On 15 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote:
Hi.
We run Samba 2.2.1a in production and it seems to be working fine. We
run it on RedHat 7.2, kernel 2.4.7-10smp. All of a sudden (I'm sure
it's for a reason, but I can't tell why), this shows up in the logs:
Oct 15 10:36:03 mumbai kernel:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Sean Cullen wrote:
Yes - RH7.2 + default 2.4 Kernels seem to solve
the problem. So looks like I'll have to reinstall
a bunch of machines.
Out of curiosity, if you knew what was causing this
in the 2.2 Kernel, I'd be interested.
Most likely smb_revalidate_inode and
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shown, but I have to do it rapidly. If I wait for a little bit then
do:
perl doit.pl | wc
the count goes down again. If I use:
ls -Ral /smbfs | wc
find /smbfs -ls | wc
these never seem to show all the files.
Please try this kernel patch:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, tim smith wrote:
So, am i completely barking up the wrong tree is do i have some other
problem. help is much appreciated cheers
Yes, don't mount printers.
You can configure a printcap entry to use a filter, and that filter can be
a script that runs smbclient to send the
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and
remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the
correct timestamp.
smbfs sets the mtimes itself. Not really sure why it was done like that,
but some comments
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Andreas Schlager wrote:
The problem was the 'user' parameter in the mount options. I think,
this was a valid parameter in a old version of smbmount, but now I
cant't find it in the documentation.
No, smbmount has never understood the 'user' option.
It may be that the
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Tidu Nicola wrote:
Can you give me an explanation about this error I get:
when I give the command:
mount -t smb -o username=name,password=pw //10.110.4.106/software /mnt/remote
i receive these two lines:
12500: session request to 10.110.4.106 failed (Called name
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Andreas Schlager wrote:
Hi list,
I want to write a file larger than 2GB via a mounted windows-share
(debian unstable-version) from linux (2.4.18 i386) to a windows
fileserver.
You need patches to add large file support to smbfs:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Cipriano Groenendal wrote:
Every morning at 2:02am, and 6:25am, I get the following two lines in my
/var/log/messages:
Nov 6 06:25:15 borgCube kernel: smb_trans2_request: result=-104, setting invalid
Nov 6 06:25:16 borgCube kernel: smb_retry: successful, new
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Vijay Viswanathan wrote:
right now ,
$mount -t smbfs share mountpoint
it gives wrong fs type, bad option bad super block.
Was your kernel built with smbfs support?
Any error messages from the kernel when you try to mount? Run dmesg and
see if there is anything that
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, David Livingstone wrote:
Hello !
I am running samba-2.2.0a-0 on Suse 7.3 and attempting to use smbfs to mount a
share on a
dos 6.x system running, pctcp + nebios + powerlan
When I attempt to mount the share ie in fstab
//ARNLSPEC/E /wheelspec/ARNL smbfs
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an issue with smbfs? smbmount?
anyone have a workaround?
Perhaps you have already found the answer...
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html
smbfs and smbmount need patches to support large files. But you don't
actually say if
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
tar: filename: file changed as we read it
...
mtime tar puts into the archive: (no matter how many times I run tar)
2002-01-30 13:41:57
This is the same value reported by the file properties on the Windows 2k
server.
I posted something regarding this
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Sundaram wrote:
Hi
in linux you can mount a windows partition by the smbmount command.
How can i do this in solaris ?
smbmount is only a tool to mount smbfs, which is a linux kernel
filesystem. On its own it is fairly useless.
sharity should work with solaris, or you can
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Jason Rizer wrote:
mount -t smbfs -o username=jrizer/MyDomain
//MyMachine/projects /mnt/MyMachine
Now when I issue this command I get the following
error:
1729: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - Errnosuchshare
(You specified an invalid share name)
It seems that it
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Carey Jung wrote:
Hi,
The release notes say 2.2.7a fixes some large file handling problems in
smbclient, but I think not all. I'm seeing the following problems still:
- large files in mounted filesystems (smbmount) report incorrect file sizes
with Unix 'ls' and
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, CHS wrote:
when I configured the samba packages, I used --with-libsmbclient
--with-ssl --with-smbmount --prefix=/usr
I verified that LFS support in the configure output messages was
detected as yes
any ideas?
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html
You
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, onofrio panzarino wrote:
Connecting to 192.168.0.2 at port 139
timeout connecting to 192.168.0.2:139
327: Connection to peppe failed
Can you ping 192.168.0.2? Is it listening on port 139? Any firewalls
between you?
This doesn't look like a smbmount problem, it looks like
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dmitry Kirsanov wrote:
I installed Samba under Mandrake 8.2 to access a win98 box. The windows
machine has 2 partitions, C: and D:. Now I can mount the //winbox/c
partition from within linux and access it without a problem. With
//winbox/d, I can access it using
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Rob Keeling wrote:
I have set up samba 2.2.3a with winbind to join SuSE linux 7.3 machines
into our NT 4 domain, but would like to be able to set up Linux thin client machines
to allow transparent use of either windows or Linux desktops. To accheve this I need
to be able
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Brian Spears wrote:
weirdest problem, from a RH7.2 (base or + everything) samba client running
eclipse utilizing SMB mount.
Apr 11 13:43:54 testsmbbug kernel: smb_get_length: recv error = 512
Apr 11 13:43:54 testsmbbug kernel: smb_request: result -512, setting invalid
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Cyrille PIERRE-NADAL wrote:
Hello, I've installed today Samba 2.2.3 and when I'm launching the
command mount, it tells me that I might have mount v6 but I don't find
this version of mount. Where can I find it? Thanks.
The mount v6 it refers to is actually the smbmount
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Rafael wrote:
I have tried to mount a share from a windowsclient of my brother over the
internet and dont know if it is possible or not
i tried this:
smbmount //222.132.33/hol /kol
^^
Try using the whole IP number ... (all 4 octets).
If the other
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Dimitris Zilaskos wrote:
Hello ,
I am experiencing data corruption when I use loopback mounted
filesystems over smbfs . I mount a share which is in a win2000pro computer
Yes, loopback and smbfs is currently a bad idea.
There is something with how loopback is
On 17 Apr 2002, Samo Gabrovec wrote:
Hello!
I have a dos box which has a shared disk (no password) i can access this
disk from any windows machine (win95) but not from linux with smbclient.
what ever command i run (to list shares, mount it ...) i get *SMBSERVER
failed (code 143). I can
On 17 Apr 2002, David Brodbeck wrote:
I checked into AFS, but unless I'm mistaken you have to buy some kind of
server license. That makes testing it out as a solution kind of
difficult.
http://www.openafs.org/
http://www.stacken.kth.se/projekt/arla/
I only know they exist, not how well
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, J Anthony wrote:
how do i get libsmb to allow me to make smbmount suid root?
currently i get 'libsmb based programs must *NOT* be setuid root.'
any ideas?
man smbmnt
/Urban
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Angel F. Rosa wrote:
Hello,
I have SAMBA installed in a Solaris 8 system...
I would like to MAP from SOlaris to an NT Drive on the network
Define what you mean by MAP.
Shartiy and smbsh/smbwrapper are options you could try.
/Urban
--
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Hanser, Kevin wrote:
I have been searching newsgroups and whatnot for over an hour trying to find
out a few things:
first, who maintains smbfs now..??
I do.
The correct place to look for maintainer of a part of the linux kernel is
the MAINTAINERS file in the kernel
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Stefan Onken wrote:
The Problem:
After updating (complete new installation) of my workstation, Samba
crashes constantly when I try to mount the share.
Client: SuSE 8
stonki@stonki:~ uname -a
Linux stonki 2.4.18-4GB #1 Wed Mar 27 13:57:05 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Michael Jastram wrote:
Kernel: 2.4.2 on i686
Why 2.4.2? Try using something more recent (but not 2.4.18, 2.4.17 or
2.4.19-pre-latest). Older 2.4s would end up in a loop trying to reconnect,
it could be the reason you see so many smb_retry messages.
2.4.2 also had some
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Malcolm Jack wrote:
[root@hoc samba]# mount -t smbfs -o username=administrator,password=
//bytelair/C$ /mnt/net1
tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess
Sometimes you need to specify the workgroup parameter.
It seems to me to be an access problem, that XP
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hello:
I am trying to compile sambe with SSL on my RedHat 7.2 machine.
Are you sure you want SSL? As I understand, it is useless with windows
clients as they don't support it.
No idea why it doesn't build, perhaps you should use the openssl
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Scott Svendsen wrote:
Ok I will check it out,
I was at version 2.2.3a , uninstalled it, put 2.2.1a in and that
command below worked fine. Wonder if the version change did something?
Sort of. It's an installation issue. The 2.2.3a rpm(?) you used to install
put smbmnt
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Sanjiv Bawa wrote:
I have one share on the samba box that is actually smbmounted from a Win2K
machine. This share seems to be giving me lots of errors. It seems to work
fine though. On at least one instance the smb processes crashed, so I would
like to get this resolved.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Jim Hale wrote:
Hm.. I have this same issue and tried the below, what I get back is
'Unable to resolve mount point'. Why would it do that? :)
mkdir /destination
?
/Urban
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Cecil Westerhoff wrote:
I can mount a samba share in Linux know. The only problem is that when I
mount all the files get root as owner and as group. So I can not write or
delete any files. What could be the problem?
Read the manpage for smbmount.
There are some
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Cecil Westerhoff wrote:
Op dinsdag 14 mei 2002 18:48, schreef Cecil Westerhoff:
I can mount a samba share in Linux know. The only problem is that when I
mount all the files get root as owner and as group. So I can not write or
delete any files. What could be the
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Tom Hartwell wrote:
I am running Red Hat 7.2 and using smbmount to mount a PC share from a NT4
SP5 Workstation.
I have a folder, in this share, of around 300 files and when I do ls -l I
get inconsistencies.
Sometimes files are missing, and if I keep repeating the
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Inaki Sanchez wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a little problem: I have a NT share mounted on my linux box,
with smbmount (samba 2.2.3a). When I try to create a tar archive with
some files of that share, sometimes I got the following messages for
some files:
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Wayne S. Gabree wrote:
I'm trying to NFS mount an export of a SMB mounted share:
Windows Box - Linux Box - Solaris Box
Windows Share - Linux SMB Mounted/Exported as NFS - Solaris NFS
mount
\\windows\share - /mnt/windows/share
On Tue, 21 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the NT server that I have to reboot so it will know the IP of the
WINS server.
Actually, I don't think you need proper wins support for this to work (you
may want it for other reasons).
Using a command like this:
smbmount
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Hall, Leam wrote:
Switching to NFS may be a good idea.
One of my first responses, too.
So go for it.
NFS between two unix machines is for obvious reasons better than SMB.
The smb unix extensions may change that, but that is not current state of
affairs.
Didn't
On 21 May 2002, Chris Tooley wrote:
You can't currently mount a directory below the share level. It wouldn't
be that hard to support it but it's never been requested before.
I have wished for this for a long time. The ability to mount some
directory down the tree without making a ton of
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
Linux version 2.4.18 (root@gere) (gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian
...
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c400
Apply this, or upgrade to 2.4.19-preX.
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
Found these messages in /var/log/dmesg on a Redhat 7.1 machine running
Samba 2.2.2 accessing a Win 2000 share. Actually, there are a bunch of
tasks accessing the same share, complete with file locking, etc.
smbfs does not support file locking to
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
I misspoke when I said file locking. The locking is via a guard file
created with open(guard, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644), which
should protect against other processes opening it once it has been
created. It appears that is not working
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Curtis Rempel wrote:
On one ME box, I can access the C:\WINDOWS directory without difficulty from
Linux, however, on the second ME box, the C:\WINDOWS directory does not show
up as a directory and has a zero byte size when using 'smbmount' and 'ls' as
follows:
Is the
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Marcus Käll wrote:
I use a Linux system with the Redhat 7.2 distribution. It runs on a
AMD 500 K6-2 processor with a memory of 192MB. The kernel is an
unmodified 2.4.9-31 from Redhat. I have tried both
samba-2.2.4-1.i386.rpm from one of your samba mirrors as well as
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Stephan Maihoefer wrote:
on the filesystem. but if i do a smbmount (or rather
mount -t smbff) from another linux machine (this case
a redhat 6.2 box with some 2.2.x kernel) it shows
the umlauts as ? and creates files wrong.
if i removethe above two options from smb.conf
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 5 10:30:00 tux1 kernel: smb_retry: signal failed, error=-3
Jun 5 10:30:00 tux1 last message repeated 2 times
the mountpoint is disapearing and the mount directory to. if i try a umount
and mount again the problem is fixed. is there any
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Tom Ansley wrote:
Hi all,
I have changed my workstation fstab file to include 3 shares on the server
that I want to mount during boot up. But, I had to include my username and
password inside the fstab file. Does anybody have any other ways of doing
this
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Niranjan Ghate wrote:
Hi,
I am mounting a windows 2000 share on a linux box (2.4.18) using smbmount
(2.2.2). I can create files 2Gb on both the systems, but I can't copy a
file 2Gb from the linux box over the smbmount. The file size limit is
exceeded and the cp
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use this to mount shared files of remote windows2000 on my local linux:
smbmount //remote-host/share /mnt/tmp -o username=***,password=***
It works.
But it prints out this:
1339:session request to 11.100.90.10 failed(called name not present)
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Mike Chambers wrote:
smb_trans2_request: result=-104, setting invalid
smb_retry: successful, new pid=1509, generation=35
result=-104, setting invalid is an error message. It means that the
server has disconnected. The second line with successful in it means
that smbmount
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, LAUTIER Sabrina wrote:
Is it still true ?
What do you recommend me to use ?
The one that works best. Nowadays smbmount is being maintained.
I believe there are/were some problems getting smbwrapper working on more
recent Linux (glibc 2.2 trouble).
smbmount/smbfs works
On 10 Jun 2002, Neil Prockter wrote:
Hello
I have a problem mounting a win2k share onto linux
I want to mount the share so that all filenames are in lowercase (or
uppercase) only
Support for this has been dropped. There used to be code in smbfs that
mapped A-Z|a-z but smbmount didn't
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, LAUTIER Sabrina wrote:
I can then see that toto owns all files and directories
(fmask=664,dmask=775): does this mean that he can do what he wants ?
As if the SMB share was a regular linux fs ?
Isn't there permissions checking from the win2k server ?
Are the windows
On 12 Jun 2002, Olivier Daigle wrote:
Every SuSE workstation is UP and has a default SuSE UP kernel
(2.4.4-4GB for 7.2 and 2.4.18-4GB for 8.0).
It's a known bug in 2.4.18. Upgrade the kernel to 2.4.19-preX.
/Urban
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Darryl Harvey wrote:
Why would the newer machine be slower ?? I am at a loss. I suspect the
SCSI drive, but cannot explain why.. Anyone got any methods or ways I can
find out what is slowing it down?
Run a benchmark on the systems and compare disk performance
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, LAUTIER Sabrina wrote:
This because the groupname gid contains blank char, ' or .
It wokfs fine if I replace 'Domain Users' wih 1 (toto numeric
gid).
Any idea of how to use username/groupname uid/gid with blank char file
/etc/fstab ?
The problem lies in mount.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Egon Eckert wrote:
Thanks. We will have to find out something (we are trying to
synchronize Linux vs. Windows application). lock directory
seems a bit strange/bizarre to me... Lock regions (in files)
make me scared as well -- I see many problems/questions about
them
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Geoffrey Hurlus wrote:
I've heard that the culprit was smbfs because it doesn't support file bigger
than 2Gb. I know there are patchs to this issue, but is there any way to
solve this problem without patching the system ?
smbfs is a client. If you are using smbfs then
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, PG wrote:
Hi,
I'm using smbmount to mount winme boxes to my redhat 7.3 to perform
daily backup with taper. Everything is working well except when one of the
winme boxes crashed (you know it happens frequently), the smbmount locked
the mount process. I can't
On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Helder Miguel Rodrigues wrote:
Hello!
Im trying to mount the ADMIN$ share of my windows XP and i cant!
Is that really a file share?
./smbmount 192.168.0.18\\ADMIN$ /mnt/laptop/ -o
username=Administrator password=mypassword
That should be:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Winne, Joerg wrote:
//fileserver/public /mnt/public smbfs
noauto,user,username=foo,password=bar 0 0
BUT THIS DOES NOT WORK!!! I'm getting this error message:
6264: session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password -
name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, John Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I installed Samba from source, and the smbmount utility didn't install
(atleast it's not where it's supposed to be.) A find / -name smbm*
-print, turns up 2 C files (smbmount.c and smbmnt.c) in the source
directory.
My question is, how can
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Edoardo Causarano wrote:
ACL enabled network filesystem, where is it? I can't go with alpha code nfs4,
so is there a patch to the smb kernel modules that provides support to ACLs?
(I mean... the server does!!) Even a userland daemon will do... I'm ready to
patch,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, John Anderson wrote:
Thanks, that made it work.
Quick question, I am mounting a remote NT folder. I tried passing username
and password in the smbmount command line, but it still asked fore a
password.
You probably didn't set both, like this: username=a,password=b
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
About a month ago, the email inbox directory for one parituclar user
experienced a curious problem where the last (most recent) message file
in the directory became locked. Any attempt to move or rename the
file resulted in error messages like these:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Egidijus Antanaitis wrote:
Mounted a smbfs filesystem from windows 2000 server. I am not able to list
about 1500 files in the mounted directory, the other directories are OK. The
error I've got:
smb_proc_readdir_long: name=, result=-2, rcls=1, err=123
The server hates
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Anderson wrote:
Then I use my windows boxes (12 98 boxes, and 1 2K box) to connect to
the
//localservername/hq share thru samba, and that's where I get prompted
for a password.
No matter what password I put in, it's wrong. I get an error saying that
username /
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Michael Marano wrote:
I have a tangential question based upon your response about the
credentials file. I have set up a smbmount to happen on boot in
/etc/fstab, but am looking for a good way to not be prompted for the
password, and not have the password in plaintext in
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Kristyan Osborne wrote:
Hi,
I've looked though the archives but i've only found stuff on smbfs.
What is the deal with the 2GB limit. I have a NT box do a backup though
windows backup to a samba share (samba 2.2.5 on SUSE 7.1 kernel 2.4.18).
When it gets to 2GB it
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Buchan Milne wrote:
You mean something like this?
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/smbfs/index.html
:)
I modified his smbfs patches for unix extensions during the weekend
(they are in 2.5 now). Didn't read the whole page though ...
But, every time I think
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Story, KC5GOI wrote:
I am trying to perform a backup of a win98 share to the tape drive on my
server. Until I upgraded to 2.2.5-1 everything was peachy. Now I am getting
this:
Which version were you running before ... ?
[root@chamber-gw samba]# mount -t smbfs
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
Two days ago I got a whole slew of smbfs errors in my system logs, all
stemming from an apparent inability to read two files. Here are some
samples:
Oct 7 14:36:41 server kernel: smb_file_read:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Sean Cullen wrote:
[Background]
Redhat 6.2 2.2.19-6.2.16
Any chance of testing this on a 2.4.19 kernel?
/Urban
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Malcolm Jack wrote:
[root@hoc etc]# mount -t smbfs -o username=malc,password=***
//bytelair/c$
/mnt/net1
5356: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.)
I agree with the other reply to check what the XP is set for. Also look
for other
On 10 Oct 2002, Stas Firstov wrote:
Hi
I have mounted W2K share to the Linux box (RH 7.0 kernel 2.2.19-7.0.16,
samba-2.2.5-1). Here is part of /etc/fstab:
//machine/share /u/smb/machinesmbfs
username=smbusername,workgroup=smbworkgroup,uid=675,fmask=440 0 0
If I do ls |wc in
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Lars Heineken wrote:
I tried to make an entry in /etc/fstab to enable users to mount a
specific samba-share (here: //Heineken/CD-ROM)
//Heineken/CD-ROM /mnt/HeinekenCDROM smbfs user,auto,username=x,
passwordx0 0
the only way to make this work is that the
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Lars Heineken wrote:
I'm sorry to tell, but I Had to drop the whole thing. When I mounted
the volume as root, a single read-acces onto the mountes smb-share on
the client-side locked his machine. The smb-server noticed nothing.
The cd-rom is mounted via supermount. All
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Abdij Bhat wrote:
Hi,
I am deploying samba for an embedded system. The requirement is that the
system should be able to mount windows share points. I believe smbmount,
smbumount and smbmnt components are needed to do the same. I am not very
clear about smbmnt though!
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Esh, Andrew wrote:
But it gets assigned to data.uid in client/smbmnt.c, main(228):
data.uid = mount_uid;
This is where the info is lost. smbmnt needs to be changed not to use the
smb_mount_data struct as a storage for anything, it should only be used
inside
On Mon, 20 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some trouble with smbmount. When I attempt to mount a share and
specify a uid of 95829 it mounts, but gives it a uid of 30293 is samba
limited to a 16 bit number the uid field?
As promised here are the patches. It works for me but I
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c800
Strictly speaking not a samba-technical issue (linux-kernel because it is
about the linux kernel or samba because tridge put that list as the list
for smbfs questions). The thing that
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Abdij Bhat wrote:
This was working fine a few weeks ago when we were using the full blown
Red-Hat distribution built for our embedded target (MIPS). Now we have
scaled down the linux to minimal files ( to fit to our flash ) and i beleive
something is missing; which
On Mon, 27 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a limit of 2 GB when I copy a file (greater then 2 GB) from an
Ext3 file sytem to a mounted smb share with smbmount. I got the message
file size exceeded
Upgrade your kernel to 2.4.18 and apply the 2.4.18 patches from this page:
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I don't think that any do yet.
I expect to be looking at smbclient and will try to put the code into
libsmb, but that is still an issue for things like smbfs, I believe
because of the amount of junk that might get dragged in.
Regarding
On Thu, 30 May 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
That makes sense. Currently we ship with something under GPL in our kernel
so I think this has already been taken care of. We do not charge for our
sources and they are all readily available. smbfs is distributed with
FreeBSD and I believe
On 13 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to hide a file if it
is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently unlink it
when the last process closes it.
It just
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Brett Simpson wrote:
I'm trying to access a Windows 2000 server share that has files 2GB
using the Samba client 2.2.3 that comes with Redhat 7.3. It lists the
files as being many times larger than their actual size. I upgraded to
the CVS version of Samba today and it
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steven French wrote:
Good question - at some point I need to look at that. Clearly the
structure is quite a bit different between the two. Most visibly the mount
...
specification. Over time function between the two will probably diverge
quite a bit more.I
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steven French wrote:
FYI - The CIFS VFS handles large files and has been tested with RedHat 7.3
version of the kernel. It was a pain to test due to the lack of sparse
file support on the Linux side (I had not seen an equivalent to the sparse
flag on the Linux side - but
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Christopher R.Hertel wrote:
The problem here is that W2K simply ignores the packet, so the client
must decide whether to time-out waiting for a reply or to start sending
SMBs before it knows if it got an error message back from the server.
I am not sure what
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
what is that exactly? I am looking for a method to automount NT
shares from windows to linux.. so my users can access their home
directories..
The common way to do that *kind* of thing would be by
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also tried:
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html
with exactly the steps whatever they are:
But no luck i have used kernel 2.4.16 and samba 2.2.2.
You have probably not patched both the kernel and samba, rebuilt and
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This patch removes most of that - in an attempt to allow for easier
verification of its security status. I would also (but not included in
this patch) like to remove its use of includes.h (for the same reason),
but I know tridge has different
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, root wrote:
But during boot time i gets some error message of this kind.
#
/lib/ext3.o: unresolved symbol iget4_R7414451b
...
ERROR: /bin/insmod exited abnormally!
#
Is this ok? or i have missed out something.
When you rebuilt your kernel you didn't rebuild
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
The server sends its Capabilities data in the NegProt respoinse, and then
the client replies with its Capabilities in the SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. The
two values are ANDed... and the result is the agreed upon behavior.
Is that close?
Yes,
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
