On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
All
Has any consideration been made to converting the list to a forum? in that
way everyone can just check the web site instead of checking the
inbox? For those folk who rather read the mail most forum software can
Somewhat off-topic for the list, and
On May 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Basically if re-training your SPAM filter does not help and
one really wants to get rid of all those junk mails, installing
a challenge/response system like TMDA behind a statistical
filter (e.g. DSPAM) would be a possible solution ...
Please don't do
On March 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why is it that smbd tries to open the directory as a regular file?
This would be the point at which I say works for me! and fail to
understand what's happening on your end. Sorry!
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Winbind calls into the rpc client, which starts fetching the list of members
The rpc client sets a timeout and starts pulling the list of group members
Fetching all 60k users takes longer than the timeout, the timeout fires and
the rpc client returns failure
Compiling lib/adt_tree.c
lib/adt_tree.c: In function `sorted_tree_destroy':
lib/adt_tree.c:114: structure has no member named `_free_leap'
make: *** [lib/adt_tree.o] Error 1
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
Junk food is considered part of the vegetable
On April 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 23:41, Ronan Waide wrote:
Compiling lib/adt_tree.c
lib/adt_tree.c: In function `sorted_tree_destroy':
lib/adt_tree.c:114: structure has no member named `_free_leap'
make: *** [lib/adt_tree.o] Error 1
It's due to dmalloc() using
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm looking for some assistance regarding file permissions and the inability
to stop the execution of a file even though the execute permission has not
been set.
Execute bits are a Unix concept. Windows will execute any file it can
read that it understands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# smbclient //server/print\$ -U admin%passwd -Tc
Error opening local file //server/print$ - No such file or directory
It's picking up the share name as the tar file name. Even specifying a
filename after -Tc doesn't work. Sneaking tar.out in as the first
parameter doesn't
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, I did some testing a week or so ago, and found that removing the
execute permission from ACLs on the file (esp inherited ones) prevents
Win2K from executing the file, although it does open the file for read
first.
Yep, turns out I opened my mouth
Small patch to stop net rpc samsync from copying an empty comment when
syncing group data.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
On March 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What is the bug you're trying to fix ? ie. What is the behaviour
that Windows shows that is not correct with the Samba code ?
The bug I'm seeing is that Samba isn't getting a response to the
WriteAndX request it's sending and times out.
Also, I'd feel
On March 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Can anyone tell me if this is possible and if so what actions I must take?
Not presently possible. The files remain owned by the user/group that
you used for the smbmount command.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
Ok, I think I've figured this out, but since I'm relatively new to
Samba internals I'm not entirely clear on how to fix it, or what I
might break with my fix.
In a large RPC call, such as an EnumPrinters 2 call with a big buffer,
the DCE/RPC stuff gets split into several SMB messages and tossed
On March 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been debugging another massive fall-apart at my site :-(
This time it appears that the installation of glibc=2.3.2-4.80.i686.rpm
(required to fix a security issue) broke my installation.
This update also broke wine, but as far as I know the wine
Hi folks,
I've been digging around a problem I've had recently where an NT4 PDC
is refusing to give me password hashes. Everything else from a samsync
run appears ok, just that the password hashes are missing. I've tried
to build an identical virtual machine, but can't figure out what's
causing
There's a bunch of essentially duplicated code in net_rpc_samsync
which should probably be merged into a single block, but anyway. The
previous patch added more useful text for net rpc samdump. This does
likewise for net rpc vampire.
Also, I notice basic indent seems to be set to 5 rather than 4
Thanks to pointers from Andrew Bartlett, I redid my samsync
sam_account_from_delta patch a little more sanely. Now it only marks
as changed things which have actually changed. This patch is against
current HEAD. The STRING_CHANGED macro and general style of the
additions is copied from
This makes samsync tell you what record types it's skipping, rather
than just dumping out the number corresponding to the type. It also
prints the database type instead of database 1, database 2, database
3.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
On March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I put all the files in the print share at (\\dev\print$\w32x86). The
files are from Windows XP Professional SP1. The files are, as
reported by the printer test page:
pscript.ntf
pscript.hlp
ps5ui.dll
hplj5si1.ppd
pscript5.dll
I issued the
This patch prevents net rpc vampire from copying empty strings into
various fields; doing so can cause problems with pdb_ldap (and
possibly others).
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
===
RCS file:
Currently the code does the following checks:
if the account is ACB_WSTRUST or ACB_SRVTRUST,
set up to create a machine account
else if it's ACB_NORMAL,
set up to create a normal account
else
error unknown account type
This currently fails for ACB_DOMTRUST. I'm not sure what the
On March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Firstly, you first said that it expects the files in the w32x86/win40
directories.
Oh, hmm, you're right. Sorry. The files go into the w32x86/win40
directories, but not into the 2/ or 0/ subdirectories of those. My
mistake.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL
uidNumber: 1126
gidNumber: 1000
homeDirectory: /home/waider
uid: waider
rid: 1181
primaryGroupID: 513
displayName: Ronan Waide
cn: Ronan Waide
description: yadda
smbHome: \\srv1\waider
homeDrive: H:
profilePath: \\pdc\profiles\waider
logonTime: 1046707306
logoffTime: 1040143165
kickoffTime: 2147483647
On March 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So why is Samba setting the primaryGroupID to 513?
Okay, I had made two basic errors here. One is that the above is an
RID, not a GID. The second was not double-checking my scripts'
output. The groupadd script was spitting out some garbage before the
GID,
Hi,
still messing about with printers. If I create a printer like so:
[TestP]
printer name = Test_Printer
printable = yes
and then do rpcclient enumprinters 2 against the server, I get:
servername:[\\server]
printername:[\\server\TestP]
sharename:[TestP]
This patch allows WERROR-based RPC calls to return their real value to
the user instead of NT_STATUS_OK/NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL. Basically
I've extended the cmd_set type to include a return type field and
instead of the NTSTATUS (*fn)() definition there's a NTSTATUS
(*ntfn)() and a WERROR (*wfn)();
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with this message:
the data area passed to a
On March 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with
On March 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
adddriver Windows NT x86 HP LaserJet 5Si/5Si MX
PS:pscript5.dll:hplj5si1.ppd:ps5ui.dll:pscript.hlp::pscript.ntf
Don't leave unused parameters blank. use the word NULL instead.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
On March 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uh... How can Samba users be members of NT groups? I did not know
Samba supports that... How do you add Unix users to NT groups for
Samba?
I was just clarifying that when I said Printer Admins I wasn't
referring to the NT group.
Yet, my problem
background:
I had a stock redhat samba setup using security = share and sharing
out three directories - [homes] and two fixed locations. pretty
trivial setup. I built Samba 3 head (current as of this morning, but
the problem has been happening for at least a week) and tried
connecting to it from a
when doing enumdomusers, rpcclient prints each one preceded by the
word group instead of user
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: rpcclient/cmd_samr.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/rpcclient/cmd_samr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.157
diff -u
On March 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, create
empty directories like 'w32x86' and 'win40' and then issue a setdriver
RPC?
Well, I tried that, does not work, I get:
SetPrinter call failed!
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, include/client.h,
libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface.
The intention is to allow for NTLMSSP and kerberos signing of packets, but
On March 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've checked in a fix. It's odd that MAXIMUM_ALLOWED_ACCESS doesn't
do what it's supposed to in this case. Are you running the setdriver
against a NT or Samba server?
Running against Samba HEAD, but just one sec...
Right, here's the summary of what I've
The add printer command program can output a single line of text,
which Samba will set as the port the new printer is connected to. From
my reading of the code, if this line /isn't/ output, Samba won't
reload its printer shares.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal
Hi folks,
tracked down a problem I mentioned last week with printing. When you
use the rpcclient adddriver command as follows:
adddriver Windows NT x86 name:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
you get a NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL error, which further investigation
reveals to be caused by an Access
On February 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the rpcclient
run.
Cheers,
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows NT x86 HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows 4.0 HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
Printer Driver HP CLJ 8500 - PCL successfully installed.
rpcclient $
This is HEAD,
On February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows NT x86 HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows 4.0 HP CLJ 8500 -
PCL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
Printer Driver HP CLJ 8500 - PCL
Hi folks,
mentioned this briefly on samba@ about a week ago, but I've actually
done some tracking on it now. I'm still digging, but this is a summary
of what I've found.
symptoms: doing rpcclient SERVER enumdrivers level 3 fetches
information for the Windows 9x drivers, then stalls trying to
Hi folks,
this is an updated version of Urban Widmark's smbmount patch to enable
lfs and unicode options to be switched on the command line. It's
diff'd against current CVS HEAD.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/client/smbmount.c
===
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Any idea where I can find a REdHat7.3 rpm for 1.1.18?
I can't find one anywhere
try the cups website, or build from source.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
even when american adverts try for the oblique and wordless,
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmm ... couldn't seem to find it on the cups site (google couldn't either)
It's the first hit on google. I've no idea what you're trying to
search for. http://www.google.com/search?q=cups
What are your opinions on this strategy?
If you don't build an
On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you download the cups source and unzip it, you will find a file called cups.spec
in the top
level dir of the source. You can pass the spec file to rpm (or rpmbuild on newer
redhat systems)
and it will create an rpm for you out of the dowloaded
On February 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
didn't hear anything back on this, so i'm trying again:
--
i would bet someone's already asked and had this
answered, but since the archives of these listss aren't
searchable, and since i couldn't find the info in the
docs or elsewhere on
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And, here what I have!!! : First file has NO PROBLEM, second one HAS
READ ONLY ERROR, (but not if the file is REOPEN again):
-rw-rw-r--1 nobody nogroup 37888 Feb 14 11:46 test_file_1.doc
-rwxr--r--1 nobody nogroup 37376 Feb 14
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I presume that's output from ls -l. I would hazard a guess that your
server and client clocks are not in sync. If you're on linux, try ls
--full-time
Yes! It's ls -l output I've posted.
And yes again, client and server are not in sync.
Do you
On February 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If newbs tend to ask the same questions over and over and you
don't like to see what they wrote, delete it. You don't have to respond
and it's not that big of a deal to take a second to read something that
you have no intention of responding
This is puzzling me (and hampering some work, slightly):
NT4SP6 + full updates server, with some printers attached.
rpcclient -U admin%pass enumdrivers 2 server gives me a list of stuff
like this:
[Windows 4.0]
Printer Driver Info 2:
Version: [0]
Driver Name: [HP LaserJet 5Si
On February 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is puzzling me (and hampering some work, slightly):
NT4SP6 + full updates server, with some printers attached.
Woopsy, forgot to mention:
Samba HEAD. Administrative user, joined to the domain, in printer
admins group, etc.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
Samba HEAD
Looks like it's triggered by not closing quotes:
[root@workst1 root]# rpcclient -U admin%passwd -W GROUP workst1 -d2
added interface ip=192.168.168.250 bcast=192.168.168.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows 4.0 HP CL 8500 -
PCL:HPCPCLA.DLL:HP_LJ85.PPD:HPCPCLA1.DLL:H
Added a driver using:
adddriver "Windows 4.0" "PR2:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL"
Now I get funny characters in the enumdrivers output:
[root@workst1 root]# rpcclient -U user%pass -c "enumdrivers 2" workst1
[Windows 4.0]
Printer Driver Info 2:
I've tried to determine this empirically, but have run foul of config
issues that won't be resolved in the immediate future. Basically, I
know that Samba + ACL + an acl-aware filesystem will allow me to
assign unix-style permissions to arbitrary groups of people for a
given file. However, Windows
On February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
you don't need ACL support for unix style permissions
(user, group, world)
ACLs are lists of arbitrary users that have the specified permissions on
the files you choose.
You do if you want more than one set of user/group acls per file.
Waider.
--
On February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just tried to set an acl on take ownership it doesn't stick - it
should.
Read and write attributes does stick.
Thanks, that's what I'd seen myself. I guess it's not supported at
present.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very
line #29:
} else (m/-r/) {
should be
} elsif (m/-r/) {
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
kate says, no, there's a lot of red in heliotrope.
kate says, we're talking like #993366 or so
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The linux box can see the large Windows files, but does not see their
correct sizes -- it reports an absurdly big size when using ls -l. Files
less
that 2GB show up correctly. Trying to create a 3G file on the Windows box
from the linux box,
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't have HPUX, so I don't know what to suggest for that. I just know
getent won't work without winbindd in nsswitch.conf on Linux.
I think the point that was being made is that NSS support on HPUX only
supports a few known types, of which one is LDAP.
hi folks,
ran this command:
rpcclient -U Administrator%password PDC -c getdriver PRINTER
and got this output:
[Windows 4.0]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Here's the stacktrace:
#0 0x080a8abd in strlen_w (src=0x0) at lib/util_unistr.c:312
#1 0x0809bf6f in pull_ucs2 (base_ptr=0x0,
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't have HPUX, so I don't know what to suggest for that. I just know
getent won't work without winbindd in nsswitch.conf on Linux.
I think the point that was being made is that NSS support on HPUX only
supports a few known types, of which one is LDAP.
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?
Yes, search the archives for the procedure I posted on Nov 25 or
thereabouts.
The only problem as such is that if you need to keep the PDC
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
1. What packages/ports do I need to install? Because most papers of LDAP
online I could find mentioned little about Openssl. However, as I know,
it's necessary for the option ldap ssl = start_tls in Samba . Also, I
didn't find any ports of nss_ldap,
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
i made some minor changes to the migrationtools to work properly. (some
atrribute types are spelled wrong)
What changes? Seems like it might be worthwhile telling the people on
this list, if not the people at padl, about the errors.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there any work in progress to fix that problem? I'm running Linux
2.4.20 and SuSE 8.1 installed samba 2.2.5 but I've also played with
samba-2.2-cvs as of today.
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very
This patch allows net rpc vampire to create accounts in the same way
that smbpasswd does, i.e. it will attempt to use the appropriate
account creation function for the backend in use. From reading the
comments on the top of the local_password_change function, either I
shouldn't be going this route
On January 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
sort of change in status. The only major caveat I've found is that
because net rpc vampire does a getpwnam_alloc() immediately after
account creation, which fails in my case because I'm using ldap_nua as
my backend so getpwnam_alloc() will /always/ fail.
Continuing the saga:
Groups are not migrated by the ldap_nua backend, even if I create a
posixGroup entry. After a bit of prodding, I found the latter was
because Samba had set up group mappings in group_mapping.tdb, which my
manually-created LDAP groups didn't agree with. Removing
Continuing the saga:
Groups are not migrated by the ldap_nua backend, even if I create a
posixGroup entry. After a bit of prodding, I found the latter was
because Samba had set up group mappings in group_mapping.tdb, which my
manually-created LDAP groups didn't agree with. Removing
On January 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, it is not called stable and surely there are still a lot of bugs
somewhere. We've migrated our ~700 user network from ActiveDirectory to
samba 3.0 about one month ago, and up to now there are surprisingly few
problems (3.0 is running on our Domain
still digging at this:
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_connect_system(421)
ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_open(472)
The LDAP server is succesful connected
[2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4]
On January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At this point I am suspecting that it's expecting an LDAP account to
exist already because I'm using sam backend = ldap. I'll try ldap_nua
to see if it improves things, but if anyone can interrupt me and tell
me what I'm missing I'd appreciate it.
Right,
On January 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3) from a console (or, in case you have no GUI), you type 'ntsysv'.
Again, this gives you a list of services and checkboxes; tick off 'smb'.
And perhaps the best way, since it's the (current) Red Hat preferred
method:
open a console/root terminal and
On January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
samba is calling the 'add user script' option for creating machine
accounts. does the 'add machine script' option exist in 2.2.7?
Nope, it's new for Samba 3.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
i do this some times
On January 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mmm
Perhaps we should do this a bit differently then for the smbldap
scripts, eh?
when samba gives the machine name in %u, does it trail a dollar sign on
it? or does it just give the machine name alone?
Dunno, I've not traced it. I'm guessing it has
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:06:04AM -0600, Darin Bawden wrote:
Greetings everyone,
Just a quick question, I hope. I installed the 3.0 alpha for an RH 8.0 test
server. In the smb.conf file I have printing=cups and printcap=cups. In
should this not
Hi,
under current CVS samba I've set up a BDC to test some migration
stuff. If I look at it in Network Neighbourhood and view its
properties, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Primary. If, however, I look
at it in Server Manager, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Backup (which
is what I'd expect, since
On January 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Try sudo. Put a line into sudoers that allows your users to only use the
command mount -t smbfs //machine_name/share /home/usr_name/music
For user-level mounts, try adding the 'user' flag to the fstab:
//pdc/d /mnt/tmpsmbfs noauto,user
On January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am running a Samba Server on a 7.0 Linux machine.
I am having poor luck in enabling SWAT. As this machine
has no inetd.conf file but instead has a xinetd.conf file.
To this file I have added the line:
swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/sbin/swat
On January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Indeed, Mr. Waide's answer should suffice; however, before you take the
opportunity of creating that file, you may want to look in /etc/xinetd.d
to see if there is a file called swat. If that file is there, then
you only need edit that file and change the
Hi sambafolks,
I see a number of topics cropping up here repeatedly over the last few
weeks:
* Files 4GB not supported
This is confirmed and solved in 2.2.7a, but not in the current
incarnation of smbfs (which is not part of samba, I know, but will
get discussed here as a related topic)
On January 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* desktop.ini weirdness in profiles
I've seen this mentioned a few times with no sign of a real
solution.
I'm not sure what you mean by this - given that what gets uploaded into
I believe Dragan Karnic (sp? sorry, don't have the name to hand!)
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Check that this says:
interfaces = eth0 lo
where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a newcomer to unix/samba :)
What is the output of 'netstat
Okay, it appears that something in my patches (unposted!) breaks the
NFS daemon in such a way as to cause oopses. This is not good, so I'll
see if I can debug it before offering the patches for general
consumption.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
It's
Hi,
just spotted this while leafing through the CVS tree (some code elided
for clarity)
source/utils/smbcacls.c
static int cacl_dump(struct cli_state *cli, char *filename)
{
[-]
fnum = cli_nt_create(cli, filename, CREATE_ACCESS_READ);
[-]
if (!sd) {
printf(ERROR: secdesc query
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, alan brown wrote:
Could not find a valid trust path to the key. Let's see whether we can
assign some missing owner trust values.
No path leading to one of our keys found
gpg: Warning: This key is not certified with a trusted signature.
Gpg: There is no indication that
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, I thought I had bind interfaces only = Yes but it is commented
out. I commented out the interfaces lines and restarted Samba. Now
Red Hat 7.3
samba-2.2.7-1.7.3
with the interfaces line, there's still a listener on the ppp0
interface (the one I
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Waider,
Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
support ACLs.
Thanks
K.C.
Sure:
* Download kernel SRPM
* Modify patches[1]
* Spend several hours rebuilding kernel packages
[1] is obviously the tricky bit. I'm
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just having a senior moment here, but, I recall vaguely that samba will
listening on all NIC's but ignores the ones you tell it to ignore with.
Joel
Hmm. My home network config has samba configured to only listen on the
internal network, but nmb seems
For the record, stock RedHat 7.3 kernel (2.4.18-18.7.x) supports files
greater than 2GB.
Rather than debating the point as to whether various things
theoretically support 2GB files or not, it's rather easy to
empirically determine support using dd to create a file greater than
2GB.
Just my $.02
On December 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a way to configure Samba so that all password authentication is
done through the Windows domain controllers?
I presume you mean all samba authentication: join your server to the
domain. This is covered pretty exhaustively in the documentation.
On December 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils, etc. I'm currently rebuilding various bits and pieces to
see if I can make it work without too much grief.
Okay,
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So it looks like the option is turned on in the kernel config, but the
patch is not actually in the kernel.
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils,
On December 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
I installed RedHat 8.0 and acl on ext2/3 didn't work, with the precompiled
Kernel from SGI and xfs acl work fine.
Yup, this is why I said appear to have rather
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
bestbits.
xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL
On December 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The trouble is that if you enable this for any shared file space, your MS
Windows client applications will break.
I think the point he was making is that he's using it solely for
Linux-to-Linux communication, which I think is the wrong tool for the
job,
On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact
that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be
ashamed of but rather reason to be proud.
I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this
opinion,
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You need to disable RequiresSignorSeal in the registry. If you check the
Samba source tarball, ~samba/docs/Registry/WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg is the
file you need to double-click on in XP to turn off this feature. The other
way is to use the Security editor
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This feature was possible in Win2K but disabled by default, in WinXP it is
enabled by default. It is necessary to turn it off in XP if you want to
connect with NT4 servers also.
Aha, so if I have an NT4 server already I should consider this a
On November 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, adam morley wrote:
my problem is that while nmblookup is reading smb.conf (see attached
strace) its not honoring the name resolve order line and checking with
the wins server.
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
