Hi !
QNAP TurboNas (our model number is TS-EC1279U-RP) do successfully the
trick. Joined as a member to our S4 AD, we use it as a cifs server in a
mixed environnement. The server is ssh opened, and the configuration
files (ex : smb.conf) could be modified by hand or by an automated
script.
Hi everyone.
We currently develop a small interface to allow some end users to change
the samba 4 account expiracy and password of some specified accounts.
We would like to know what's the best way to remotely change a user
parameter like password or expiracy date for example. Should we use
Hi !
I bounce on the Mr Sloop's post ([Samba] DDNS / DHCPd Internal DNS or
BIND_DLZ) to ask what's the easiest way to allow Linux clients to update
themself their DNS record in the Samba4 AD server (with BIND_DLZ Dns
server).
It works well with windows clients, but with Linux clients
We've got the same problem.
That is due to a problem in a kerberos version, but I can't remerber
which one.
Try to update your kerberos client, and keep us in touch.
Cheers
---
*** OB
*** Service Informatique
Le 13/01/2013 20:00, samba-requ...@lists.samba.org a
Long life to Samba contributors !
They free our work from pain.
Many thanks.
---
*** Olivier BILHAUT
*** Service Informatique
*** Fondation de la Miséricorde
*** Email : o.bilh...@fondation-misericorde.fr
*** Tel : 02.31.38.50.50
*** Fax
Dear samba list,
We did more tests on this topic and I'd like to give more precisions.
Here's a small tab illustrating our tests
Samba version-AD Version-Usage of primary group with the
valid users's option of a share
3.5.6 (debian stable)-Windows 2003- Works
.
Thanks for your efforts.
---
*** OB
*** Service Informatique
*** Fondation de la Miséricorde
Le 26/10/2012 11:48, Andrew Bartlett a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 09:36 +0200, Olivier BILHAUT wrote:
Hi Andrew, Hi Alex,
Pleased to see that you figured this out
Hi All,
We wonder about the possibility to use the primary group of a user as
argument in the valid users option, in the share section of the
smb.conf.
I explain :
In an AD schema, you're primary group could be, for example, 530 (Domain
Users), you're not memberof the Domain users group in
raise ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not
match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access),
path, fsacl_sddl, acl))
---
*** Olivier BILHAUT
*** Service Informatique
*** Fondation de la Miséricorde
*** Email : o.bilh
Hi Andrew, Hi Alex,
Pleased to see that you figured this out.
We've got exactly the same problem from a blank provisioned domain (not
a migration), with a setup with 2 gpo. (Ubuntu 12.04 - S4 rc3).
Since our instance is in a semi-production environment, we'll wait for
your fix. But if needed,
Hi.
Maybe my previous request was ignored for some reasons.
Does anybody know how to definitely resolve sysvol acl issues ? It
prevent us from upgrading to rc2.
The command ./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck returns
ERROR(type 'exceptions.TypeError'): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data
Hi!
Since samba4 rc1 (we update it since beta1) the ./samba-tool ntacl
sysvolcheck command returns the following :
ERROR(type 'exceptions.TypeError'): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data
available')
File
/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py,
line 168, in
I answer to myself, if that can eventually help any of you.
If you use the Windows 7/ 2008 admin console, you'll be able to use the
windows 7 / 2008 policies and GPOs.
If you installed the admin console on windows XP/2003, you'll
unfortunately be limited to the xp/2003 policies and GPOs.
administrative rights.
We use it to deploy printers to user accounts.
Some post talk about updating the ADMX files on the AD, but I would like
to have your advices first.
Thanks in advance (and sorry for my english faults).
Cheers
--
---
*** Olivier BILHAUT
*** Service
Hi, subscribers,
We currently use samba4 beta 4 from sources as described in the wiki.
Every core func. works really fine since we use it in a test/production
environment with 20 users and a bunch of computers with windows 7/xp and
some linux station and servers with winbind. So for my first
I mates,
We'd like to know if the beta version of S4 with the s3fs file system
now allow to use the [homes] special share. Are we now allowed to use
it in smb.conf, and does it works like in S3, as the home share of the
user is converted by it's username?
Sorry for my approximate english.
16 matches
Mail list logo