George wrote:
Hi! I have a problem involving Samba4, exim4, fetchmail, dovecot and PAM...
I have setup a maildrop machine, which fetches mail from an external POP3
server for multiple accounts and then serves them locally via IMAP. On the
same machine, I am currently running Samba 4.0.9 over
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With FDX fast ethernet steady SMB throughput was ~8.5MB/s. FTP and HTTP
throughput were ~11.5MB/s. With GbE steady SMB throughput is ~23MB/s,
nearly a 3x improvement, making large file copies such as ISOs much
speedier. However ProFTPd and Lighttpd throughput are both a
(some more followup---sorry if I ask too much / too many Q's,
if so, just don't respond! I won't be offended)..
You might look for a file system loop and check for options in treesize pro
to detect such.
Another program to try is WinDirStat's home is
http://windirstat.sourceforge.net/.
The
Cy Mike wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being
accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of
files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system.
---
Which system is crashing? the NAS or the one running the
Shouldn't it use one or the other?
In file included from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss_config.h:46:0,
from ../nsswitch/libwbclient/libwbclient.h:31,
from ../nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_guid.c:26:
./../lib/replace/system/network.h:134:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct
ifaddrs’
struct ifaddrs {
^
In file
Michael wrote:
Hi,
My system: OS: Centos 6.4 Samba: 3.6.16
I'm trying to build the RPMS from the packaging/RHEL directory. After I
patched the samba.spec file the build is successful. All packages
install without an issue. But when I try to install the SSSD, its
dependencies get
kiko seis wrote:
And got the following error:
net_rpc.c:(.text+0xcbc8): undefined reference to `libnetapi_net_init'
Then I recompiled with the following parameters set:
./configure --enable-shared-libs=no --enable-external-libtalloc=no
--enable-external-libtdb=no
Jacob Seeley wrote:
Hello,
My question revolves around 'User Private Groups'. I noticed my AD users
UID's do not have matching GID's. I came across the following:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#id2596644
This seems to indicate I cannot
[homes] is a special name:
from smb.conf manpage:
The [homes] section
If a section called [homes] is included in the configuration file,
services connecting clients to their home directories can be
created on
the fly by the server.
When the connection request is made,
Does anyone have scripts they use for doing this automatically that they
use?
I'd like to compare it to mine and see what features I might have left out
that I might want...
Currently nightly, the script determines the changes during the day (snaps
take about 60-150 minutes to create, so once a
I'm not sure I've seen that message before.
Do you get it when trying to login to the domain?
or pinging it, or mounting a file system?
Have you tried looking at the traffic with wireshark and seeing how
your two
clients differ in their conversation at whatever point you are failing?
Are
This is on a private internal net optimized for speed, not security (it
isn't exposed to the 'net', generally speaking, or the public)...
So most security is turned off. Excuse typos -- this was from a screen
reader...
I turn off sign/seal/encrypt because all that is overhead on a 20Gb
Thierry Lacoste wrote:
Now I'm adding win 7 clients to the mix and I want the same thing.
It's (almost) working but I think my procedure is a bit dirty
(i.e. I use windows enabler to build my ntuser.man roaming profile).
It's pretty much procedure on either --- with an important
Robert M. Martel - CSU wrote:
Greetings,
I recently upgraded an AD member server from Samba 3.5.15 to Samba
3.6.9 and found that I had lost all the existing local group mappings.
I had same problem. Never got an answer. Went back to 3.5 series for
the time, later, when I was ready, did
Todor Fassl wrote:
From: Cain, Marc marc.c...@seattlecolleges.edu
e user's profile folder location (though in the case of Active
Directory --
delivering additional GroupPolicy behaviors). The client's copy of
Windows
is doing the roaming work and it's behavior is determined by local Group
I was looking at a case where I have a 'Documents' dir mounted from my
server.
It's setup is:
[Documents]
acl group control = yes
block size = 4096
store dos attributes = yes
map acl inherit = yes
inherit acls = yes
comment = Domain User's Home Documents
path =
Is it possible to build samba without waf?
It has slowed down my local samba builds by a factor of 5-10x -- it
seems to lack
any parallelism, and on a 12 core machine, that really sucks.
When going through it's tests, it's noticeably slower than the configure
shell
tests that do the same...
Colin Fowler wrote:
If I create a directory with 700 permissions owned by me with the
group set to my primary group I *cannot* get into the directory from
my windows machine. I can of course get into it from unix
If however I set the mode to 740, I can get into it from windows
Samba version
This what you looking for?
(gdb) where
#0 0x7faa1b6b126e in waitpid () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7faa1b64c491 in do_system () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x7faa1dba319a in smb_panic ()
#3 0x7faa1db93996 in sig_fault ()
#4 signal handler called
#5 0x7faa1b654f54 in
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:33:12PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
I have a bunch of these in my log... Was wondering if anyone had seen them
before
and what the cause might be? Thanks...
Oct 1 03:31:14 Ishtar smbd[24022]:#1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x55)
But what if we didn't need the option in the first place?
(i.e. the workaround code?)...
Wouldn't it make for a cleaner implementation to not add a hack on top
of a hack?
I'm a perfectionist -- just just a it'll do type...that's why I tend
to persist.
Though if you aren't interested, you
Thomas Bork wrote:
On 11.09.2011 04:44, Linda Walsh wrote:
This sounds like https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8412.
I don't think, it's the same problem. I already tried without oplocks
and smb2 isn't activated here.
Anyway - I could test a patch for 3.5.11.
Don't know if there is
This sounds like https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8412.
Which has had fix created for the next 3.6 series, but AFAIK, hasn't
been included
in the 3.5 tree.
But Jeremy would know for sure...
Thomas Bork wrote:
Am 10.09.2011 03:22, schrieb ich:
Internet Explorer 9 on Windows 7
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:36:31PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Hi,
If you open a word document on a Windows 7 PC on a samba share and
attempt to save it (or ppt, etc) it will fail (SMB2 enabled).
Go back to 3.5.10, it works fine (SMB2 removed obviously).
Not sure
` Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:15:04PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Yes... more than one person has noticed it...
I think it has to do with SMB2 keeping multiple descriptors open in,
perhaps, a cache,to the same file...
Like a 'fake-level-II oplock cache' ???
` Peacock,Josh wrote:
I am also experiencing the same problems. I am running 3.6 on AIX 6.1. I do
have a 3.5.8 installation running without problem (I understand some major
changes have happened.) I took the smb.conf from my 3.5.8 install and changed
appropriately for 3.6 (At least as
` Chris Smith wrote:
Testing 3.6.0 on a member server of a 3.5.8 domain shows some strange problems.
With the standard:
idmap config * : backend = tdb
no results are returned by getent, and wbinfo does not always
work, also no winbind_idmap.tdb file is ever created.
by changing to:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:05:13PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
I made progress in tracking down a problem on cygwin that's been bothering
me for a while since Win7 and domain.
when I do:
mkpasswd -D
mkpasswd (434): [31] A device attached to the system is not functioning.
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:58:55AM -0700, Linda W wrote:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:05:13PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
I made progress in tracking down a problem on cygwin that's been bothering
me for a while since Win7 and domain.
when I do
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:16:00PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
On 24/06/11 09:46 AM, John G. Heim wrote:
I'm setting up a new linux fileserver and I was wondering if samba
likes one filesystem more than another. I have to format a 1.8Tb
partition sometime today and I'll
Linda W wrote:
No, it was originally developed over SunOS ufs. I did the
xfs work when I was @ SGI doing the 64-bit Samba port, so
it's one of the older supported filesystems though.
Jeremy.
Sorry, I've been suitably disillusioned
FWIW, I was at Sun for 6 years
Dale Schroeder wrote:
David,
Samba does not have the ability to change the permissions of directories
on the security tab, and many times they will not be displayed either.
As you have already discovered, permissions on directories are changed
in Advanced. The permissions of files can be
Linda W wrote:
I just tried this --
I was able to add a Domain group, and give it 'full permissions'
on the ACL and save it.
'RIGHTS' / priviledges work as well...(just tried it)
FWIW, I use the 'xfs' file system.
It requires no special options to enable acl
Pedro Rafael Alves Simoes wrote:
I'm trying to setup a PDC with Samba, but I have the known problem of the
roaming profiles: big files.
Could someone give me some lights in how I can circumvent this problem?
Would quota's help?
Limit their space in their profiles and they'll manage the
I doubt it's samba -- since no one else is seeing that symptom...
I think it is, since I am having this effect only when using my roaming
profile!
But I think that the group of users using the following combination:
Samba 3.4.3 Windows 7-64bit Samba as a PDC roaming profiles using
this
Tom H. Lautenbacher wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wanted to ask if there is an official Samba Forum, because I could not
find any on the Project Page. If there isn't any, is there a particular
reason for this not-existance?
---
No need?
Why do you need a forum with a mailing
Tom H. Lautenbacher wrote:
U, well.. I am self employed and feel distracted and annoyed by all
those useless emails from all those mailing-lists that I have to attend,
too.
That's because you don't use the software and tools available
to process email.
Try procmail.
I don't know about the program delays, but the long time
delay for the Win7 users sounds like it is copying the profile
from your PDC to the user's workstation the first time.
YES -- win7 is inordinately slow copying profiles. I've
had it take 45 minutes just to log out.
But it would take a
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
IS the Samba server the PDC? Do you have local unix accounts on it?
(yes, yes)..
I might be wrong but couldn't you modify /etc/nsswitch.conf to use
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
instead?
---
I tried this --
When I run smbstatus, I have the impression it's giving me the status of the
smb server.
But the first thing that pops when I run it was:
rlimit_max: rlimit_max(1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384)
But this isn't really the case -- it's telling me my rlimit_max on the
linux-client I am
On Sunday 20/06/2010 at 10:52 pm, L. A. Walsh wrote:
I assigned the TakeOwnerShip right ['Domain Admins'].
I placed myself in that group.
when I try taking ownership of [a] directory [owned
by someone else, it] fails with a permission denied.
[Why doesn't this work?]
If domain rights DON't
(oops...end truncated, on prior)
On Sunday 20/06/2010 at 10:52 pm, L. A. Walsh wrote:
I assigned the TakeOwnerShip right ['Domain Admins'].
I placed myself in that group.
when I try taking ownership of [a] directory [owned
by someone else, it] fails with a permission denied.
[Why doesn't this
Holger Rauch wrote:
Hi Linda,
thanks a lot for sharing your params; IMHO it's very useful to them in
combination (Win registry, Samba config, Linux sysctls).
Would you mind telling us a bit about your client and server HW,
the Samba server OS and version you use so that your test results
Henri Cook wrote:
Afternoon all,
I'm running a transfer setup as follows:
A - B - C - fairly simple, B initiates a transfer from A to C - B is a
vital intermediary as it bridges two otherwise seperate networks.
All machines have onboard Gigabit ethernet, A+B are connected via
Crossover and B-C
I can share what I have, but won't claim they are optimal for
everyone. For win7, they give near theoretical performance on
writes (with win7 tuned correctly as well).
Will only mention a few pertinent items. Standard
disclaimers concerning your software, work load and hardware
all need to
Bartosz Stec wrote:
Hello list
On my server almost half of files are duplicated, and there are almost
100GB of data which is growing fast. I'm using weekly script to find
duplicated files and replace them with hardlinks. Everything is fine as
long as users aren't trying to edit and save some
Volker Lendecke wrote
If you asked me, I would support that.
insecure wide links and unix extensions = yes
---
If I catch your drift -- we might be saying same --
if I specify 'wide links = true' or ' = insecurely_true,
the former could change a '_non-specified_ default for unix
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:38:58PM +0100, Stefan Götz wrote:
Setting the 'wide links' option to yes and/or the 'follow symlinks' to no on
the
server has no effect, neither globally nor on a per-share basis. Is there any
other way to tell smbd to not meddle with
I'm getting some odd queries from a WinXPSP3 client to an older samba
(3.2.0-24) Domain File server running on linux kernel (2.6.27.19).
The client seems to be querying for a netbios name literal-question mark
followed by binary 0 (00) to the DomainServer, or Broadcasting the query
with the '?'
While I've made all the changes (I think) suggested, samba works no better now
than it did before. Except now I have smb.conf files I can't easily reuse by
just reinstalling
3.0.23 ... :-(...
So far nothing is being shared than what was originally shared --
the /root dir, a /suse93 dir and
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Linda,
Du (samba) meintest am 30.07.08:
While I've made all the changes (I think) suggested, samba works no
better now than it did before. Except now I have smb.conf files I
can't easily reuse by just reinstalling
3.0.23 ... :-(...
Have you changed to Samba
Well this is weird -- I can access my shares under the alternate Netbios names
-- but
not under the primary server name. Is that a useful hint?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2008 01:21:49 Linda W wrote:
So what happened to groups being in /etc/samba/smbgroup?
That has never existed. In Samba 2.x series UNIX groups would automatically
map to Windows groups. In Samba 3.x it is necessary to explicitly map groups
John H Terpstra wrote:
...
I can see why you said to use log level=3 ... at log level=2, it just appears
to work (though it doesn't) -- no obvious errors at level=2:
== log.athena ==
[2008/07/31 07:19:33, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(406)
Allowed connection from Athena (192.168.3.11)
John H Terpstra wrote:
Looks like you are running into an msdfs bug in 3.0.26. You really should
update to the latest samba release. There have been a lot of bug fixes since
3.0.26. I offered to provide samba 3.2.0 RPMs for your OpenSUSE 10.3
system - that offer is still good.
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Linda,
Du (samba) meintest am 31.07.08:
Well this is weird -- I can access my shares under the alternate
Netbios names -- but
not under the primary server name. Is that a useful hint?
What tells
pidof smbd
pidof nmbd
etc/samba# pidof smbd
3378
John H Terpstra wrote:
Anyhow, add the following to your smb.conf [global] section:
host msdfs = no
Makes no difference...
(I am running 3.2, BTW:
etc/samba# rpm -q samba
samba-3.2.0-24.1.123
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
I just saved some files to my smb server and ended up with a bunch of little
1k files with weird names (when viewed from windows)
all CAPLETTERS~X
'cept capletters is 6 long... so all are 8 long...on the linux side, they
are all the same as the file's I downloaded
with :Zone.Identifier appended
Jeremy Allison wrote:
This is a bug in default 3.2 which I fixed recently. These
are Windows alternate data streams, and Samba 3.0.x refuses
to create them entirely. Samba 3.2 has a VFS module which
will store them in xattr's streams_xattr, and one that
will store them in a db in the filesystem
John H Terpstra wrote:
If I understand correctly, you have done an update installation of 10.3 over
the top of the 9.3 server. Correct?
---
Yup
Even so, there are significant changes in going from Samba 3.0.23 to 3.0.26
and later. It is always best to use the latest version of
correctly and I wanted to try speeding I/O.
I used to have /var/log/samba/log.%m, and max log = 2048.
any reason to have max log = 0? Doesn't that mean grow w/o limit, where 2048
means keep the last 2Meg?
Cheers,
John T.
---
Better than Jeers,...
Cheerio!, :-)
Linda W
BTW --
This may be a basic question -- but
While I wanted to have several netbios aliases for my main
server (wpad, clock, web-proxy), is there any easy way not to have the
file systems exported (duplicated) under the aliases? Somewhat annoying,
visually, that is, and
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Linda,
The actual version is 3.0.31 - I had some trouble with versions below
3.0.29 (and much trouble with 3.0.23 ...)
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
---
Hallo Helmut!
Thanks for the info...maybe my sup^h^h^hrepository is not as up-to-date
as it should
I'm trying to upgrade and old server from the 3.0.23 to the 3.0.26
version (suse93-suse103)
(for brevity, abbreviating 3.0.23-.23, and 3.0.26-.26)
It's not working as smoothly as I had hoped...and was wondering if
anyone has seen similar behavior or if I have some gotcha that I
haven't kept
John H Terpstra wrote:
Please do not send the output of testparm -sv.
--sorry---didn't want to presume defaults were the same in suse vs. standard.
Just send the output from testparm -s from the OpenSUSE 10.3 system.
Done:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing
John H Terpstra wrote:
Please show us the output of executing on both servers:
net groupmap list
---
Both? There's only 1 server. The difference is only what version of
samba it runs: version 3.0.23 vs. 3.0.26... Did you mean under both
versions?
Also, what is the output of?:
John H Terpstra wrote:
This parameter should be changed from:
write list = @admin, root
to:
write list = @BLISS\admin, BLISS\root
Ahhinteresting.
add:
guest ok = Yes
Also make sure that the guest account (nobody) is able to access
the
jeffunit wrote:
I ran my python program locally on the linux system, and it reported
that roughly
100 md5sums for files differed.
Any ideas how to track down this problem
---
Could it be a code-page conversion issue?
Have you tried copying the file over with cp from
I've run into a bit of a peculiarity with exporting home directories
and what they map to.
I'm running SuSE samba-3.0.23b-0.1.35.
I have partition /home, with usernames on my linux box.
Am running in user security mode.
I'd like to be able to not only access my home directory, but
the parent
FYI, the same bug apears if one mounts the file system
using cifs:
-rwxr- 1 user 2532415 2000-04-02 00:34:50.0 -0800 fo1.mp3*
-rwxr- 1 user 3876671 2000-03-12 21:33:20.0 -0800 fo2.mp3*
Linda W wrote:
Summary:
There appears to be a bug in the time range Samba is using
Summary:
There appears to be a bug in the time range Samba is using on
dates where time is scheduled to Spring Forward from Standard
to Daylight Savings time. Might want to review the code for
Falling back, as well...
Details:
This started out with my thinking it was an rsync problem, but
it
Thierry ITTY a écrit:
maybe
if you access a share on a server as user1 and want to access another share
on the same server as user2, windows complains that you can't use different
credentials at the same time (error 1236 ? I think)
---
Yeah, something similar
thought this doesn't
Thierry ITTY wrote:
can you open a session on your machine with the username/domain you wish to
runas ?
---
This was a semi-yes. It couldn't find the profile for Home/Linda, so
said it would use the local profile -- then it said it couldn't find it, so it
logged me in to a temporary
Otto Müller wrote:
Linda W schrieb am 26.07.2005 20:51:
...
I verified on my Samba server (running SuSE 9.1)
to have the following in my /etc/samba/smbpasswd file:
linda:1000:08...long hex string...:8...guid looking thing...B: \
[]:LCT-4##E:
As the man page of the smbpasswd file
I have my XP-Pro machine setup as a member of an Samba-based Domain server.
I usually run as linda@localmachine, but wanted to try running a
program using RunAs in the Home, DOMAIN my machine belongs to. The
runas command says:
RUNAS [ [/noprofile | /profile] [/env] [/netonly] ]
I have a winXP client connecting to Samba 3.09 running as a PDC.
The client machine is joined to the domain and the login box
shows the domain name as the entity I'm logging into.
I don't know if I don't have something set right or not, but I
noticed my local clock had drifted about 50 seconds off
I've been going back and forth over the HOWTO on bringing up a new samba
3.0 server in place of
an old 2.8.
I only have about 2-3 users, so even recreating them isn't a major pain
-- but what does seem to be
a pain is password authentication. I was using smbpasswd before, and am
using it in
I was reading through the smb man page -- and this may be outdated,
but there was a caution on this option:
Note
that due to Windows 2000 client redirector bugs
this requires Samba to be running on a 64-bit capa
ble operating system
Might not be it...but the '30 second lockup' triggered a memory...
Could this be the 'looking for scheduled tasks' problem?
Here's a blurb from the
windows-net-mag site
(http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24546)
.
Like Windows 2000, XP suffers from a
79 matches
Mail list logo
