Hi there.
I wanted long already to get into automatic determination and
downloading of printer drivers for Windows. I notice now that the
'printer driver' parameter is specified as deprecated in the manual
page of smb.conf (was long already so, probably, but only now I really
checked exactly).
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:27:50PM +0200, Tom Alsberg wrote about 'Printer driver
parameter deprecated - what now?':
snip /
I think that would be the 'setdriver' command from rpcclient - Tim,
does that sound correct?
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
I think that would be the 'setdriver' command from rpcclient - Tim,
does that sound correct?
Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, create
On March 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, create
empty directories like 'w32x86' and 'win40' and then issue a setdriver
RPC?
Well, I tried that, does not work, I get:
SetPrinter call failed!
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
to download and build samba, based on the instructions
in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
These are the same instructions that we put in Using Samba,
and are unchanged in the second edition.
Alas, they now only cause diagnostics, at
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, include/client.h,
libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface.
The intention is to allow for NTLMSSP and kerberos signing of packets, but
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:34AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in,
include/client.h, libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
Change the way we sign SMB
Hello,
I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
has a primary focus of testing? I have some questions.
Is there a
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:55, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:34AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in,
include/client.h,
Check out http://build.samba.org - it has the build farm. If you'd like
to see what happens, check out the build_farm module from samba's cvs,
as described on http://pserver.samba.org/
Vance Lankhaar
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 16:03, Scott Prive wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is the correct forum to
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
has a primary
On 8 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:20, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
I think the patch was eaten by Mailman. Please
I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
working on it. I think we're on the right track with this version.
Tim.
On 9 Mar 2003, Scott Prive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Tim. So far, most of the tests I've seen in CVS are unit- or
small-tests, but as a software tester I'm more interested in integration
tests... which it sounds like you and Martin are working on.
Our framework is intended to
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
to download and build samba, based on the instructions
in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
These are the same instructions that we put in Using Samba,
and are
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:36:56PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
working on
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
files to be created and old ones changed. But I've come to the
conclusion this isn't possible with standard UNIX file permissions,
and unfortunately
At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
files to be created and old ones changed. But I've come to the
conclusion this isn't possible with
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:02, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
files to be created and old
Dear All,
I run the winbindd daemon, however the process
doesn't run. I don't know how to troubleshoot the winbindd
daemon. Does anyone help me how to configure and run it?
Below the logs I got when winbindd daemon executed but
process doesn't run in backroound...Please help. Many
At 18:37 10.03.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:02, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions,
Hello,
I heard a following problem in Samba-JP.
The masked_match function in lib/access.c is wrong.(CVS HEAD and 2_2)
mask = (uint32)((ALLONES atoi(slash + 1)) ^ ALLONES);
Example: hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/23
This produces following result. This isn't mask.
mask = 0111
22 matches
Mail list logo
