781: Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase (sharename) when adding new share via MMC. * BUG 9236: Apply ACL masks correctly when setting ACLs. * BUG 9455: munmap called for an address location not mapped by Samba. o Björn Baumbach b...@sernet.de * BUG 9345: Fix usage of smbconfoption tag. o Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org * BUG 9390: Fix segfaults in log level = 10 on Solaris. * BUG 9402: Fix dns updates against BIND9 (used in a Samba4 domain). ## Reporting bugs Development Discussion ### Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net. If you do report problems then please try to send high quality feedback. If you don't provide vital information to help us track down the problem then you will probably be ignored. All bug reports should be filed under the Samba 3.5 product in the project's Bugzilla database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/). == == Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. == The Samba Team == Download Details The uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed using GnuPG (ID 6568B7EA). The source code can be downloaded from: http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/stable The release notes are available online at: http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.20.html Binary packages will be made available on a volunteer basis from http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. (https://bugzilla.samba.org/) --Enjoy The Samba Team
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-5-stable updated
The branch, v3-5-stable has been updated via 0c72376 WHATSNEW: Prepare release notes for Samba 3.5.20. via 403ddeb Fix bug #9455 munmap called for an address location not mapped by samba. via 0a99e5d source3/libaddns: don't depend on the order in resp-answers[] via 4fabb76 source3/libaddns: remove pointless check for resp-num_additionals != 1 via 6848625 lib/replace: replace all *printf function if we replace snprintf (bug #9390) via dcd11b2 libreplace: Fix symbol names for snprintf/asprintf/vasprintf. via ce6e959 libreplace: fixed declaration of dprintf() on FreeBSD (cherry picked from commit a599319d0a389ff0c31dae8068cd7a78352aa9e7) (cherry picked from commit fa16d0e4c2329fad8edde5a5e8d626a90caba6d9) via 043eb5e libreplace: added replacements for dprintf() and vdprintf() via 3f0c021 libreplace: some systems don't have memmem() via 42cfbb8 Another fix needed for bug #9236 - ACL masks incorrectly applied when setting ACLs. via ea35034 docs-xml: fix use of smbconfoption tag (fix bug #9345) via 18d9c35 Second part of fix for bug #7781 - Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase (sharename) when adding new share via MMC via 429133f Fix bug #7781 (Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase when adding new share via MMC) from a6c3bff WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.20. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-5-stable - Log - commit 0c723760b4a8975bcd11e645ff76f6834559ae71 Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Fri Dec 14 10:12:34 2012 +0100 WHATSNEW: Prepare release notes for Samba 3.5.20. Karolin (cherry picked from commit 31292e6fbedef78126435c92d6e687a4844847d9) commit 403ddeb5d8832ab14cbcf3e77d108cefb8386149 Author: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org Date: Mon Dec 10 10:40:12 2012 -0800 Fix bug #9455 munmap called for an address location not mapped by samba. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org (cherry picked from commit 06e3c65af559baaee7fa61ed3df1287b786d1858) commit 0a99e5d09a38e51607248290e9d9cb7f5c1b5808 Author: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Date: Fri Nov 9 08:59:36 2012 +0100 source3/libaddns: don't depend on the order in resp-answers[] Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org (cherry picked from commit eecc1d294256210ee8c2f6ab79d21b835258a6d4) The last 2 patches address bug #9402 - lib/addns doesn't work samba4 with a bind9 server. (cherry picked from commit cf4773f929b2ac01bfe22e8113ccd3843c92bf56) commit 4fabb76106fc5224d48d380c9b1a6cb399dc3621 Author: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Date: Fri Nov 9 08:55:40 2012 +0100 source3/libaddns: remove pointless check for resp-num_additionals != 1 We never use resp-additionals, so there's no reason to check. This fixes dns updates against BIND9 (used in a Samba4 domain). Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org (cherry picked from commit b59c5db5f74f56c0536635a41ae51c389109ceb5) (cherry picked from commit 4bb99f454cea8a0c37422f1e64cabe96543ca6e8) commit 6848625add89ca7fd97a4bf1705cad89c0ea2092 Author: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Date: Tue Nov 13 14:07:11 2012 +0100 lib/replace: replace all *printf function if we replace snprintf (bug #9390) This fixes segfaults in log level = 10 on Solaris. Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher me...@samba.org Signed-off-by: Björn Jacke b...@sernet.de Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke b...@sernet.de Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Nov 14 19:41:14 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104 (cherry picked from commit a15da3625850d97b3da1b02308c870f820007c52) The last 5 patches address bug #9390 - Solaris printf doesn't allow %s, NULL. (cherry picked from commit 05f151c041e407514c1b35619b2f2454aa4d614b) commit dcd11b2f2c523a2f80295ad993dfd1f2b6403fba Author: Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org Date: Sun May 13 03:21:34 2012 +0200 libreplace: Fix symbol names for snprintf/asprintf/vasprintf. Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org Autobuild-Date: Sun May 13 05:16:28 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104 (cherry picked from commit cf67da70c9a63c4dc63f287059321d6c36d1e19e) (cherry picked from commit 27405fb8cfaa56f3a39cdcd2fd635fd37af629f9) commit ce6e9599721fcf83d8418019849b8e59ed8bffef Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@freebsd.home.tridgell.net Date: Wed Mar 24 05:06:25 2010 +1100 libreplace: fixed declaration of dprintf() on FreeBSD (cherry picked from commit a599319d0a389ff0c31dae8068cd7a78352aa9e7) (cherry picked from commit fa16d0e4c2329fad8edde5a5e8d626a90caba6d9) commit 043eb5e62ee89eae4f6dec5854aea3ed9925e3fb Author: Andrew Tridgell tri...@samba.org Date: Thu Feb 11 20:18:50
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - annotated tag samba-3.5.20 created
The annotated tag, samba-3.5.20 has been created at 8a0214783831375f5cffca0d2ada3233d2f030e7 (tag) tagging 0c723760b4a8975bcd11e645ff76f6834559ae71 (commit) replaces samba-3.5.19 tagged by Karolin Seeger on Mon Dec 17 09:06:40 2012 +0100 - Log - tag release samba-3.5.20 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBQztKgbzORW2Vot+oRAhISAJwIPrCQreWKLnz6QTRGCVVZAwjWuQCfX+DH mSTNfnb0GvHP06Mncd5QxlU= =qw4e -END PGP SIGNATURE- Andrew Tridgell (3): libreplace: some systems don't have memmem() libreplace: added replacements for dprintf() and vdprintf() libreplace: fixed declaration of dprintf() on FreeBSD (cherry picked from commit a599319d0a389ff0c31dae8068cd7a78352aa9e7) Björn Baumbach (1): docs-xml: fix use of smbconfoption tag (fix bug #9345) Jelmer Vernooij (1): libreplace: Fix symbol names for snprintf/asprintf/vasprintf. Jeremy Allison (4): Fix bug #7781 (Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase when adding new share via MMC) Second part of fix for bug #7781 - Samba transforms ShareName to lowercase (sharename) when adding new share via MMC Another fix needed for bug #9236 - ACL masks incorrectly applied when setting ACLs. Fix bug #9455 munmap called for an address location not mapped by samba. Karolin Seeger (3): VERSION: Bump version number up to 3.5.20. WHATSNEW: Start release notes for Samba 3.5.20. WHATSNEW: Prepare release notes for Samba 3.5.20. Stefan Metzmacher (3): lib/replace: replace all *printf function if we replace snprintf (bug #9390) source3/libaddns: remove pointless check for resp-num_additionals != 1 source3/libaddns: don't depend on the order in resp-answers[] --- -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Website Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated via 0bbfd60 Announce Samba 3.5.20. via 98dbccf devel: Update current branch descriptions. from d3e615b Remove superflous 'for' http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba-web.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit 0bbfd602cd2b6995343233458a0caf986aaee270 Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Mon Dec 17 09:31:44 2012 +0100 Announce Samba 3.5.20. Karolin commit 98dbccf3eed9175434284dc50868532852bae003 Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Mon Dec 17 09:31:08 2012 +0100 devel: Update current branch descriptions. Karolin --- Summary of changes: devel/index.html| 34 +++-- generated_news/latest_10_bodies.html| 21 +++-- generated_news/latest_10_headlines.html |4 +- generated_news/latest_2_bodies.html | 26 history/header_history.html |1 + history/samba-3.5.20.html | 49 +++ 6 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) create mode 100755 history/samba-3.5.20.html Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/devel/index.html b/devel/index.html index 35ee1cd..bd3b6d0 100755 --- a/devel/index.html +++ b/devel/index.html @@ -19,16 +19,12 @@ original Subversion and CVS trees; this would include 3.0.x and 2.2.x versions of Samba, which are no longer in active development. /p -pWith the release of Samba 3.6.0, the 3.5 series has been turned into +pWith the release of Samba 4.0.0, the 3.6 series has been turned into maintenance mode, which means severe bug fixes and security fixes only./p -pThere will be security fixes only for the 3.4 series./p +pThere will be security fixes only for the 3.5 series./p -pThe 3.3 series will be discontinued./p - -pOngoing future research is being done for Samba 4.0 -This work is concurrent with Samba 3.6 maintenance -and development. a href=/samba/ftp/samba4/alpha releases/a are available./p +pThe 3.4 series will be discontinued./p br / h3Samba Branches/h3 @@ -56,38 +52,30 @@ Git for Samba Development/a./p pThis is the new combined branch for 3.x.x emand/em 4.x.x development./p /li li - h4emv3-4-test/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.4.x maintenance releases -(security fixes emonly/em)./p -/li -li - h4emv3-4-stable/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.4.x maintenance releases/p -(security fixes emonly/em./p -/li -li h4emv3-5-test/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases./p + pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases +(security fixes emonly/em./p /li li h4emv3-5-stable/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases./p + pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases +(security fixes emonly/em./p /li li h4emv3-6-test/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.6.x development./p + pThis is the current branch for 3.6.x maintenance releases./p /li li h4emv3-6-stable/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 3.6.x production releases./p + pThis is the current branch for 3.6.x maintenance releases./p /li li h4emv4-0-stable/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x release candidates./p + pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x development./p /li li h4emv4-0-test/em/h4 - pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x release candidates./p + pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x production releases./p /li /ul diff --git a/generated_news/latest_10_bodies.html b/generated_news/latest_10_bodies.html index 98f8ead..a9721d7 100644 --- a/generated_news/latest_10_bodies.html +++ b/generated_news/latest_10_bodies.html @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ + h5a name=3.5.2017 December 2012/a/h5 + p class=headlineSamba 3.5.20 Available for Download/p + pThis is the latest stable release of the Samba 3.5 series./p + +pThe uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed +using GnuPG (ID 6568B7EA). The source code can be +a href=http://samba.org/samba/ftp/stable/samba-3.5.20.tar.gz;downloaded +now/a. A a href=http://samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/patch-3.5.19-3.5.20.diffs.gz; +patch against Samba 3.5.19/a is also available. See +a href=http://samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.20.html; +the release notes for more info/a./p + h5a name=4.0.011 December 2012/a/h5 p class=headlineSamba 4.0.0 Available for Download/p pThis is the first stable release of the Samba 4.0 series./p @@ -87,12 +99,3 @@ See a href=https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/rc/WHATSNEW-4-0-0rc3.txt;the using GnuPG (ID 6568B7EA). The source code can be a
[SCM] Samba Website Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated via 9879681 devel: Fix some typos. from 0bbfd60 Announce Samba 3.5.20. http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba-web.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit 9879681b57fc1f0933bfe36235fc5ff0a2602f3d Author: Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org Date: Mon Dec 17 11:07:13 2012 +0100 devel: Fix some typos. Karolin --- Summary of changes: devel/index.html |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/devel/index.html b/devel/index.html index bd3b6d0..2bf2bfd 100755 --- a/devel/index.html +++ b/devel/index.html @@ -54,12 +54,12 @@ Git for Samba Development/a./p li h4emv3-5-test/em/h4 pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases -(security fixes emonly/em./p +(security fixes emonly/em)./p /li li h4emv3-5-stable/em/h4 pThis is the current branch for 3.5.x maintenance releases -(security fixes emonly/em./p +(security fixes emonly/em)./p /li li h4emv3-6-test/em/h4 @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ Git for Samba Development/a./p pThis is the current branch for 3.6.x maintenance releases./p /li li - h4emv4-0-stable/em/h4 + h4emv4-0-test/em/h4 pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x development./p /li li - h4emv4-0-test/em/h4 + h4emv4-0-stable/em/h4 pThis is the current branch for 4.0.x production releases./p /li /ul -- Samba Website Repository
