[Samba] (no subject)
Hello list, My samba server stopped allowing access to shares this morning. It gave some funky errors. Has anyone seen these before? The OS is Fedora 9 and the version is... Version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 Am using ADS security for serving shares. Server is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP Looks like it is saying no login servers in client log but, there are two listed in smb.conf and they both replied to a ping when this happened. I tried restarting smb but it did not help. A reboot cleared up the issue but I want to get to the root cause. There are some strange lines in the smbd log as well(bottom). Any help is greatly appreciated. Can I avoid rebooting this to fix it if it happens again. Or better yet can I permanently fix it maybe upgrade Samba. I saw a previous post where raising amount of processes allowed per group was suggested. Thank you James + + Client log excerpt+ * [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(221) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(318) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [some_user] - [some_user] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP +++ = log.smbd excerpt = [2009/01/19 14:33:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/20 13:29:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1208) smbd version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/tallocmsg.c:register_msg_pool_usage(106) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/dmallocmsg.c:register_dmalloc_msgs(77) Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED = CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba server stopped serving shares, strange errors.
Sorry sent no subject in my message post. Please disregard the previous post and reply to this one. A correction in the line below where I stated Server is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP I meant the domain controller is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP Hello list, My samba server stopped allowing access to shares this morning. It gave some funky errors. Has anyone seen these before? The OS is Fedora 9 and the version is... Version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 Am using ADS security for serving shares. Server is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP Looks like it is saying no login servers in client log but, there are two listed in smb.conf and they both replied to a ping when this happened. I tried restarting smb but it did not help. A reboot cleared up the issue but I want to get to the root cause. There are some strange lines in the smbd log as well(bottom). Any help is greatly appreciated. Can I avoid rebooting this to fix it if it happens again. Or better yet can I permanently fix it maybe upgrade Samba. I saw a previous post where raising amount of processes allowed per group was suggested. Thank you James + + Client log excerpt+ * [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(221) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(318) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [some_user] - [some_user] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP +++ = log.smbd excerpt = [2009/01/19 14:33:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/20 13:29:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1208) smbd version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/tallocmsg.c:register_msg_pool_usage(106) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/dmallocmsg.c:register_dmalloc_msgs(77) Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED = CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba server stopped serving shares, strange errors.(Any Ideas?)
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:23 -0700, James Chavez wrote: Sorry sent no subject in my message post. Please disregard the previous post and reply to this one. A correction in the line below where I stated Server is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP I meant the domain controller is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP Hello list, My samba server stopped allowing access to shares this morning. It gave some funky errors. Has anyone seen these before? The OS is Fedora 9 and the version is... Version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 Am using ADS security for serving shares. Server is EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP Looks like it is saying no login servers in client log but, there are two listed in smb.conf and they both replied to a ping when this happened. I tried restarting smb but it did not help. A reboot cleared up the issue but I want to get to the root cause. There are some strange lines in the smbd log as well(bottom). Any help is greatly appreciated. Can I avoid rebooting this to fix it if it happens again. Or better yet can I permanently fix it maybe upgrade Samba. I saw a previous post where raising amount of processes allowed per group was suggested. Thank you James + + Client log excerpt+ * [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:08:35, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(221) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(318) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [some_user] - [some_user] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP in tdb /var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/server_mutex.c:grab_named_mutex(71) Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP +++ = log.smbd excerpt = [2009/01/19 14:33:44, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/20 13:29:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1601) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1208) smbd version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/tallocmsg.c:register_msg_pool_usage(106) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2009/01/21 09:03:39, 2] lib/dmallocmsg.c:register_dmalloc_msgs(77) Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED = CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message
[Samba] Samba using ADS
Hello list, I am using Samba with ADS authentication. I am able to map drives and open and close files with no issues with the exception of Microsoft Outlook email files. So from within Outlook, I open one of these email files and I get an access denied error. Even if i put 777 permission on the files in question I get the same error. I am using LDAP as a user and group store if that means anything to the list, I do not think it is the issue since everything works well except for this. I found the following in the logs. Hinting at lock errors, not sure what to make of it. Can you folks help me out? Thank you James [2008/12/29 13:10:46, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(586) elmer_fudd closed file efudd/vxvm.pst (numopen=0) NT_STATUS_OK [2008/12/29 13:15:30, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1188) phx1ambckw02 (:::172.16.155.109) connect to service homedir initially as user elmer_fudd (uid=5171, gid=5009) (pid 15526) [2008/12/29 13:15:30, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1399) phx1ambckw02 (:::172.16.155.109) closed connection to service homedir [2008/12/29 13:15:47, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(399) elmer_fudd opened file efudd/vxvm.pst read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2008/12/29 13:15:47, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(586) elmer_fudd closed file efudd/vxvm.pst (numopen=0) NT_STATUS_OK [2008/12/29 13:15:47, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(399) elmer_fudd opened file efudd/vxvm.pst read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=1) [2008/12/29 13:15:48, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(196) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 532, length 1 returned an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2008/12/29 13:15:48, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(586) elmer_fudd closed file efudd/vxvm.pst (numopen=0) NT_STATUS_OK CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba using ADS
Volker, My friend you are the man. If ever in Phoenix I owe you a beer. Do you know of any ramifications of altering this? As long as only one person accesses the file at a time I should be OK I would think. The smb.conf man page says that smbd keeps it's own locks and tries to match these to posix locks for files opened by local or nfs access. At least I understand it that way. I think I should be ok as these files will only be accessed from these samba sessions. Thank you again James On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 19:54 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:50:10AM -0800, Chavez, James R. wrote: I did not mention that the data I am sharing out is actually mounted through NFS off of other boxes. Perhaps that helps with the NFS mentoin in the log. Try posix locking = no. Volker CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba using ADS
Volker, I scanned the lists and came across quite a few with the same issue I had and you were in a few :). I have found no mention of negative impact as of yet. Did find many posts asking if it would cause negative impact but no definitive answer. I understand that does not mean that there will be no issues. Seems the solution is to not re export NFS file systems as you mentioned in the posts. I was hoping not to run Samba off of this box to avoid bogging it down but I may have to after all. Actually the box exporting the NFS data is a NT4.0 domain member server and the Samba install has no ADS support built in. I will have to recompile or rebuild I guess. Thank you again. James On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 20:49 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:14:55PM -0700, James Chavez wrote: My friend you are the man. If ever in Phoenix I owe you a beer. Do you know of any ramifications of altering this? As long as only one person accesses the file at a time I should be OK I would think. The smb.conf man page says that smbd keeps it's own locks and tries to match these to posix locks for files opened by local or nfs access. At least I understand it that way. I think I should be ok as these files will only be accessed from these samba sessions. As long as you don't have concurrent access to the same files from other NFS clients and/or Unix processes, you should be as ok as it is possible to be for re-exported NFS imports. Scan the mailing lists for my opinion on this matter :-) Volker CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Solaris 8 and Solaris 10
Steve, Nice product, I am downloading now. The free version is good for one mounted share so it seems I would have to pay to implement it. Open Solaris has a Cifs client that I installed on Solaris 10 SPARC. However I get libnsl.so.1 errors so it looks like it is not compatible. I will get posting on the Open Solaris forum to see if there is a work around. Thanks for the heads up on Sharity. James On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 12:02 +, Steve Kennedy wrote: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:36:10PM -0600, Mike Brown wrote: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:26:36AM -0700, James Chavez wrote: I was looking for mapping in the opposite direction. From the Solaris clients to the Windows Share. I too can access shares on *NIX machines from Windows boxes but I was hoping to mount my Windows shares from *NIX like I do with mount.cifs from Linux. Sorry, I misunderstood your query. I don't share out Windblows files. So, I've never run into the problem. Have a look at Sharity http://www.obdev.at/Products/Sharity.html Steve -- home steve at gbnet.org NetTek Ltdtel/fax +44-(0)207 483 2455 Email to SMS steve - epage (at) gbnet dot net CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Solaris 8 and Solaris 10
Mike, I was looking for mapping in the opposite direction. From the Solaris clients to the Windows Share. I too can access shares on *NIX machines from Windows boxes but I was hoping to mount my Windows shares from *NIX like I do with mount.cifs from Linux. I see some promising links with cifs server for open Solaris, usually means it would work with Solaris 10 but maybe not in this case. James On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 01:44 -0600, Mike Brown wrote: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:27:46AM -0700, James Chavez wrote: Is there a mount.cifs utility or mount_smbfs for Solaris 8 and Solaris 10. I would like to map drives to my Windows servers from Solaris. smbclient works great for accessing files but I want to map the drives. Weird, I'm running Solaris 10 X86 and my 98SE, W2K and XP boxes have no trouble at all mapping the drives that I have configured for access. It is the samba version that ships with Solaris 10. MB CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Solaris 8 and Solaris 10
All, Is there a mount.cifs utility or mount_smbfs for Solaris 8 and Solaris 10. I would like to map drives to my Windows servers from Solaris. smbclient works great for accessing files but I want to map the drives. Thank you James CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Creating folders while preserving sharing group
I have used the force group entry for shares in the past. [Share] comment = Share path = /Share read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0740 force group = data Not sure if this is frowned upon or not but seems to work ok. James On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 11:24 -0700, Andrew Masterson wrote: chmod g+s ~/Share/ smb.conf: inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes orcreate mask 750 or something similar. -Original Message- From: samba-bounces+andrew.masterson=nuvistaenergy@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+andrew.masterson=nuvistaenergy@lists.samba.org ] On Behalf Of Ooi Kwan Chen Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 6:47 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Creating folders while preserving sharing group Hi there, I'm using Samba 3.0.24-6etch10 in Debian Etch 64bit with kernel Linux 2.6.18-6-amd64. Here is my case scenario. I have created a folder to be shared with other group users. The ownership for the folders are showed as below: Directory path:~/Share/ drwxr-x--- 25 admin data 4096 2008-05-05 13:42 file1107 drwxr-x--- 25 admin data 4096 2008-11-13 14:57 file1207 When the admin group users created a folder under the Share directory, it is showed as below: drwxr- 2 admin admin 4096 2008-12-15 11:45 New Folder I wanted the folder to have admin:data kind of ownership whenever the admin users created a file or a folder. Is it possible to do that? Here's my smb.conf file [Share] comment = Share path = /Share read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0740 [global] workgroup = IT netbios name = ITSHARE server string = %h server security = USER encrypt passwords = No passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 os level = 64 local master = No domain master = No dns proxy = No wins support = Yes panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d invalid users = root read list = data write list = admin hosts allow = 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.10.0/24 Appreciate your all kind suggestions. Thank you -- Best regards, Ooi Kwan Chen (John), System Support, Server Management Section, Group IT Department, DXN Holdings Berhad Office Phone : +604 771 6688 Ext 122 Fax : +604 772 4785 Website : www.dxn2u.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any prints thereof. ABSENT AN EXPRESS STATEMENT TO THE CONTRARY HEREINABOVE, THIS E-MAIL IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A WRITING. Notwithstanding the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of similar substance and effect, absent an express statement to the contrary hereinabove, this e-mail message its contents, and any attachments hereto are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Sanmina-SCI Corporation (or any of its subsidiaries), or any other person or entity. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
