--- Parker, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We're now getting corrupt files appearing in
ClearCase. The files are in
tact except for a number of lines added to the
beggining of the file.
I can't explain that type of corruption, but I can
suggest you disable all oplocks. In your smb.conf
]
wrote:
Chris,
I am about to implement a MS Access2000 database
here on the samba server.
Was it MS Access that you had the trouble with
specifically?
Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Parker, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We're now
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run an application on an HPUX 11.0 system that
creates report files daily
and I am wanting to have those files placed on a W2K
server instead of the
local drive during creation. Can I do this w/
Samba? Thanks for your
time.
I don't see why not. Install
directory=/mnt/Proga so
they can be mapped and accessed from Windoze as
E: - \\server\Proga
etc.
Works fine with 2 clients accessing each share, but
with total 8,
accessing 2 shares (4/share), crashes occur..
Shane
Chris de Vidal wrote:
--- Shane Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Aaron Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd also like to configure sshd to use this
winbindd. However, this
/etc/pam.d/sshd file doesn't work and I can't figure
out why. I've put
+ signs to show the lines I added I added to the
stock RHAT 8 sshd pam def.
#%PAM-1.0
+ auth
--- Aaron Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you. That did the trick.
Great! Did you learn anything new? Or did you cut
and paste? grin You can use the patterns I
described to add winbind support for any pam-aware
service (e.g. NetAtalk and Webmin), which is very
groovy.
/dev/idal
--- Khanh Tran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so
likeauth use_first_pass nullok
snip
The only difference from what I had been using was
the addition of the
likeauth and nullok options on the pam_unix.so
library.
Could you help my ignorance? What
--- Matthias Rutzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately the group members still can not access
the shares.
I'm sorry, I'd tested this some time back and should
have told you. Winbind doesn't appear to obey local
group membership for domain users on the Samba box.
We worked around this by
2003 09:20 am, Chris de Vidal
wrote:
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short version: I think it's a problem with
RedHat
8's glibc and not Samba.
I've submitted a report to Bugzilla as I'm not
tinkering with glibc on a server! :)
And I don't know enough about glibc
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using RedHat 8.0? It's also broken on my
RedHat 8.0 workstation; I think it's because there
are
so many members of that group and some broken
library
in 8.0 can't handle long group memberships. It's
working perfectly on all of my 7.3 servers.
A
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using RedHat 8.0? It's also broken on my
RedHat 8.0 workstation; I think it's because
there
are
so many members of that group and some broken
library
in 8.0 can't handle long group memberships. It's
Downgrading back to glibc-2.2.93-5.. too many things
were broken with 2.3.1-46. Perhaps I missed a
dependancy? rpm didn't complain, and I didn't have to
force install it.
Thanks for the info though.. Debian looks better every
day (:
/dev/idal
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Super
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, now I get segmentation faults in rpm and
tripwire. I'm sure there's
other surprises in store, too!
And you can't uninstall it because RPM is pooched.
You can copy the RPM binaries from another working RH8
box but I don't have one ): I'll
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know more about groups? I am
considering switching from NT
to Samba domain and have made some test.
Unfortunately I need to make
two additional groups, except Domain Admin (one of
them is Domain
Users). Is it possible to make that with the stable
--- Scott Wrosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I did the other box, I did a binary
distribution, so the file had
apparently already existed. In following the
instructions in the above
link, this command doesn't seem to do anything:
root# make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so
Here's a quick
--- Scott Wrosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's what I'm trying to do though, is install from
source. I know I
wouldn't be having the problems if I was using the
RPMs, but I figure I
gotta learn somehow. So I decided to try source,
and this is the only
thing (so far) that I'm having
--- Jim Wharton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears to me that there are only two groups
these days... Domain Admins
and Domain Users. I did remember that countless
groups could be added and
mapped to Unix groups. Is this still possible
without downgrading to
samba-2.2?
Sorry, I don't
--- Scott Wrosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Back to your problem, someone else suggested you
go
into your samba-X.X.X/source directory, run make
nsswitch/pam_winbind.so, and then manually copy
nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security, then set
up
a link to /lib/security/pam_winbind.so in
--- Scott Wrosch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It looks like that did the trick. Apparently the
necessary package
wasn't installed!
Thanks for all your assistance! Who knows how long
I would have been
beating my head against the keyboard.
Cool.
Future reference: Include those errors (:
--- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as
in this case! :-O
Yeah, it actually had the opposite effect of what I
was begging people to do :-P
here's a suggestion:
i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this
'NEWBEES' with
important
I'm sorry I gave the appearance I was slamming you.
The tone was supposed to be Please, help yourself
first, here's why... here's ALL of the resources I use
to help myself. I've successfully been able to keep
questions about Samba to this list down to a minimum
by first consulting all of my
--- Robert Adkins II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read a few more of your responses. It
appears that you
believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced
questions are going
unanswered simply because of the volume of lower
skilled questions.
That was but one of the 5 points I was making.
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short version: I think it's a problem with RedHat
8's glibc and not Samba.
I've submitted a report to Bugzilla as I'm not
tinkering with glibc on a server! :)
And I don't know enough about glibc to tinker, either.
I had a hunch it was a RedHat
--- David Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I got this to work once by manually editing
the /etc/group file, like
adding the line:
localgroup:x:gid: domain+user1,domain+user2,etc
I don't know if this is a safe thing to do, however.
:)
I don't believe you can safely manually edit
--- Brad Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In one of your replies to the attention newbies...
series, you mentioned you teach a linux newbie
class.
I'm interested (seriously, or sarcasm) in checking
out
one of your seminars. Where do I get information?
A few other JaxLUG members and I are
--- juan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server
to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my
linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share on
the samba server. I gave
the group the rights to the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I setup the share so only
the group owns it no
matter what user in the group adds to the share
the
group maintains the
permissions
under shares do;
force group =
I forgot about that.. it works well, too (:
Sgid is more flexible and works in
--- Cyril Y. Nickonorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Samba PDC installed to authorize my windows
network clients.
And it is running
on Solaris. I want to install a one another Samba
file server and I want it
to authorize windows clients by consulting the PDC.
This second server
must
I've been reading this list for a few weeks now and
I've given advice on questions that look challenging
but I've deleted MANY questions like these:
How do I (easy question found in the documents)?
Though I don't count myself an expert, I've known
enough experts to see that they _HATE_ it when
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also had to do a;
smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC -UAdmininstrator%password
snip
security = domain
encrypt passwords = yes
Thanks, after I sent that, I remembered the first step
and wondered if there was something else in the
smb.conf I was forgetting (:
By the
Before you assume, I actually host Linux Newbie
classes and answer some of the most basic questions in
great detail on our LUG list.
I believe I was misunderstood.
--- Robert Adkins II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is ANGRY MAILING LIST GUY.
Wasn't angry when I wrote it.
I am here
--- Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think all Chris was asking for was a little
respect on both sides:
please do your homework before asking a question,
and please treat
nicely people who do ask.
In essense, yes, I was saying those very things, and
offered ways I've used to answer my
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In samba now, you can
have read list or write list and say this user
and/or group has write
and/or this user and/or group has read only. This
is a scaled down
version of an acl. What if they created a folder
called acl's and had one
file called no access,
--- Francesc Guasch Ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm trying to set up a Samba server with ACLS.
Versions:
- xfs in kernel-2.4.20.
- samba-2.2.7a compiled with ACL support
I'm trying first with smbcacls. But I can't manage
to
guess the syntax of the ACL command.
It's done
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These basic permissions are sufficient for many
uses,
Except mine ofcourse :)
ACL support like XFS, and you compile Samba
--with-acl-support, you get full NT ACL support,
Before I recompile as I've SGI_XFS running on my RH
servers, I'd like to make sure
Oops, dat was 'posed to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
too (:
/dev/idal
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jon Niehof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using PuTTY as an SSH client and it works
fine. I can connect to the
samba server and port forward port 139 without
any
problems
--- Eric Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 linux machines, SOURCE and DEST on a
network. I create some
snapshots of the file structure on SOURCE and these
snapshots have extended
attributes. I want to copy the snapshots from SOURCE
over to DEST over the
network, but I don't want
Oops, [EMAIL PROTECTED], not SALBA (:
/dev/idal
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: oplock problems
To: Brian Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Brian Johnson [EMAIL
--- David Gibbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to setup a RedHat 8 fileserver, it must
work seamlessly within
our 2000/NT network. After some research, I believe
the first thing I need
to do is install ACL support.
I tried doing this once, didn't go well, had to
reinstall RedHat.
--- Adam Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The next step (and what you're probably missing)
is
compiling samba --with-acl-support (or something
like
that.. do ./configure --help | grep -i acl). I
tweaked a .spec file in a SRPM and you might have
to
edit your port's Makefile or
--- Eric Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if smb 3.0 supports the network
file transfer of files with
extended attributes and retains them? I want to do a
backup from one server,
SOURCE, to another server, DEST, and I want the
extended attributes to be
intact. I have been
finds anything out that sounds similar,
please let me
knowas I'd really like to go back to using
smbmount/Samba.
Thanks again...and take care,
-J
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:35, Chris de Vidal wrote:
--- Joe Gerkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:47, Chris de
--- Adam Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am playing with a test box at the moment running a
Samba 2.2.7a domain
on FreeBSD 5.0. I wish to enable ACLs, but I am not
exactly sure what I
am supposed to expect once they are enabled.
I have created a UFS2 partition and enabled ACL
support
not from cd).
Oh, and check the DOS permissions on those
directories.. make sure they're not hidden. I don't
know if smbmount obeys that, but it's worth a shot.
/dev/idal
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the list: We've been having some off-list
conversation and I wanted to clue you
--- Joe Gerkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:47, Chris de Vidal wrote:
Update:
From a RedHat 8 box with Samba 2.2.7a from a
Samba.org
RPM, I could see 1000 directories on a Windows
2000
Pro share.
From a RedHat 7.3 box with Samba 2.2.7a from a
Samba.org SRPM
You're using smbmount, right? Sounds like you're
seeing only 512 files.. do ls | wc -l. 512 is a nice
round binary number and is probably what you're
seeing.
I don't have a direct answer, but I'm under the
impression that there are many broken things in RedHat
8.0 (RedHat 7.0 also had many
I just found this smb.conf setting recently which
fixed the same problem you are having now:
winbind use default domain = yes
Restart both Samba and Winbind.
Now we can log into webmin and ssh and netatalk and
anything else that uses PAM with our NT username and
password (:
Oh, you do have to
Oh and I found it with testparm | grep winbind.
Followed up in man smb.conf and learned how to use it.
Try testparm | less some time and see what you'll
learn!
/dev/idal
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this smb.conf setting recently which
fixed the same problem you
it from a
RH 7.3 and 8.0 box to an NT and 2000 Pro (no
Server/Advanced) share (:
/dev/idal
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 17:45, Chris de Vidal wrote:
Whoa, really strange. Might be something you're
doing, but I'll post my results to you and the
list
tomorrow and we can see if it's a consistent
My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice
with Winbind. The rest of our Samba servers (on
RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with
setting up Winbind.
Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org. RedHat's RPMs do
same thing.)
Kernel 2.4.20
NT 4 domain
I'd copied the pam and
My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice
with Winbind. The rest of our Samba servers (on
RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with
setting up Winbind.
Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org. RedHat's RPMs do
same thing.)
Kernel 2.4.20
NT 4 domain
I'd copied the pam and
--- Claudia Moroder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does samba if a client locks a byte range
behind the end of the file ?
This could be important because it looks like many
'corruption' problems
happern with foxpro files.
And we are using foxpro files.. hmm.
/dev/idal
P.S. haven't gotten a
:
Jeremy Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Chris de Vidal wrote:
Still, wouldn't you welcome documentation
advising
people of potential corruption? I think we both
agree
that there is no guarantee that everyone's
network is
100% on and the danger of corruption appears
--- Green, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My opinion is that the right fix is for anyone who
is experiencing data
corruption of any sort, whether with oplocks on,
off, or sideways, to work
with the Samba team to come up with a reproducible
test case so that we can
root cause the true source
--- David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's rather
shocking to me that SMB reacts
to poorly to network problems, but I realize there's
not much Samba can do
about the crummy protocol design. ;)
There is one thing: (Now I'm beating a dead horse on
this, so I'll shut up and see what I can
--- Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he's referring to the phenomenon that
I've seen on way too
many technical mailing lists: be a complete
asshole and you'll get
the complete and undivided attention of multiple
developers and power
users, all of of whom assert,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de
Vidal wrote:
OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only
turned
them off, made no other changes, and have no more
corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't
that be
a priority 1, drop everything
--- Neil Hoggarth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I'd be happy to let the group know. I'm not
positive
we'll reenable anything but kernel oplocks,
though.
We have work to do.
The kernel oplocks parameter affects how Unix
processes accessing
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The oplock code in Samba has been *heavily* tested.
The one thing we cannot fix is clients ignoring
oplock
break requests. If you can show a problem occurring
when clients are *not* ignoring oplock break
requests then
it's a Samba logic bug and we'll jump on it
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts
wrote:
The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm
doing
File corruption is treated as a drop everything -
priority
1 bug in Samba. If this were a generic problem known
with
2.2.6 we'd be issuing a
--- Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The corruption was missing records. It would
interrupt the print process and the Opus analysis
indicated hundreds of records were missing. It
would
happen in random places in print files (hundreds
of
megs to gigs in size), and seldomly would not
--- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the oplock problem with access databases is well
known...
I don't think samba alone can fix it.
(somebody prove me wrong :)
Samba alone probably cannot fix it. I have since
learned it can also be a problem on NT. Jeremy says,
file
--- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:43, Chris de Vidal wrote:
If preventing file corruption is a drop
everything -
priority 1 bug (quoting Jeremy), it should either
be
documented and/or disabled by default. But if
performance takes priority over
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:25:56AM -0700, Jay Ts
wrote:
The corruption might be related to oplocks. I'm
doing
File corruption is treated as a drop everything -
priority
1 bug in Samba. If this were a generic problem known
with
2.2.6 we'd be issuing a
--- Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The corruption was missing records. It would
interrupt the print process and the Opus analysis
indicated hundreds of records were missing. It
would
happen in random places in print files (hundreds
of
megs to gigs in size), and seldomly would not
--- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the oplock problem with access databases is well
known...
I don't think samba alone can fix it.
(somebody prove me wrong :)
Samba alone probably cannot fix it. I have since
learned it can also be a problem on NT. Jeremy says,
file
The new NT server has a bad HD, so we have a repreive
temporarily and perhaps we can still work this problem
out and still use Samba (:
--- Mathew McKernan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the look of it, the reason why it is so slow is
the fact that you may not
be running a WINS Server. We had
My first post, for reference:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=103535378916869w=2
When the new NT server's hard drive died, we decided
to keep hobbling along on Samba. Meanwhile, my
supervisor was searching around on OpLock issues on
Google and he saw other people that were having
similar
--- Chris de Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- tim smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
err are you asking for help, or just wasting our
time?
Read the first paragraph of my email, please.
It said:
Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons
listed below) that I don't expect an answer
--- Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:13 2002-10-23, you wrote:
The printers were missing some of the records sent
to
them to print, something that had never happened
with
Netware. Every time the missing records were
different. Occasionally, it would work
Thank you for responding. You win a gold star for
actually reading my email and not jumping to
conclusions (-:
--- Tristan Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the 7580 might be a mistake. The card has
only 2meg of cache (read: f*ck all).
The amount of RAM is not an apples-to-apples
--- Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski
The actual queues are on an NT server. This server
merely acts as a large spool area. Are you using
Samba as the spool area only or using Samba
printing
support?
I use only samba printing support (all printers are
net printers
HP4000N/4050N/4100N)
The new NT server has a bad HD, so we have a repreive
temporarily and perhaps we can still work this problem
out and still use Samba (:
--- Mathew McKernan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the look of it, the reason why it is so slow is
the fact that you may not
be running a WINS Server. We had
--- Michael Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use Samba with option
write cache size = 262144
my antivirus monitoring programs(AVP Monitor) do not
catch viruses on Samba network drive,
but successfully catch viruses, after I delete this
options and restart Samba!
This _may_ help:
My first post, for reference:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=103535378916869w=2
When the new NT server's hard drive died, we decided
to keep hobbling along on Samba. Meanwhile, my
supervisor was searching around on OpLock issues on
Google and he saw other people that were having
similar
--- Scott Wrosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question I'm sure has been answered before, but
I'm
still relatively new to Samba, and having just
moved,
have not been able to locate any of my Samba
reference
materials.
Anyways, I'm running a small Samba server at work
using RedHat Linux
Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons
listed below) that I don't expect an answer (advice is
welcomed, but please read this email carefully before
answering). I'm sharing this with the community with
the hope that better software results from our sad
experience...
BACKGROUND
I've
Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons
listed below) that I don't expect an answer (advice is
welcomed, but please read this email carefully before
answering). I'm sharing this with the community with
the hope that better software results from our sad
experience...
BACKGROUND
I've
78 matches
Mail list logo
