On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Roger Prefontaine wrote:
On the Ubuntu server, id DOMAINNAME+David, id DOMAINNAME+david, and id
David only list the primary group, and id david lists all groups. All
of these combinations produce all groups on the CentOS server.
winbind use default domain =
On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Roger Prefontaine wrote:
On the Ubuntu server, id DOMAINNAME+David, id DOMAINNAME+david, and id
David only list the primary group, and id david lists all groups. All
of these combinations produce all groups on the CentOS server.
winbind use default domain =
Possibly just a quirk with the id utility.
The version I tested with:
$ id --version
id (GNU coreutils) 6.7
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software. You may redistribute copies of it under the terms of
the GNU General
On Friday 09 February 2007, Antony Sargent wrote:
# only bind to the loopback and first ethernet interfaces
interfaces = lo eth0
bind interfaces only = yes
Back on 10/15/06 I posted about an issue - titled:
nmbd problems with secondary lo.
No responses were received.
It's not the
On Friday 09 February 2007, Antony Sargent wrote:
# only bind to the loopback and first ethernet interfaces
interfaces = lo eth0
bind interfaces only = yes
And one more thought. Always use testparm to see what's really being set. One
time I had made some changes but further down in
On Thursday 08 February 2007, John Schmerold wrote:
security = DOMAIN
domain master = Yes
?
RTFM
And possibly missing (depending on which line above is correct):
wins support = Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Monday 22 January 2007 13:10, Markus Lauterbach wrote:
Are
there any hints?
For starters, here's a couple of hints:
1) Don't step on another thread by using reply to create a new thread. Your
new subject post get's buried in the current thread and you destroy the
continuity of the current
On Thursday 18 January 2007 10:10, Kay Obermueller wrote:
Everything works pretty well except that a new windows client that installs
the driver tries to print out as Letter instead of A4.
Did you try setting the printer up properly in cups (Set Printer Options)
before using cupsaddsmb?
Chris
On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:40, Reza Naima wrote:
whenever I update a file via windows (i.e. delete/rename a file,
create a directory), it doesn't show anything has changed till I manully
do a 'View-Refresh' from the menu in windows. What could I have
misconfigured?
Refresh shouldn't be
On Friday 05 January 2007 06:25, Michael Gasch wrote:
valid users = Unix Group\your_local_group
? I don't understand that example.
Unless you're using NIS, dump @ (considered deprecated) and replace it with +.
For local ('nix) groups, use +group_name, put the group name in quotes if it
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 15:40, Chris Worley wrote:
The attached message is 2001, but was the top of the list in a Google
search for the error message.
The same solution fixed a SuSE 9.3 Samba/Cups problem for a Brother
MFC 3360C printer.
No longer necessary unless you're running old
With samba-3.0.23d and an NT4 PDC, passwords expire for no obvious reason when
using winbind for system services such as ssh(sftp). The users have no
problem when accessing the Samba shares or logging onto the domain locally,
but periodically windbind will expire their passwords when attempting
On Thursday 21 December 2006 18:37, Michael Coburn wrote:
How is your Unix service talking to winbind, via
PAM?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 11:38, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
IT policy and just plan stupid.
plain
It may be plan stupid as well, as in stupid planning:)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:28, Scott wrote:
Yes.
Difficult to believe as lack of NetBIOS name resolution appears to be the
culprit.
Check these items on your Windows systems:
NetBIOS is enabled.
WINS server addresses are configured (either manually or by DHCP) and point to
your WINS
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 06:13, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Any hints to debug?
May have nothing to do with your issue but I had a scenario where when I
attepted to su from a secure shell it only took the password the second time.
It was related to the pam/winbind setup as my username was both a
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:39, Scott wrote:
I have verified that name
resolution is working correctly.
From your Windows clients?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Friday 08 December 2006 11:59, Scott wrote:
This is a samba box acting as a DC.
See the section Procedure 3.5. Server Validation Steps in
http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/secure.html.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:59, James A. Dinkel wrote:
deb http://us5.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Debian sarge samba
And you'll track the latest stable release.
I have a production Debian Sarge server that does just this.
Just don't do it with Etch, since in a few days time
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 16:46, Urs Rau wrote:
Alternatively, I would also welcome any suggestions that would allow
us to use microsoft outlook shared calendaring
Not microsoft outlook shared calendaring but shared calendaring
nonetheless:
http://www.google.com/calendar/
If you really
On Friday 01 December 2006 14:27, timothy johnson wrote:
Tried that and it still doesnt hide files. I have never had this problem
with samba before, is this something with version 3
Works here with 3.0.23d - hide files = /*.pst/. Remember it's case sensitive
and will also affect performance.
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:50, David Schulz wrote:
dont you think the issue is in xp
itself? when connecting with a macosx machine to the samba share, i
do not get this problem.
On the surface it appears to be an XP--Samba issue. The Mac, of course, runs
Samba. I cannot recreate the
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 13:49, James A. Dinkel wrote:
I like that there is a deb repo for Debian from samba.org, but
I'm more comfortable with CentOS (Redhat). I just want to be sure I
have a well supported Samba server and I need at least the 3.0.20
version so I can use the inherit owner
On Friday 17 November 2006 09:37, Jim Shanks wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that the winbind daemon is running?
To follow up on this question, I have noticed that Gentoo's Samba startup
scripts (the original poster is running Gentoo) do not properly stop winbind.
So simple doing
On Friday 17 November 2006 12:55, Chris Smith wrote:
To follow up on this question, I have noticed that Gentoo's Samba startup
scripts (the original poster is running Gentoo) do not properly stop
winbind. So simple doing /etc/init.d/samba restart after upgrading could
possibly cause problems
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 14:08, Guillermo Gutierrez wrote:
Woo hoo, will anyone be making an ebuild for it or Gentoo I wonder?
Just rename the 3.0.23c ebuild and update the digest.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
try:
cupsaddsmb -U administrator
or
cupsaddsmb -U BGS\administrator ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Monday 25 September 2006 19:41, Ron wrote:
I'm not sure how I determine my passdb backend statement. I don't see
anything like this in my global values. If I just add something like
passdb backend = tdbsam don't I have to have set something up to make
that work?
Use testparm -v to get all
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:36, Ron wrote:
Samba 3.0.23 on debian breaks my eMac connection. I have a debian box
and an eMac. I posted to my debian distro (Kanotix) and got this info:
Samba upstream has dropped a previously valid config option with their
latest version and made every use
Wow, the 1000+ users we have printing thru Samba 3.0 and up would be
surprised to hear that!
We even have click and print working... the load that took off of our
sysadmins (not having to set up lpr/IP printing and manually keep track of
drivers)
was definitely worth the week of tweaking Samba to
Where does the ¨Display Name in XP come from in a Domain?
I have about 300 machines that are in a ldap backended Samba 3.0
domain. I regularly add users like so:
smbldap-useradd -a -m -c First Last -P flast
It seem that at least at first they usually get the First Last
portion displayed in the
I have the following in my logon batch file and everything works great
other than the home H:drive. This randomly works or doesn't work,
and I can't seem to find a consistent reason.
This is with samba-3.0.10-1.fc2. I have tried it with and without the
/persistent switch.
Any ideas? thank you in
On Thursday 24 February 2005 11:47 am, Craig White wrote:
I'm quite certain that Tonni meant to say only stable version of
openldap is 2.2.23 and of course none of the current distributions
of Linux package that version yet.
Gentoo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Woops, wrong window. Sorry!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:24 AM
To: 'Borut Kurnik'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] winbind problems
Mark, this is a known issue, please follow the steps in the attached
I am having the same problem using Samba 3.0.7 w/ FC2.
This only started happening recently, and is happening on 3 servers. I
hadn't seen it happen on 3.0.4. Nothing else has changed.
Thanks,
Chris Smith
Systems Administrator
API Group Information Systems Dept.
-Original Message
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 04:34, Mike Stewart wrote:
net stop Windows Time
net time /setsntp:172.16.15.4 (my samba server)
net start Windows Time
Still no errors but hasn't yet synchronised the time with the server.
Done this way Samba is out of the loop and time control is not a Samba
issue.
I just put the mount commands in the rc.local. Maybe there's a better way?
--
Chris
Do not reply to this address.
The contact page below is a spam limiting device.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
http://realcomputerguy.com/contact.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 16:10, Jim Morris wrote:
I vote to kill the mailing list - Usenet gateway, if that is what is
causing these virus email attacks on subscribers. If I wanted to use
Usenet, I would go read comp.os.protocols.smb or whatever, directly!
I disagree. A Usenet search via
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 10:00, Thiago Lima wrote:
If I configure samba and cups in the RAW mode using windows original
drivers of the printers, everything works fine, but this way I can't use
cups accounting.
Yeah, that bites.
So I reinstaled all my printers in cups using
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:17, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
But alas, printing with IPP is fine. :-)
From Windows or just 'nix?
Note that this still doesn't mean the problem is definitely in Samba
(although see the WERR_ACCESS_DENIED error below). It could be a
problem with the cups-samba
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 12:51, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
But alas, printing with IPP is fine. :-)
From Windows or just 'nix?
Just *UNIX.
My intent with the IPP suggestion was to print via IPP from the Windows box to
CUPS, only changing the equation by taking Samba out of the loop.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 14:49, Thiago Lima wrote:
Any tips? I can't believe that nobody ever had this problem. :(
I never had a problem getting the CUPS Windows PS drivers working but had an
entirely different problem in the use of them. What I experienced was when a
user requested
On Saturday 27 September 2003 15:00, John H Terpstra wrote:
On each workstation make the Domain Admins group a member of the local
Administrators group.
John, I'm missing the point here as this shouldn't be necessary at all. The
only reason to add someone to the local Administrators group
A net groupmap list show 2 each of Domain Admins and Domain Guests as
marked below with ** and *** respectively.
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1
Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1
Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1
Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1
Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1
Administrators
On Saturday 27 September 2003 21:08, John H Terpstra wrote:
It looks here as if you changed either the domain name or the machine name
of your Samba server. That will result in the duplicate entries you see
here.
OK, this probably happened during a reasonably sloppy install - I didn't quite
On Saturday 27 September 2003 21:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The only way that a domain user can gain admin priviliges ona domain
member workstation is through domain users or domain groups being made
members of a local workstation group that has sufficient rights and
privilige to do what
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his
homedirectory
Same change occured here when upgrading from 2.2.7a to the 3.0.0 release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:26, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I see this problem too. I thought that I was going crazy.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
So this is a purposeful change in behavior then? With 2.2.x one could have
browseable = Yes and valid users = %S.
Chris
--
To
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:28, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Petty, Robert wrote:
No, I haven't filed a bug report...
The key part of my message was:
Since nobody's home directory was / it would open the root
directory
I have changed it since I immediately
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 11:01, Eric Treu wrote:
Can anybody help me. I have come to the conclusion that the one XP
Professional box that I have does not have this problem.
Xteq X-Setup from http://www.xteq.com/products/xset/ can allow some better LAN
functionality, at a price - you must
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 13:54, Dan Gapinski wrote:
XP home cannot log onto domains at all.
Rather disappointing what they did with it.
All is not lost, however. I have successfully used X-Setup from Xteq Systems
(http://www.xteq.com/) to at least enable domain participation close to the
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 06:05, Joel Hammer wrote:
With XP Home, printing to a postscript printer on my linux box, the job is
sent as multiple, sequential postscript files, each file being just one
copy. Ergo, samba thinks it has received multiple different print jobs,
not one job consisting
On Friday 27 June 2003 03:35, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
Also, do NOT try to go from a workgroup to a domain of the same name.
It will quite surely fail.
Just want to mention that although I've read this advice many times I have
almost always joined the domain from a workgroup of the same name
On Monday 23 June 2003 11:01, Alexandru Molodoi wrote:
I wish that a user could be able to choose to which domain he
should log on to (and I think that is the normal way).
Why do you think that is the normal way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 16:36, SoloCDM wrote:
How does Microsoft Windows know to grab the time off the Linux server?
In regards to Samba's time service the Windows system simply performs a
net time /set command, executed manually or via a script.
Is ntpd needed on the Linux server to execute
On Friday 16 May 2003 07:12, Honza Houstek wrote:
I must agree. Reiserfs is quite fast but not very reliable.
Totally reliable from my experience. I've been running several small business
offices plus my own server for about two years without a glitch. Reiserfs has
held up with constant
Most MS OS's systems either use the DNS/hosts system very poorly or not
at all for NetBIOS name resolution. In place of DNS/hosts is
WINS/lmhosts. WINS is the dynamic, centralized version of an lmhosts
file and is to lmhosts as DNS is to hosts. Without the use of WINS or
lmhosts files NetBIOS name
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 17:44, Jim Shaffer wrote:
this might be the blind leading the blind, but I think restarting samba
will simply cause it to reread the smb.conf. It will not disconnect the
users.
I think the smb.conf is re-read every 30 seconds or so, nothing needs to
be done. From my
I believe this works OK with an NT PDC as one can restrict share users
to, as an example, members of the Domain Users group, but this group
is not available in Samba 2.2.x. Maybe 3.0 will help.
I suppose, as one hack, you could use a root preexec and a root
postexec to add and remove users to a
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 08:42, Buchan Milne wrote:
The script in packaging/Mandrake/print-pdf (or something like that) is
IMHO a better solution. I can expand as to why if you are interested.
Expansion would be appreciated thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
WFWG 3.11 supports encryted passwords as well.
Rule of thumb should be to use encryted passwords unless you have some
specific reason for not doing so (of which I can't think of any off
hand).
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 12:36, William R. Knox wrote:
The information provided here about the use of
Not including cases of unsupported clients for IPP printing (such as
Windows NT) are there any reasons/caveats for installations running CUPS
to not move over to IPP printing?
Are there any features or benefits to Windows/Samba printing for Windows
clients that make it superior compared to IPP?
One Win2k client constantly generates these messages in the log:
Jan 30 16:50:32 server smbd[30271]: [2003/01/30 16:50:32, 0]
rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(134)
Jan 30 16:50:32 server smbd[30271]:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:17, John H Terpstra wrote:
Which clearly, and seemingly purposely, leaves out the lo interface.
Which is always allowed except when explicitly NOT allowed.
OK, so there is no need to add the lo interface because it is added by
default.
How about the format of the
Thanks for clearing that up.
It's good to know that one can rely on the official docs.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 15:07, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Chris Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:17, John H Terpstra wrote:
Which clearly, and seemingly purposely, leaves out
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 10:39, Simon Faulkner wrote:
[global]
oplocks = false
kernel oplocks = false
level2 oplocks = false
in /etc/samba/smb.conf
The Samba docs I have list the oplocks and level2 oplocks params as
being share level, not global and on by default.
What does a testparm show
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 16:58, Corey Hart wrote:
We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near
future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be
for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the
different journaling file systems
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
Have you ever tried ACLs with reiserfs?
No. Didn't even know that it was possible.
Any opinion on ACL support in reiserfs?
If it truly works I would like to try it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:40, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
I am trying to export a share to several Windows clients, that start some
application in a dos box. The application itself is located on the share. The
first client can start it, the second cannot.
I have a client whose major
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 10:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Would you mind to allow me a look in the smb.conf (in private email)? Maybe
there is some difference ...
No problem but it might be better shared here as there are many who know
more than I.
In my clients smb.conf we use these
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 16:31, Vladimir I. Umnov wrote:
May be it my poor english, but I mean that I don't want to allow login
user into domain and don't want allow him create profile and use
home directory, but I want allow this local autentificates in PDC.
May be I need run for him some
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options.
In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Not sure. I didn't think that was the default, maybe I'm mistaken or
that it changed at a certain release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Just checked my docs for 2.2.5 claim that the default is large
readwrite = no. Maybe it's just the way your distribution set up the
are not being unspooled to a printer.
Regards
Chris
=
Chris Smith
Tech. Support Mgr
VSPL, The Old Court House
Trinity Road, Marlow
Bucks. SL7 3AN
+44 (0)1628 891616 Phone
+44 (0)1628 472137 Fax
You need 4 rpm's: samba, samba-client, and either the two classic's or
the two ldap's.
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 05:38, Peter
Meyer wrote:
Hello list,
I wanna update 2.2.1a to 2.2.4 on SuSE 7.3.
Find under
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/ftp.suse.com/people/lmuelle/i386/7.3/ the
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:05, A.J.Dawson wrote:
Many thanks to those who have replied so far - still no luck
unfortunately.
It would appear that I was ni=ot quite specific enough in the original
post re: the OS version I am using - it is Windows 98SE, NOT vanilla 98.
My first guess is the
a
browseable = Yes in the [global] section.
Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17 10:52 AM
If you've installed TCP/IP printing on the W2k client and setting up
an
LPR port why bother using Samba for the printing at all?
If you skip these steps: 1a,1b,2a 2b(printer),2a 2b(global), 3h
managed nor always the best way.
Chris
Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17 3:11 PM
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 13:44, Van Sickler, Jim wrote:
You do want to use the samba box to manage
your printers; otherwise all of your PCs
are going to be fighting over the printers...
that gets real ugly
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 07:52, Markus A. Madlener wrote:
i have exact the same behavior !
if a new user logons on to a samba domain, the profile IS roaming, you can
easily check by starting NT user manager and connect to the samba PDC, the
path to the user profile is always set to the samba
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:47, Simon Jester wrote:
Just to clarify:
Deleting the options in smb.conf doesn't work because the default
service definitions for those parameters become active; one must
actively set them to null (logon path= for example).
So, you are saying that simply
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 14:49, Jay Ts wrote:
Are you really sure of this? I don't have time to check it right now,
but the way I remember it is that new users get a local profile, no
matter whether Windows or Samba is used as the PDC.
Three separate Samba PDC installs that I've done recently
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the Samba docs, but wouldn't you need host
to be in the name resolve order for Samba to use hosts, or DNS for
name resolution?
Since Win2k/XP are DNS/hosts centric OS's that only use WINS/lmhosts for
backward compatibility one should be able to have a WINS free network
301 - 384 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
