(ie 3.5) this much will work. If
you need Samba to be an AD domain controller, then you will need to use
Samba4.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 10:47 +0100, Marcello Romani wrote:
> Il 04/03/2011 05:43, Andrew Bartlett ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:17 +0100, Marcello Romani wrote:
> >> Hallo,
> >> I'm running a W2K AD network with about 20 clients (mostly Windows
>
" parameter is
> the only way, I think.
Even this (and it would be insecure, and very unsupported) isn't likely
to work well, we do expect the schema to match our schema.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Dev
cess/failure stories in
> similar setups would be great.
> Thanks in advance.
This (Windows 2000 -> Samba4) certainly has been made to work, multiple
times. Those successful migrations that I know of were via Windows 2003
due to an odd Kerberos interop issue between Samba4
is in the server
logs at the time? perhaps turn up the debug level?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to t
did you make to the generated config file for it to work
for you?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
missed or mis-understood one of the steps.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
nds are not part of Samba4.
As is almost correctly mentioned above, to run 'samba' (the Samba4
server binary) from /usr/local/samba, you need to run:
/usr/local/sbin/samba
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Develope
will publish some more docs on this. But in the meantime, you
seem to have cracked the setup for the less secure, unsafe (no
transactions) but works-for-a-demo mode of operation :-).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Develop
s of that discussion and other research, Kai and Metze
started writing Samba4's own DNS server. Then tridge and the BIND folks
got together, and given the excellent progress made, not reinventing
this particular wheel seems to be the best way forward at the moment.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andre
gt; NT4 BDC will work in a Samba PDC enviroment?
Look into the tools (myldap-pub.py or something) mentioned on the lists
to migrate Samba3 to Samba4, which will get you a replication source you
could then use to migrate to AD if you can't use Samba4.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
nds to support Exchange. Any issues with the exchange
install failing are bugs we want to fix. Certainly we have reports of
exchange-supporting AD environments being imported into Samba4, but I
don't know if folks have used Exchange itself directly against Samba4.
Andrew Bartlett
ing NTLM or Kerberos?
Either way, this is unlikely to be a Samba3 bug, given that it's not
been raised before, so perhaps re-raise the issue on samba-technical,
with network traces etc to show what's going on, and I'll happily look
into it for you.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
I prefer dnsmasq as nameserver; do you support this
> program too?
No. BIND is the only server that will support the range of functions
Samba requires.
I know BIND has a bad name in some minds, but we did look and there is
no suitable alternative. I also don't think BIND deserves the
re
at this stage, but if
security is your worry then of course the AD DC is the heart of that.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscribe
get abcde from the system but not from the samba4. Furthermore,
> files created via samba by the uid 300018 is not deletable by user uid 1000.
Correct. Samba4 uses it's own uid and gid space, and manages all
aspects of the user. You could edit the idmap.ldb I suppose.
Eventually we will
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 22:46 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:17 +0100, Vaclav Klecanda wrote:
> > Yes, python provision scripts are easy to use. But it is necessary to
> > say: "yes, these scripts are the API and wont change. Here is the
> > docu
are interested in developing this, please have a go,
and make a proposal on the samba-technical list.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
T
e same OpenLDAP tree. Samba3 isn't bound by the 'one PDC'
requirement, except within a NetBIOS scope.
Otherwise, as has been suggested, you can run Samba4 as an AD domain
controller.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Aut
ings are not an issue for
python based wrappers. libsmbclient is the Samba3 client library, which
is quite distinct.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco
.
I fear it will be difficult to find and fix all the instances, but
others who are more involved in this code regularly may wish to
comment.
In short, you may be better to re-configure this workstation from
scratch.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://sa
rd for web
GUIs).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https:
t; option and run "strip" on it, and look up those
> options and tools.
This won't help anything except the on-disk size, as those pages are
only mapped in by the debugger in the case that they are needed.
Otherwise, they just stay on disk.
It may help to explain what you are
perhaps another
OpenLDAP instance can be configured as a combining proxy for the
different bases, or you can replicate all the data using manual scripts
into a single tree.
Multiple distinct LDAP trees should serve multiple distinct LDAP
domains.
What exactly are you t
t you
have missed out 'cn=users' from the DN.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:36 -0800, Liam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:37 -0800, Liam wrote:
> > > I'm setting up samba service on a battery-powered WiFi device. The
> > > plan is to have it
e, using the LDAP backend is
> incompatible with DRS replication. You have been warned.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
--
To unsubscr
clients may keep a connection open for quite some time while not
actually using it.
(I don't have personal experience with this setup, but wanted to give
you some hints about where to start).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Aut
a-technical on
irc.freenode.net.
The code is still alpha, but that mostly means that we need you to work
with us closely when something goes wrong, so we can fix it up or work
around it as quickly as possible.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.or
ked?
> Anil, I don't think so, because even if I run the script with root privileges
> I'm getting the same error.
changing the mode to 777 of anything is almost never the correct
solution, and indeed yes, this isn't relevent for LDAP anyway.
Andrew Bartl
t I'm getting: error in module acl: insufficient access
> rights (50).
>
> Where's the problem?
Well, to start with: was the bind actually successful?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, S
DOWS 2000 DOMAIN) = {
> kdc = (HOSTNAME).(WINDOWS 2000 DOMAIN):88
> }
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This
r
issues remain. Our automated testing infrastructure is being extended
to support this, and so we should be able to reliably handle this in the
near future.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba T
//lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2010-January/068656.html
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
available = yes
>
> encrypt passwords = yes
> server signing = mandatory
You cannot use security=share and smb signing at the same time.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http:/
//wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
; >> Net pwsettings has settings for Complexity, Password history Length,
> >> Minimum password length, Minimum password age, and Maximum password age.
> >>
> >> But I can not see how to set a bad password login attempts.
Samba4 does not track bad password login
The workgroup for all Samba servers in a domian
must be the same, just as the realm must be the same. If they are not,
then they are not in the same domain, and no replication should be
expected.
Magnus,
You are of course free to try and set up whatever manual processes you
wish to operati
nd NTLM) can I still connect with rpcclient ?
rpcclient will honour the same setting in the smb.conf as smbclient -
'client ntlmv2 auth = yes' should do it.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba
lowly starting to understand sites (it will allow computers
to be put in sites, and return the correct site names), but it is at a
very early stage.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 12:58 -0700, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 20:47 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> > On 26 September 2010 04:21, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:29 -0700, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 1
1
> didn't). We no longer have big generated configure and Makefile's, I
> suspect that explains at least part of the reduction in size.
We also don't have the generated PIDL output in the Samba4 tarball (this
will still be provided for Samba3 tarballs). That is probably
resp
s to the local
box - just use 'net sam rights'.
I hope this helps,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: Th
4?
Yes, by selecting a different prefix as you have, you certainly can keep
both on the system at the same time.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
#x27;ve Cc'ed samba-technical for a better chance at an authoritative answer.
The use of reverse DNS for Kerberos can introduce security holes and
Windows does not use it in that way. However, I think MIT Kerberos
might, if you are intending to use unix hosts. (It may also have
options to turn
The Samba Team appreciates the efforts that SerNet puts into their
packages, and simply refers users to them.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
d I correct it ? I tried to compile the last Samba on Redhat os
> but I have new errors (impossible to start smbd nor nmbd)...
Indeed, as you have suspected, you need a newer version than 3.0.33.
Try the RPMs from http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/rhel/5/x86_64/ if
y
hing at all to do with 'netlogon_creds_server_check failed',
I suspect the issue has happened because your Windows 7 clients have
changed their machine account password, but try and use the new password
'too soon'. Once the password has replicated back to the local DC, then
ever
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 14:33 +0200, John Anderson wrote:
> On 09/09/10 13:57, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:35 +0200, John Anderson wrote:
> >> I have a linux firewall using winbind to authenticate users coming in
> >> with PPTP. It all seemed t
pp to say "mutual authentication
> failed". I hacked the ppp sources (chap_ms.c) gently to output the two
> hashes.
> I'be been using samba-3.5.4 (and 3.4.6 and 3.4.8) and ppp-2.4.[2345]
> (tried all of them) on a x86_64 gentoo box.
Try with the lastest GIT tre
first condition and which
> I've tried for the first time ever.
>
> Can anyone confirm this behavior?
That's an odd one.
Perhaps it's a minimum password age?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication
om = MYDOMAIN.COM
> >
>
> Change the contents of /etc/krb5.conf to
> [libdefaults]
> dns_lookup_realm = true
> dns_lookup_kdc = true
>
> Even though the system is using DNS kerberos doesn't use DNS due to
> the settings that you've configured
re long overdue with making another Samba4 release, and the last
alpha is quite old now. Please try again with the current version in
our GIT tree.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team h
T or Heimdal KDC. See 'kerberos method' in your smb.conf for the
documentation.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Descrip
x27;staff' in /etc/passwd. What OS is this?
You can override this with --users= option (see the provision --help for
other options for the other groups we try and lookup)
I'll add an exception handler here that explains the situation in better
detail.
> > Also when I
the instance we configure
in the way that we expect.
> And one last question, is it possible to create interdomain trust with the
> current version of Samba4?
Not yet. (We of course intend to support this, but we don't at this
time).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
s to push those patches I'm fine with that, but we still
have a long way to go to resolve the other issues)
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
and the files it serves.
See the 'net pwsettings' command to control server-side password
policies in Samba4.
Andrew Bartlett
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
amba/private/dns.keytab: unexpected
> token
>
> Any ideas what am I doing wrong?
Don't set the nsupdate command unless you have configured static keys.
(which means a key file you have generated, not the samba-managed
Kerberos keytab)
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
xcatly the tutorial:
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
>
> kinit administrator is working and not time issues between the servers.
>
> Please advise,
> Thanks
G'day,
I'll need more than the last lines of the log before I can give
en
these hosts? The auth code for Kerberos will trigger
NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER (yeah, it is probably not the best choice of
error code) if Kerberos won't work.
Perhaps turn up the debug level and see if there are more clues?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
cvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 >> 0.0.0.0>]
> >> Jun 3 11:10:40 debian pppd[17826]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x8 >> 192.168.54.181>]
> >> Jun 3 11:10:40 debian pppd[17826]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 >> 192.168.54.181>]
> >> Jun 3 11:10:40 debian pppd[1
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 20:33 +0100, Lukasz Zalewski wrote:
> On 22/04/2010 12:14, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:44 -0400, Stuart Wehrly wrote:
> >> Is there a list of options for smb.conf?
> >
> > Sadly Samba4 does lack documentation. But test
update to upgradeprovision is pending - keep an eye on the
GIT tree or ask Matthieu Patou (CC'ed).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
ords for that zone and see which ones
> you are missing
Indeed, if you used a zone file other than the one we generated, then
you are asking for trouble. Please us the one we generate.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authenti
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 17:21 -0700, t...@tms3.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > --- Original message ---
> > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11
> > From: Andrew Bartlett
> > To:
> > Cc:
> > Date: Saturday, 15/05/2010 5:14 AM
> >
>
inbind built from the source3 build. You need
to set (in smb.conf)
winbindd socket directory = /tmp/.winbindd
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Develope
've noticed so far (still in early lab stage) is a GC
> issue.
>
> Now if I can upgrade a Samba3-LDAP domain
This should not be to hard, as a one-way, change the schema upgrade. If
you want to help with that, I can point you some of the tools and
existing attempts that you could
self (it just hosts it for Windows
clients to apply locally. See the 'net pwsettings' command for the way
to change these settings in the Samba4 domain until this functionality
is extended.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:30 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Am 11.05.2010 06:59, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > Am 11.05.2010 03:08, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 14:40 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> >>> I have a Samba3 + OpenLDAP installati
ora DS/'389' can work as a Samba4
backend, but beyond that I don't know their status (and it's not very
clear on their wiki).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://sam
reate a
setup with a unix-like schema, but you will have to ask them about their
progress).
We also don't yet have good upgrade scripts from Samba3. It can be
done, but a lot of the task will be manual.
Sorry,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba
to get it out as quickly as I should have.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
misconfiguration on any host-based firewall you
may have. If you don't see any noise in the logs, I suspect that while
Samba4 may be running, clients can't contact it.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Develop
heckout from today, it should work. We
finally changed to a new build system, which should fix this and many
other issues.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba De
is sounds very much like an issue solved in the past few weeks.
Perhaps try a current GIT snapshot?
I am trying to get another alpha release made, but I've not managed to
do it quite yet.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authen
very real production use
I've personally assisted administrators with, I can attest that it does
really work.
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer,
it is also very much working for our users.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/videos
Give it a try - particularly if you can put your traditional file-server
and printer roles on a Samba3 member server. You will quickly find out
what works for you, and what does not.
Andrew B
didn't make it to the list. Can you make it with git
format-patch (if possible) and attach it to a bug, or mail it to me. I
would be delighted to include it in the tree, or otherwise fix this
bug.
(Sorry for the slow response, I normally expect Samba4 questions on
samba-technical during this
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:44 -0400, Stuart Wehrly wrote:
> Is there a list of options for smb.conf?
Sadly Samba4 does lack documentation. But testparm -v from Samba4
should get you what you want.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abart
See also the main HOWTO at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 09:06 -0400, Konstantin Pobudzey wrote:
> Hello Andrew Bartlett
> Thank You for response. userParameters value is not set actually.
> I found difference,it is value in userAccountControl.
> ( if account enabled 512 ( 66048 if enabled and password never expi
balance the domain?
Correct. Load balancing is up to the client, but yes it should just
work.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
Samba4 does not support any clustered operation. In it's primary role
as an AD domain controller, this simply isn't needed - multiple DCs are
expected.
The fileserver could with work be clustered - indeed ctdb was first
developed in Samba4 - but there is no work in this area at this time
y we can maintain the best of both
worlds is wanted. We have to be an AD server first, but I'm open to
ideas for how we can be better as well.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
baNTPassword
attribute, and the other Samba flags. )
With Samba4, the restrictions we have in the AD design (much closer
integration with the KDC and LDAP server) have meant that these parts
must now be under Samba4's control.
I hope this clarifies things,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bart
> for this ?
Samba4 does not currently handle (or know about) this attribute. A
disabled account has a flag in the userParameters set, and this is what
we use.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba T
domain controller, and we can't enable behaviours that are in
conflict with being an AD DC.
For example, we will soon enable ACL support that will block anonymous
access to our directory - while most POSIX clients prefer anonymous
searches.
I hope this clarifies things,
Andrew Bartlett
-
illa when you pin things
down a bit more. Perhaps also try a 'git bisect' to find the failing
revision.
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Develope
dns_lookup_realm = true
dns_lookup_kdc = true
is set, and then try a 'kinit administrator' to check that this works
first.
Also perhaps turn up the debug level (add -d3 for example).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authent
they are stored in a separate password store,
accessed by the Open Directory KDC and the password server.
We can talk about the options and how we might be able to make something
work for you on samba-technical if you like.
I'm sorry this isn't so easy,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bart
-w"
No, these have been autoconfigured by the provision script.
> Could someone, who has this configuration running, be so kind to send me
> an example smb.conf
There is nothing special in the smb.conf. Instead, the provision script
embeds the right information in the sam.ldb datab
ues to get around
> such an issue?
You should never use 'security=server' if there is any other possible
way to authenticate your users. It is a disgusting man in the middle
attack, that therefore makes important security features go away,
including NTLMv2.
Andrew Bartlett
--
An
he
> attribute with the same value already exists or when an attribute to
> be deleted does not exists.
Correct, we don't currently support this control. Please file a bug,
and we will try and get to it soon.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
up running against Windows. That way, we can match the
behaviour, and write a testsuite for it.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
signature.asc
D
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 00:21 +1100, Mike Fabre wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:18:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 10:21 +1100, Mike Fabre wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have a network setup with one Samba PDC and two Samba
e Samba DCs PDCs of their own networks.
That way, they will all be contacted for password changes, because on
each of their local networks, they hold the DOMAIN#1B name.
(They need not be read-write OpenLDAP replicas, as Samba happily handles
the referral to the master for writes).
Andrew
his will not work in the latest alpha, but we
hope to integrate some patches Endi has been working on to fix this
soon.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, C
ttern_allow"
This means that the version of 'acl' you are trying to install is not
compatible with the OS yo are trying to install it on. Why are you not
trying to install it via a package management system?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthtt
mpt to upgrade Samba
on it's own. Or if you must, then find RPM packages (sernet has some
for a wide variety of OS versions) of the recent code pre-packaged. It
is best to upgrade the server OS to a current revision for other reasons
anyway.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
801 - 900 of 2760 matches
Mail list logo
