[Samba] smbclient, kerberos, and EMC

2004-08-24 Thread Joey Collins
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to get smbclient to cooperate with my new EMC Celerra (just got it a little while ago) using kerberos. My windows domain environment is win2000 + sp4, the EMC is joined to the domain. I am using samba 3.0, fresh sources, and MIT KRB5 1.3.4, all freshly built. I join

[Samba] Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Collins
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: [snip] Also, sometimes I saw problems like wbinfo -t just says secret is bad, when all the daemons were running. It sure was good at some point before. Samba periodially changes the password on the server. secrets.tdb should be in sync with this. Hi,

Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Collins
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: [snip] Also, sometimes I saw problems like wbinfo -t just says secret is bad, when all the daemons were running. It sure was good at some point before. Samba periodially changes the password on the server. secrets.tdb should be in sync with this. Hi,

SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO not correct in SNIA spec?

2003-02-18 Thread Joey Collins
Good evening ladies and gents, The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation does not seem right, either. Here's what SNIA says: TIME CreationTime; TIME LastAccessTime; TIME

NTLMv2 Response (Only) yields Unicode password length of 78

2003-01-29 Thread Joey Collins
Good evening folks, I have a WIN2K system and I am failing to authenticate to a Samba 2.2 installation, which I suspect is due to the weird length of Unicode password length in the SessionSetupAndX message. Here is my circumstance. On my W2K machine: -Run the secpol.msc management plug-in

[Samba] Error in SNIA spec wrt. SessionSetupAndX response when dialect is NT LM0.12

2003-01-02 Thread Joey Collins
Good evening, On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec (http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e., use traditional NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the