One Win2k client constantly generates these messages in the log:
Jan 30 16:50:32 server smbd[30271]: [2003/01/30 16:50:32, 0]
rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(134)
Jan 30 16:50:32 server smbd[30271]:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:17, John H Terpstra wrote:
Which clearly, and seemingly purposely, leaves out the lo interface.
Which is always allowed except when explicitly NOT allowed.
OK, so there is no need to add the lo interface because it is added by
default.
How about the format of the
Thanks for clearing that up.
It's good to know that one can rely on the official docs.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 15:07, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Chris Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:17, John H Terpstra wrote:
Which clearly, and seemingly purposely, leaves out
Not including cases of unsupported clients for IPP printing (such as
Windows NT) are there any reasons/caveats for installations running CUPS
to not move over to IPP printing?
Are there any features or benefits to Windows/Samba printing for Windows
clients that make it superior compared to IPP?
WFWG 3.11 supports encryted passwords as well.
Rule of thumb should be to use encryted passwords unless you have some
specific reason for not doing so (of which I can't think of any off
hand).
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 12:36, William R. Knox wrote:
The information provided here about the use of
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 08:42, Buchan Milne wrote:
The script in packaging/Mandrake/print-pdf (or something like that) is
IMHO a better solution. I can expand as to why if you are interested.
Expansion would be appreciated thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
I believe this works OK with an NT PDC as one can restrict share users
to, as an example, members of the Domain Users group, but this group
is not available in Samba 2.2.x. Maybe 3.0 will help.
I suppose, as one hack, you could use a root preexec and a root
postexec to add and remove users to a
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 17:44, Jim Shaffer wrote:
this might be the blind leading the blind, but I think restarting samba
will simply cause it to reread the smb.conf. It will not disconnect the
users.
I think the smb.conf is re-read every 30 seconds or so, nothing needs to
be done. From my
Most MS OS's systems either use the DNS/hosts system very poorly or not
at all for NetBIOS name resolution. In place of DNS/hosts is
WINS/lmhosts. WINS is the dynamic, centralized version of an lmhosts
file and is to lmhosts as DNS is to hosts. Without the use of WINS or
lmhosts files NetBIOS name
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:40, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
I am trying to export a share to several Windows clients, that start some
application in a dos box. The application itself is located on the share. The
first client can start it, the second cannot.
I have a client whose major
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 10:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Would you mind to allow me a look in the smb.conf (in private email)? Maybe
there is some difference ...
No problem but it might be better shared here as there are many who know
more than I.
In my clients smb.conf we use these
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 16:58, Corey Hart wrote:
We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near
future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be
for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the
different journaling file systems
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
Have you ever tried ACLs with reiserfs?
No. Didn't even know that it was possible.
Any opinion on ACL support in reiserfs?
If it truly works I would like to try it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 10:39, Simon Faulkner wrote:
[global]
oplocks = false
kernel oplocks = false
level2 oplocks = false
in /etc/samba/smb.conf
The Samba docs I have list the oplocks and level2 oplocks params as
being share level, not global and on by default.
What does a testparm show
Woops, wrong window. Sorry!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:24 AM
To: 'Borut Kurnik'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] winbind problems
Mark, this is a known issue, please follow the steps in the attached
Wow, the 1000+ users we have printing thru Samba 3.0 and up would be
surprised to hear that!
We even have click and print working... the load that took off of our
sysadmins (not having to set up lpr/IP printing and manually keep track of
drivers)
was definitely worth the week of tweaking Samba to
I am having the same problem using Samba 3.0.7 w/ FC2.
This only started happening recently, and is happening on 3 servers. I
hadn't seen it happen on 3.0.4. Nothing else has changed.
Thanks,
Chris Smith
Systems Administrator
API Group Information Systems Dept.
-Original Message
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 11:01, Eric Treu wrote:
Can anybody help me. I have come to the conclusion that the one XP
Professional box that I have does not have this problem.
Xteq X-Setup from http://www.xteq.com/products/xset/ can allow some better LAN
functionality, at a price - you must
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his
homedirectory
Same change occured here when upgrading from 2.2.7a to the 3.0.0 release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:26, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I see this problem too. I thought that I was going crazy.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
So this is a purposeful change in behavior then? With 2.2.x one could have
browseable = Yes and valid users = %S.
Chris
--
To
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:28, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Petty, Robert wrote:
No, I haven't filed a bug report...
The key part of my message was:
Since nobody's home directory was / it would open the root
directory
I have changed it since I immediately
On Saturday 27 September 2003 15:00, John H Terpstra wrote:
On each workstation make the Domain Admins group a member of the local
Administrators group.
John, I'm missing the point here as this shouldn't be necessary at all. The
only reason to add someone to the local Administrators group
A net groupmap list show 2 each of Domain Admins and Domain Guests as
marked below with ** and *** respectively.
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1
Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1
Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1
Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1
Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1
Administrators
On Saturday 27 September 2003 21:08, John H Terpstra wrote:
It looks here as if you changed either the domain name or the machine name
of your Samba server. That will result in the duplicate entries you see
here.
OK, this probably happened during a reasonably sloppy install - I didn't quite
On Saturday 27 September 2003 21:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The only way that a domain user can gain admin priviliges ona domain
member workstation is through domain users or domain groups being made
members of a local workstation group that has sufficient rights and
privilige to do what
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 10:00, Thiago Lima wrote:
If I configure samba and cups in the RAW mode using windows original
drivers of the printers, everything works fine, but this way I can't use
cups accounting.
Yeah, that bites.
So I reinstaled all my printers in cups using
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:17, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
But alas, printing with IPP is fine. :-)
From Windows or just 'nix?
Note that this still doesn't mean the problem is definitely in Samba
(although see the WERR_ACCESS_DENIED error below). It could be a
problem with the cups-samba
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 12:51, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
But alas, printing with IPP is fine. :-)
From Windows or just 'nix?
Just *UNIX.
My intent with the IPP suggestion was to print via IPP from the Windows box to
CUPS, only changing the equation by taking Samba out of the loop.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 14:49, Thiago Lima wrote:
Any tips? I can't believe that nobody ever had this problem. :(
I never had a problem getting the CUPS Windows PS drivers working but had an
entirely different problem in the use of them. What I experienced was when a
user requested
I just put the mount commands in the rc.local. Maybe there's a better way?
--
Chris
Do not reply to this address.
The contact page below is a spam limiting device.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
http://realcomputerguy.com/contact.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 16:10, Jim Morris wrote:
I vote to kill the mailing list - Usenet gateway, if that is what is
causing these virus email attacks on subscribers. If I wanted to use
Usenet, I would go read comp.os.protocols.smb or whatever, directly!
I disagree. A Usenet search via
On Thursday 24 February 2005 11:47 am, Craig White wrote:
I'm quite certain that Tonni meant to say only stable version of
openldap is 2.2.23 and of course none of the current distributions
of Linux package that version yet.
Gentoo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
I have the following in my logon batch file and everything works great
other than the home H:drive. This randomly works or doesn't work,
and I can't seem to find a consistent reason.
This is with samba-3.0.10-1.fc2. I have tried it with and without the
/persistent switch.
Any ideas? thank you in
Where does the ¨Display Name in XP come from in a Domain?
I have about 300 machines that are in a ldap backended Samba 3.0
domain. I regularly add users like so:
smbldap-useradd -a -m -c First Last -P flast
It seem that at least at first they usually get the First Last
portion displayed in the
On Friday 16 May 2003 07:12, Honza Houstek wrote:
I must agree. Reiserfs is quite fast but not very reliable.
Totally reliable from my experience. I've been running several small business
offices plus my own server for about two years without a glitch. Reiserfs has
held up with constant
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 16:36, SoloCDM wrote:
How does Microsoft Windows know to grab the time off the Linux server?
In regards to Samba's time service the Windows system simply performs a
net time /set command, executed manually or via a script.
Is ntpd needed on the Linux server to execute
On Monday 23 June 2003 11:01, Alexandru Molodoi wrote:
I wish that a user could be able to choose to which domain he
should log on to (and I think that is the normal way).
Why do you think that is the normal way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Friday 27 June 2003 03:35, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
Also, do NOT try to go from a workgroup to a domain of the same name.
It will quite surely fail.
Just want to mention that although I've read this advice many times I have
almost always joined the domain from a workgroup of the same name
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 06:05, Joel Hammer wrote:
With XP Home, printing to a postscript printer on my linux box, the job is
sent as multiple, sequential postscript files, each file being just one
copy. Ergo, samba thinks it has received multiple different print jobs,
not one job consisting
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 13:54, Dan Gapinski wrote:
XP home cannot log onto domains at all.
Rather disappointing what they did with it.
All is not lost, however. I have successfully used X-Setup from Xteq Systems
(http://www.xteq.com/) to at least enable domain participation close to the
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the Samba docs, but wouldn't you need host
to be in the name resolve order for Samba to use hosts, or DNS for
name resolution?
Since Win2k/XP are DNS/hosts centric OS's that only use WINS/lmhosts for
backward compatibility one should be able to have a WINS free network
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 14:49, Jay Ts wrote:
Are you really sure of this? I don't have time to check it right now,
but the way I remember it is that new users get a local profile, no
matter whether Windows or Samba is used as the PDC.
Three separate Samba PDC installs that I've done recently
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 07:52, Markus A. Madlener wrote:
i have exact the same behavior !
if a new user logons on to a samba domain, the profile IS roaming, you can
easily check by starting NT user manager and connect to the samba PDC, the
path to the user profile is always set to the samba
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:47, Simon Jester wrote:
Just to clarify:
Deleting the options in smb.conf doesn't work because the default
service definitions for those parameters become active; one must
actively set them to null (logon path= for example).
So, you are saying that simply
a
browseable = Yes in the [global] section.
Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17 10:52 AM
If you've installed TCP/IP printing on the W2k client and setting up
an
LPR port why bother using Samba for the printing at all?
If you skip these steps: 1a,1b,2a 2b(printer),2a 2b(global), 3h
managed nor always the best way.
Chris
Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17 3:11 PM
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 13:44, Van Sickler, Jim wrote:
You do want to use the samba box to manage
your printers; otherwise all of your PCs
are going to be fighting over the printers...
that gets real ugly
You need 4 rpm's: samba, samba-client, and either the two classic's or
the two ldap's.
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 05:38, Peter
Meyer wrote:
Hello list,
I wanna update 2.2.1a to 2.2.4 on SuSE 7.3.
Find under
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/ftp.suse.com/people/lmuelle/i386/7.3/ the
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:05, A.J.Dawson wrote:
Many thanks to those who have replied so far - still no luck
unfortunately.
It would appear that I was ni=ot quite specific enough in the original
post re: the OS version I am using - it is Windows 98SE, NOT vanilla 98.
My first guess is the
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options.
In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Not sure. I didn't think that was the default, maybe I'm mistaken or
that it changed at a certain release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Just checked my docs for 2.2.5 claim that the default is large
readwrite = no. Maybe it's just the way your distribution set up the
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 16:31, Vladimir I. Umnov wrote:
May be it my poor english, but I mean that I don't want to allow login
user into domain and don't want allow him create profile and use
home directory, but I want allow this local autentificates in PDC.
May be I need run for him some
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 04:34, Mike Stewart wrote:
net stop Windows Time
net time /setsntp:172.16.15.4 (my samba server)
net start Windows Time
Still no errors but hasn't yet synchronised the time with the server.
Done this way Samba is out of the loop and time control is not a Samba
issue.
What is the easiest way to allow specific users access to other users home
shares?
Current config is:
=
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
read only = no
valid users = %S
dos filetimes = Yes
guest ok = no
On Wednesday 08 August 2007, samba-list wrote:
I need to have some public folders on the samba server that anybody can use
Use a username map and set nobody = guest.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Friday 24 August 2007, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
With only a Samba PDC, with everything defined in LDAP, is there any
requirement for Winbind?
I think the only reason to use it in this case (or even with a different
passdb backend - any time when you are not authenticating against a Windows
building 'smb' extension
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -march=nocona -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.5 -c
python/py_smb.c -o
build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/python/py_smb.o -march=nocona -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could it be possible to code in a time out.
so I can set say
user kirsty can login once in a 24 or 12 hour period.
Maybe some sort of hack where upon login you set the allowed workstations (net
sam set workstaions, for tdbsam) for the
On Saturday 08 September 2007, Michael Schmitt wrote:
there is stated that it is not a good idea to
have a local workgroup and create a domain with the exact same name and
join the windows boxes ther. It is said that this will fail or at least
it will have some problems. But here, what should
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Helmut Hullen wrote:
only SMB server,
security = server
For the only SMB server it should, under most circumstances, be security =
user.
Also you should consider upgrading to a current version.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, James Perry wrote:
I'm sending a DNS query to the outside
world, and after some hunting around through various DNS servers, it
gives up and comes back empty, so then the clients have to resort to
broadcast.
They shouldn't resort to broadcast unless WINS for
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Mike Seda wrote:
I only use one samba share (home). There is a symlink called share in
each users' $HOME that points to /opt/data/share, which has a *many*
subdirectories (owned by certain groups). Since there are so many
subdirectories, I am reluctant to make them
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Luke Pittman wrote:
Samba maps the username correctly but then immediately changes it to an
Anonymous request. Am I missing something?
As your smbusers file is part of the equation you may have wanted to post at
least part of it.
Did you quote the usernames with
On Sunday 02 December 2007, Dane Shea wrote:
[public]
comment = Public Shared Folder
path = /home/public
write list = DShea
create mask = 0775
guest ok = Yes
It's good to distinguish between other authenticated users and guests.
Authenticated users may or may not have admin rights, but
On Thursday 06 December 2007, Dale Schroeder wrote:
The links below all say the same thing concerning this error message:
the version of libnss_winbind.so running does not match the version
of winbind that is running.
In case it helps anyone:
Whenever I upgrade Samba on the boxes that run
Hello,
Is there any way to use NOT logic with net sam set workstations?
Instead of explicitly declaring which workstations are allowed, I would
like to explicitly declare which ones are not on a per user basis.
The reason is that many users bring in their own systems
(desktops/laptops) and in
On Friday 21 December 2007, CJ Keist wrote:
There is no writable option ...
man smb.conf
The shares work fine otherwise, just not to our dropbox
folders that have the permissions of 2733.
Have you read the release notes from 3.0.28 to 3.0.26a? Maybe a fix
(possibly that mentioned for BUG
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Not sure why you didn't use Google (apparently, as this didn't take
me very long), but I did:
http://www.ntcompatible.com/story8718.html
My experience is that that hack is relatively useless for this purpose.
The app may have improved but
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Gary Dale wrote:
Not necessarily. If you have a business where each person only logs
onto one computer, then Home is probably all you need. For example, a
small business with only one computer in a department/section or one
with multiple computers but each staff
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Richard Chapman wrote:
I guess it does appear that the use client driver is preventing me
from uploading the drivers. Can anyone suggest the best way around
this?
I think use client driver is pretty clear. If you want a driver on the
server to automagically
On Friday 04 January 2008, Boaz Bezborodko wrote:
As I understand it winbind allows users to be logged in as Linux
users when they log in as Windows users.
winbind allows authentication to be done by a Microsft domain controller
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
On Friday 04 January 2008, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
I cannot
use smbpasswd -x in a loop.
Why not?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mike Eggleston wrote:
I'm aware that you cannot use smbpasswd in a loop creating the
accounts because you have to type in the password
Sure you can.
Example using a variable x for the username and, in this case, setting
the password equal to the username:
echo -e
On Monday 07 January 2008, Michael Heydon wrote:
It is much more better if we can simplied the share via this
command: mount -t cifs -o (with necessary
option) //server/department/purchasing
/home/purchasinguser/Desktop/mydepartmentdata
One can already do this with cifs. Unfortunately
On Friday 11 January 2008, Héctor Sánchez Sanmartín wrote:
nt acl support = No
Have you tried it with the default nt acl support = yes?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 11 January 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
instead
of writable or writable.
SHould be writeable or writable.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 11 January 2008, Rune Tønnesen wrote:
[publica]
path = /sis/publica/
public = yes
# only guest = yes
writable = yes
force user = sis
force group = sis
This should solve your problem as samba by default set a share as
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris wrote:
When I try to access a share i get the following error
man smb.conf
search for msdfs proxy
and note that the homes special share doesn't normally need a path
also note that the [chr] share is mostly likely redundant as the [homes]
share should
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Greg Sims wrote:
The first access to the samba server requests a userid -- this likely
allows samba to understand which home share should be displayed.
It's more than that - the user authenticates with the server and is now
allowed access to all shares the user
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Greg Sims wrote:
I created a standalone server
Looks more like you created a domain controller. Are the clients domain
members? If not. are the users' client logins identical to the samba
ones?
And when you FW instead of replying you screw up the threading of the
On Friday 18 January 2008, Dragan Krnic wrote:
What has preferred master to do with this passwords?
I'm really puzzled
I'm a bit puzzled also. Because we changed that early on (took out
non-essential statements - I was assisting) to simplify the smb.conf
and as far as I remember it didn't
On Monday 21 January 2008, Martin Petersen wrote:
I'm no samba god, but You habe two lines of
passdb backend in use. Are You sure that is correct?
At best it's a confusing practice (one reason I advocate synonym
deprecation). I think that with duplicate parameter entries the last
one found
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Robert Pollard wrote:
Do you have any recommendations as to what is available to read that
will take me through the world of Windows networking?
Because Samba, as it is today, mainly emulates a Windows NT4 Server when
used as a PDC it really helps to have that
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs
Subject line is misleading: smbmount != cifs.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I get the idea from man smbmount that smbmount is merely a wrapper
invoking mount -t cifs.
Would you expect different results if I were using the smbmount
binary instead?
In the sense that it would invoke the deprecated mount -t smbfs
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
Aaahhh, so smbclient from the Samba developers is hard coded to not
use current smb protocol code? Confusing!
Smbclient is new to the conversation, which until now has been about
smbmount which
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct way
On Friday 15 February 2008, tovis wrote:
windows/DOS clients are follows symlinks but Linux clients not. Linux
clients shows that the symlinks points to nowhere - the points are
doen't exists on client box(es) - obviously.
Answered, I believe, by Michael Heydon earlier: disable unix
On Monday 18 February 2008, Michael Heydon wrote:
You need helpers
(mount.cifs) in order to mount a smbfs or cifs share.
Not necessarily. You can, at least with cifs, mount without a helper
although there is much less flexibility.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
That is actually a good point because today I wanted to switch to
cifs on all my mount scripts for work and I got:
sudo mount -t cifs -o uid=lucas -o username=myusername
//192.168.1.196/c$ /home/lucas/Desktop/C
mount error 13 = Permission
On Friday 01 February 2008, Felix Miata wrote:
If you have Win9x and/or OS/2 shares on your network, you'll need to
recompile your SUSE kernel to include SMBFS support to provide
acceptable access to those shares.
I think cifs should be able to work in those cases, but I can't
personally
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Felix Miata wrote:
There is at least one open time
stamping bug that makes the connections worthless.
Wondering which OS's exactly. Is it just OS2? Or Windows 95? Or Windows
98? Or Windows ME?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Paul E Condon wrote:
I am setting up Samba as a work-around for situation in a Debian/Mac
OS X LAN.
I'm missing something here, as both Linux and OS X natively support
CUPS, why involve Samba with the printing at all?
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Fabiano Caixeta Duarte wrote:
How can I know the real amount of pages sent to the printer?
I use CUPS + Pykota for handling page accounting. It can enforce quotas
as well but I don't use it for that. Also works properly no matter how
the job was submitted (samba,
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Francis Galiegue wrote:
When I use XP, the only option I have is to first add the printer as
either the local administrator of the machine, or the domain
administrator, and only then I can add this printer as a normal,
unpriviledged domain user. Uh.
This is not
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Well, this page doesn't agree:
My experience is different. Believe what you will.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
//superman/www-pub /smb/superman/www-pub cifs
auto,uid=33,gid=33,username=WORKGROUP/www-pub,password=sekret,sec=no
ne 0 0
Maybe no help but try leaving sec=none out of your fstab entry. From
the man page it seems none means attempt
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Maginot Junior wrote:
I try to connect using cups
http://cups.org/doc-1.1/sam.html#8_9
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 07 March 2008, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
It would be nice if this complained at all or warned you in testparm
I've often wished that the appropriately named testparm was better at
testing the values, and not just the parameters.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Mesterhazy Attila wrote:
What I want:
- some machines (for example machine1) should be used only by user1
and user2 - allow user3 to use ONLY some machines (for example
machine2)
Depends on your backend. LDAP has entry for this, with tdbsam you can
use net sam set
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
