Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-19 Thread Dragan Lukic
Hello Dale, I must say, your answer pushed me into more testing, and although it was not exactly answer that is visible in my solution, testing around your proposal finally got me where I wanted to be. Now to describe my steps: -1. Change mod for shared directory and it's all existing contents

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-16 Thread Dragan Lukic
Can anyone help me? I cannot imagine why is my question so hard Looks like I will have to make at least one post to this thread each day until I finally get a reply/solution. 123 days with no solution, well my patience is getting thin... Please help me get this working in new samba

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-16 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:31:51PM +0100, Dragan Lukic wrote: I cannot imagine why is my question so hard Looks like I will have to make at least one post to this thread each day until I finally get a reply/solution. 123 days with no solution, well my patience is getting thin... If

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-16 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2/16/2009 7:31 AM, Dragan Lukic wrote: Can anyone help me? I cannot imagine why is my question so hard Looks like I will have to make at least one post to this thread each day until I finally get a reply/solution. Doing that will likely get you totally ignored by most everyone

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-16 Thread Dragan Lukic
On Monday, 16. February 2009. 17:33:45 Charles Marcus wrote: On 2/16/2009 7:31 AM, Dragan Lukic wrote: Can anyone help me? I cannot imagine why is my question so hard Looks like I will have to make at least one post to this thread each day until I finally get a reply/solution.

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-16 Thread Walter Mautner
Am Monday 16 February 2009 21:00:04 schrieb Dragan Lukic: OK, I might not be a most polite person, but for sure I am not rude. Do have in mind that english is not my native language, and as I am not using it on day to day basis (spoken or written) my sentences might look/feel odd or as

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-12 Thread J. Pilfold-Bagwell
Try changing force group = foobar to force group = DOMAIN\foobar . The way Samba handles groups was changed (it was in the release notes around 3.0.28) and if you use read list and write list in smb.conf, users are now specified using DOMAIN\username and groups using +DOMAIN \groupname instead of

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2009-02-11 Thread Dragan Lukic
I am fascinated!! 68 day from my last post, and 1142 more posts STILL no reply with even hint of solution In total 117 days and 1915 messages Nice score respectable. And what I want?? This: - need share level of security - need forcing of user who access that share -

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-12-05 Thread Dragan Lukic
Again. 22 more days and 388 more messages later... STILL no answer to my (simple) request? To to be brief: - need share level of security - need forcing of user who access that share - need forcing of file/directory create mask Goal: Allowing network users (as well as local user) to access

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-12-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Dragan Lukic wrote: Looks like I just want impossible: simple share with no limits, but with local user permissions for remote users. And NO I do not wish to use user level security, as users that have to use those shares hardly can cope with more

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-12-05 Thread Dragan Lukic
Let me see if I understand In my smb.conf things should look like this: [global] workgroup = FOO server string = FOO Server security = user map to guest = Bad Password hosts allow = 192.168.125. 127.0. log file =

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-12-05 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:02:37PM +0100, Dragan Lukic wrote: Let me see if I understand In my smb.conf things should look like this: [global] workgroup = FOO server string = FOO Server security = user map to guest

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-12-05 Thread Dragan Lukic
Again... to confirm that I do understand: [global] workgroup = FOO server string = FOO Server security = user map to guest = Bad Password hosts allow = 192.168.125. 127.0. log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-11-18 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dragan Lukic wrote: So, 18 days and 375 posts later. no answer to my question? Looks like I just want impossible: simple share with no limits, but with local user permissions for remote users. And NO I do not wish to use user level

Re: [Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-11-13 Thread Dragan Lukic
So, 18 days and 375 posts later. no answer to my question? Looks like I just want impossible: simple share with no limits, but with local user permissions for remote users. And NO I do not wish to use user level security, as users that have to use those shares hardly can cope with more

[Samba] The way things used to work...

2008-10-27 Thread Dragan Lukic
Hello all, As I was instructed on #samba IRC channel, I will start new discussion here, about samba and a way it works. I might call myself an experienced Linux user, and self thought admin, so things in Linux are not so new to me, but lacking proper (certified) education, I still tend to